Forwarded from Save Our Rights UK
CORONAVIRUS ACT REVIEW TOMORROW
The Coronavirus Act 2020 was passed on 26th March 2020 and is reviewed every 6 months for it’s 2 year duration. It had it’s first review in Sept 2020 and is due it’s second at the end of this month. The feedback from MP’s in September was that while lockdowns were still happening due to another piece of legislation (The Health Regulations 2020) they were unwilling to reject the whole of the Coronavirus Act as it has provisions such as furlough contained within it.
This time we are targeting two specific Schedules and asking for them to be repealed. This is Schedule 12 which has absolved local authorities of their duty of care meaning many vulnerable and disabled people have not been getting the care they need – this has been going on for a year now and people cannot be left to struggle any longer.
Also Schedule 21 which has been used to detain and fine people yet the CPS have found that every single prosecution under this Schedule have been unlawfully applied – if it cannot be understood by the police and used lawfully then it cannot remain.
So please Use Your Voice to write to your MP via saveourrights.uk/use-your-voice and help make a difference
The Coronavirus Act 2020 was passed on 26th March 2020 and is reviewed every 6 months for it’s 2 year duration. It had it’s first review in Sept 2020 and is due it’s second at the end of this month. The feedback from MP’s in September was that while lockdowns were still happening due to another piece of legislation (The Health Regulations 2020) they were unwilling to reject the whole of the Coronavirus Act as it has provisions such as furlough contained within it.
This time we are targeting two specific Schedules and asking for them to be repealed. This is Schedule 12 which has absolved local authorities of their duty of care meaning many vulnerable and disabled people have not been getting the care they need – this has been going on for a year now and people cannot be left to struggle any longer.
Also Schedule 21 which has been used to detain and fine people yet the CPS have found that every single prosecution under this Schedule have been unlawfully applied – if it cannot be understood by the police and used lawfully then it cannot remain.
So please Use Your Voice to write to your MP via saveourrights.uk/use-your-voice and help make a difference
Covid-19: vaccination roll-out correlates with worse mortality trends - InProportion2
In the northern hemisphere, countries that have administered more vaccines per head of population tended to have worse covid-19 trends than other countries when comparing the number of deaths happening in equivalent periods before and after the date of the first vaccination in that country.
https://inproportion2.talkigy.com/vac_correlate_2021-03-22.html
In the northern hemisphere, countries that have administered more vaccines per head of population tended to have worse covid-19 trends than other countries when comparing the number of deaths happening in equivalent periods before and after the date of the first vaccination in that country.
https://inproportion2.talkigy.com/vac_correlate_2021-03-22.html
INDIA: "Vaccination started on 16th January and from around 16th February, India started showing a rise in cases. Now there is a steep rise in deaths too"
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037/rr-20
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037/rr-20
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
We ALL must be part of the pushback.
Too many have seen the deceptions but have been reluctant to voice them.
This has to change.
The risks of speaking up are real, but they’re tiny compared to the risks of NOT speaking up!
Use the power of knowing that very many people aren’t drunk on furlough cash & the vast majority want their old, imperfect, largely chosen lives back.
Three cheers for all of us!
Mike
Too many have seen the deceptions but have been reluctant to voice them.
This has to change.
The risks of speaking up are real, but they’re tiny compared to the risks of NOT speaking up!
Use the power of knowing that very many people aren’t drunk on furlough cash & the vast majority want their old, imperfect, largely chosen lives back.
Three cheers for all of us!
Mike
❤1
UK PROTEST SCHEDULE
SATURDAY: BRADFORD
3RD APRIL: SPEAKERS CORNER
24TH APRIL: CENTRAL LONDON
1ST MAY: LIVERPOOL 1PM
26TH JUNE: TBC.
https://youtu.be/w8KQmps-Sog
SATURDAY: BRADFORD
3RD APRIL: SPEAKERS CORNER
24TH APRIL: CENTRAL LONDON
1ST MAY: LIVERPOOL 1PM
26TH JUNE: TBC.
https://youtu.be/w8KQmps-Sog
With this test, people will be able to tell if they have immunity & therefore do not need vaccination. Demand it from your government.
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Adaptive Biotechnologies T-Detect COVID Test | FDA
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-adaptive-biotechnologies-t-detect-covid-test#:~:text=The%20T%2DDetect%20COVID%20Test%20is%20a%20next%20generation%20sequencing,with%20SARS%2DCoV%2D2
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Adaptive Biotechnologies T-Detect COVID Test | FDA
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-adaptive-biotechnologies-t-detect-covid-test#:~:text=The%20T%2DDetect%20COVID%20Test%20is%20a%20next%20generation%20sequencing,with%20SARS%2DCoV%2D2
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Adaptive Biotechnologies T-Detect COVID Test
FDA issued an EUA for the T-Detect COVID Test developed by Adaptive Biotechnologies to aid in identifying individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Heart attacks and brain strokes have been the two main causes of hospitalisation and death for Covid-19 vaccine recipients, the expert group investigating the serious adverse events after immunisation has found.
https://m.economictimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/heart-attack-and-brain-stroke-main-causes-of-death-after-jab/amp_articleshow/81680805.cms
https://m.economictimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/heart-attack-and-brain-stroke-main-causes-of-death-after-jab/amp_articleshow/81680805.cms
The Economic Times
Heart attack, brain stroke main causes of death after Covid shot
Heart attacks and brain strokes have been the two main causes of hospitalisation and death for Covid-19 vaccine recipients, the expert group investigating the serious adverse events after immunisation has found.
CLOSING MONDAY
COVID-Status Certification Review - Call for evidence - GOV.UK
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence
COVID-Status Certification Review - Call for evidence - GOV.UK
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence/covid-status-certification-review-call-for-evidence
GOV.UK
COVID-Status Certification Review - Call for evidence - now closed
The government is reviewing whether COVID-status certification could play a role in reopening our economy, reducing restrictions on social contact and improving safety.
Forwarded from Y
You can use/adopt a big brother watch letter template https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/campaigns/stopvaccinepassports/
Big Brother Watch
Stop Covid Passes — Big Brother Watch
Defending Civil Liberties, Protecting Privacy
ASTRAZENECA DOESNT WORK
"A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [ASTRAZENECA] vaccine DID NOT show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant [South African Variant]"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2102214
"A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [ASTRAZENECA] vaccine DID NOT show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant [South African Variant]"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2102214
The New England Journal of Medicine
Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant | NEJM
Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation
of the efficacy...
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation
of the efficacy...
"COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
Michael Yeadon 25 Mar 2021 10:43AM
Once an infectious disease is endemic it’s nonsensical to prevent a tiny proportion of people moving from A to B.
The variants narrative is completely fallacious.
I’m immunologically trained & can see gaping holes in the story.
As an illustration, note that the most-different variant is still 99,7% identical to the original sequence.
There’s no way on earth that a 0.3% change will allow a variant to not be recognised by the immune system as the same virus.
It’s as if I put my baseball cap on back to front & expecting not to be recognised as Dr Mike Yeadon.
Worse, once you realise it’s all lies re variants, you surely get a wash of fear?
Why have they all but closed borders?
Why are they making top up vaccines?
Why have global medicines regulators decided no safety studies are required?
What’s happened & happening does not add up.
Once you accept that, you should become sceptical.
There’s risk of being told you’re silly if you ask questions.
But the far bigger risk is NOT questioning things.
No one is going to come & put all this mess right.
Only we can do that & only if enough of us say “I’m not putting up with this nonsense a moment longer”,
Please do that. I can’t communicate how vital it is that you do.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Once an infectious disease is endemic it’s nonsensical to prevent a tiny proportion of people moving from A to B.
The variants narrative is completely fallacious.
I’m immunologically trained & can see gaping holes in the story.
As an illustration, note that the most-different variant is still 99,7% identical to the original sequence.
There’s no way on earth that a 0.3% change will allow a variant to not be recognised by the immune system as the same virus.
It’s as if I put my baseball cap on back to front & expecting not to be recognised as Dr Mike Yeadon.
Worse, once you realise it’s all lies re variants, you surely get a wash of fear?
Why have they all but closed borders?
Why are they making top up vaccines?
Why have global medicines regulators decided no safety studies are required?
What’s happened & happening does not add up.
Once you accept that, you should become sceptical.
There’s risk of being told you’re silly if you ask questions.
But the far bigger risk is NOT questioning things.
No one is going to come & put all this mess right.
Only we can do that & only if enough of us say “I’m not putting up with this nonsense a moment longer”,
Please do that. I can’t communicate how vital it is that you do.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Cc: Posa Beata <Beata.Posa@ema.europa.eu>
Subject: Green Pass Requires Debate, Not Emergency Adoption, COM 2021 130
Date: Thursday, 25 March 2021 09:19
Dear Sirs,
I am an Italian citizen and I am concerned as to the unintended consequences COM 2021130 (Vaccine Certification or Passports system) could have on health and safety, thus breaching Article 191 of the Treaty of Functioning of the European Union, as well the Nurenberg Principle, Code, and Trials (a criminal offence).
As you are aware, currently airlines and other transport carriers forbid boarding to anyone not having a negative PCR (or equivalent) Covid test.
As there exist such practice and precedent, it would be likely that airlines and other transport carriers could use your proposed Vaccine Certification system to restrict boarding thus further preventing EU country nationals from returning to their home country.
The issue is that currently there are NO APPROVED Covid vaccines in any country, as these have only received EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION, insofar the required pre-approval testing are not due to be completed until 2023.
This means that any EU country nationals which would be required to receive a vaccine and show your proposed Vaccine Certificate to return to their home country would be coerced to accept submitting to an experimental vaccine (as alternatively he/she would be prevented to return home, rejoin family, work...).
The Council of Europe has made it clear as per Resolution 2361 (2021) that experimental vaccines are wholly voluntary and not subject to mandates or coercion - as any other way would be a criminal offence and the police may be compelled to intervene!!!
Preventing EU country nationals to return home unless he/she has received an experimental vaccine would be in breach of the EU country nationals inalienable right of freedom of movement and expression and right to bodily integrity and in breach of the Nurenberg Code against human experimentation.
It might be different if such vaccine certificates and restrictions were to be issued after 2023 when the vaccine trials are completed.
Subject: Green Pass Requires Debate, Not Emergency Adoption, COM 2021 130
Date: Thursday, 25 March 2021 09:19
Dear Sirs,
I am an Italian citizen and I am concerned as to the unintended consequences COM 2021130 (Vaccine Certification or Passports system) could have on health and safety, thus breaching Article 191 of the Treaty of Functioning of the European Union, as well the Nurenberg Principle, Code, and Trials (a criminal offence).
As you are aware, currently airlines and other transport carriers forbid boarding to anyone not having a negative PCR (or equivalent) Covid test.
As there exist such practice and precedent, it would be likely that airlines and other transport carriers could use your proposed Vaccine Certification system to restrict boarding thus further preventing EU country nationals from returning to their home country.
The issue is that currently there are NO APPROVED Covid vaccines in any country, as these have only received EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION, insofar the required pre-approval testing are not due to be completed until 2023.
This means that any EU country nationals which would be required to receive a vaccine and show your proposed Vaccine Certificate to return to their home country would be coerced to accept submitting to an experimental vaccine (as alternatively he/she would be prevented to return home, rejoin family, work...).
The Council of Europe has made it clear as per Resolution 2361 (2021) that experimental vaccines are wholly voluntary and not subject to mandates or coercion - as any other way would be a criminal offence and the police may be compelled to intervene!!!
Preventing EU country nationals to return home unless he/she has received an experimental vaccine would be in breach of the EU country nationals inalienable right of freedom of movement and expression and right to bodily integrity and in breach of the Nurenberg Code against human experimentation.
It might be different if such vaccine certificates and restrictions were to be issued after 2023 when the vaccine trials are completed.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
However, you would have to bear in mind that even after 2023 some individuals would have legitimate medical or religious reasons for which they may wish NOT to be injected with some medical products, hence even after 2023 it would be unlawful to restrict EU country nationals to return home and freely travel and exercise their inalienable human rights.
I'd also like to point out as it has some relevance that EMA (copied herewith) have grossly misrepresented to the general public that these experimental vaccines are "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE."
Well educated persons would certainly know and understand that such claim can only be reasonably made at the conclusion of the safety and efficacy studies in 2023, and not whilst those studies are under-way.
Indeed, there are many unknowns in respect of these experimental vaccines.
It appears they have some prophilactic effect, but to date NOBODY has been able to demostrate through serological studies that these experimental vaccines produce immunity.
Any claims by EMA and national governments and its agents that these experimental vaccines can lead to herd immunity are gross misrepresentations of fact until serological studies are published and peer reviewed to demonstrate that these experimental vaccines could provide immunity hence contribute to herd immunity (I have requested from EMA such data under the FOI and EMA has confirmed such data to date does not exist).
Therefore, the only scientific established path to herd immunity to date is by way of naturally acquired immunity and NOT these experimental vaccines.
There would be no benefit at this stage absent serological studies to confirm the contrary to adopt these experimental vaccines in a herd immunity strategy or any other strategy which would restrict inalienable rights of EU country nationals to freely go about their life within or outside the EU.
The above does not represent my views, but is based on the enclosed public data and evidence by renowned scientists, none of which are anti-vaxxers.
Kindly also accept as part of this submission the expert opinion and evidence presented by Prof. Dolores Cahill here:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/must-watch-professor-dolores-cahill-lawyer-dr-reiner-fuellmich_bhiXMUOG4jtoTR4.html
See also as furhter expert opinion and evidence:
https://cormandrostenreview.com/downloads/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=shg0VWkz0VM
For the avoidance of doubt, I am not an anti-vaxxer, never been, never will, and where benefits exceed the risks I am favourable to fully tested and fully approved vaccines, but I am, as you also should be, against coercion into being subjected to experimental vaccines, fear inducing psychological torture, and denial of inalienable rights.
Kindly give due regard to the above and do not implement vaccine certificates/passports as you do already know these would be used to restrict EU nationals inalienable rights including their right to travel and return home to work and rejoin their family with no scientific evidence to date of corresponding benefits to health and herd immunity.
Vaccine passports/certificates would induce and coerce EU nationals to submit themselves to human experimentation this in explicit breach of Nurenberg Principles, Code, Trials, and Resolution 2361 (2021).
For the avoidance of doubt, it would be for you to produce evicence that your proposed vaccine certificates/passports would not be used as a form of coercion into human experimentation in breach of Nurenberg Code, Principles, and UK presided Trials and Resolution 2361 (2021).
Best regards,
Gian A. Ameri, Pz. della Pigna 6, Rome, Italy, 00186
I'd also like to point out as it has some relevance that EMA (copied herewith) have grossly misrepresented to the general public that these experimental vaccines are "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE."
Well educated persons would certainly know and understand that such claim can only be reasonably made at the conclusion of the safety and efficacy studies in 2023, and not whilst those studies are under-way.
Indeed, there are many unknowns in respect of these experimental vaccines.
It appears they have some prophilactic effect, but to date NOBODY has been able to demostrate through serological studies that these experimental vaccines produce immunity.
Any claims by EMA and national governments and its agents that these experimental vaccines can lead to herd immunity are gross misrepresentations of fact until serological studies are published and peer reviewed to demonstrate that these experimental vaccines could provide immunity hence contribute to herd immunity (I have requested from EMA such data under the FOI and EMA has confirmed such data to date does not exist).
Therefore, the only scientific established path to herd immunity to date is by way of naturally acquired immunity and NOT these experimental vaccines.
There would be no benefit at this stage absent serological studies to confirm the contrary to adopt these experimental vaccines in a herd immunity strategy or any other strategy which would restrict inalienable rights of EU country nationals to freely go about their life within or outside the EU.
The above does not represent my views, but is based on the enclosed public data and evidence by renowned scientists, none of which are anti-vaxxers.
Kindly also accept as part of this submission the expert opinion and evidence presented by Prof. Dolores Cahill here:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/must-watch-professor-dolores-cahill-lawyer-dr-reiner-fuellmich_bhiXMUOG4jtoTR4.html
See also as furhter expert opinion and evidence:
https://cormandrostenreview.com/downloads/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=shg0VWkz0VM
For the avoidance of doubt, I am not an anti-vaxxer, never been, never will, and where benefits exceed the risks I am favourable to fully tested and fully approved vaccines, but I am, as you also should be, against coercion into being subjected to experimental vaccines, fear inducing psychological torture, and denial of inalienable rights.
Kindly give due regard to the above and do not implement vaccine certificates/passports as you do already know these would be used to restrict EU nationals inalienable rights including their right to travel and return home to work and rejoin their family with no scientific evidence to date of corresponding benefits to health and herd immunity.
Vaccine passports/certificates would induce and coerce EU nationals to submit themselves to human experimentation this in explicit breach of Nurenberg Principles, Code, Trials, and Resolution 2361 (2021).
For the avoidance of doubt, it would be for you to produce evicence that your proposed vaccine certificates/passports would not be used as a form of coercion into human experimentation in breach of Nurenberg Code, Principles, and UK presided Trials and Resolution 2361 (2021).
Best regards,
Gian A. Ameri, Pz. della Pigna 6, Rome, Italy, 00186
UK PROTEST SCHEDULE
TODAY: BRADFORD
TOMORROW: CHELTENHAM 1pm
3RD APRIL: SPEAKERS CORNER
17TH APRIL: MANCHESTER
24TH APRIL: CENTRAL LONDON
1ST MAY: LIVERPOOL 1PM
29TH MAY: LONDON
26TH JUNE: TBC.
https://youtu.be/w8KQmps-Sog
TODAY: BRADFORD
TOMORROW: CHELTENHAM 1pm
3RD APRIL: SPEAKERS CORNER
17TH APRIL: MANCHESTER
24TH APRIL: CENTRAL LONDON
1ST MAY: LIVERPOOL 1PM
29TH MAY: LONDON
26TH JUNE: TBC.
https://youtu.be/w8KQmps-Sog
Parliament fast-tracks procedure to adopt Digital Green Certificate by June | News | European Parliament
According to the Commission proposal, this could include information on whether a traveller has been vaccinated against COVID-19, a COVID-19 test result, and information on recovery from a COVID-19 infection.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20210323IPR00654/parliament-fast-tracks-procedure-to-adopt-digital-green-certificate-by-june
According to the Commission proposal, this could include information on whether a traveller has been vaccinated against COVID-19, a COVID-19 test result, and information on recovery from a COVID-19 infection.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20210323IPR00654/parliament-fast-tracks-procedure-to-adopt-digital-green-certificate-by-june
European Parliament
Parliament fast-tracks procedure to adopt Digital Green Certificate by June
To facilitate its adoption by the summer, MEPs decided to accelerate the approval of the Digital Green Certificate, allowing for safe and free movement during the pandemic.