How times have changed..
"Golden Lion awarded to Andrei Tarkovski for "Ivan's childhood" (1962)"
https://youtu.be/XrY1LaIvD4M
"Golden Lion awarded to Andrei Tarkovski for "Ivan's childhood" (1962)"
https://youtu.be/XrY1LaIvD4M
YouTube
Golden Lion awarded to Andrei Tarkovski for "Ivan's childhood" (1962)
English subtitles thanks to Raff Goccia who also found this video.
Golden Lion Prize at Venice Film Festival (1962) won by Andrei Tarkovski for "Ivan's Childhood".
____________________________________
Leone d'Oro ad Andrej Tarkovskij per "L' infanzia di…
Golden Lion Prize at Venice Film Festival (1962) won by Andrei Tarkovski for "Ivan's Childhood".
____________________________________
Leone d'Oro ad Andrej Tarkovskij per "L' infanzia di…
Forwarded from Marie 2
Someone is posting messages that, at a glance, appear to come from this channel. Same logo, same names, but on closer inspection Robin and Mike are spelt with some extra characters. They try to draw you into a conversation.
Forwarded from Robert
I am not an „foreign“ outsider with Family Roots from Crimea, Kiew and Ural. With 3/4 of grandparents lost in WWII or the aftermath dislocation, starvation and pandemics, I dived in the horrors of WWII. The Point is: Nazi-ideology was widely supported by national Ukrainian people of Galicia and Wolynia. They murdered by ten thousands: other „untermensch ethnicities“like: JEWS, Russian, Belorussians, Karaim, Poles, Roma, and others which deemed „ERLAUBT“ by their German-Masters of „Sondereinsatz-Gruppen“ of SS. In times of USSR the bigger part of her inhabitants were NOT of Ukrainian Nationality ( even Kossack would never call them Ukranian, because of their FREEDOMS compared to the existence of the Ukrainians as serves under Polish-Lithuanian MAGNATS). The Ukrainian Helpers were notorious of guarding the Concentration Camps and Dead Camps of the German „Masters“. And Ukraine since 1991 has done nothing to DE-Nazify their politics, but worse they HAIL TO BANDERA and his Nazi-Helpers.
Who Was Stepan Bandera?
"On January 22, 2010 Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko honored Stepan Bandera by posthumously bestowing on him the state honor, “Hero of Ukraine.” The Soviet KGB assassinated Bandera, a Ukrainian nationalist-in-exile, in 1959. Many Ukrainians, including Ukrainian émigré groups in Canada, pressed Yushchenko to grant the honor, which, according to one statement, "would restore justice and truth about the Bandera and the...struggle for liberation that he headed." To this day, many Ukrainians view Bandera as a martyred freedom fighter.
As an uncompromising leader of the militant, terrorist branch of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), Bandera became a Nazi collaborator who lived with his deputies under German protection after World War II began. In preparation for the attack on the USSR, the Nazis recruited Bandera’s followers to act as Ukrainian-speaking policemen and to serve in two Ukrainian volunteer army battalions. By working with the Nazis, Bandera hoped to free Ukraine from Soviet rule and establish his own government there. An independent Ukraine, Bandera promised, would remain friendly to Germany.
The Germans intended to keep Ukraine for themselves. They arrested Bandera for his intransigence on the issue of independence, but released him in 1944 when it appeared that his popularity with Ukrainians might help stem the Soviet advance. But whatever their disappointment with the Germans, the Banderists never disagreed with their Jewish policy in Ukraine, which eventually killed over 1.5 million Ukrainian Jews.
This is a truth that many in Ukraine, particularly in its western parts, deny. In his book Erased (2007), Omer Bartov discusses the large bronze statue of Bandera that stands in a park in the east Galician town of Drohobych, most of whose 15,000 Jews were murdered. The park stands on the site of the town’s former Jewish ghetto, but there is not so much as a plaque in the park to memorialize the Jewish dead. This and other examples like it make a condemnation of Yushchenko’s step necessary.
But the rest of the story, much of which is revealed in CIA records released in 2007, reveals irony in Yushchenko’s award. After the war Bandera lived in Munich. British intelligence used him to help run agents into Ukraine to gather intelligence and to help the Ukrainian underground against the Soviets.
It is a sad comment on Ukrainian memory that the man declared a Hero of Ukraine in January headed a movement that was deeply involved in the Holocaust. It is more gratifying to know that by the time of Stepan Bandera’s death, most Ukrainian leaders had long rejected him as a dangerous charlatan who harmed his own cause. By the time of his death, Bandera was reduced to dancing with the Cold War’s most compromised intelligence agency, where the Soviets could watch his every move. Those who label him a hero today, in other words, are as foolish as they are offensive."
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/122778
"On January 22, 2010 Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko honored Stepan Bandera by posthumously bestowing on him the state honor, “Hero of Ukraine.” The Soviet KGB assassinated Bandera, a Ukrainian nationalist-in-exile, in 1959. Many Ukrainians, including Ukrainian émigré groups in Canada, pressed Yushchenko to grant the honor, which, according to one statement, "would restore justice and truth about the Bandera and the...struggle for liberation that he headed." To this day, many Ukrainians view Bandera as a martyred freedom fighter.
As an uncompromising leader of the militant, terrorist branch of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), Bandera became a Nazi collaborator who lived with his deputies under German protection after World War II began. In preparation for the attack on the USSR, the Nazis recruited Bandera’s followers to act as Ukrainian-speaking policemen and to serve in two Ukrainian volunteer army battalions. By working with the Nazis, Bandera hoped to free Ukraine from Soviet rule and establish his own government there. An independent Ukraine, Bandera promised, would remain friendly to Germany.
The Germans intended to keep Ukraine for themselves. They arrested Bandera for his intransigence on the issue of independence, but released him in 1944 when it appeared that his popularity with Ukrainians might help stem the Soviet advance. But whatever their disappointment with the Germans, the Banderists never disagreed with their Jewish policy in Ukraine, which eventually killed over 1.5 million Ukrainian Jews.
This is a truth that many in Ukraine, particularly in its western parts, deny. In his book Erased (2007), Omer Bartov discusses the large bronze statue of Bandera that stands in a park in the east Galician town of Drohobych, most of whose 15,000 Jews were murdered. The park stands on the site of the town’s former Jewish ghetto, but there is not so much as a plaque in the park to memorialize the Jewish dead. This and other examples like it make a condemnation of Yushchenko’s step necessary.
But the rest of the story, much of which is revealed in CIA records released in 2007, reveals irony in Yushchenko’s award. After the war Bandera lived in Munich. British intelligence used him to help run agents into Ukraine to gather intelligence and to help the Ukrainian underground against the Soviets.
It is a sad comment on Ukrainian memory that the man declared a Hero of Ukraine in January headed a movement that was deeply involved in the Holocaust. It is more gratifying to know that by the time of Stepan Bandera’s death, most Ukrainian leaders had long rejected him as a dangerous charlatan who harmed his own cause. By the time of his death, Bandera was reduced to dancing with the Cold War’s most compromised intelligence agency, where the Soviets could watch his every move. Those who label him a hero today, in other words, are as foolish as they are offensive."
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/122778
History News Network
Who Was Stepan Bandera?
On January 22, 2010 Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko honored Stepan Bandera by posthumously bestowing on him the state honor, “Hero of Ukraine.&rdqu
Does this sound familiar?
It's from 1950..
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0016.pdf
Channel: @robinmg
It's from 1950..
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0016.pdf
Channel: @robinmg
Does this sound familiar?
It's from 1951..
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0016.pdf
Channel: @robinmg
It's from 1951..
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0016.pdf
Channel: @robinmg
Nothing to see here, just a declassified 1945 CIA (OSS) document on how the hero of the contemporary Ukrainian political leadership burned Polish villages in this instance killing 50 people.
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0016.pdf
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0016.pdf
Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act revealed a document confirming Bandera, the hero of the post Soviet Ukrainian political leadership as "extreme rightist"
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0083.pdf
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0083.pdf
Bandera, the hero of the post Soviet Ukrainian political leadership, was no democrat..
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0083.pdf
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0083.pdf
In 1945 the US considered helping out in the capture of Bandera to be tried for WW2 War Crimes in the USSR. They opted not to in order to keep in touch with the Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council (UHVR), noting though that there was no doubt this was a terrorist organisation. Here begins the collaboration of the OSS-CIA with Ukrainian terrorist groups.
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0008.pdf
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0008.pdf
Stepan Bandera, "Hero of Ukraine" by Presidential decree in 2010, statues all over West Ukraine, was an anti-Russian and anti-Polish extreme rightist terrorist who believed in dictatorship over democracy, was responsible for burning down entire Polish villages with people inside, documented for having killed at least 50 ethnic Poles in this way.
Already in 1948 this OSS-CIA document released under the "Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act" confirms his ideological position as anti-Russian and anti-Polish.
Anybody who says that the contemporary Ukrainian state is not being formed and directed by the West as a fundamentally ideologically anti-Russian state, and that it has not been formed as such by a number of CIA backed Presidents (Yushenko, Turchinov, Poroshenko, Zelensky) should just look at the status of mythical father of the nation given to Stepan Bandera since Yushenko declared him "Hero of Ukraine" in 2010.
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0010.pdf
Already in 1948 this OSS-CIA document released under the "Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act" confirms his ideological position as anti-Russian and anti-Polish.
Anybody who says that the contemporary Ukrainian state is not being formed and directed by the West as a fundamentally ideologically anti-Russian state, and that it has not been formed as such by a number of CIA backed Presidents (Yushenko, Turchinov, Poroshenko, Zelensky) should just look at the status of mythical father of the nation given to Stepan Bandera since Yushenko declared him "Hero of Ukraine" in 2010.
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/BANDERA%2C%20STEFAN_0010.pdf
UK Government data proves the Covid Vaccination Campaign is a disaster; the Fully Vaccinated now account for 92.2% of all Covid-19 Deaths in England
"Deaths among the vaccinated population in the past 4 weeks are double the number of deaths recorded among the vaccinated population throughout December at the height of the Omicron wave. Whereas deaths among the unvaccinated population have halved"
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/24/uk-gov-data-92-percent-covid-deaths-fully-vaccinated/
"Deaths among the vaccinated population in the past 4 weeks are double the number of deaths recorded among the vaccinated population throughout December at the height of the Omicron wave. Whereas deaths among the unvaccinated population have halved"
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/24/uk-gov-data-92-percent-covid-deaths-fully-vaccinated/
Forwarded from Jerm Warfare Updates
💬 My podcast with Catherine Fitts and Robert Kennedy is now online.
We chatted about Fauci, vaccine fraud, and the dangerous control grid.
https://jermwarfare.com/blog/the-real-anthony-fauci
We chatted about Fauci, vaccine fraud, and the dangerous control grid.
https://jermwarfare.com/blog/the-real-anthony-fauci
The Covid measures which can most obviously be classified as bullshit are those that are utterly scientifically indefensible.
"Hygiene theatre, outdoor social distancing and outdoor masking, curfews, temperature checks, travel quarantines between countries where Covid is endemic, Scotch eggs in pubs … We have long known that none of this works, yet most of it remains in place as active or reserve policies.
It may then seem flippant to speak of the Covid measures as a manifestation of bureaucratic bullshit. Every human society has deep urges towards cruelty and self-destruction, and those of our own have been at play in the Covid response. Still, I believe that the terrain over which this dark river has flowed has, inevitably, been that of our habitual landscape of process-driven, bureaucratic faux-rationality. The Bullshit is the medium, not the message, but, as ever, the two are inseparable.
The Covid Bullshit has not just brought us the maddening annoyances of Zoom meetings, passenger locator forms and nasal swabs. It has ushered in poverty, isolation and social division, death and despair. That these consequences were brought about by soft, well-meaning power makes them no less grave. Rather, the true lesson is just how dangerous soft, well-meaning power can be. Sixty years ago, Hannah Arendt taught us to fear the banality of evil: how totalitarianism could turn extreme violence into an administrative routine. Our culture is defined by an obsessive fear of repeating this scenario, and this helps explain our preference for soft power, and our focus on safety and harm reduction. Much of the Bullshit and even more of the Covid Bullshit is born of these values. However we must now see that to escape in this way from the banality of evil is also to brew an opposite poison: the evil of banality."
https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2022/03/the-bullshit/
"Hygiene theatre, outdoor social distancing and outdoor masking, curfews, temperature checks, travel quarantines between countries where Covid is endemic, Scotch eggs in pubs … We have long known that none of this works, yet most of it remains in place as active or reserve policies.
It may then seem flippant to speak of the Covid measures as a manifestation of bureaucratic bullshit. Every human society has deep urges towards cruelty and self-destruction, and those of our own have been at play in the Covid response. Still, I believe that the terrain over which this dark river has flowed has, inevitably, been that of our habitual landscape of process-driven, bureaucratic faux-rationality. The Bullshit is the medium, not the message, but, as ever, the two are inseparable.
The Covid Bullshit has not just brought us the maddening annoyances of Zoom meetings, passenger locator forms and nasal swabs. It has ushered in poverty, isolation and social division, death and despair. That these consequences were brought about by soft, well-meaning power makes them no less grave. Rather, the true lesson is just how dangerous soft, well-meaning power can be. Sixty years ago, Hannah Arendt taught us to fear the banality of evil: how totalitarianism could turn extreme violence into an administrative routine. Our culture is defined by an obsessive fear of repeating this scenario, and this helps explain our preference for soft power, and our focus on safety and harm reduction. Much of the Bullshit and even more of the Covid Bullshit is born of these values. However we must now see that to escape in this way from the banality of evil is also to brew an opposite poison: the evil of banality."
https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2022/03/the-bullshit/
❤1
Risk from vaccine was unknown, but pregnant women were still told to get the jab
By
Kathy Gyngell
-
"NEWLY-RELEASED documents from pharmaceutical giant Pfizer and the watchdog US Food and Drug Administration contradict the official Covid vaccine safety narrative.
Legal documents exist that lay out precisely what the evidence showed when the decision was made to issue an Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
‘It may come as a shock,’ writes vaccine expert Dr Meryl Nass on the children’s health website The Defender, ‘but what the FDA said when it issued both the EUA and the licence for Pfizer’s vaccines was very different from what you heard from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the media and other sources.’
Just one example she gives from the documents is that they state that the information available was inadequate to determine the risk in pregnancy – confirming everything TCW and others have written about this over the last year.
It calls into question once again the huge pressure to get jabs which was put on pregnant women by health authorities and individual doctors and health professionals here in the UK.
The gap between the original risk assessments and the zeal with which US federal government and our own government took up the vaccine cause perhaps explains their studied denial of vaccine damage.
It certainly raises the question of what Johnson and the then Health Secretary Matt Hancock knew or sought to find out prior to committing to their huge vaccine pre-orders. Were they knowingly prepared to use the British public as a mass experimental gene therapy trial?"
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/risk-from-vaccine-was-unknown-but-pregnant-women-were-still-told-to-get-the-jab/
By
Kathy Gyngell
-
"NEWLY-RELEASED documents from pharmaceutical giant Pfizer and the watchdog US Food and Drug Administration contradict the official Covid vaccine safety narrative.
Legal documents exist that lay out precisely what the evidence showed when the decision was made to issue an Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
‘It may come as a shock,’ writes vaccine expert Dr Meryl Nass on the children’s health website The Defender, ‘but what the FDA said when it issued both the EUA and the licence for Pfizer’s vaccines was very different from what you heard from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the media and other sources.’
Just one example she gives from the documents is that they state that the information available was inadequate to determine the risk in pregnancy – confirming everything TCW and others have written about this over the last year.
It calls into question once again the huge pressure to get jabs which was put on pregnant women by health authorities and individual doctors and health professionals here in the UK.
The gap between the original risk assessments and the zeal with which US federal government and our own government took up the vaccine cause perhaps explains their studied denial of vaccine damage.
It certainly raises the question of what Johnson and the then Health Secretary Matt Hancock knew or sought to find out prior to committing to their huge vaccine pre-orders. Were they knowingly prepared to use the British public as a mass experimental gene therapy trial?"
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/risk-from-vaccine-was-unknown-but-pregnant-women-were-still-told-to-get-the-jab/
The Conservative Woman
Risk from vaccine was unknown, but pregnant women were still told to get the jab - The Conservative Woman
Covid has made us forget how democracy works
"It is time for democratic and constitutional reform and the restitution of rights of medical choice. Instead our government has gazetted new laws to restrict the availability of traditional natural products and remedies. The puppet masters are still pulling the strings."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-has-made-us-forget-how-democracy-works/
"It is time for democratic and constitutional reform and the restitution of rights of medical choice. Instead our government has gazetted new laws to restrict the availability of traditional natural products and remedies. The puppet masters are still pulling the strings."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-has-made-us-forget-how-democracy-works/
The Conservative Woman
Covid has made us forget how democracy works - The Conservative Woman
👍1
Debunked, the great renewables delusion
"ONE of the great lines of the proponents of renewable power is that the input energy (mostly wind and solar) is free, therefore producing renewable energy is less expensive that from fossil fuels. Even though wind isn’t always available and therefore needs some back-up power – usually gas fired – the more wind generation there is the less gas will be needed and therefore the cheaper energy will be.
There’s just one problem: that’s not what the evidence shows. The reality is that there is a close correlation between the amount of wind generation and the increasing price of electricity. More renewables makes electricity more expensive.
There are the subsidies hidden in the Climate Change Levy. The subsidy regime for electricity generation is almost impenetrably complex. (The theory behind them was to encourage investors to take the risks of new technologies by guaranteeing that they would make a profit. Wind and solar are hardly new any more – but that’s an argument for another day). Fortunately the subsidy regime has been unpicked by the Renewable Energy Foundation who have produced the chart below. The subsidy rate for electricity is increasing, even though the technology is mature. The risks have decreased but the rewards remain. Who pays? You do.
Many of the subsidies being paid are index-linked to inflation. So if inflation goes up the subsidies go up, driving the price of electricity up and causing more inflation. It’s called an inflationary spiral. You know who pays, don’t you?
This deranged and deluded system needs to be put on hold. No new renewable subsidy agreements should be entered into and the Prime Minister and his minions (we pay for them too) must explain how they propose to deliver the energy that the country needs at a price it can afford."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/debunked-the-great-renewables-delusion/
"ONE of the great lines of the proponents of renewable power is that the input energy (mostly wind and solar) is free, therefore producing renewable energy is less expensive that from fossil fuels. Even though wind isn’t always available and therefore needs some back-up power – usually gas fired – the more wind generation there is the less gas will be needed and therefore the cheaper energy will be.
There’s just one problem: that’s not what the evidence shows. The reality is that there is a close correlation between the amount of wind generation and the increasing price of electricity. More renewables makes electricity more expensive.
There are the subsidies hidden in the Climate Change Levy. The subsidy regime for electricity generation is almost impenetrably complex. (The theory behind them was to encourage investors to take the risks of new technologies by guaranteeing that they would make a profit. Wind and solar are hardly new any more – but that’s an argument for another day). Fortunately the subsidy regime has been unpicked by the Renewable Energy Foundation who have produced the chart below. The subsidy rate for electricity is increasing, even though the technology is mature. The risks have decreased but the rewards remain. Who pays? You do.
Many of the subsidies being paid are index-linked to inflation. So if inflation goes up the subsidies go up, driving the price of electricity up and causing more inflation. It’s called an inflationary spiral. You know who pays, don’t you?
This deranged and deluded system needs to be put on hold. No new renewable subsidy agreements should be entered into and the Prime Minister and his minions (we pay for them too) must explain how they propose to deliver the energy that the country needs at a price it can afford."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/debunked-the-great-renewables-delusion/
The Conservative Woman
Debunked, the great renewables delusion - The Conservative Woman
👍1
NG163.pdf
249.5 KB
The now deleted Midazolam protocol document used and authorised by NICE / NHS against expert advice