🇩🇰 "DENMARK's state modeller: Why we've ended ALL Covid laws"
https://youtu.be/1s1UX2ZNsh4

Finland's Timeline Out of Pandemic on Horizon

PM Sanna Marin has announced a timetable for lifting restrictions will be negotiated in parliament - but confirmed it will be next month. (AP)

Border restrictions between Finland and other Schengen countries are set to end Monday. Neighboring Denmark is also set to lift all its measures against the virus on Tuesday - including the use of face masks.

Subscribe to RT t.me/rtnews

ONS data shows Covid-19 Vaccinated Teens aged 15-19 are 3 times more likely to die than Unvaccinated Teens; is this why male Teen Deaths increased by 53% in 2021?

According to numbers supplied by the Office for National Statistics, teenagers aged 15-19 who‘ve had the Covid-19 vaccine are over 3 times more likely to die than teenagers who have not had the Covid-19 vaccine, which may explain why deaths among teen boys increased by 53% following the introduction of the jab to this age group in 2021…

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/01/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-teens-more-likely-to-die/

The Freedom Variant Clobbers Canada's Regime

Canadians are rising up, showing the world how to fight a tyrannical regime that promotes hatred and discrimination. Now, Freedom Convoys are springing up across the globe.

For two years, most Canadians naively trusted Trudeau, hypnotized by his regime’s lies and fear-mongering propaganda in the face of a mysterious illness that few people understood. Only a small resistance fought to keep the flame of freedom alive.

Now, however, times are changing, and changing quickly. The virus of freedom has been unleashed and is spreading like wildfire. People are snapping out of the media-induced trance. The Truth is roaring and won’t be shackled no more.
The law enforcement officers of Canada have a choice — to do their job and bring an end to Trudeau’s tyrannical regime, or be complicit in its crimes and eventually face punishment for grave human rights abuses.

Dear Officers, you have a chance to become heroes, to become legends, to become immortal. Hear the cries of the Canadian people. Restore the rule of law in Canada.

https://john365.substack.com/p/the-freedom-variant-clobbers-canadas?r=1e4au

Let's talk about it...

Matt le Tissier - On the Record

Tonight 7pm GMT

Links will be posted here.

Share. Download. Reupload.

t.me/oraclefilms

Seven signs that they're taking us for a ride.

1. When you enter a restaurant, you need to wear a mask. As soon as you sit down to eat, you can take it off (https://bit.ly/3uhzQOU - see bullet point #3). There is no single virus that solely hovers at an altitude of 1.50m and above or double-checks whether someone is eating/drinking before choosing that person as a host.

2. The goalposts regarding the vaccine's efficacy are constantly shifting (https://bit.ly/3KZJITo). We all remember that self-proclaimed experts such as Fauci and Drosten claimed to achieve herd immunity against a respiratory virus (LOL!) at a vaccination rate of 60%. Now, the countries with the highest vaccination rates suffer from the highest number of cases. Surprise, surprise!

3. There is no robust scientific evidence that masks work (https://t.me/goddek/1169). However, there is much evidence that masks harm those who wear them (https://bit.ly/3LczvDx). And yet, people in many countries have to wear such masks throughout the whole day - even outside. This raises the suspicion that they are primarily used to gag us and serve as a daily reminder that we are in the middle of a "deadly pandemic".

4. The majority of the experts presented in the media have substantial conflicts of interest, such as being funded from the Welcome Trust, the Gates Foundation or Big Pharma (https://bit.ly/3HoDuKH). Independent scientists with dissenting opinions are pigeon-holed as dangerous heretics.

5. Big Tech bans dissidents who question the official narrative. I, for instance, have been removed from social media platforms for spreading "dangerous misinformation about Covid-19". There is nothing dangerous about facts about viral evolution, the efficacy of Ivermectin, or citing my own vitamin D publication (https://t.me/goddek/1149). Worse still, it is currently being debated to ban alternative social media, such as Telegram, as it provides a platform for "dangerous" alternative opinions (https://bit.ly/3ghT8f3). The truth is that we are a danger to their narrative and that is why they are fighting us.

6. There is no single need to vaccinate young people or children that are not exposed to any risk of becoming seriously ill. The narrative that "they need to get vaccinated to make sure that the vaccines of others work" is a mixture of illogicality and absurdity. Alternative treatment methods such as using Ivermectin have been fiercely criticized by so-called "experts" from the beginning, even though the body of evidence was already overwhelming back then (https://c19ivermectin.com).

7. Politicians never cared about our health; otherwise, they would long have enlightened us about the importance of vitamin D, physical exercise, a healthy diet etc. It speaks volumes that the first thing they closed were sports clubs while locking us up at home so food delivery companies could flourish. Obesity is associated with a much higher risk of hospitalization (https://bit.ly/3Hf0Pym). And yet, many obese politicians argue for compulsory vaccinations instead of using a treadmill. Well done, hypocrites!

There are many more signs that this is a big hoax. What is your favourite one? Leave a comment below.

Cheers and remain sane,
Dr. Simon

👉🏻 https://t.me/goddek (click + join!)

https://zeeemedia.com/interview/dr-mike-yeadon-ex-pfizer-chief-scientific-officer-exposes-deadly-vax-lots-for-nuremberg-2-0/

An interview yesterday with Maria Zeee in Australia. Apologies for occasional bad language. Uncharacteristic of me. A sign of growing frustration.

Best wishes & thanks,
Mike

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020...

I can’t read anything from this bunch of common criminals without my lip curling.
Take a look at the mendacious claims here.
That “>2B people are living under some kind of lockdown” tells us NOTHING about respiratory viruses & everything about a global fraud & PsyOp.
Similarly, you see the repeated claim that “you might think things will return to normal. You’d be wrong”.
Why is that?
In light of that, should we take seriously the alleged threat from a cyber-pandemic? Sure: because it’s invented, just for now. Luckily, you’re not susceptible to the PsyOp aspect of it. Nevertheless, if bad actors decide to disrupt the world in this way, I’ve no idea how bad that might be.
I’ve no skills in the field at all. If anyone does, please would you warn us what kind of this to expect? Thanks 😎
Mike

Bring back the guillotine.

"Western Australia bans unvaccinated parents from seeing their sick children in hospital. The media applauds exploiting desperate parents in their darkest hour." [Caldron Pool]

"A license to live."

"I don't know who this guy is but people need to listen to him. The Digital Identity Bill going through Australian Parliament is a massive worry. Digital ID's will enable a social credit system and mark the end of universal human rights. It is on the agenda throughout the world." [Daniel Fooks, Twitter]

I have now read the Human Rights review documentation and I am seriously concerned.

The review seeks to impose a rights culture that displaces personal responsibility in favour of "the public interest”.

The proposed reforms say “the international human rights framework recognises that not all rights are absolute and that an individual’s rights may need to be balanced, either against the rights of others or against the wider public interest.

Further concerning statements are:

“The idea that rights come alongside duties and responsibilities is steeped in the UK tradition of liberty, but is also reflected in the qualifications in the Convention and is explicit in Article 29 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights (‘Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible’). The increasing reliance on human rights claims over the years has, however, led to a culture of rights decoupled from our responsibilities as citizens, and a displacement of due consideration of the wider public interest”.

"Whilst human rights are universal, a Bill of Rights could require the courts to give greater consideration to the behaviour of claimants and the wider public interest when interpreting and balancing qualified rights. More broadly, our proposals can also set out more clearly the extent to which the behaviour of claimants is a factor that the courts take into account when deciding what sort of remedy, if any, is appropriate. This will ensure that claimants’ responsibilities, and the rights of others, form a part of the process of making a claim based on the violation of a human right”.

There are other concerning statements too, but you get the gist from the above.

Under the proposed reforms it is clear that Parliament is seeking to impose itself as arbiter of when a person can have human rights and when they cannot. This is disgraceful. It does not matter the crime, major or minor, a person must always have their human rights available to them and protected. It is abundantly clear to me that although the proposed reforms mention the courts power to decide matters, the govt expect the courts to be led on this by parliament, (and legislation), whatever the govt decide their rules to be at any given time.

This is an overt attack on personal freedoms in a bid to enforce communitarianism (which is worse than socialism, and is in fact totalitarianism). Wider interests should never trump an individual’s rights, the latter of which are fundamental freedoms that are God given.

These proposed changes seek to make sure that Human Rights are NOT fundamental and universal. Giving power to the courts to say you are not entitled to your human rights if they think your behaviour has not been what they consider "good" is a huge worry, knowing how much the courts are now refusing to challenge govt policy decisions and harmful legislation.

The separation of powers has been lost in this country for some time now. These proposed reforms confirm parliaments march to make itself the sovereign power and authority to decide on people's fundamental rights according to its own whim, and this must be stopped at all costs.

The consultation is open until 8th March and the link to respond to it is below. We desperately need everyone to take action and say no to these reforms.

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/human-rights-act-reform-a-modern-bill-of-rights

Jan 31, 2022: Premier of Manitoba (Canada) Heather Stefanson has removed Josh Guenter from his recent appointment as a legislative assistant to the minister of health for defending bodily autonomy, and government overreach. Media tows line in sowing division and hatred, painting resistance as racist, etc.

https://globalnews.ca/news/8584907/manitoba-tory-backbencher-loses-appointment-after-meeting-with-trucker-convoy/

We'll be at The Albert Hall Weds 2nd Feb 6pm to protest against their discriminatory and bio-fascist decision to CONTINUE demanding covid passports or proof of negative SC2 test upon entry. They're doing this via "spot checks" They have also decided to stop taking cash for tickets and all bars/cafes inside their venue, using “covid” as the pathetic excuse.

This is medical apartheid.

You can also let them know what you think of their policy here https://www.royalalberthall.com/your-visit/contact-us/


https://t.me/Pierscorbyn

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/shining-s...
You’d be forgiven for thinking I’d long have been beyond shocking.
That’s wrong. Ignoring suffering is never OK. But these bastards at the NIH are knowingly doing just that. They were probably told to stop responding. Right. That would have been the moment when I would have ignored the orders, at best. Folk at NIH: wth has happened to you???
Best wishes
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon