Russophobes, germophobes, it’s all the same…

"How seamlessly we have moved from war with covid, to war with Russia.  But how, by what process has this happened, and why?
What, if they exist, are the links between these two totally different enemies?

The how is relatively easy to define. The narrative – everything in these mediatised days is about the narrative – is much the same in each case.
A dreadful scourge of mankind (the coronavirus, Russia) suddenly emerges out of nowhere and ravages populations. Governments, overwhelmed, clueless how to respond but under huge pressure from media and public  to ‘do something’, flail about, alighting on draconian measures (lockdowns, sanctions) which make everybody feel good about themselves but do nothing to solve the problem and boomerang on the societies which deploy them.

However, there is no price to pay for this self-inflicted damage because it’s all the fault of the covid or Putin, isn’t it, and so the restrictions/sanctions are ratcheted up and extended.
There is no cost-benefit analysis, no scrutiny. Left and Right are united in baying for what amounts to self-abuse, especially as the poor will bear the brunt. Only a few cranks or marginalised figures on the Right (Farage, Tucker Carlson) or the Provisional wing of the Left (Piers Corbyn and Jeremy Corbyn) beg to differ. With covid it was slightly different, thanks to a number of freedom-loving Conservative MPs, but the fact remains: Right and Left were broadly united on covid and even more so on Ukraine. Much the same analysis could be made of the climate ‘emergency’ fandango.

The techniques used to develop the narrative are the same in each case. The mainstream media open the spigots, as they have now with Ukraine, for an inescapable  torrent of ‘coverage’ indistinguishable from propaganda.  Dissenting voices, even distinguished professors and diplomats, are denigrated, marginalised, silenced and ignored.

War porn, hospital porn, swamp the media. Crisis actors (featured in NHS ads and, allegedly, Ukrainian PR videos) make their cameo appearances. We clap for the Ukrainians (well, nearly) and believe all their claims, implicitly, just as we believed our politicians and public health officials.

We follow events by the hour. The daily death count which worked so well with covid doesn’t work so well with Ukraine, because according to the UN the death count after two weeks is still in the low hundreds, a figure about which Yemenis and Syrians could only dream. Never mind, the daily refugee count will do.  This has the advantage of allowing us to flagellate ourselves for never doing enough and being selfish."

https://21stcenturywire.com/2022/03/12/covid-climate-russia-what-will-the-next-horseman-of-the-apocalypse-be/

🚨 First Open Letter on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty

Read the open letter here: worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/2022/03/pandemic-treaty/45591

WCH urges everyone to approach credible government representatives, political parties, trade unions, civil society groups, professionals, public figures, and independent media to:

✓ Raise awareness about the implications of the proposed global pandemic agreement
✓ Call for national campaigns that protect natural law and democratic constitutions
✓ Join credible civil society coalitions such as WCH

Download the open letter here.

#StopTheTreaty | Prepared by WCH Law and Activism Committee

📌 Follow World Council for Health:
➨ @WCH_org

🗣 Join the discussion:
➨ @worldforhealthchat

Saint Augustine
City of God, Book 1, 32

32. Of the establishment of scenic entertainments.

"Besides, though the pestilence was stayed, this was not because the voluptuous madness of stage-plays had taken possession of a warlike people hitherto accustomed only to the games of the circus; but these astute and wicked spirits, foreseeing that in due course the pestilence would shortly cease, took occasion to infect, not the bodies, but the morals of their worshippers, with a far more serious disease."

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/45304/45304-h/45304-h.htm#Page_1

CALLING OUT THE FLAG BIG LIE

I hereby call out the new Big Lie: the "standing with Ukraine" symbol of the waving of the Ukrainian flag or ribbon by non Ukrainians (Ukrainians are justified in waving their national flag if they so wish) in a context of military conflict between four parties (current government, Donetsk, Lugansk & Russia) is not "showing solidarity with refugees", but it is a psychological operation to turn the bourgeois middle classes of Europe into rabid warmongers.

If refugees were the concern then flags of Peace would have served a better purpose. This is because there are millions of refugees waving the flags of Donetsk and Lugansk too. This "standing with Ukraine" symbolised by the flag of a belligerent party to this four way conflict is designed to erode any morality left and possibility of understanding a world made of complexities where what is required is not judgement, but morally driven understanding of complexity.

It is designed to infect the soul of the middle classes with the germ of war in the terrain of destruction.

@robinmg

CBDC=Vouchers
Channel: @robinmg

Confirmation from the Ukrainian president that indeed, a propaganda war is underway, fueled in part or whole by Big Tech.

Russia Attacks Ukraine | Invasion Or Collective Self-Defence? What International Law Says About Putin Action

Collective Self-Defence?

https://legal.un.org/repertory/art51.shtml

"The law of prohibition of use of force in the UN charter has an exception in the form of law of self-defence and collective self-defence (Article 51). In the present case, we must focus on the concept of collective self-defence. 

Right to collective self-defence provides that a State is within the four walls of international law and the UN charter if they act in self-defence on behalf of other states.

Let’s assume State A has used force against State B. This makes State A an aggressor in international law. In this case, the law of self-defence in the UN charter allows the victim state to legitimately use force against the aggressor state. In this case, there are two uses of force, one is by State A, since it is an aggressor State, it has violated the UN charter [Art.2(4)]; the second use of force is not prohibited as it is legitimate use of force of self-defence under Article 51 of the UN charter. 

Now, what if State B is no match to the might of State A? Can State C step in and use force on behalf of State B? The question is legitimate because use of force is not used against State C. Under the law of collective self-defence, it is perfectly within the scheme of the UN charter if State C uses force against State A on behalf of State B. The use of force by State C is covered under the right to collective self-defence and is outside the purview of Article 2(4) of the UN charter.

This is what the Russians have engineered, and here is how.

Russia first carved out two states from the troubled eastern region of Ukraine by recognising their independence and sovereignty. Thus, two more states were born out of Russia [out of Ukraine: the Donetsk & Lugansk Republics]. Since these States invited Russia to protect them from the Ukrainian Armed Force, Russian troops entered their territory without violating Article 2(4). They called the Russian forces in the States carved out of Ukraine as peacekeeping forces.

Subsequently, it was argued that Ukraine attacked these new territories after their independence [which they did in 2014, 2015 and ever since, including in February 2022]. Consequently, Russia argued invocation of Article 51, UN charter, i.e. collective self-defence. 

In other words, it acted on behalf of the States of Donetsk and Luhansk, the breakaway States of Ukraine according to Russia. Thus, Russia is arguing that it is invading Ukraine in collective self-defence."

Abishek Mishra

https://news.abplive.com/blog/russia-attacks-ukraine-invasion-or-collective-self-defence-what-international-law-says-about-putin-action-1515388

It's what the USA did for Kuwait against Iraq in 1991

Ali Farag, Egyptian squash player.

As intended, the pLandemic psyop is morphing into the War psyop at breakneck speed.
All the quicker to make you forget....

Odysee video 7 minutes
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/NEUTRALIZE-THE-LIES:9

We will never forget the lying liars of Covid and their agents of deadly deceit.

People were locked down and forced to wait for a deadly jab of scant benefit to anyone but the corrupt, "doctors" EVIL et al who prostituted ethics for a few dollars more.

-They suppressed viable early treatments in favour of deadly protocols.
-They never mentioned vitamins and healthy lifestyle which is integral to prevention.
-They gave junk food to obese diabetics as incentives to jab.
-They hid the data that showed the vaccines are a failure while claiming 'miracle efficacy'.

Never Forget

Pursue Health....Resist TYRANNY
t.me/FreedomTirade

So it turns out that a video which the BBC sold as China locking up Covid patients in Wuhan was an anti-terrorism drill misrepresented by the BBC. Presumably most of those early videos claiming to be about Covid19 had nothing to do with Covid19, but the BBC and other media claimed they did. Even the Chinese call out the BBC as the laughing stock of the planet when it comes to "news"..
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMLP6fLoF/?k=1

Sept 27, 201: "Military leaders saw pandemic as unique opportunity to test propaganda techniques on Canadians, Forces report says"

"Canadian military leaders saw the pandemic as a unique opportunity to test out propaganda techniques on an unsuspecting public, a newly released Canadian Forces report concludes."

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/military-leaders-saw-pandemic-as-unique-opportunity-to-test-propaganda-techniques-on-canadians-forces-report-says

All-cause excess mortality in the 25-44 aged, is getting worse and worse...
@USMortality

Just appalling. And yes I believe them over the US.

"The Russian Federation to the UN just reported that the United States has been funding gain of function research in Ukraine.

“The United States actively funded the biological projects in Ukraine. Experiments were being conducted to study the spread of dangerous diseases…”

Biological Weapons Convention

"States Parties to the Biological Weapons Convention undertook “never in any circumstances to develop, produce, stockpile or otherwise acquire or retain:

microbial or other biological agents, or toxins whatever their origin or method of production, of types and in quantities that have no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes;

weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict.”

https://www.un.org/disarmament/biological-weapons/

Biological Weapons Convention (BTWC)

Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons (BTWC)

The BTWC mandates the elimination of existing biological weapons and prohibits developing, stockpiling, or using biological and toxin weapons.

"States Parties to the Biological Weapons Convention undertook “never in any circumstances to develop, produce, stockpile or otherwise acquire or retain:

microbial or other biological agents, or toxins whatever their origin or method of production, of types and in quantities that have no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes;

weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict.”

https://www.un.org/disarmament/biological-weapons/

https://youtu.be/el3Gt_zXJIg