The author is highly experienced in manufacture of complex bio pharmaceuticals.
His article makes deeply concerning reading, as do the casual responses of the U.K. regulatory agency.
Best wishes
Mike

https://hedleyrees.substack.com/p/frozen-sars-cov-2-injections-broke

I’m in regular touch with Steve Kirsch. So if you get answers to his questions, please do post them below.
Best wishes
Mike

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/100-questions-they-dont-want-to-answer

"Imagine trusting Pfizer over nature." [Citizen Nobody, Twitter]

Jan 23, 2022: Quebec hit piece on holistic practitioners and practices:

"Then ask them the killer question: can we seriously conclude that all governments, all pharmaceutical companies are part of a vast planetary conspiracy?

Maybe, just maybe, they will finally see the light."

https://www.lapresse.ca/contexte/2022-01-23/covid-19/quand-l-industrie-du-bien-etre-sombre-dans-le-complotisme.php

Seeing the light - with Michael Parenti.

WATCH: Conspiracy AND Class Power [Michael Parenti Lecture, 1993, Berkeley, CA.]

https://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2020/08/24/watch-conspiracy-and-class-power-michael-parenti-lecture-1993-berkeley-ca/

A comparison of official Government reports from around the world suggests the Fully Vaccinated may be suffering Antibody Dependent Enhancement

ADE occurs when antibodies generated during an immune response recognise & bind to a pathogen, but are unable to prevent infection. The result is more severe illness than if the person had been unvaccinated, and this is precisely what we are now seeing around the world….

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/23/world-government-data-shows-covid-vaccinated-suffering-ade/

Guys I'm going to make it really simple for you as regards NICE guidance NG163.

That guidance contained a treatment protocol which has led to the deaths of people to whom it was administered.

Someone must therefore be held accountable for that. Put simply, if I gave legal advice to my clients, and that advice was wrong, and led to their deaths, I would, rightly, be liable and consequently sued for negligence, and possibly imprisoned.

That's how this works.

The obvious accountability falls on those at the top of NICE for putting the guidance together and allowing it to be published. But given that NICE are a non departmental body of the DHSC, the wider question is whether the head of the DHSC, (the Secretary of State for Health), who is ultimately responsible for the actions of NICE, should also have to answer for the negligence. In other words, it's negligence or misfeasance in a public office.

If guilty of the offence of misfeasance in public office, a person faces a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The offence involves a public official acting in contravention of their position of authority, resulting in harm, injury, financial loss or damage to a third party.

Negligence  generally involves harm to another as a result of carelessness, error or lack of judgement, whereas misfeasance requires a greater degree of culpability on the part of the person concerned, often when the person has intentionally committed an act that would be to the detriment of another and often where there has been an abuse of that person’s power or position of responsibility.

Yes this is all to be proved within a court, on the evidence gathered, but this is the crux of the issue.

"My address to Ursula von der Leyen (President of the @EU_Commission) in the @Europarl_EN":

"Your report on the human rights situation in the EU is fabricated and untrue, end insane divisions and discrimination against citizens." [Mislav Kolakusic MEP, Twitter]

"The report emphasizes that the development of human augmentation being presented goes beyond warfare, it suggests that humans will now control their own evolution via genetic engineering.

The arrogance and hubris in this point of view is enormous. That in one or two generations, the military industrial complex will pivot to controlling human evolution via genetic engineering and human augmentation is not only naive, ethically corrupt but fundamentally dangerous."

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/human-augmentation-the-dawn-of-a

From 'State of Fear' by Laura Dodsworth [Piers Robinson, Twitter]

#Bioethics #BehaviouralScience

"People have drunk the kool-aid. They don't realize that they cannot any longer trust the advice from federal agencies." - Dr. Meryl Nass

The interview with Dr. Meryl Nass that YouTube took down in less than 5 minutes. Here it is on Rumble:

https://rumble.com/vst5vp-tessa-lena-talks-to-dr.-meryl-nass-on-make-language-great-again.html

#Immunity-As-A-Service

Jan 7, 2022: "Antibody-dependent enhancement of virus infection and disease: implications in COVID-19"

"Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) can be seen in a variety of viruses. It has a deleterious impact on antibody treatment of viral infection. This effect was first discovered in the dengue virus, and it has since been discovered in the coronavirus. Over 213 million people have been affected by the rapid spread of the newly emerging coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The new coronavirus offers a significant threat and has sparked widespread concern. ADE in dengue virus and other viruses are discussed with possible effect on COVID-19 treatment and vaccine development will need to consider this phenomenon to ensure it is mitigated and avoided altogether. In these case scenarios, the role of ADE and its clinical consequences remains to be explored for this newly detected virus...

Recovered previously infected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on infection with another strain are potentially susceptible to ADE. Currently, there are six known strains of SARS-CoV-2, namely, L-, S-, V-, G-, GH-, and GR-strain. The L strain was responsible for causing COVID-19 infections in Wuhan in December 2019. Other strains were subsequently detected; among these, the G strain is responsible for causing most widespread infections [16]. Therefore, if a candidate vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 is specific for any particular strain, then subsequent infection by other strain in the vaccinated person can potentially cause ADE. So, more studies are needed to focus on how the virus interacts with the host leading to the wide variance in observed symptoms and the apparent geographically based discrepancy. Should ADE be proven to be a mechanism of pathogenesis, both treatment regimens and vaccine development will need to consider this phenomenon to ensure it is mitigated and avoided altogether in the case of a vaccine. In these case scenarios, the role of ADE and its clinical consequences remains to be explored for this newly detected virus. Researchers must take note of what is known about ADE and coronaviruses and proceed with extreme caution in the development of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine."

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbcpp-2021-0264/html

Coronavirus digest: Fourth booster 'not enough' to fight Omicron, study shows

"Israeli researchers found that a fourth COVID-19 booster provided "only partial defence" against Omicron. Meanwhile, US drug maker Moderna plans to have a vaccine ready for the variant this spring."

"An Israeli study found that a fourth shot of the Covid-19 vaccine was able to boost antibodies to higher levels than the third shot, but researchers found that it is still not enough to prevent Omicron-variant infections, researchers at Israel's Sheba Medical Centre said on Monday.

This is the first trial worldwide studying a fourth vaccination with combined vaccines, the Israeli hospital said, adding that the findings were preliminary and have not yet been published...

Meanwhile, US drug maker Moderna said its vaccine candidate against the Omicron coronavirus variant will enter clinical development in the next few weeks. The company expects to be able to share data with regulators around March, CEO Stephane Bancel said.

The company also aims to roll out a combined Covid-flu-RSV booster vaccine in late 2023, hoping a joint jab would encourage people to get an annual shot.

RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) is a common virus that causes the cold that can be more serious for infants and elderly people."

https://www.hindustantimes.com/lifestyle/health/coronavirus-digest-fourth-booster-not-enough-to-fight-omicron-study-shows-101642476139132.html

This is a real finding. Those multiple vaccinated people make lower amounts of antibodies to the most stable & different (from human proteins) sequences in nucleoprotein of the virus.
Unvaccinated people mount the most vigorous immune responses to NON spike protein portions of the virus. There’s a good reason for that. Our immune systems chose not to focus on spike protein.
While some of us guessed this before the studies were done, I was already certain that spike protein was a bad target for a vaccine, yet all the prime movers chose it? Would any of them like to explain why?
Its least stable, it’s a known toxin & it has highest homology to several human proteins. Dangerous & ineffective isn’t the usual pattern, but absolutely true.
Best wishes
Mike

https://agrdailynews.com/2021/12/27/british-government-admits-that-vaccines-have-damaged-the-natural-immune-system-of-people-who-have-received-a-double-vaccination-el-colectivo-de-uno-the-collective-of-one/

“These policies may constitute Crimes Against Humanity!”
Dr. Lynn Fynn and Dr. Heather Gessling

"In the Pfizer study of 38,000 people, not a single person in the placebo or the vaccine group died of COVID. By publication date, only one person had died of COVID in the Moderna study. To state it clearly: One person out of about 70,000 in the combined studies of Pfizer and Moderna actually died of COVID. In the real world, at the time, about 60 per cent of COVID deaths were in people over 75 years of age. But only 4.4 per cent of that age group were in the Pfizer study. The sample chosen was not appropriate to answer the public’s most pressing question: Could the vaccines save lives?

And how long had the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines been studied, when released for mass use in the winter of 2021? Two months.

These studies looked at the vaccines at their most potent, in a low risk population, and gave us a flattering snapshot. But COVID-19 is a movie...

"That vaccines would get us to a vaccine-based herd immunity had been one of the two main scientific justifications for vaccine mandates. Now it was gone...

Those unvaccinated people who were exposed to the virus, make up a huge number. For instance, in the U.S., according to a Columbia University study, by Jan. 31, 2021 (before many vaccines had been given) 10 months into the pandemic, 120 million Americans had natural immunity. Now, 12 months later, with the much more infectious Delta and Omicron variants, it is likely a highly significant majority of the unvaccinated now have natural immunity.

A recent pivotal study from South Africa – not yet peer reviewed – shows that in poor communities, where there was modest vaccination (39 per cent of adults), more than 70 per cent of people had already been exposed to the virus in previous waves, going into Omicron. The twice vaccinated had more protection than those who were unvaccinated and never had COVID. But the unvaccinated who had COVID and recovered had more protection from severe disease than the vaccinated. One Israeli study showed that the unvaccinated who recovered from COVID have 27 times less risk of reinfection compared with the vaccinated, and nine times less risk of hospitalization.

In a recent Munk Debate, Harvard’s Dr. Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist and vaccine safety specialist, argued that mandating vaccines for the naturally immune “actually creates problems because when people see that they are forced to take a vaccine that they don’t need because they already are immune, that causes a lot of distrust in public health. And we have seen during this last year and a half that all the hard work we’ve done over many decades to build trust in vaccines is now disappearing because we’re making these mandates that make no sense from a scientific or public health perspective.”

https://web.archive.org/web/20220123035927/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-vaccines-are-a-tool-not-a-silver-bullet-if-wed-allowed-more-scientific/

"Then on Jan. 1, 2022, a study of vaccine effectiveness against getting infection in Ontario – not yet peer-reviewed – showed a trend that had already shown up in Denmark. It examined provincial data and was authored by members of Public Health Ontario, ICES, the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, UHN, and other major Ontario university and health programs.

They found two things of note. The first was that “VE [vaccine effectiveness against getting infection] against Omicron was only 37% > 7 days following a third dose.” That doesn’t mean that those in the other 63 per cent who did get the infection might not have got some protection from severe infection, but the authors were unable to measure protection from severity from the data that had.

The second finding was more dramatic:, “We also observed negative VE against Omicron among those who had received 2 doses compared to unvaccinated individuals.” Translation: Negative VE means that the vaccinated got more infections than the unvaccinated...

Another possible explanation the authors raise is “the possibility that antigenic imprinting could impact the immune response to Omicron.” It had been observed in the past that the immune system is highly influenced by the first exposure to a microbe (antigen) that it encounters. It’s called “original antigenic sin.” When a second exposure occurs, to a similar but not identical microbe, the immune system reacts as though it is targeting the original microbe. But the new invader isn’t the original, and so the immune system is actually less effective in dealing with this. In essence the immune system is weakened for a microbe too similar to its first similar exposure. This phenomenon was originally described as occurring in influenza on occasion. This is only a theoretical possibility here, not proven for COVID, but now a matter of scientific discussion. The negative vaccine efficacy has since shown up in Iceland, and the U.K. as well. The Ontario authors are to be applauded for thoughtfully laying out some possibilities to think through, so as to determine what might be the cause."

Doctors demand investigation of vaccine-related child deaths

"WHAT follows is a letter from doctors that should have made front page news. But in all the debate about Boris Johnson’s future dominating the headlines no question has been asked about perhaps what will turn out to be his most serious wrongdoing of all. Not Partygate but the government’s reckless extension of the experimental gene therapy Covid vaccine programme to children against their own expert advice, and their subsequent refusal to bother about the statistically significant increase in child deaths, reported here, that have followed its rollout."

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/doctors-demand-investigation-of-vaccine-related-child-deaths/