Robin Monotti
66.8K subscribers
15.8K photos
8.73K videos
625 files
30.1K links
Official Robin Monotti Channel
Donations:
robinmonotti.substack.com/
Group is @robinmggroup
We don't DM from this channel account.
Rule: Be polite & respectful.
Download Telegram
“There seems to have been a larger proportion of side effects than expected,” Andreas Heddini, medical director of AstraZeneca in the Nordic region told SVT News. “We have seen that somewhere around 10 percent of those vaccinated are expected to have side effects of this kind.”
Multiple adverse reactions were reported during the 2020 AstraZeneca trials, including spinal cord damage consistent with transverse myelitis, death and acute neuro encephalopathy."
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/astra-zeneca-om-biverkningarna-inte-forvantat
"The AstraZeneca vaccine is different from Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA COVID vaccines. The AstraZeneca vaccine is based on the virus’ genetic instructions for building the spike protein — proteins on the SARS-CoV-2 virus that it uses to enter human cells. Whereas Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines use single-stranded RNA to “store” these instructions, the AstraZeneca vaccine uses double-stranded DNA. Researchers then added the gene for the coronavirus spike protein to a modified version of a chimpanzee adenovirus that can enter cells.
The AstraZeneca vaccine is similar to the controversial ebola vaccine, a DNA and recombinant-based adenovirus vaccine, which, as The Defender reported in December, may put some populations at heightened risk of developing HIV"
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/who-approves-astrazeneca-vaccine-emergency-use/
The Astrazeneca Oxford vaccine: "Last week’s study concluded that the vaccine was just 22% effective at protecting against mild to moderate COVID symptoms and that neutralization titers against the South Africa variant were “substantially reduced” in comparison to the original virus."
https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/fda-could-reject-astra-zeneca-s-covid-vaccine-efficacy-and-manufacturing-shortfalls-analyst
AstraZeneca Vaccine: it doesn't work, and causes side effects:
"AstraZeneca caused more side-effects than the Pfizer vaccine," said Melanie Cotigny, communications manager at Saint-Lo hospital in Normandy.

"Between 10% and 15% of those vaccinated may have side-effects from this vaccination, but it is only a feverish state, fevers, nausea"
https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2021-02-18/astrazeneca-vaccine-faces-resistance-in-europe-after-health-workers-suffer-side-effects
"The AstraZeneca vaccine will reach the masses through a program called “COVAX,” a mechanism for procurement and distribution of vaccines. COVAX was founded by Bill Gates and is co-led by the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) set up in 1999 with seed money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Since 1999, the foundation has committed more $4 billion to GAVI and has a permanent seat on the board.
Gates’ foundation also co-founded the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations (CEPI) launched in 2017 to develop vaccines to stop future epidemics and is a major donor to WHO second only to the U.S.
Gates funded the manufacturing and distribution of the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine through GAVI and CEPI, provided millions to the Serum Institute of India to manufacture the vaccine, and is funding the “safety and efficacy” studies of the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine in Brazil and South Africa. Although data from these studies have yet to be released, it forms the basis of Gates’ most recent warning that a “third dose of the vaccine,” boosters, or a “tuned vaccine” may be needed to combat coronavirus variants. According to GAVI, the Gates Foundation plays a key financial and technical role in shaping vaccine markets, while providing the data and financial support for market investments. The AstraZeneca vaccine forms the bulk of the stockpile already acquired by Gates’ COVAX.
WHO recommends the use of AstraZeneca’s vaccine even in countries that have expressed concerns about safety and efficacy, and for all age groups over 18, including the older populations."
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/who-approves-astrazeneca-vaccine-emergency-use/
Bill Gates made a terrible computer operating system open to viruses on all sides & requiring constant updates but people thought he would make good vaccines? What planet are people living on? Planet Gates?
Vaccinations are like Microsoft Windows: open to attack by all sorts of new viruses. Monotti Protocol is like Apple OS: more user friendly & fewer viruses.
https://t.me/robinmg/763
The keys out of lockdown are the Monotti Protocol, not rushed mass vaccinations.
"Why vaccination should not be so rushed."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/why-vaccination-should-not-be-so-rushed/
"PCR seeks the genetic code of the virus from nose or throat swabs and amplifies it over 30–40 cycles, doubling each cycle, enabling even miniscule, potentially single, copies to be detected. PCR is thus a powerful clinical test, specifically when a patient is, or was recently, infected with SARS-CoV-2. Fragments of RNA can linger for weeks after infectious virus has been cleared, often in people without symptoms or known exposures.

Most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 are contagious for 4–8 days  Specimens are generally not found to contain culture-positive (potentially contagious) virus beyond day 9 after the onset of symptoms, with most transmission occurring before day.

The short window of transmissibility contrasts with a median 22–33 days of PCR positivity (longer with severe infections & somewhat shorter among asymptomatic individuals) 

This suggests that 50–75% of the time an individual is PCR positive, they are likely to be post-infectious"

Ct values of 21–18 most likely reflect the 100 000 to 1 million RNA copies per mL, quantities below which virus cultures usually become negative and transmission risks are low.
Other laboratories place this threshold at a Ct of 30. 🤔
There is no international standardisation between laboratories and assays, leaving Ct calibration with viral load poorly reported and easy to misunderstand."

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00425-6/fulltext