I wasn’t aware that others heard the BBC Women’s Hour program aimed at encouraging pregnant women to get vaccinated against Covid19 & wrote to complain about their outrageous smears about me.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365912000892
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365912000892
Reference CAS-6495579-Q0F1V7
Dear Mr Taylor,
Thank you for bringing to our attention your concerns about the accuracy of the item on Woman's Hour on 12th January which discussed a survey showing many young women are hesitant about having a covid vaccination.
As you will have heard in the item, disinformation about the effect on fertility was one of the main reasons for hesitancy in this group.
Your concern is that we attributed to Dr Yeadon the phrase 'a form of sterilisation'. Dr Yeadon had raised concerns about the body’s response to syncytin-1 and how that could affect fertility in a submission to the European Medicines Agency on 1st December 2020 in which he called for trials of the Pfizer vaccine to be halted:
"There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile."
The body of scientific opinion has said that the Pfizer Covid vaccination is safe and that such concerns about possible infertility are unfounded. This was included in our item.
However the phrase 'a form of sterilisation' which has been quoted widely in the press, was wrongly attributed to Dr Yeadon personally, whereas it was a headline description by a third party of the points he had raised regarding women’s fertility and the vaccination and the phraseology was not his own.
We've responded to Dr Yeadon and apologised for not making this clear. This segment has now been removed from the Woman's Hour podcast.
Please rest assured that your comments have been made available to senior management across the BBC.
Thanks again for sharing your views.
Kind regards,
Joshua Wesley
BBC Complaints Team
www.bbc.co.uk/complaints
Please note: this email is sent from an unmonitored address so please don’t reply. If necessary please contact us through our webform (please include your case reference number).
Dear Mr Taylor,
Thank you for bringing to our attention your concerns about the accuracy of the item on Woman's Hour on 12th January which discussed a survey showing many young women are hesitant about having a covid vaccination.
As you will have heard in the item, disinformation about the effect on fertility was one of the main reasons for hesitancy in this group.
Your concern is that we attributed to Dr Yeadon the phrase 'a form of sterilisation'. Dr Yeadon had raised concerns about the body’s response to syncytin-1 and how that could affect fertility in a submission to the European Medicines Agency on 1st December 2020 in which he called for trials of the Pfizer vaccine to be halted:
"There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile."
The body of scientific opinion has said that the Pfizer Covid vaccination is safe and that such concerns about possible infertility are unfounded. This was included in our item.
However the phrase 'a form of sterilisation' which has been quoted widely in the press, was wrongly attributed to Dr Yeadon personally, whereas it was a headline description by a third party of the points he had raised regarding women’s fertility and the vaccination and the phraseology was not his own.
We've responded to Dr Yeadon and apologised for not making this clear. This segment has now been removed from the Woman's Hour podcast.
Please rest assured that your comments have been made available to senior management across the BBC.
Thanks again for sharing your views.
Kind regards,
Joshua Wesley
BBC Complaints Team
www.bbc.co.uk/complaints
Please note: this email is sent from an unmonitored address so please don’t reply. If necessary please contact us through our webform (please include your case reference number).
www.bbc.co.uk
Complaints | Contact the BBC
These pages have information about how to complain to the BBC, with links to the BBC’s Complaints Framework, the BBC’s regulator Ofcom and regular reports about complaints. If you would like to understand how we collect and use personal data, please refer…
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Thank you, I never knew anyone objected other than me!
There’ve been developmental since, and I wonder if knowing them might prompt a follow up communication?
1. By way of background, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg & I filed a detailed petition with the European Medicines Agency on Dec 1, 2020. In it, we warned about a range of safety concerns which we expected to see if EMA prematurely gave Emergency Use Authorisation to these gene-based “vaccines”.
Just one related to reproductive health harms.
Several others have since been confirmed or suspected.
2. The BBC used Radio 4 to attack me. Unfortunately they used a line of attack that left potentially millions of listeners believing that these agents are safe in pregnancy, when we simply don’t have the data to make such a claim.
3. Recently, a paper was published demonstrating EXACTLY the concern we’d written about.
A team undertook a study of the Pfizer vaccine in a small number of women, measuring antibodies to spike protein & to syncytin-1. The results are shocking. From the earliest time after the injection, all women had measurable levels of antibodies against the placental protein, syncytial-1, even before antibodies to spike protein increased.
Worse, the authors proceeded to cover up & lie about their results.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.23.21257686v1.full.pdf
They misleadingly state more than once that no increase was observed. They claimed this by placing a wholly arbitrary threshold on the graph, them stating “our results are all below this”.
4. I had read a leaked report, conducted for Pfizer in relation to their regulatory submission in Japan. This was a study of distribution of the vaccine “envelope” after injection into rats. This showed very unusual tissue distribution. There was 10X more in ovaries & spleen than in most other tissues. Then a real shocker. I came across a paper from 2012, stating that these lipid nanoparticle formulations ALL accumulated in ovaries of several species.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365912000892
I find the concatenation of evidence, all pointing to a risk for reproductive health harms, yet the BBC actively LIES about it & instead smears independent scientists pointing out such risks.
Who should the public believe? Those paid to lie or those taking hits & who gain nothing & lose their reputations in their attempts?
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
There’ve been developmental since, and I wonder if knowing them might prompt a follow up communication?
1. By way of background, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg & I filed a detailed petition with the European Medicines Agency on Dec 1, 2020. In it, we warned about a range of safety concerns which we expected to see if EMA prematurely gave Emergency Use Authorisation to these gene-based “vaccines”.
Just one related to reproductive health harms.
Several others have since been confirmed or suspected.
2. The BBC used Radio 4 to attack me. Unfortunately they used a line of attack that left potentially millions of listeners believing that these agents are safe in pregnancy, when we simply don’t have the data to make such a claim.
3. Recently, a paper was published demonstrating EXACTLY the concern we’d written about.
A team undertook a study of the Pfizer vaccine in a small number of women, measuring antibodies to spike protein & to syncytin-1. The results are shocking. From the earliest time after the injection, all women had measurable levels of antibodies against the placental protein, syncytial-1, even before antibodies to spike protein increased.
Worse, the authors proceeded to cover up & lie about their results.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.23.21257686v1.full.pdf
They misleadingly state more than once that no increase was observed. They claimed this by placing a wholly arbitrary threshold on the graph, them stating “our results are all below this”.
4. I had read a leaked report, conducted for Pfizer in relation to their regulatory submission in Japan. This was a study of distribution of the vaccine “envelope” after injection into rats. This showed very unusual tissue distribution. There was 10X more in ovaries & spleen than in most other tissues. Then a real shocker. I came across a paper from 2012, stating that these lipid nanoparticle formulations ALL accumulated in ovaries of several species.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365912000892
I find the concatenation of evidence, all pointing to a risk for reproductive health harms, yet the BBC actively LIES about it & instead smears independent scientists pointing out such risks.
Who should the public believe? Those paid to lie or those taking hits & who gain nothing & lose their reputations in their attempts?
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
What do folk think? Should the presenter, Emma Barnett, be held to account for her deliberate smearing & deflection of truthful information?
The original program might have been heard by hundreds of thousands of people, some of whom may well have gone for vaccination.
Thanks,
Mike
Ps: the BBC “apology” wasn’t made a format beyond a from Barnet’s editor. They also didn’t bother telling their audience that they’d been subject to BBC misinformation. Instead, the episode was placed on iPlayer, with the lying partners.
The original program might have been heard by hundreds of thousands of people, some of whom may well have gone for vaccination.
Thanks,
Mike
Ps: the BBC “apology” wasn’t made a format beyond a from Barnet’s editor. They also didn’t bother telling their audience that they’d been subject to BBC misinformation. Instead, the episode was placed on iPlayer, with the lying partners.
ITALY 🇮🇹 UPDATE
The anti-Green Pass for work strike at the Port of Trieste has began.
Reports that Genova and Ancona ports are also currently blocked by protesters.
The government is trying to negotiate minor testing concessions while at the same time saying that the strike is illegal.
The port workers are saying the strike goes on and the only thing they will accept is no Green Pass for work.
The Military Aviation is on strike.
The metal mechanic workers are on strike.
The anti-Green Pass for work strike at the Port of Trieste has began.
Reports that Genova and Ancona ports are also currently blocked by protesters.
The government is trying to negotiate minor testing concessions while at the same time saying that the strike is illegal.
The port workers are saying the strike goes on and the only thing they will accept is no Green Pass for work.
The Military Aviation is on strike.
The metal mechanic workers are on strike.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ITALY 🇮🇹 UPDATE
The anti-Green Pass for work strike at the Port of Trieste has began (VIDEO)
Reports that Genova and Ancona ports are also currently blocked by protesters.
The government is trying to negotiate minor testing concessions while at the same time saying that the strike is illegal.
The port workers are saying the strike goes on and the only thing they will accept is no Green Pass for work.
The Military Aviation is on strike.
The metal mechanic workers are on strike.
The anti-Green Pass for work strike at the Port of Trieste has began (VIDEO)
Reports that Genova and Ancona ports are also currently blocked by protesters.
The government is trying to negotiate minor testing concessions while at the same time saying that the strike is illegal.
The port workers are saying the strike goes on and the only thing they will accept is no Green Pass for work.
The Military Aviation is on strike.
The metal mechanic workers are on strike.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ITALY 🇮🇹 The Port Workers of Trieste: we will stay here until the government changes its mind on the green pass for work. ABSOLUTELY.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ITALY 🇮🇹 Monfalcone Port (Fincantieri) joins Trieste in protesting against the Green Pass for work. Reports that entry to this port is also currently blocked
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ITALY 🇮🇹 Ancona port workers join Trieste and Monfalcone. Three ports are now blocked in protest against the Green Pass for work.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ITALY 🇮🇹 The citizens of Trieste bring food for the port workers who are blocking entry to the port.
This is perhaps the most important medical presentation I’ve ever seen.
Dr Peter McCullough is the most courageous & smart physician involved in fighting for recognition that covid19 is treatable using rational, sequential, multi-drug treatment.
Also, using PUBLIC DATA ALONE, showing that the gene-based vaccines are neither safe nor effective.
Finally, and he gives just five minutes to this at the end. He’s very clear that this is a planned event & is much more than only a viral pandemic. He rightly alludes to the global, lockstep nature of the coercion going on almost everywhere in parallel.
Dr McCullough calls upon doctors everywhere to stand up and join the fight to hold & express medical opinions, to uphold their Hippocratic Oath & to TREAT patients with covid19, not demonise them.
Please let this play in the background if you don’t have an hour.
But please do not pass on this. The presentation contains all the evidence that’s needed that the vaccines are not the way forward but that rational, sequential, multi drug treatment is.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeutic-nihilism-and-trusted-treatments-vs-unte.html
Dr Peter McCullough is the most courageous & smart physician involved in fighting for recognition that covid19 is treatable using rational, sequential, multi-drug treatment.
Also, using PUBLIC DATA ALONE, showing that the gene-based vaccines are neither safe nor effective.
Finally, and he gives just five minutes to this at the end. He’s very clear that this is a planned event & is much more than only a viral pandemic. He rightly alludes to the global, lockstep nature of the coercion going on almost everywhere in parallel.
Dr McCullough calls upon doctors everywhere to stand up and join the fight to hold & express medical opinions, to uphold their Hippocratic Oath & to TREAT patients with covid19, not demonise them.
Please let this play in the background if you don’t have an hour.
But please do not pass on this. The presentation contains all the evidence that’s needed that the vaccines are not the way forward but that rational, sequential, multi drug treatment is.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeutic-nihilism-and-trusted-treatments-vs-unte.html
Rumble
Winning the War Against Therapeutic Nihilism & Trusted Treatments vs Untested Novel Therapies
Peter McCullough, MD, MPH speaks at the 78th Annual Meeting of AAPS on October 2, 2021. Slides: https://www.scribd.com/document/530328436/Slides-from-Peter-McCullough-MD-Oct-1-2021-Lecture Patient Gui
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A patient escapes from the Chilean hospital "Luis Tisné Brousse" and shouts in despair:
- They're killing people!
- I don't know what's going on, they drug them!
- They're killing people!
- I don't know what's going on, they drug them!
https://twitter.com/cliveyboy7/status/1448962897204416518?s=10
At last, a U.K. MP states what we’ve known for months:
“There is a large number of inpatients in our hospitals solely because they took a covid19 vaccine. Government is not being honest about that”.
Thank you, Christopher Chope, MP.
Your words will forever be recorded in the proceedings of the House of Commons, “Hansard”.
Dr Mike Yeadon
At last, a U.K. MP states what we’ve known for months:
“There is a large number of inpatients in our hospitals solely because they took a covid19 vaccine. Government is not being honest about that”.
Thank you, Christopher Chope, MP.
Your words will forever be recorded in the proceedings of the House of Commons, “Hansard”.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Twitter
cliveyboy
@Steve2401 @ridgeisback Are you sure? Sir Christopher Chope MP: “Our hospitals have got a large number of in-patients who are only there because those patients took the vaccine..there is causation between vaccination and damage caused by those vaccines yet…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
TRIESTE, ITALY 🇮🇹 Port workers on strike offer coffee to the Customs Officers
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
TRIESTE, ITALY 🇮🇹 Trieste firefighters join the port workers on strike.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
GENOVA, ITALY 🇮🇹 Port workers join Trieste in striking against the Green Pass for work.
ITALY UPDATE 🇮🇹 Protests against the Green Pass for work on all major city squares right now as well as Rome, Milan, Bologna Universities and the blockade of Trieste and Genova ports by striking port workers joined by firefighters. Military aviation and metal mechanics also on strike.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
UDINE ITALY 🇮🇹 Firefighters show solidarity with No Green Pass for work strikes.