Robin Monotti
66.9K subscribers
15.8K photos
8.73K videos
625 files
30.1K links
Official Robin Monotti Channel
Donations:
robinmonotti.substack.com/
Group is @robinmggroup
We don't DM from this channel account.
Rule: Be polite & respectful.
Download Telegram
1. STOP CALLING THEM VACCINES. They do not work like vaccines (they do not prevent disease, infection, transmission, nor lower the chances of death from the disease) and we have no solid third party confirmation of what exactly is in them, or of what actual genetic code and adjuvants they are really using

2. STOP CALLING THEM JABS
It makes them seem friendly jabs whereas they are secretive injections with toxic effects.

Alternative definition:
Injections with near zero efficacy and a high chance of enhanced disease & adverse reactions.

Eco said that all it takes is just a single one of these fourteen characteristics to be present in order for a fascist nebula to start forming itself:

14. Orwellian Newspeak: an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning. Eco here warns us that ‘we must be ready to identify other kinds of Newspeak, even if they take the apparently innocent form of a popular talk show’

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2016/02/22/memories-of-not-meeting-umberto-eco/
The problem and importance of the specific language used explained clearly in this comment:
Forwarded from Oskar
You clearly believe that (most) vaccines don't work. Great.
But most people out there believe that they do. That's the problem. Not you, not the minority of "anti-vaxxers". The normies that haven't looked at the data for themselves and just assume that whatever is called a "vaccine" must be working. How often have they been told that the "vaccines" are 95% effective? They don't know about relative risk reduction (and who can blame them?) so they assume that their personal risk of catching Covid-19 goes down by 95% with these "vaccines".
Nobody is afraid of criticizing certain drugs. But a lot more people are afraid of criticizing "vaccines" because they are considered sacrosanct. And who wants to get called "stupid anti-vaxxer" anyway?
Forwarded from Hannah D'Aristotile
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The problem is that the public NEVER SEES THESE HEADLINES that Dr. Cole is alluding to.
The attacks on Florida Governor DeSantis continue.
Mike

https://rumble.com/vkt0ql-governor-who-protects-florida.html
Pregnant women are being pressured to get the Covid-19 jab based on a study that has ‘NOT been peer-reviewed and should NOT be used to guide clinical practice’

In recent weeks the pressure placed on pregnant women to get the Covid-19 vaccine has been relentless, and today we can reveal that the data being used to justify that pressure has been taken from a study that has not been peer reviewed and should therefore not be used to guide clinical practice….
@dailyexpose
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/08/08/pregnant-women-are-being-pressured-to-get-the-covid-19-jab-based-on-a-study-that-has-not-been-peer-reviewed-and-should-not-be-used-to-guide-clinical-practice/
😱1
Forwarded from Oracle Films
Nothing to see here. Just the IMF creating $650 billion of monetary assets out of thin air; the single largest SDR (Special Drawing Rights) allocation in history.

One would be forgiven at this point for assuming that governments around the world are being bribed by a slew of United Nations agencies; (the IMF, The World Bank, the World Health Organisation, among others) for their continued implementation of nonsensical, oppressive measures, under the pretext of ‘controlling the virus’.

Though when you realise there are in fact an entitled few among the upper echelons of society who happen to look upon humanity as if it were a plague… ‘controlling the virus’ takes on a whole new meaning.

Source: https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2021/03/23/pr2177-imf-execdir-discuss-new-sdr-allocation-us-650b-boost-reserves-help-global-recovery-covid19
Forwarded from Dave Wiebe
Yep.
Lewis reminded his readers that naturalism, determinism, and rigid empiricism all view man as a biological accident with no meaning and no unmeasureable qualities like soul or spirit. These philosophies presuppose that there is neither a God nor absolute truth of values. The study of humankind by sociologists, psychologists, and anthropologists has reduced persons to things having minimal dignity or worth, having little or no individual responsibility for their choices and actions. In explaining nature and man, scientists have “explained away” his value and meaning
Lewis was concerned that the modern rejection of absolute standards and objective values would leave mankind with no defense against what some persons might do with the powers of science. His love of individual freedom and his appreciation for people as creatures made in the image of God caused him to fear what might be done to humanity if science, without Christian standards to restrain it, were to be given the power of government to enforce what a few persons might plan for all the rest.
https://www.lewissociety.org/scientism/
Forwarded from Ana
Forwarded from Ana