"Of primary concern to the Doctors for COVID Ethics was the potential for the vaccines to damage endothelial cells which form the barrier between blood vessels &tissues, including the blood brain barrier, potentially leading to problems incl. blood clots"
https://t.co/92JhTM3y6r
https://t.co/92JhTM3y6r
UKColumn
Why Are We Still Giving People COVID-19 Vaccines?
The refusal by the MHRA to consider vaccine injury makes a mockery of any pretensions they claim to have that their only concern is public safety.
The deaths of THIRTY Pfizer vaccine recipients in Norway show it is actually stimulating an immune response: death.
https://amp.scroll.in/article/984481/the-deaths-of-pfizer-vaccine-recipients-in-norway-show-it-is-actually-stimulating-an-immune-response
https://amp.scroll.in/article/984481/the-deaths-of-pfizer-vaccine-recipients-in-norway-show-it-is-actually-stimulating-an-immune-response
Scroll.in
Respond to this article with a post
mRNA technology is completely new in a human vaccine.
Forwarded from Deleted Account
Important - Hand sanitizer/ antibacterial products can traverse the skin barrier, disturbing the gut microbiome. Avoid sanitizer/antibacterial products. Triclosan is one offender
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/05/160518152805.htm
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/05/160518152805.htm
ScienceDaily
Common antimicrobial agent rapidly disrupts gut bacteria
Triclosan, an antimicrobial and antifungal agent found in many consumer products ranging from hand soaps to toys and even toothpaste, can rapidly disrupt bacterial communities found in the gut, new research shows. Although the health implications are not…
Vaccine Nationalism is a particularly virulent contemporary form & mutated variant of 1930s Nationalism. We should call them the Vazis. Just like nazism was ready to sacrifice the German population in the military war effort in order to profit the steel, chemical & pharmaceutical industries, vazism is prepared to sacrifice the British population in the propaganda war effort to profit Astrazeneca shareholders. What we are seeing is a natural split along nationalist lines between the interests of the vazis and those of the vashists, however the vazi-vashists are inexhorably tied together in their class war against the middle & working classes in a Vaccine-Pact. Everyone is free to get injected with viral spike proteins if they want to, but anyone who believes in restricting the freedom of people who do not want this, or even to coerce them or force them into any injection is a declared card carrying Vazi. Anyone is free to wear whatever they want on their faces, but anyone who forces or coerces others to restrict their breathing and hide their emotions while muffling their primary communication vocal chords is a declared Vazi. Everyone is free to stay home when they feel poorly and avoid close contacts to others if they want to, but anyone who forces or coerces others to stay home when they are healthy and stops them seeing their loved ones or their right to work is a declared and committed Vazi.
ESHANI KING: "Antibodies can only latch onto and help destroy pathogens outside cells and may also occasionally, paradoxically, enhance a pathogen’s ability to infect cell instead by antibody dependent ”enhancement” or ADE. It is only the T-cell that can cleverly sense and destroy pathogens inside infected cells using “sensors” which detect foreign protein fragments.
In the late 60’s the Lancet described a case of a child with agammaglobulinemia, a condition in which absence of B cells prevent them from producing antibodies, who overcame a measles infection quite normally and did not become re-infected thereafter. We now know that, although this condition can compromise immunity, in that particular case the rest of the immune functions, including T-cells, must have been perfectly up to the job of clearing infection and establishing immune memory without help from antibodies. The importance of T-cells in fighting SARS-CoV-1 and establishing immune memory has also been well documented and discussed in a number of pre-COVID papers from 2017 and earlier [2].
Then, early in April, it was reported that two patients with agammaglobulinemia overcame COVID-19 infections without requiring ventilation [3], prompting the Italian authors to write: “This observation suggests that T‐cell response is probably important for immune protection against the virus, while B‐cell response might be unessential”.
All this should have shifted the focus of efforts towards T-cells at an early stage - the real question is why mainstream media and others continued to focus efforts and narrative on antibodies. Is it because vaccines are good at provoking antibody responses but not so great at generating T-cells? Some of the vaccines presently under trial do elicit some T-cells but it seems that neither the quantity nor variety are hugely impressive."
https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563/rr-6
In the late 60’s the Lancet described a case of a child with agammaglobulinemia, a condition in which absence of B cells prevent them from producing antibodies, who overcame a measles infection quite normally and did not become re-infected thereafter. We now know that, although this condition can compromise immunity, in that particular case the rest of the immune functions, including T-cells, must have been perfectly up to the job of clearing infection and establishing immune memory without help from antibodies. The importance of T-cells in fighting SARS-CoV-1 and establishing immune memory has also been well documented and discussed in a number of pre-COVID papers from 2017 and earlier [2].
Then, early in April, it was reported that two patients with agammaglobulinemia overcame COVID-19 infections without requiring ventilation [3], prompting the Italian authors to write: “This observation suggests that T‐cell response is probably important for immune protection against the virus, while B‐cell response might be unessential”.
All this should have shifted the focus of efforts towards T-cells at an early stage - the real question is why mainstream media and others continued to focus efforts and narrative on antibodies. Is it because vaccines are good at provoking antibody responses but not so great at generating T-cells? Some of the vaccines presently under trial do elicit some T-cells but it seems that neither the quantity nor variety are hugely impressive."
https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563/rr-6
👍1
ESHANI KING: "Does this matter? Apparently so: Research establishments including Yale found that in mild or asymptomatic cases, many T-cells are produced. These were highly varied, responding not just to parts of the Spike, S protein or Receptor Binding Domain but to many other parts of the virus [1, 4-6]. Notably, in these mild cases there were few or no detectable antibodies. Conversely, the severely ill produced few T-cells with less variety but had plenty of antibodies. What is also of interest is that men produced fewer T-cells than women, and unlike women, their T-cell response reduced with age [7].
So why are some people unable to mount a good protective T-cell response? The key to this question might be a 10-year-old Danish study led by Carsten Geisler, head of the Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology at the University of Copenhagen [8]. Geisler noted that "When a T cell is exposed to a foreign pathogen, it extends a signalling device or 'antenna' known as a vitamin D receptor, with which it searches for vitamin D,", and if there is an inadequate vitamin D level, "they won't even begin to mobilize." In other words, adequate vitamin D is critically important for the activation of T-cells from their inactive naïve state. The question of whether T-cells might also need a continuing supply of vitamin D to prevent the T-cell exhaustion and apoptosis observed in some serious COVID-19 cases [9] deserves further research."
So why are some people unable to mount a good protective T-cell response? The key to this question might be a 10-year-old Danish study led by Carsten Geisler, head of the Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology at the University of Copenhagen [8]. Geisler noted that "When a T cell is exposed to a foreign pathogen, it extends a signalling device or 'antenna' known as a vitamin D receptor, with which it searches for vitamin D,", and if there is an inadequate vitamin D level, "they won't even begin to mobilize." In other words, adequate vitamin D is critically important for the activation of T-cells from their inactive naïve state. The question of whether T-cells might also need a continuing supply of vitamin D to prevent the T-cell exhaustion and apoptosis observed in some serious COVID-19 cases [9] deserves further research."
ESHANI KING: "Another intriguing clue is that Japan has the highest proportion of elderly on the planet but despite lack of lockdowns, little mask wearing and high population densities in cities, it escaped with few COVID deaths. Could this, at least in part, be because of extraordinarily high vitamin D levels of over 30 ng/ml in 95% of the active elderly [11]? By comparison, UK average levels are below 20ng/ml [10]. Vitamin D is made in the skin from the action of UV sunlight, food usually being a poor source, but the Japanese diet includes unusually high levels. Sunny countries near the equator (e.g. Nigeria, Singapore, Sri Lanka) also have very low COVID related deaths.
The results of the first vitamin D intervention double blind RCT for COVID was published on 29 August by researchers in Córdoba, Spain. This very well conducted study produced spectacular outcomes for the vitamin D group (n=50), virtually eliminating the need for ICU (reducing it by 96%) and eliminating deaths (8% in the n=26 control group). Although this was a small trial, the ICU results are so dramatic that they are statistically highly significant [12]."
The results of the first vitamin D intervention double blind RCT for COVID was published on 29 August by researchers in Córdoba, Spain. This very well conducted study produced spectacular outcomes for the vitamin D group (n=50), virtually eliminating the need for ICU (reducing it by 96%) and eliminating deaths (8% in the n=26 control group). Although this was a small trial, the ICU results are so dramatic that they are statistically highly significant [12]."
ESHANI KING: "Substantially more vitamin D is required for optimal immune function than for bone health. It seems Dr Fauci is not ignorant of this, having apparently confirmed on TV and by email that he takes 6,000 IU daily! (see Dr John Campbell on YouTube Vitamin D and pandemic science, 16 September 2020). Meanwhile the US’s health body continues to recommend only 600-800 IU and the UK’s, only 400 IU.
It is high time for joined up solid scientific rationale to overthrow mainstream narratives based on an alternative “science” controlled by industry interests/politics. Beda M Stadler, the former Director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and Professor Emeritus, certainly appears to think so (see Ivor Cummins Ep91 Emeritus Professor of Immunology...Reveals Crucial Viral Immunity Reality on YouTube, 28 July 2020).
In the same way that prior infections protect us against future infections by means of cross-reacting T-cells, overcoming COVID-19 naturally offers potential for greater protection against future coronaviruses. Vaccines have their place but so do our amazingly complex, sophisticated, highly effective immune systems which have evolved over millennia to protect us from a world teeming with trillions of pathogens."
It is high time for joined up solid scientific rationale to overthrow mainstream narratives based on an alternative “science” controlled by industry interests/politics. Beda M Stadler, the former Director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and Professor Emeritus, certainly appears to think so (see Ivor Cummins Ep91 Emeritus Professor of Immunology...Reveals Crucial Viral Immunity Reality on YouTube, 28 July 2020).
In the same way that prior infections protect us against future infections by means of cross-reacting T-cells, overcoming COVID-19 naturally offers potential for greater protection against future coronaviruses. Vaccines have their place but so do our amazingly complex, sophisticated, highly effective immune systems which have evolved over millennia to protect us from a world teeming with trillions of pathogens."
Forwarded from Deleted Account
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ivor Cummings has been saying this for some time also.
What Is A Vazi? The Vazi Party is one of the most virulent and dangerous strains of vascism that arose in the wake of Covid19.
A Vaccinist Ideology
Vazism is only one type of vascism, but all Vazis believed in the superiority of the vaccinated. Even though Gates did not vaccinate his own children, and was never pictured wearing a face mask, he nonetheless convinced millions of people that the vaccinated were superior to all other people. In fact, vazi scientists and propagandists even claimed that all the civilizations of the world, such as Greece and Rome, had been founded by the vaccinated.
A Belief In Force And Violence
In the early 2020s, the Vazis became the most powerful political force in the West. They used the tools of democracy to destroy democracy, by persuading people to scapegoat the non vaccinated and vote for them. However, Vazis were forcefully anti-democratic. They believed in intimidating, beating, and even killing their foes through adverse events due to forced vaccine passports. Force was considered the final arbiter of any dispute.
A Focus On Central Authority
Partially because they were so against the idea of popular rule and democratic institutions, the average Vazi believed in central authority: That is, the authority of “Supreme Leader” Tedros of the WHO and Bill Gates of the BMGF. They felt that society should be patterned along vaccinated lines and that people should submit to the members of the medical hierarchy above them. This is one reason that so many Vazis claimed they were “only following orders” in the wake of awful vaccine atrocities.
A Vaccinist Ideology
Vazism is only one type of vascism, but all Vazis believed in the superiority of the vaccinated. Even though Gates did not vaccinate his own children, and was never pictured wearing a face mask, he nonetheless convinced millions of people that the vaccinated were superior to all other people. In fact, vazi scientists and propagandists even claimed that all the civilizations of the world, such as Greece and Rome, had been founded by the vaccinated.
A Belief In Force And Violence
In the early 2020s, the Vazis became the most powerful political force in the West. They used the tools of democracy to destroy democracy, by persuading people to scapegoat the non vaccinated and vote for them. However, Vazis were forcefully anti-democratic. They believed in intimidating, beating, and even killing their foes through adverse events due to forced vaccine passports. Force was considered the final arbiter of any dispute.
A Focus On Central Authority
Partially because they were so against the idea of popular rule and democratic institutions, the average Vazi believed in central authority: That is, the authority of “Supreme Leader” Tedros of the WHO and Bill Gates of the BMGF. They felt that society should be patterned along vaccinated lines and that people should submit to the members of the medical hierarchy above them. This is one reason that so many Vazis claimed they were “only following orders” in the wake of awful vaccine atrocities.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
This is a really good piece. It’s a response in the Brit Med J to an editorial by Dr Peter Doshi, introducing many to the role of T-cells in the immune response to certain viruses.
The response is a well laid out piece, containing some important ‘natural experiments’, such as those born without the ability to make antibodies. Yet they’re still able to eliminate the virus.
Don’t let anyone flannel you into the idea that antibodies are what protect you from viruses. I’d rather have them than not, but I’d trade them for a working T-cell repertoire if I was to face SARS-CoV-2.
Cheers,
Mike
The response is a well laid out piece, containing some important ‘natural experiments’, such as those born without the ability to make antibodies. Yet they’re still able to eliminate the virus.
Don’t let anyone flannel you into the idea that antibodies are what protect you from viruses. I’d rather have them than not, but I’d trade them for a working T-cell repertoire if I was to face SARS-CoV-2.
Cheers,
Mike
MURDERNA INC.
"Moderna Inc. (Nasdaq: MRNA), a biotechnology company pioneering messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics and vaccines, today announced that the first participants have been dosed in the Phase 2/3 study, called the KidCOVE study, of mRNA-1273, the Company’s vaccine candidate against COVID-19, in children ages 6 months to less than 12 years. The study is being conducted in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
“We are pleased to begin this Phase 2/3 study of mRNA-1273 in healthy children in the U.S. and Canada"
Moderna Announces First Participants Dosed in Phase 2/3 Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate in Pediatric Population | Moderna, Inc.
https://investors.modernatx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/moderna-announces-first-participants-dosed-phase-23-study-0
"Moderna Inc. (Nasdaq: MRNA), a biotechnology company pioneering messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics and vaccines, today announced that the first participants have been dosed in the Phase 2/3 study, called the KidCOVE study, of mRNA-1273, the Company’s vaccine candidate against COVID-19, in children ages 6 months to less than 12 years. The study is being conducted in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
“We are pleased to begin this Phase 2/3 study of mRNA-1273 in healthy children in the U.S. and Canada"
Moderna Announces First Participants Dosed in Phase 2/3 Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate in Pediatric Population | Moderna, Inc.
https://investors.modernatx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/moderna-announces-first-participants-dosed-phase-23-study-0
The UK government has just criminalised dissent. Does this ring a bell yet? ⬇️ https://twitter.com/Geopolitics_Emp/status/1356094382840156160?s=19
Twitter
Geopolitics & Empire
"#UmbertoEco said that every generation has its own battle against #fascism. What people do not want to accept is exactly this. They do not want to accept that it happens again & again...we need to fight it again & again." @robinmonotti Full Interview 👉 …
"It is generally thought that the sole function of viral membrane fusion proteins [eg. THE SPIKE PROTEIN INDUCED BY ALL GENE THERAPIES] is to allow the viruses to bind to the host cells for the purpose of viral entry into the cells, so that the genetic materials can be released and the viral replication and amplification can take place. However, recent observations suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can by itself trigger cell signaling that can lead to various biological processes. It is reasonable to assume that such events, in some cases, result in the pathogenesis of certain diseases.
Our laboratory only tested the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in lung vascular cells and those implicated in the development of PAH. However, this protein may also affect the cells of systemic and coronary vasculatures, eliciting other cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease, systemic hypertension, and stroke. In addition to cardiovascular cells, other cells that express ACE2 have the potential to be affected by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which may cause adverse pathological events. Thus, it is important to consider the possibility that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein produced by the new COVID-19 vaccines triggers cell signaling events that promote PAH, other cardiovascular complications, and/or complications in other tissues/organs in certain individuals"
Vaccines | Free Full-Text | SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Elicits Cell Signaling in Human Host Cells: Implications for Possible Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines | HTML
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/36/htm
Our laboratory only tested the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in lung vascular cells and those implicated in the development of PAH. However, this protein may also affect the cells of systemic and coronary vasculatures, eliciting other cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease, systemic hypertension, and stroke. In addition to cardiovascular cells, other cells that express ACE2 have the potential to be affected by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which may cause adverse pathological events. Thus, it is important to consider the possibility that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein produced by the new COVID-19 vaccines triggers cell signaling events that promote PAH, other cardiovascular complications, and/or complications in other tissues/organs in certain individuals"
Vaccines | Free Full-Text | SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Elicits Cell Signaling in Human Host Cells: Implications for Possible Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines | HTML
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/36/htm
MDPI
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Elicits Cell Signaling in Human Host Cells: Implications for Possible Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines
The world is suffering from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). SARS-CoV-2 uses its spike protein to enter the host cells. Vaccines that introduce the spike protein into…
Analysis of vitamin D level among asymptomatic and critically ill COVID-19 patients and its correlation with inflammatory markers | Scientific Reports
"The fatality rate was high in vitamin D deficient (21% vs 3.1%). Vitamin D level is markedly low in severe COVID-19 patients. Inflammatory response is high in vitamin D deficient COVID-19 patients. This all translates into increased mortality in vitamin D deficient COVID-19 patients. As per the flexible approach in the current COVID-19 pandemic authors recommend mass administration of vitamin D supplements to population at risk for COVID-19."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77093-z
"The fatality rate was high in vitamin D deficient (21% vs 3.1%). Vitamin D level is markedly low in severe COVID-19 patients. Inflammatory response is high in vitamin D deficient COVID-19 patients. This all translates into increased mortality in vitamin D deficient COVID-19 patients. As per the flexible approach in the current COVID-19 pandemic authors recommend mass administration of vitamin D supplements to population at risk for COVID-19."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77093-z
Nature
Analysis of vitamin D level among asymptomatic and critically ill COVID-19 patients and its correlation with inflammatory markers
Scientific Reports - Analysis of vitamin D level among asymptomatic and critically ill COVID-19 patients and its correlation with inflammatory markers
Forwarded from Amanda
COVERING EMAIL LETTER
Subject line of email: PERSONAL LIABILITY FOR FAILING TO VOTE AGAINST THE RENEWAL OF THE Coronavirus Act 2020
NOTICE OF LIABILITY - OPPORTUNITY TO REMEDY:
PERSONAL LIABILITY FOR FAILING TO VOTE AGAINST THE RENEWAL OF THE Coronavirus Act 2020
Service by email in accordance with precedence set by Master Marsh PT-2018-000160, dated 01 March 2018
Dear MP,
Please find attached my CAUTION - Unlawful Breach of the People's Peace by causing: Alarm and distress by discrimination, harassment and misrepresentation, in respect to COVID-19, which is common law trespass.
As a MP you both create legislation, and as creator can uncreate it.
You have failed in your duty of care by allowing the Coronavirus Act to stand despite it being unlawful on the grounds listed within the notice.
Should you fail to vote against its renewal you will be held personally liable for harm caused by allowing it to be renewed, even if by not voting, that is knowingly causing harm.
Further you have failed in your obligation to the people to hold those governing to account where:
1 - the actions of Matt Hancock and Boris Johnson were ruled unlawful in regards to awarding contracts https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/good-law-project-high-court-ruling-government-contracts-transparency, and
2 - a second judgement also from the High Court ruling the actions of the police are unlawful specifically in relation to coronavirus legislation in Neale v DPP - the right to silence, citizens’ duties and Coronavirus Regulations https://www.bindmans.com/news/neale-v-dpp-the-right-to-silence-citizens-duties-and-coronavirus-regulations
Why are you not getting the DPP to criminally prosecute these criminals?
The UK Supreme court, reaffirming that they have had lawful authority for centuries to settle disputes in their unanimous 11 judge Supreme Court ruling in R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland ([2019] UKSC 41)
a) The determination is simple and logical, reaffirming "Common law precedence" introduced by Lord Ellesmere (1596-1617) who ".... began to apply the same principle in all cases, instead of following the inclination of the moment under the name of conscience...’ Snell’s Equity 29th Edition (1990), Part 1, §2, at 2(b).
b) REAFFIRMING: the monarch (Royal prerogative to govern) is subordinate to law of the land and “... the King hath no prerogative, but that which the law of the land allows him...”, and "...indicating that the limits of prerogative powers were set by law and were determined by the courts ... the courts have exercised a supervisory jurisdiction over the decisions of the executive for centuries..”, and
c) REAFFIRMING:. Those acting for HM Government are accountable to Parliament only in regards policy and efficiency "..They are accountable to Parliament for what they do so far as regards efficiency and policy, and of that Parliament is the only judge; ..",
d) REAFFIRMING: those acting in Parliament and HM Government are accountable to the people in the courts: "...they are responsible to a court of justice for the lawfulness of what they do, and of that the court is the only judge.’
e) REAFFIRMING: no exceptions including "...the Secretary of State could not order searches of private property without authority conferred by an Act of Parliament or the common law."
f) where, in any event, equitably "secretary of state" is any officer of the state.
g) And back to where we started, the "law of the land" = common law precedence as established by Lord Ellesmere!
You have 7 days to respond to the notice, which further details your rights.
Regards,
Subject line of email: PERSONAL LIABILITY FOR FAILING TO VOTE AGAINST THE RENEWAL OF THE Coronavirus Act 2020
NOTICE OF LIABILITY - OPPORTUNITY TO REMEDY:
PERSONAL LIABILITY FOR FAILING TO VOTE AGAINST THE RENEWAL OF THE Coronavirus Act 2020
Service by email in accordance with precedence set by Master Marsh PT-2018-000160, dated 01 March 2018
Dear MP,
Please find attached my CAUTION - Unlawful Breach of the People's Peace by causing: Alarm and distress by discrimination, harassment and misrepresentation, in respect to COVID-19, which is common law trespass.
As a MP you both create legislation, and as creator can uncreate it.
You have failed in your duty of care by allowing the Coronavirus Act to stand despite it being unlawful on the grounds listed within the notice.
Should you fail to vote against its renewal you will be held personally liable for harm caused by allowing it to be renewed, even if by not voting, that is knowingly causing harm.
Further you have failed in your obligation to the people to hold those governing to account where:
1 - the actions of Matt Hancock and Boris Johnson were ruled unlawful in regards to awarding contracts https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/good-law-project-high-court-ruling-government-contracts-transparency, and
2 - a second judgement also from the High Court ruling the actions of the police are unlawful specifically in relation to coronavirus legislation in Neale v DPP - the right to silence, citizens’ duties and Coronavirus Regulations https://www.bindmans.com/news/neale-v-dpp-the-right-to-silence-citizens-duties-and-coronavirus-regulations
Why are you not getting the DPP to criminally prosecute these criminals?
The UK Supreme court, reaffirming that they have had lawful authority for centuries to settle disputes in their unanimous 11 judge Supreme Court ruling in R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland ([2019] UKSC 41)
a) The determination is simple and logical, reaffirming "Common law precedence" introduced by Lord Ellesmere (1596-1617) who ".... began to apply the same principle in all cases, instead of following the inclination of the moment under the name of conscience...’ Snell’s Equity 29th Edition (1990), Part 1, §2, at 2(b).
b) REAFFIRMING: the monarch (Royal prerogative to govern) is subordinate to law of the land and “... the King hath no prerogative, but that which the law of the land allows him...”, and "...indicating that the limits of prerogative powers were set by law and were determined by the courts ... the courts have exercised a supervisory jurisdiction over the decisions of the executive for centuries..”, and
c) REAFFIRMING:. Those acting for HM Government are accountable to Parliament only in regards policy and efficiency "..They are accountable to Parliament for what they do so far as regards efficiency and policy, and of that Parliament is the only judge; ..",
d) REAFFIRMING: those acting in Parliament and HM Government are accountable to the people in the courts: "...they are responsible to a court of justice for the lawfulness of what they do, and of that the court is the only judge.’
e) REAFFIRMING: no exceptions including "...the Secretary of State could not order searches of private property without authority conferred by an Act of Parliament or the common law."
f) where, in any event, equitably "secretary of state" is any officer of the state.
g) And back to where we started, the "law of the land" = common law precedence as established by Lord Ellesmere!
You have 7 days to respond to the notice, which further details your rights.
Regards,
Politics Home
Government Failure To Publish Details Of Coronavirus Contracts Is Ruled "Unlawful" By High Court
The Department of Health acted "unlawfully" by failing to publish details of Covid contracts worth billions of pounds, a judge has ruled.