I’m with Cav Man as that’s all correct. The graphene analysis disappoints because the one piece of evidence, transmission electron microscopy, is missing. The rest, while “consistent with G/GO” is way too non-specific.
I worry it’s deliberate misdirection, too.
Enigma is finding % intact mRNA predicts a substantial fraction of the observed batch toxicity. And you don’t need anything from Enigma to know, for sure, that all four main claimed “vaccines” were always going to injure & kill.
I’m appalled at former colleagues, probably not involved directly, but looking at their shoes while this is going on.
Examples from over 30y in R&D (not vaccines) which are inviolable regardless of type or medical intervention:
1. Experimental technology not once used successfully in a launched product, numerous serious faults even ten years ago have not been solved:
(a) mRNA unstable, mRNA delivery to inside of cells limited unless harsh chemical solvents or high DV voltages applied.
(b) least stable component of alleged virus. Least likely to induce cross-immunity to new variants. No immunologist so pick this target.
(c) chosen immunogen known to be toxic, being “fusogenic”
(promotes clumping of cells, which initiates blood coagulation). All four lead companies selected spike. Collusion. No toxicologist would have chosen this.
(d) spike is least different from numerous human proteins, rendering ‘off target’ toxicity much more likely, meaning neo auto immunity very likely (example raised by Wolfgang Wodarg & me prior to any emergency authorisations is syncytin-1 & fertility. There is now two lines of evidence that our assessment was reasonable now exists, in that vaccinated women promptly develop antibodies to syncytin-1 & the US military equivalent of VAERS is showing a nearly three-fold rate of miscarriage. None of four agents have a complete reproductive toxicology in hand. Also, the mRNA products, being formulated is novel, lipid nanoparticles, well known to lead to accumulation in ovaries. Both main companies knew this for certain, long before selecting mRNA & LNPs.
(e) injectable vaccines do not, and I sincerely predict never will, generate “sterilising immunity”, because the airway mucosa is bypassed.
(f) some of the lipid used in LNP formulation carry a known acute toxicity risk, triggering potentially lethal anaphylactoid responses. VAERS shows that this is a valid concern.
This is but a partial set of concerns.
This isn’t about public health. The uppermost three priorities in any public health context are safety, safety & safety, because the intervention will be administered to billions of people.
If it was about public health, there are at least three groups to whom you’d NEVER administer agents kind this:
(i) children & any other grouping which is at near-zero risk of severe outcomes including death from the virus. There’s no risk posed by the virus so automatically it’s a making policy to jab the children.
(ii) those who are recovered from infection, because they already have immunity which is robust, complete and durable. It’s also more dangerous to vaccinate the already immune.
(iii) pregnant women & indeed females of child-bearing potential (by which I mean even girls, because of the ovarian accumulation issue).
Comparing the profile of these agents with the actual hazard presented by the alleged virus, I think is unequivocal that the manufacturers have either been astonishingly incompetent (to the extent that this alone is malign) or engaged in criminal conduct.
I pledge to give evidence orally or in writing at any criminal trial of anyone relating to these agents.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
I worry it’s deliberate misdirection, too.
Enigma is finding % intact mRNA predicts a substantial fraction of the observed batch toxicity. And you don’t need anything from Enigma to know, for sure, that all four main claimed “vaccines” were always going to injure & kill.
I’m appalled at former colleagues, probably not involved directly, but looking at their shoes while this is going on.
Examples from over 30y in R&D (not vaccines) which are inviolable regardless of type or medical intervention:
1. Experimental technology not once used successfully in a launched product, numerous serious faults even ten years ago have not been solved:
(a) mRNA unstable, mRNA delivery to inside of cells limited unless harsh chemical solvents or high DV voltages applied.
(b) least stable component of alleged virus. Least likely to induce cross-immunity to new variants. No immunologist so pick this target.
(c) chosen immunogen known to be toxic, being “fusogenic”
(promotes clumping of cells, which initiates blood coagulation). All four lead companies selected spike. Collusion. No toxicologist would have chosen this.
(d) spike is least different from numerous human proteins, rendering ‘off target’ toxicity much more likely, meaning neo auto immunity very likely (example raised by Wolfgang Wodarg & me prior to any emergency authorisations is syncytin-1 & fertility. There is now two lines of evidence that our assessment was reasonable now exists, in that vaccinated women promptly develop antibodies to syncytin-1 & the US military equivalent of VAERS is showing a nearly three-fold rate of miscarriage. None of four agents have a complete reproductive toxicology in hand. Also, the mRNA products, being formulated is novel, lipid nanoparticles, well known to lead to accumulation in ovaries. Both main companies knew this for certain, long before selecting mRNA & LNPs.
(e) injectable vaccines do not, and I sincerely predict never will, generate “sterilising immunity”, because the airway mucosa is bypassed.
(f) some of the lipid used in LNP formulation carry a known acute toxicity risk, triggering potentially lethal anaphylactoid responses. VAERS shows that this is a valid concern.
This is but a partial set of concerns.
This isn’t about public health. The uppermost three priorities in any public health context are safety, safety & safety, because the intervention will be administered to billions of people.
If it was about public health, there are at least three groups to whom you’d NEVER administer agents kind this:
(i) children & any other grouping which is at near-zero risk of severe outcomes including death from the virus. There’s no risk posed by the virus so automatically it’s a making policy to jab the children.
(ii) those who are recovered from infection, because they already have immunity which is robust, complete and durable. It’s also more dangerous to vaccinate the already immune.
(iii) pregnant women & indeed females of child-bearing potential (by which I mean even girls, because of the ovarian accumulation issue).
Comparing the profile of these agents with the actual hazard presented by the alleged virus, I think is unequivocal that the manufacturers have either been astonishingly incompetent (to the extent that this alone is malign) or engaged in criminal conduct.
I pledge to give evidence orally or in writing at any criminal trial of anyone relating to these agents.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
UK lawyer Clare Wills-Harrison exposes ‘End of Life’ drugs and protocols
https://vokalnow.com/video/4611
https://vokalnow.com/video/4611
Vokalnow
The Dr. Ardis Show - VokalNow.com
I am Dr Bryan Ardis, DC, I have a passion for inspiring, encouraging, educating, and extending hope to people all over the world in the way of health, wellness, and vibrant living!!! - VokalNow.com offers the best in live podcasting from Dallas, Texas.
Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination than Unvaccinated Children & the ONS is trying to hide it
This horrifying report, derived wholly from data released by the U.K. Office of National Statistics, shows that standardised death rates since vaccination rollout in younger people is fifty (50) times greater in vaccinated young teenagers compared with their unvaccinated peers.
The ratio is so huge in part because baseline death rates in 10-14 year olds is so very low, so it doesn’t take many deaths as a multiple of baseline to shine a spotlight on what’s happening.
The drug companies know, the regulatory agencies (MHRA & EMA) know, the government knows.
None of them are saying anything, even surreptitiously, to stop this. I regard their inaction as no less that cold-blooded murder.
I recall making a back of the envelope estimate of the ratio of vaccination induced deaths & deaths due to (as opposed to with) covid19 but I can’t recall what that number offered was.
The important part of that intentionally shocking estimate wasn’t whether it was 50X or 100X, but that it was completely the wrong way up.
The ratio ought to be a tiny sliver, like 0.001 to 1, showing that a large number of children, who might otherwise have died, are being saved, and if there was extraordinarily uncommon fatalities from the vaccine, many could accept that.
Please do make a lot of noise about this inadvertent leak by ONS (maybe we have anonymous allies on the inside?).
Best wishes & thanks
Mike
Ps: I offer a prayer for every child harmed or even killed by these horrifying & deliberately dangerous agents, together with their families.
Pps: this is just so appalling. PLEASE, parents, do a little research!!!! For example, do you know how many children died OF this virus in Sweden & Germany during 2020, before the vaccines were available? It’s zero (0).
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/
This horrifying report, derived wholly from data released by the U.K. Office of National Statistics, shows that standardised death rates since vaccination rollout in younger people is fifty (50) times greater in vaccinated young teenagers compared with their unvaccinated peers.
The ratio is so huge in part because baseline death rates in 10-14 year olds is so very low, so it doesn’t take many deaths as a multiple of baseline to shine a spotlight on what’s happening.
The drug companies know, the regulatory agencies (MHRA & EMA) know, the government knows.
None of them are saying anything, even surreptitiously, to stop this. I regard their inaction as no less that cold-blooded murder.
I recall making a back of the envelope estimate of the ratio of vaccination induced deaths & deaths due to (as opposed to with) covid19 but I can’t recall what that number offered was.
The important part of that intentionally shocking estimate wasn’t whether it was 50X or 100X, but that it was completely the wrong way up.
The ratio ought to be a tiny sliver, like 0.001 to 1, showing that a large number of children, who might otherwise have died, are being saved, and if there was extraordinarily uncommon fatalities from the vaccine, many could accept that.
Please do make a lot of noise about this inadvertent leak by ONS (maybe we have anonymous allies on the inside?).
Best wishes & thanks
Mike
Ps: I offer a prayer for every child harmed or even killed by these horrifying & deliberately dangerous agents, together with their families.
Pps: this is just so appalling. PLEASE, parents, do a little research!!!! For example, do you know how many children died OF this virus in Sweden & Germany during 2020, before the vaccines were available? It’s zero (0).
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/
We have to Talk about Nazism. How Our Times Do Indeed Echo an Earlier Totalitarian Era
https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/compartmentalization-bureaucratization
A stark warning that profound discernment is essential to dispel engineered confusion and mass apathy.
Excerpt:
In the early years of Nazi policy, as Robert Proctor’s magisterial 1990 Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis points out, it was doctors who were tasked by the State, and given special status and authority, with singling out “life unworthy of life” and elaborating racially-based policies that separated the “clean” and privileged, from the “unclean,” or “degenerate,” and restricted. In 1933, doctors began to sterilize the unfit. As Michael A Grodin, MD, Erin L Miller, BA, and Jonathan Miller, MA, point out, in “The Nazi Physicians as Leaders in Eugenics and ‘Euthanasia’: Lessons for Today”:“A series of recurrent themes arose in Nazi medicine as physicians undertook the mission of cleansing the State: the devaluation and dehumanization of segments of the community, medicalization of social and political problems, training of physicians to identify with the political goals of the government, fear of consequences of refusing to cooperate with civil authority, bureaucratization of the medical role, and the lack of concern for medical ethics and human rights.”
Half of Germany’s physicians joined the Nazi party.
“The devaluing and dehumanization of segments of the community”….
Proctor shows how medical associations embraced the rise in the status and authority of physicians, and how, then as now, “public health” was the anodyne label under which the early structure of emerging horrors was erected. He shows how doctors led the way.
The author even addresses the “health pass” that was established by Nazi public health policy, a pass that separated those who could participate fully in Nazi society, from those who were singled out for deprivation and disgust.
Proctor tracks how eugenics allowed for increasing arguments, similar to those being resuscitated today, that “useless eaters” or the “unfit” do not deserve food, or are a burden on public resources, and should not be a drag on hospitals, or receive medical care.
Proctor shows what a short slide it was from public health officials identifying “life unworthy of life”, these “useless eaters”, to the same officials using the language of “hygiene” and public safety, to set up the first Nazi euthanasia programs — programs targeting those who were identified as “less than,” or in some way impaired.
Then as now, anodyne language, whether around “public health” or “racial hygiene”, as in the 1930s, or around “public health,” “safety” and “harm reduction,” as today, concealed then, and now conceals, the true nature of what should be a visible, nauseating, daily-spreading evil.
Historians such as Proctor have argued that public health glosses, the invocation of medical authority, and compartmentalization and bureaucratization, permitted evil in the early Nazi past to flourish, in spite of its taking root in what was still supposed to have been a modern civil society.
I’d argue that the same exact things in similar guises, cloaked in similar language, are recurring today.
If we don’t wake up and see exactly where we stand, and read back in history quickly about a demonic time that overtly mirrors and in many ways foreshadows where we are — then most of us will be fools, even as some of us are already monsters.
If we don’t forcibly and immediately call out monsters where we see them — where they walk among us — whether they wear nice earrings and sit demurely at the helm of the CDC, or whether they gather in white coats, in all their authority, at the Mayo Clinic, standing between a dying man and his desperate wife — we will fail forever to deserve the blessing of the Constitution, and of the rule of law, that are supposed to be our heritage.
https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/compartmentalization-bureaucratization
A stark warning that profound discernment is essential to dispel engineered confusion and mass apathy.
Excerpt:
In the early years of Nazi policy, as Robert Proctor’s magisterial 1990 Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis points out, it was doctors who were tasked by the State, and given special status and authority, with singling out “life unworthy of life” and elaborating racially-based policies that separated the “clean” and privileged, from the “unclean,” or “degenerate,” and restricted. In 1933, doctors began to sterilize the unfit. As Michael A Grodin, MD, Erin L Miller, BA, and Jonathan Miller, MA, point out, in “The Nazi Physicians as Leaders in Eugenics and ‘Euthanasia’: Lessons for Today”:“A series of recurrent themes arose in Nazi medicine as physicians undertook the mission of cleansing the State: the devaluation and dehumanization of segments of the community, medicalization of social and political problems, training of physicians to identify with the political goals of the government, fear of consequences of refusing to cooperate with civil authority, bureaucratization of the medical role, and the lack of concern for medical ethics and human rights.”
Half of Germany’s physicians joined the Nazi party.
“The devaluing and dehumanization of segments of the community”….
Proctor shows how medical associations embraced the rise in the status and authority of physicians, and how, then as now, “public health” was the anodyne label under which the early structure of emerging horrors was erected. He shows how doctors led the way.
The author even addresses the “health pass” that was established by Nazi public health policy, a pass that separated those who could participate fully in Nazi society, from those who were singled out for deprivation and disgust.
Proctor tracks how eugenics allowed for increasing arguments, similar to those being resuscitated today, that “useless eaters” or the “unfit” do not deserve food, or are a burden on public resources, and should not be a drag on hospitals, or receive medical care.
Proctor shows what a short slide it was from public health officials identifying “life unworthy of life”, these “useless eaters”, to the same officials using the language of “hygiene” and public safety, to set up the first Nazi euthanasia programs — programs targeting those who were identified as “less than,” or in some way impaired.
Then as now, anodyne language, whether around “public health” or “racial hygiene”, as in the 1930s, or around “public health,” “safety” and “harm reduction,” as today, concealed then, and now conceals, the true nature of what should be a visible, nauseating, daily-spreading evil.
Historians such as Proctor have argued that public health glosses, the invocation of medical authority, and compartmentalization and bureaucratization, permitted evil in the early Nazi past to flourish, in spite of its taking root in what was still supposed to have been a modern civil society.
I’d argue that the same exact things in similar guises, cloaked in similar language, are recurring today.
If we don’t wake up and see exactly where we stand, and read back in history quickly about a demonic time that overtly mirrors and in many ways foreshadows where we are — then most of us will be fools, even as some of us are already monsters.
If we don’t forcibly and immediately call out monsters where we see them — where they walk among us — whether they wear nice earrings and sit demurely at the helm of the CDC, or whether they gather in white coats, in all their authority, at the Mayo Clinic, standing between a dying man and his desperate wife — we will fail forever to deserve the blessing of the Constitution, and of the rule of law, that are supposed to be our heritage.
Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf
On the Subtlety of Monsters
We have to Talk about Nazism. How Our Times Do Indeed Echo an Earlier Totalitarian Era
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr Zev Zelenko: "I wonder how you do it?"
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"The Covidian biosecurity regime in action: Uniformed soldiers hold down and forcibly vaccinate a terrified elderly man in Jharkhand, India as he begs them not to.
How many times has this happened when there’s no camera recording?" [Dan Cohen, Twitter]
How many times has this happened when there’s no camera recording?" [Dan Cohen, Twitter]
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
धर-पकड़ कर लोगों को लगाया जा रहा कोरोना टीका।स्वास्थ्यकर्मियों ने महिला को खेत में पकड़ कर कोरोना टीका दिया।
घर से खेत तक स्वास्थ्य कर्मियों के साथ पुलिस के जवान अलग-अलग इलाकों में घूम-घूम कर लोगों को वैक्सीनेशन के लिए पकड़ते देखे जा रहे हैं।
#Jharkhand #Gumla | Translated from Hindi:
"Corona vaccine being administered to people by holding them. Health workers caught the woman in the field and gave corona vaccine.
From home to farm, along with health workers, police personnel are seen roaming in different areas catching people for vaccination." [Sohan Singh, Twitter]
घर से खेत तक स्वास्थ्य कर्मियों के साथ पुलिस के जवान अलग-अलग इलाकों में घूम-घूम कर लोगों को वैक्सीनेशन के लिए पकड़ते देखे जा रहे हैं।
#Jharkhand #Gumla | Translated from Hindi:
"Corona vaccine being administered to people by holding them. Health workers caught the woman in the field and gave corona vaccine.
From home to farm, along with health workers, police personnel are seen roaming in different areas catching people for vaccination." [Sohan Singh, Twitter]
CTV News, Canada, Today's Poll (right side of page):
VOTE
Today's Poll:
How do you feel about the ‘freedom convoy’?
https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/
VOTE
Today's Poll:
How do you feel about the ‘freedom convoy’?
https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/
Shocking (not)
" Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says he has tested positive for COVID-19 this morning.
In a tweet he says he is “feeling fine” and will continue to work remotely this week, while following public health guidance."
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/prime-minister-trudeau-tests-positive-for-covid-19-1.5761198
" Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says he has tested positive for COVID-19 this morning.
In a tweet he says he is “feeling fine” and will continue to work remotely this week, while following public health guidance."
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/prime-minister-trudeau-tests-positive-for-covid-19-1.5761198
CTVNews
Prime Minister Trudeau tests positive for COVID-19
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced he has tested positive for COVID-19 this morning. Trudeau said he feels well and 'has no symptoms,' and will continue to work remotely this week, following public health guidance. A second of his three children is now…
The most insulting address Trudeau has yet given to Canadians and working class citizens:
PM Justin Trudeau addresses ongoing protest in Ottawa – January 31, 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cATcIT3MnpY
PM Justin Trudeau addresses ongoing protest in Ottawa – January 31, 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cATcIT3MnpY
YouTube
PM Justin Trudeau responds to ongoing protest in Ottawa against vaccine mandates – January 31, 2022
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau comments as a protest against COVID-19 vaccine mandates continues in Ottawa. The downtown area in the nation's capital has been gridlocked since the protest began January 28 on Parliament Hill. The prime minister is speaking…
Here is another, exhaustive article on the acquisition of complete, robust & complete immunity after infection.
No genuine, public health initiative includes vaccination, much less mandated vaccination, of those who we know for sure are immune. It is dangerous to do so, as well.
I salute the author, Dr Paul Elias Alexander for his careful work.
Best wishes,
Mike
https://m.theepochtimes.com/evidence-on-natural-immunity-versus-covid-19-vaccine-induced-immunity_4244570.html
No genuine, public health initiative includes vaccination, much less mandated vaccination, of those who we know for sure are immune. It is dangerous to do so, as well.
I salute the author, Dr Paul Elias Alexander for his careful work.
Best wishes,
Mike
https://m.theepochtimes.com/evidence-on-natural-immunity-versus-covid-19-vaccine-induced-immunity_4244570.html
The Epoch Times
146 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to COVID-19
Commentary We should not force COVID vaccines on anyone when the evidence shows that naturally acquired immunity is ...
Please be wide awake to the fact that the UN is already using “behavioural insights” or “nudges” to get us lined up for their Sustainable Development goals also known as UN2030. That’s also the destination of other “initiatives” which include totalitarian control & ultimately “managing down” the population.
“Nudges” are nothing more than using psychological trickery to get you to do things which others have decided are “best”. For them, that is.
It’s propaganda pretending to be nice.
Nobody died & left the UN in charge. Elites have realised that they’ll most easily get what they want by piggybacking on existing supranational organisations.
Worth a read but please bear in mind almost all the examples involve mobile phones, all the better for controlling & tracking the masses.
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/Behavioral%20Insights%20at%20the%20UN.pdf
“Nudges” are nothing more than using psychological trickery to get you to do things which others have decided are “best”. For them, that is.
It’s propaganda pretending to be nice.
Nobody died & left the UN in charge. Elites have realised that they’ll most easily get what they want by piggybacking on existing supranational organisations.
Worth a read but please bear in mind almost all the examples involve mobile phones, all the better for controlling & tracking the masses.
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/Behavioral%20Insights%20at%20the%20UN.pdf
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇨🇦 OTTAWA CANADA
Graphene start-up wins backing from UK Treasury and CIA-linked firm
"Among the new investors are the UK government’s Future Fund: Breakthrough scheme, which means that the Treasury will take a direct equity stake in the start-up.. Other investors include In-Q-Tel, which was set up and backed by the CIA to identify and invest in companies developing cutting-edge technologies that can serve US national security interests."
https://todayuknews.com/economy/graphene-start-up-wins-backing-from-uk-treasury-and-cia-linked-firm/
"Among the new investors are the UK government’s Future Fund: Breakthrough scheme, which means that the Treasury will take a direct equity stake in the start-up.. Other investors include In-Q-Tel, which was set up and backed by the CIA to identify and invest in companies developing cutting-edge technologies that can serve US national security interests."
https://todayuknews.com/economy/graphene-start-up-wins-backing-from-uk-treasury-and-cia-linked-firm/
Forwarded from NVK
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Reposting from BC Interior Freedom Fighters.
Forwarded from Counter-Covid-Crime
Questions_and_points_of_law_to_assist_your_local_Police_Force_in.pdf
4.4 MB
📎📎📎📎📎📎📎📎📎📎📎
This document contains all the necessary information required to demonstrate to your local police force the legal requirement for them to act and take responsibility locally for the crimes being committed on school premises and in vaccine centers and Doctors practices in your local area.
Includes highlighted extracts from the legislation and CPS guidance with simple annotation and important questions to put to your local constabulary.
Please take and pose the challenge to your local constabulary... Supporting evidence of death and harm and of the fraudulent nature of the 'emergency' status give to Covid 19 are available from the channel and from all good vendors of truth and purveyors of freedom. 😏
✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️
This document contains all the necessary information required to demonstrate to your local police force the legal requirement for them to act and take responsibility locally for the crimes being committed on school premises and in vaccine centers and Doctors practices in your local area.
Includes highlighted extracts from the legislation and CPS guidance with simple annotation and important questions to put to your local constabulary.
Please take and pose the challenge to your local constabulary... Supporting evidence of death and harm and of the fraudulent nature of the 'emergency' status give to Covid 19 are available from the channel and from all good vendors of truth and purveyors of freedom. 😏
✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️