"The establishment, incidentally supported by much of the self-identified left, like bulls attacking a red cape, will keep screaming fascism and bloody murder over the surprisingly diverse and politically broad global protests against history’s most extreme extraction of wealth from the working class as well as the implementation of the most invasive authoritarian control structure ever attempted.

The irony is not lost, no.

All of us dissidents will be painted as extremists and terrorists, irrational all the way through, while the mass media will affirm every step of the Western covid politics as entirely reasonable given the information at the time, and beneficial in retrospect.

The lifting of the lockdowns will finally be attributed to the glorious achievements of corporate pharmaceuticals and domesticated science. The digital control structure of the “good health pass” will be subtly nudged onto us as a judicious precaution in the face of the inevitable deluge of coming pandemics and “variants”.

But it’s a long war, and we’re not going to lose it."

https://shadowrunners.substack.com/p/all-truckers-are-fascist-big-pharma

"Clan mother Noreen from Yellowknife offers blessing to convoy." [Twitter]

https://lauradodsworth.substack.com/p/we-need-a-soft-landing/comment/4719102

I’ve posted this article before, but I’m repeating it because there’s a VERY important & lengthy contribution below the piece. The author clearly has well developed understanding of the techniques of mass propaganda, hitherto notionally developed to interfere with the hearts & minds of traditional, foreign adversaries, and summarises some of the deliberate attacks on We, The People.
This ultra wide scale assault upon democratic, notionally free peoples, cabbie & must not pass unpunished & unacknowledged.
Best wishes,
Mike
Ps: Freedom Fox is the author of comments to which I refer...

⬆️ Consider changing your profile picture on your social media.

"Whether he wants one or not" where did we hear this comment from before..? We need a new set of human rights to save ourselves from this digital ID madness.

"Human Rights activist question impact on privacy": maybe we need to question a little more what the REAL motive for this madness really is.. it is certainly NOT about "protecting opur streets"

There is a great deal of controversy about the ingredients of the misnamed covid19 “vaccines”, so I offered an opinion.
Thank you
Mike

I’m with Cav Man as that’s all correct. The graphene analysis disappoints because the one piece of evidence, transmission electron microscopy, is missing. The rest, while “consistent with G/GO” is way too non-specific.
I worry it’s deliberate misdirection, too.
Enigma is finding % intact mRNA predicts a substantial fraction of the observed batch toxicity. And you don’t need anything from Enigma to know, for sure, that all four main claimed “vaccines” were always going to injure & kill.
I’m appalled at former colleagues, probably not involved directly, but looking at their shoes while this is going on.
Examples from over 30y in R&D (not vaccines) which are inviolable regardless of type or medical intervention:
1. Experimental technology not once used successfully in a launched product, numerous serious faults even ten years ago have not been solved:
(a) mRNA unstable, mRNA delivery to inside of cells limited unless harsh chemical solvents or high DV voltages applied.
(b) least stable component of alleged virus. Least likely to induce cross-immunity to new variants. No immunologist so pick this target.
(c) chosen immunogen known to be toxic, being “fusogenic”
(promotes clumping of cells, which initiates blood coagulation). All four lead companies selected spike. Collusion. No toxicologist would have chosen this.
(d) spike is least different from numerous human proteins, rendering ‘off target’ toxicity much more likely, meaning neo auto immunity very likely (example raised by Wolfgang Wodarg & me prior to any emergency authorisations is syncytin-1 & fertility. There is now two lines of evidence that our assessment was reasonable now exists, in that vaccinated women promptly develop antibodies to syncytin-1 & the US military equivalent of VAERS is showing a nearly three-fold rate of miscarriage. None of four agents have a complete reproductive toxicology in hand. Also, the mRNA products, being formulated is novel, lipid nanoparticles, well known to lead to accumulation in ovaries. Both main companies knew this for certain, long before selecting mRNA & LNPs.
(e) injectable vaccines do not, and I sincerely predict never will, generate “sterilising immunity”, because the airway mucosa is bypassed.
(f) some of the lipid used in LNP formulation carry a known acute toxicity risk, triggering potentially lethal anaphylactoid responses. VAERS shows that this is a valid concern.
This is but a partial set of concerns.
This isn’t about public health. The uppermost three priorities in any public health context are safety, safety & safety, because the intervention will be administered to billions of people.
If it was about public health, there are at least three groups to whom you’d NEVER administer agents kind this:
(i) children & any other grouping which is at near-zero risk of severe outcomes including death from the virus. There’s no risk posed by the virus so automatically it’s a making policy to jab the children.
(ii) those who are recovered from infection, because they already have immunity which is robust, complete and durable. It’s also more dangerous to vaccinate the already immune.
(iii) pregnant women & indeed females of child-bearing potential (by which I mean even girls, because of the ovarian accumulation issue).

Comparing the profile of these agents with the actual hazard presented by the alleged virus, I think is unequivocal that the manufacturers have either been astonishingly incompetent (to the extent that this alone is malign) or engaged in criminal conduct.

I pledge to give evidence orally or in writing at any criminal trial of anyone relating to these agents.

Best wishes
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

UK lawyer Clare Wills-Harrison exposes ‘End of Life’ drugs and protocols

https://vokalnow.com/video/4611

The trucks will be calling at Newcastle, Leeds, Birmingham and more updates as we go.

Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination than Unvaccinated Children & the ONS is trying to hide it

This horrifying report, derived wholly from data released by the U.K. Office of National Statistics, shows that standardised death rates since vaccination rollout in younger people is fifty (50) times greater in vaccinated young teenagers compared with their unvaccinated peers.
The ratio is so huge in part because baseline death rates in 10-14 year olds is so very low, so it doesn’t take many deaths as a multiple of baseline to shine a spotlight on what’s happening.
The drug companies know, the regulatory agencies (MHRA & EMA) know, the government knows.
None of them are saying anything, even surreptitiously, to stop this. I regard their inaction as no less that cold-blooded murder.
I recall making a back of the envelope estimate of the ratio of vaccination induced deaths & deaths due to (as opposed to with) covid19 but I can’t recall what that number offered was.
The important part of that intentionally shocking estimate wasn’t whether it was 50X or 100X, but that it was completely the wrong way up.
The ratio ought to be a tiny sliver, like 0.001 to 1, showing that a large number of children, who might otherwise have died, are being saved, and if there was extraordinarily uncommon fatalities from the vaccine, many could accept that.
Please do make a lot of noise about this inadvertent leak by ONS (maybe we have anonymous allies on the inside?).
Best wishes & thanks
Mike
Ps: I offer a prayer for every child harmed or even killed by these horrifying & deliberately dangerous agents, together with their families.
Pps: this is just so appalling. PLEASE, parents, do a little research!!!! For example, do you know how many children died OF this virus in Sweden & Germany during 2020, before the vaccines were available? It’s zero (0).

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/

We have to Talk about Nazism. How Our Times Do Indeed Echo an Earlier Totalitarian Era

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/compartmentalization-bureaucratization

A stark warning that profound discernment  is essential to dispel engineered confusion and mass apathy.

Excerpt:
In the early years of Nazi policy, as Robert Proctor’s magisterial 1990 Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis points out, it was doctors who were tasked by the State, and given special status and authority, with singling out “life unworthy of life” and elaborating racially-based policies that separated the “clean” and privileged, from the “unclean,” or “degenerate,” and restricted. In 1933, doctors began to sterilize the unfit. As Michael A Grodin, MD, Erin L Miller, BA, and Jonathan Miller, MA, point out, in “The Nazi Physicians as Leaders in Eugenics and ‘Euthanasia’: Lessons for Today”:“A series of recurrent themes arose in Nazi medicine as physicians undertook the mission of cleansing the State: the devaluation and dehumanization of segments of the community, medicalization of social and political problems, training of physicians to identify with the political goals of the government, fear of consequences of refusing to cooperate with civil authority, bureaucratization of the medical role, and the lack of concern for medical ethics and human rights.”
Half of Germany’s physicians joined the Nazi party.
“The devaluing and dehumanization of segments of the community”….
Proctor shows how medical associations embraced the rise in the status and authority of physicians, and how, then as now, “public health” was the anodyne label under which the early structure of emerging horrors was erected. He shows how doctors led the way.
The author even addresses the “health pass” that was established by Nazi public health policy, a pass that separated those who could participate fully in Nazi society, from those who were singled out for deprivation and disgust.
Proctor tracks how eugenics allowed for increasing arguments, similar to those being resuscitated today, that “useless eaters” or the “unfit” do not deserve food, or are a burden on public resources, and should not be a drag on hospitals, or receive medical care.
Proctor shows what a short slide it was from public health officials identifying “life unworthy of life”, these “useless eaters”, to the same officials using the language of “hygiene” and public safety, to set up the first Nazi euthanasia programs — programs targeting those who were identified as “less than,” or in some way impaired.
Then as now, anodyne language, whether around “public health” or “racial hygiene”, as in the 1930s, or around “public health,” “safety” and “harm reduction,” as today, concealed then, and now conceals, the true nature of what should be a visible, nauseating, daily-spreading evil.
Historians such as Proctor have argued that public health glosses, the invocation of medical authority, and compartmentalization and bureaucratization, permitted evil in the early Nazi past to flourish, in spite of its taking root in what was still supposed to have been a modern civil society.
I’d argue that the same exact things in similar guises, cloaked in similar language, are recurring today.
If we don’t wake up and see exactly where we stand, and read back in history quickly about a demonic time that overtly mirrors and in many ways foreshadows where we are — then most of us will be fools, even as some of us are already monsters.
If we don’t forcibly and immediately call out monsters where we see them — where they walk among us — whether they wear nice earrings and sit demurely at the helm of the CDC, or whether they gather in white coats, in all their authority, at the Mayo Clinic, standing between a dying man and his desperate wife — we will fail forever to deserve the blessing of the Constitution, and of the rule of law, that are supposed to be our heritage.