Exclusive: Chemical cocktail found in face masks | Dyes & Chemicals News | News
"Professor Michael Braungart, director at the Hamburg Environmental Institute and co-founder of the world-renowned Cradle to Cradle environmental standard has told Ecotextile News that mask wearers unwittingly run the risk of breathing in carcinogens, allergens and tiny synthetic microfibres by wearing both textile and nonwoven surgical masks for long periods of time.
His recent findings have been backed up by another leading industry textile chemist Dr. Dieter Sedlak, managing director and co-founder of Modern Testing Services Augsburg, Germany in partnership with Modern Testing Services Global, Hong Kong who found elevated concentrations of hazardous fluorocarbons, formaldehyde and other potentially carcinogenic substances on surgical face masks: “I can only say 100 per cent that I have similar concerns to Prof. Braungart.”
https://www.ecotextile.com/2021040127603/dyes-chemicals-news/exclusive-chemical-cocktail-found-in-face-masks.html
"Professor Michael Braungart, director at the Hamburg Environmental Institute and co-founder of the world-renowned Cradle to Cradle environmental standard has told Ecotextile News that mask wearers unwittingly run the risk of breathing in carcinogens, allergens and tiny synthetic microfibres by wearing both textile and nonwoven surgical masks for long periods of time.
His recent findings have been backed up by another leading industry textile chemist Dr. Dieter Sedlak, managing director and co-founder of Modern Testing Services Augsburg, Germany in partnership with Modern Testing Services Global, Hong Kong who found elevated concentrations of hazardous fluorocarbons, formaldehyde and other potentially carcinogenic substances on surgical face masks: “I can only say 100 per cent that I have similar concerns to Prof. Braungart.”
https://www.ecotextile.com/2021040127603/dyes-chemicals-news/exclusive-chemical-cocktail-found-in-face-masks.html
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
“In this narrative review I explain why I changed my mind about supporting lockdowns. The initial modeling predictions induced fear and crowd-effects (i.e., groupthink). Over time, important information emerged relevant to the modeling, including the lower infection fatality rate (median 0.23%), clarification of high-risk groups (specifically, those 70 years of age and older), lower herd immunity thresholds (likely 20–40% population immunity), and the difficult exit strategies. In addition, information emerged on significant collateral damage due to the response to the pandemic, adversely affecting many millions of people with poverty, food insecurity, loneliness, unemployment, school closures, and interrupted healthcare. Raw numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths were difficult to interpret, and may be tempered by information placing the number of COVID-19 deaths in proper context and perspective relative to background rates. Considering this information, a cost-benefit analysis of the response to COVID-19 finds that lockdowns are far more harmful to public health (at least 5–10 times so in terms of wellbeing years) than COVID-19 can be.”
"The human virome
We live in a “sea” of viruses known as the human virome (Lecuit and Eloit, 2013). Viruses are integral to life itself; they are nature's way of ensuring “survival of the fittest”. They constantly probe the immune system defenses of the body. If the immune system is healthy, the viruses are neutralized. If the immune system is degraded/dysfunctional, pathogenic viruses can invade the cells, replicate, and trigger a chain of events leading to clinically manifested infectious disease.
Wylie et al., (2014) analyzed DNA viruses from up to five significant body habitats (nose, skin, mouth, vagina, and stool) of 102 subjects (generally healthy adults; not symptomatic for acute infections; not diagnosed with HPV infection within the last two years; females had not had any active genital herpes infection within the last two months). They detected an average of 5.5 viral genera in each individual. These included herpesviruses, papillomaviruses, polyomaviruses, adenoviruses, anelloviruses, parvoviruses, and circoviruses.
In a later study, Wylie (2017) identified common viruses detected in the respiratory tract virome, including picornaviruses, paramyxoviruses, orthomyxoviruses, coronaviruses, adenoviruses, parvoviruses, herpesviruses, anelloviruses, papillomaviruses, and polyomaviruses. Thus, the viral distribution of the above experiments depended largely on the body sampling site.
2. Beneficial versus pathogenic effects of viruses
Viruses are parasites of host organisms, and produce beneficial or pathogenic effects. The latter include infectious diseases to humans, animals, and other living organisms. Emerging evidence suggests that some viruses could have beneficial effects, including host protection against second virus, protection against non-infectious diseases by childhood virus infection, regulation of gut microbiota, and host protection by endogenous retroviruses (Watanabe and Kawaoka, 2020).
There is a large diversity of viruses; currently, approximately 263 viruses from 25 viral families can infect humans. Most emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic, caused by viruses that originate in wild animals (e.g., primates, rodents and bats). The PREDICT program (https://ohi.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/programs-projects/predict-project) has identified over 1100 viruses in animals and humans. According to the Global Virome Project (http://www.globalviromeproject.org), ~1.67 million yet-to-be-discovered viral species from key zoonotic viral families may exist in mammal and avian hosts, with 631,000–827,000 of them having zoonotic potential (Watanabe and Kawaoka, 2020).
The mammalian virome includes diverse commensal and pathogenic viruses that evoke a broad range of immune responses from the host. A subset of the virome (in particular, zoonotic viruses that appear to be pathogenic in humans) challenges the immune system continually. This process appears to be a dual-edged sword. Healthy immune systems respond optimally to viral challenges and are further strengthened by the continual challenges, offering additional protection against other viral challenges. Degraded/dysfunctional immune systems over-respond or under-respond to viral challenges, and are thus unable to prevent the occurrence of a life-threatening clinical course."
The under-reported role of toxic substance exposures in the COVID-19 pandemic
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426727/
We live in a “sea” of viruses known as the human virome (Lecuit and Eloit, 2013). Viruses are integral to life itself; they are nature's way of ensuring “survival of the fittest”. They constantly probe the immune system defenses of the body. If the immune system is healthy, the viruses are neutralized. If the immune system is degraded/dysfunctional, pathogenic viruses can invade the cells, replicate, and trigger a chain of events leading to clinically manifested infectious disease.
Wylie et al., (2014) analyzed DNA viruses from up to five significant body habitats (nose, skin, mouth, vagina, and stool) of 102 subjects (generally healthy adults; not symptomatic for acute infections; not diagnosed with HPV infection within the last two years; females had not had any active genital herpes infection within the last two months). They detected an average of 5.5 viral genera in each individual. These included herpesviruses, papillomaviruses, polyomaviruses, adenoviruses, anelloviruses, parvoviruses, and circoviruses.
In a later study, Wylie (2017) identified common viruses detected in the respiratory tract virome, including picornaviruses, paramyxoviruses, orthomyxoviruses, coronaviruses, adenoviruses, parvoviruses, herpesviruses, anelloviruses, papillomaviruses, and polyomaviruses. Thus, the viral distribution of the above experiments depended largely on the body sampling site.
2. Beneficial versus pathogenic effects of viruses
Viruses are parasites of host organisms, and produce beneficial or pathogenic effects. The latter include infectious diseases to humans, animals, and other living organisms. Emerging evidence suggests that some viruses could have beneficial effects, including host protection against second virus, protection against non-infectious diseases by childhood virus infection, regulation of gut microbiota, and host protection by endogenous retroviruses (Watanabe and Kawaoka, 2020).
There is a large diversity of viruses; currently, approximately 263 viruses from 25 viral families can infect humans. Most emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic, caused by viruses that originate in wild animals (e.g., primates, rodents and bats). The PREDICT program (https://ohi.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/programs-projects/predict-project) has identified over 1100 viruses in animals and humans. According to the Global Virome Project (http://www.globalviromeproject.org), ~1.67 million yet-to-be-discovered viral species from key zoonotic viral families may exist in mammal and avian hosts, with 631,000–827,000 of them having zoonotic potential (Watanabe and Kawaoka, 2020).
The mammalian virome includes diverse commensal and pathogenic viruses that evoke a broad range of immune responses from the host. A subset of the virome (in particular, zoonotic viruses that appear to be pathogenic in humans) challenges the immune system continually. This process appears to be a dual-edged sword. Healthy immune systems respond optimally to viral challenges and are further strengthened by the continual challenges, offering additional protection against other viral challenges. Degraded/dysfunctional immune systems over-respond or under-respond to viral challenges, and are thus unable to prevent the occurrence of a life-threatening clinical course."
The under-reported role of toxic substance exposures in the COVID-19 pandemic
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426727/
School of Veterinary Medicine
PREDICT
PREDICT PREDICT, a project of USAID’s Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) program, was initiated in 2009 to strengthen global capacity for detection of viruses with pandemic potential that can move between animals and people.
"Conclusions
The underlying causes of the present pandemic have been both misrepresented and camouflaged. Causes that are mainly toxicology-based have been ignored relative to virology-based causes. This has resulted in treatments and ‘protective’ measures that address virology issues to the exclusion of toxicology issues, are of questionable effectiveness, and do little (if anything) to prevent future pandemics. They have produced disastrous effects on the global economy that have worsened social and economic conditions of many people and contributed to a deterioration of their physical and mental health. To correct this situation, and offer intrinsic protection against future pandemics, both tactical/reactive responses to survive the immediate threat and strategic/proactive responses to prevent the problem and damage from re-occurring are required."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426727/
The underlying causes of the present pandemic have been both misrepresented and camouflaged. Causes that are mainly toxicology-based have been ignored relative to virology-based causes. This has resulted in treatments and ‘protective’ measures that address virology issues to the exclusion of toxicology issues, are of questionable effectiveness, and do little (if anything) to prevent future pandemics. They have produced disastrous effects on the global economy that have worsened social and economic conditions of many people and contributed to a deterioration of their physical and mental health. To correct this situation, and offer intrinsic protection against future pandemics, both tactical/reactive responses to survive the immediate threat and strategic/proactive responses to prevent the problem and damage from re-occurring are required."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426727/
PubMed Central (PMC)
The under-reported role of toxic substance exposures in the COVID-19 pandemic
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and previous pandemics have been viewed almost exclusively as virology problems, with toxicology problems mostly being ignored. This perspective is not supported by the evolution of COVID-19, where the impact of real-life…
The idea that sickness causing coronaviruses are "caught" from other people rather than harboured by healthy individuals during the winter months, and only becoming the cause of infection with a weakened immune system or low vitamin D levels, is scientifically illiterate. Coronaviruses [now including SARSCoV2 as it's an endemic virus] are part of the detectable human virome during winter months: "The Virome of the [Normal and Healthy] Human Respiratory Tract: "In another study, sputum was collected from 46 adult patients and viruses were screened using PCR assays. In this study, rhinoviruses and coronaviruses were the most common viruses"
"Viruses with the potential for pathogenicity are detected in both symptomatic and asymptomatic people." - the difference being the immune system, not the virus.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115714/
Now add PCR testing "for SARSCoV2 and what do you get? PCR testing: "The potential for cross reactivity [with other coronaviruses] has already been confirmed by the German Instand laboratory report..significant cross reactivity and resultant false positives for OC43, and HCoV 229E (a common cold virus)"
https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n208/rr-3
"Viruses with the potential for pathogenicity are detected in both symptomatic and asymptomatic people." - the difference being the immune system, not the virus.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115714/
Now add PCR testing "for SARSCoV2 and what do you get? PCR testing: "The potential for cross reactivity [with other coronaviruses] has already been confirmed by the German Instand laboratory report..significant cross reactivity and resultant false positives for OC43, and HCoV 229E (a common cold virus)"
https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n208/rr-3
PubMed Central (PMC)
The Virome of the Human Respiratory Tract
The human respiratory tract virome is defined here as the viruses present in the human respiratory tract that can infect human cells. Sensitive, culture-independent molecular assays (polymerase chain reaction and high-throughput sequencing) reveal that ...
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
The criminals behind the scenes want you to believe that they are all-powerful & that resistance is useless.
Neither are true.
In any case, there is no peace, safety or redemption in following their ridiculous orders.
At very least, make things difficult. Withdraw your grudging cooperation.
WE DO NOT CONSENT to this reordering of our lives & our society.
Just a small percentage of resistors is a very great multiple of the criminals behind the scenes.
They are not smarter than you are. They have no justice behind their plans. They do not have the determination we have not to capitulate.
Neither are true.
In any case, there is no peace, safety or redemption in following their ridiculous orders.
At very least, make things difficult. Withdraw your grudging cooperation.
WE DO NOT CONSENT to this reordering of our lives & our society.
Just a small percentage of resistors is a very great multiple of the criminals behind the scenes.
They are not smarter than you are. They have no justice behind their plans. They do not have the determination we have not to capitulate.
❤1
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
https://t.me/hscreativeworks/44
INTERVIEW- Reiner Fuellmich, April 2 2021.
Really worth 20min of your time, and please SHARE.
English subtitles, courtesy of Howard Steen - thank you, Reiner & Howard! 😊
INTERVIEW- Reiner Fuellmich, April 2 2021.
Really worth 20min of your time, and please SHARE.
English subtitles, courtesy of Howard Steen - thank you, Reiner & Howard! 😊
Telegram
HrsImages
Shocking revelations cocerning business destruction in Germany due to lockdown measures in this Reiner Füllmich interview on MMnewsTV on April 1 2021. German with english subtitles.
Forwarded from Oskar
This "vaccine" is definitely way more dangerous than previous ones. Maybe not 1000x as dangerous, but dangerous enough to worry.
"From December 14, 2020 through March 22, 2021, the US VAERS database has received 2,216 reports of death among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. This was from 126 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered in that time.
During the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 US flu seasons, an estimated 165 million people in the US received the influenza vaccines during each of those seasons. Yet the total number of deaths reported for the multitude of influenza vaccines during each of those seasons was only 22 and 17, respectively.
So despite a lower number of recipients and a far shorter reporting time frame, the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines have already triggered up to a 101-fold greater volume of death reports than regular influenza vaccines!"
Source: https://anthonycolpo.com/yet-more-proof-the-covid-19-vaccines-have-not-been-thoroughly-tested-nor-proven-safe-and-effective/
"From December 14, 2020 through March 22, 2021, the US VAERS database has received 2,216 reports of death among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. This was from 126 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered in that time.
During the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 US flu seasons, an estimated 165 million people in the US received the influenza vaccines during each of those seasons. Yet the total number of deaths reported for the multitude of influenza vaccines during each of those seasons was only 22 and 17, respectively.
So despite a lower number of recipients and a far shorter reporting time frame, the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines have already triggered up to a 101-fold greater volume of death reports than regular influenza vaccines!"
Source: https://anthonycolpo.com/yet-more-proof-the-covid-19-vaccines-have-not-been-thoroughly-tested-nor-proven-safe-and-effective/
Anthonycolpo
Proof the COVID-19 Vaccines Have NOT Been Thoroughly Tested NOR Proven Safe and Effective
This morning, I received the following email from a kind reader in Slovenia (I've partially edited it for brevity):
Hi Anthony,
first of all thanks once again for writing such amazing articles on the Covid issue.
Here in Slovenia there was recently…
Hi Anthony,
first of all thanks once again for writing such amazing articles on the Covid issue.
Here in Slovenia there was recently…
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Hello everyone,
Bluntly, we cannot rely on anything we’re told. I don’t believe the gene based vaccines are anything like as effective as is claimed.
They are however many times more dangerous than they’re admitting to. Thousands, possibly tens of thousands, have died within two weeks of vaccination.
The most important thing you can do is not to get vaccinated for non medical reasons.
AND please, assume responsibility today & every day to try to persuade others NOT TO GET VACCINATED FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS.
Literally nothing is more urgent or important right now than this narrow objective.
If the criminals succeed in getting the “Vaccine passports database” up & running and with the vast majority of the population on it, it’s the end.
But despite their claims, they are a very long way from that. They can not tolerate even 10% of the population resisting vaccination. That’s over six million people. Way too many for the criminals to accept being outside the system. There will be anger, then rage.
Please retain faith that the criminals most powerful weapon is their interference with your own mind & what they want you to believe is that they have everything under control & that resistance is useless.
Neither are true. Keep the faith.
Best wishes & thank you,
Mike
Bluntly, we cannot rely on anything we’re told. I don’t believe the gene based vaccines are anything like as effective as is claimed.
They are however many times more dangerous than they’re admitting to. Thousands, possibly tens of thousands, have died within two weeks of vaccination.
The most important thing you can do is not to get vaccinated for non medical reasons.
AND please, assume responsibility today & every day to try to persuade others NOT TO GET VACCINATED FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS.
Literally nothing is more urgent or important right now than this narrow objective.
If the criminals succeed in getting the “Vaccine passports database” up & running and with the vast majority of the population on it, it’s the end.
But despite their claims, they are a very long way from that. They can not tolerate even 10% of the population resisting vaccination. That’s over six million people. Way too many for the criminals to accept being outside the system. There will be anger, then rage.
Please retain faith that the criminals most powerful weapon is their interference with your own mind & what they want you to believe is that they have everything under control & that resistance is useless.
Neither are true. Keep the faith.
Best wishes & thank you,
Mike
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
I hadn’t seen that. It’s a complete LIE.
None of the gene based vaccines are even close to completing their conventional Phase 3 clinical trials.
In any case, all of these vaccines are way too dangerous to deploy as a typical public health prophylactic intervention.
When administering something to a sizeable fraction of the population, the first priority is DO NO HARM.
Most people being vaccinated right now are at lower risk from Covid19 than they are from seasonal influenza.
If then didn’t think they were at enough risk from flu to try to reduce that risk through a flu vaccination, it’s completely illogical to get vaccinated against Covid19.
These new technology gene based vaccines are perhaps 1000 times too unsafe to use they way they’re not being deployed: in healthy, younger people at no measurable risk from this virus, yet a small but completely UNACCEPTABLE fraction of them will develop side effects & die.
This is definitely in the crimes against humanity category. They absolutely know about the risk of thromboembolic events & that it’s not only the AZ product which carries this risk.
That’s why we are in dialogue with EMA & have informed the CEO, Emer Cooke & other senior office holders in the Agency that they may face indictments in Nuremberg 2.0 personally for crimes against humanity.
Best wishes
Mike
None of the gene based vaccines are even close to completing their conventional Phase 3 clinical trials.
In any case, all of these vaccines are way too dangerous to deploy as a typical public health prophylactic intervention.
When administering something to a sizeable fraction of the population, the first priority is DO NO HARM.
Most people being vaccinated right now are at lower risk from Covid19 than they are from seasonal influenza.
If then didn’t think they were at enough risk from flu to try to reduce that risk through a flu vaccination, it’s completely illogical to get vaccinated against Covid19.
These new technology gene based vaccines are perhaps 1000 times too unsafe to use they way they’re not being deployed: in healthy, younger people at no measurable risk from this virus, yet a small but completely UNACCEPTABLE fraction of them will develop side effects & die.
This is definitely in the crimes against humanity category. They absolutely know about the risk of thromboembolic events & that it’s not only the AZ product which carries this risk.
That’s why we are in dialogue with EMA & have informed the CEO, Emer Cooke & other senior office holders in the Agency that they may face indictments in Nuremberg 2.0 personally for crimes against humanity.
Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Please read this. Prof Cahill is right to tell you that it’s just the criminals who’re telling you “taking the vaccine will give you your life back”.
All that’s necessary for that is to be told the truth. After a year of solid lies, that’s not easy.
But if any of you have caught any of the government or it’s advisors telling you things which make no sense or are actually untrue, assume that EVERYTHING they’ve told you is untrue.
The single most important thing to do is not to get vaccinated for non medical reasons.
Persuade others not to get vaccinated for non medical reasons.
CAHILL on Covid19 gene based vaccines:
Very powerful opinion piece from someone in the know:
Professor Dolores Cahill professor in immunology & vaccines:
The people say. "I've had my vaccine and I feel fine."
This is the uneducated and ignorant defence from anyone that has taken the vaccine and uses it as proof that the vaccine works, when confronting anyone who questions it. If that's your defence, then you haven't listened to a single word anyone has said, including science itself.
It's an mRNA vaccine. Innovative medicine. Completely untested. Unlike any other vaccine. In fact, it steps out of medicine and firmly into genetics. Let me explain.
What is RNA? RNA is Ribonucleic Acid. And if you actually went to school, you will have heard of DNA. This is deoxyribonucleic Acid. And if you know anything about DNA, it contains the genetic makeup of any organism.
Both are very similar, yet have their differences also. But, more importantly, lets talk about their functions.
DNA replicates and stores genetic information. It is a blueprint for all genetic information contained within an organism. RNA converts the genetic information contained within DNA to a format used to build proteins, and then moves it to ribosomal protein factories.
The mRNA vaccine is a synthetic "messenger" RNA strand, that converts genetic information within DNA.
Now, they've told you that they do this to produce proteins to in order to strengthen the immune system to fight the Covid virus, but if you really look at the bigger picture here, it might leave you quite numb to understand the potential reality of the situation.
If you have had the vaccine, rest assured that your DNA is now changing. Do you have any idea of the implications of that? Your genetic makeup is mutating.
You are being put under extreme pressure to take a substance that changes your genetic makeup, all because of a virus that has no more than a 0.03% fatality rate. A virus that is parallel with the flu (which has mysteriously vanished since the arrival of Covid.) Not to mention that the FDA have not approved this as a legitimate vaccine as yet, but have only approved for emergency use.
This means that it's being tested on you! Most "vaccine" companies don't even refer to this as a vaccine, but as an "operating system." I'll assume that Mr Gates likes to call it this!
If you are ignorant enough to tell me that I am selfish enough to want my DNA to remain intact, at the risk of somebody's life, who already has underlying conditions and probably would have died from the flu or any other ailment, due to they're own failing immune system, then you are completely insane.
I see people stating that "if it's the only way to get back to normal, then I'm having it." I'm just gobsmacked.
These people are more than prepared to risk change of the very fabric of what "life" is, just so they can get their "life" back?
If you think I'm talking rubbish then more fool you.
Go and have the vaccine. Hopefully, you wont have to regret your decision, should the time come.
This information is readily available for you to read. If you are ignorant enough to roll up your sleeves with your eyes completely shut, then maybe you have no idea on what the meaning of "life" actually is, and you're chasing a complete fantasy.
You think its about saving lives.
You think its as clear cut as "life or death." It's not. It's not dying from a vaccine that I'm scared of. It's living with it's potential long term effects.
All that’s necessary for that is to be told the truth. After a year of solid lies, that’s not easy.
But if any of you have caught any of the government or it’s advisors telling you things which make no sense or are actually untrue, assume that EVERYTHING they’ve told you is untrue.
The single most important thing to do is not to get vaccinated for non medical reasons.
Persuade others not to get vaccinated for non medical reasons.
CAHILL on Covid19 gene based vaccines:
Very powerful opinion piece from someone in the know:
Professor Dolores Cahill professor in immunology & vaccines:
The people say. "I've had my vaccine and I feel fine."
This is the uneducated and ignorant defence from anyone that has taken the vaccine and uses it as proof that the vaccine works, when confronting anyone who questions it. If that's your defence, then you haven't listened to a single word anyone has said, including science itself.
It's an mRNA vaccine. Innovative medicine. Completely untested. Unlike any other vaccine. In fact, it steps out of medicine and firmly into genetics. Let me explain.
What is RNA? RNA is Ribonucleic Acid. And if you actually went to school, you will have heard of DNA. This is deoxyribonucleic Acid. And if you know anything about DNA, it contains the genetic makeup of any organism.
Both are very similar, yet have their differences also. But, more importantly, lets talk about their functions.
DNA replicates and stores genetic information. It is a blueprint for all genetic information contained within an organism. RNA converts the genetic information contained within DNA to a format used to build proteins, and then moves it to ribosomal protein factories.
The mRNA vaccine is a synthetic "messenger" RNA strand, that converts genetic information within DNA.
Now, they've told you that they do this to produce proteins to in order to strengthen the immune system to fight the Covid virus, but if you really look at the bigger picture here, it might leave you quite numb to understand the potential reality of the situation.
If you have had the vaccine, rest assured that your DNA is now changing. Do you have any idea of the implications of that? Your genetic makeup is mutating.
You are being put under extreme pressure to take a substance that changes your genetic makeup, all because of a virus that has no more than a 0.03% fatality rate. A virus that is parallel with the flu (which has mysteriously vanished since the arrival of Covid.) Not to mention that the FDA have not approved this as a legitimate vaccine as yet, but have only approved for emergency use.
This means that it's being tested on you! Most "vaccine" companies don't even refer to this as a vaccine, but as an "operating system." I'll assume that Mr Gates likes to call it this!
If you are ignorant enough to tell me that I am selfish enough to want my DNA to remain intact, at the risk of somebody's life, who already has underlying conditions and probably would have died from the flu or any other ailment, due to they're own failing immune system, then you are completely insane.
I see people stating that "if it's the only way to get back to normal, then I'm having it." I'm just gobsmacked.
These people are more than prepared to risk change of the very fabric of what "life" is, just so they can get their "life" back?
If you think I'm talking rubbish then more fool you.
Go and have the vaccine. Hopefully, you wont have to regret your decision, should the time come.
This information is readily available for you to read. If you are ignorant enough to roll up your sleeves with your eyes completely shut, then maybe you have no idea on what the meaning of "life" actually is, and you're chasing a complete fantasy.
You think its about saving lives.
You think its as clear cut as "life or death." It's not. It's not dying from a vaccine that I'm scared of. It's living with it's potential long term effects.
👍1
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
As opposed to the 99.97% survival rate that will see the back of the effects of Covid in about a week.
So you took the vaccine and didn't die. Wonderful news.
I didn't take the vaccine and I didn't die either!
Lets pick this back up in several years, when I'm still human...God knows what you are.
Think people before you get the jab. Research please.
So you took the vaccine and didn't die. Wonderful news.
I didn't take the vaccine and I didn't die either!
Lets pick this back up in several years, when I'm still human...God knows what you are.
Think people before you get the jab. Research please.
UK UPDATE ON APARTHEID VAZI PASSES
Full list of people signing the pledge against vaccine passports
Conservative Party
Mark Harper MP
Steve Baker MP
Sir Iain Duncan Smith MP
Harriett Baldwin MP
Esther McVey MP
Adam Afriyie MP
Bob Blackman MP
Sir Graham Brady MP
Nus Ghani MP
Andrew Mitchell MP
Peter Bone MP
Ben Bradley MP
Andrew Bridgen MP
Paul Bristow MP
Philip Davies MP
Richard Drax MP
Jonathan Djanogly MP
Chris Green MP
Philip Hollobone MP
Adam Holloway MP
David Jones MP
Simon Jupp MP
Andrew Lewer MBE MP
Julian Lewis MP
Karl McCartney MP
Craig Mackinlay MP
Anthony Mangnall MP
Stephen McPartland MP
Anne Marie Morris MP
Sir John Redwood MP
Andrew Rosindell MP
Greg Smith MP
Henry Smith MP
Julian Sturdy MP
Sir Desmond Swayne MP
Sir Robert Syms MP
Craig Tracey MP
Jamie Wallis MP
David Warburton MP
William Wragg MP
Sir Charles Walker MP
Labour Party
Diane Abbot MP
Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP
Tahir Ali MP
Rebecca Long Bailey MP
Clive Lewis MP
Beth Winter MP
Rachel Hopkins MP
Apsana Begum MP
Richard Burgon MP
Ian Byrne MP
Dawn Butler MP
Jeremy Corbyn MP
Mary Kelly Foy MP
Ian Lavery MP
Ian Mearns MP
John McDonnell MP
Grahame Morris MP
Kate Osborne MP
Zarah Sultana MP
Claudia Webbe MP
Mick Whitley MP
Nadia Whittome MP
Baroness Chakrabarti
Baroness Bryan of Partick
Lord Woodley
Lord Sikka
Lord Hendy
Liberal Democrats
Ed Davey MP
Layla Moran MP
Munira Wilson MP
Alistair Carmichael MP
Daisy Cooper MP
Wendy Chamberlain MP
Sarah Olney MP
Christine Jardine MP
Jamie Stone MP
Tim Farron MP
Lord Scriven
Lord Strasburger
Lord Tyler
Lord Clement-Jones
NGOs/Businesses
Big Brother Watch
Liberty
Migrants Organise
Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants
medConfidential
Privacy International
Full list of people signing the pledge against vaccine passports
Conservative Party
Mark Harper MP
Steve Baker MP
Sir Iain Duncan Smith MP
Harriett Baldwin MP
Esther McVey MP
Adam Afriyie MP
Bob Blackman MP
Sir Graham Brady MP
Nus Ghani MP
Andrew Mitchell MP
Peter Bone MP
Ben Bradley MP
Andrew Bridgen MP
Paul Bristow MP
Philip Davies MP
Richard Drax MP
Jonathan Djanogly MP
Chris Green MP
Philip Hollobone MP
Adam Holloway MP
David Jones MP
Simon Jupp MP
Andrew Lewer MBE MP
Julian Lewis MP
Karl McCartney MP
Craig Mackinlay MP
Anthony Mangnall MP
Stephen McPartland MP
Anne Marie Morris MP
Sir John Redwood MP
Andrew Rosindell MP
Greg Smith MP
Henry Smith MP
Julian Sturdy MP
Sir Desmond Swayne MP
Sir Robert Syms MP
Craig Tracey MP
Jamie Wallis MP
David Warburton MP
William Wragg MP
Sir Charles Walker MP
Labour Party
Diane Abbot MP
Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP
Tahir Ali MP
Rebecca Long Bailey MP
Clive Lewis MP
Beth Winter MP
Rachel Hopkins MP
Apsana Begum MP
Richard Burgon MP
Ian Byrne MP
Dawn Butler MP
Jeremy Corbyn MP
Mary Kelly Foy MP
Ian Lavery MP
Ian Mearns MP
John McDonnell MP
Grahame Morris MP
Kate Osborne MP
Zarah Sultana MP
Claudia Webbe MP
Mick Whitley MP
Nadia Whittome MP
Baroness Chakrabarti
Baroness Bryan of Partick
Lord Woodley
Lord Sikka
Lord Hendy
Liberal Democrats
Ed Davey MP
Layla Moran MP
Munira Wilson MP
Alistair Carmichael MP
Daisy Cooper MP
Wendy Chamberlain MP
Sarah Olney MP
Christine Jardine MP
Jamie Stone MP
Tim Farron MP
Lord Scriven
Lord Strasburger
Lord Tyler
Lord Clement-Jones
NGOs/Businesses
Big Brother Watch
Liberty
Migrants Organise
Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants
medConfidential
Privacy International
Forwarded from FUTURE NOT SET
We appreciate that not all of our subscribers may be religiously inclined - but this isn't a society we should be living in. This is deeply wrong.
https://twitter.com/BreesAnna/status/1378261278892904449
https://twitter.com/BreesAnna/status/1378261278892904449
Twitter
Anna Brees
If the police are doing this now, we can only imagine what they will agree to do next. Yesterday’s Good Friday service at a Polish Roman Catholic Church. More here youtu.be/aqOKm4k2Wcc
"If someone does not wish to share their details, provides incorrect information or chooses not to scan the NHS QR code
Hospitality venues must take reasonable steps to refuse entry to a customer or visitor who does not provide their name and contact details or who has not scanned the NHS QR code.
Hospitality venues should verify that an individual has checked in using the QR code by reviewing the individual’s phone screen. This is not necessary if they have already provided their contact details.
Venues in other settings do not need to refuse entry but should strongly encourage customers and visitors to scan the official NHS QR code poster or provide their contact details in order to support NHS Test and Trace. They should advise customers and visitors that this information will only be used where necessary to help stop the spread of COVID-19.
If in the rare case that a customer or visitor becomes unruly, you should follow your own security procedures. This may include calling the police if you feel the individual poses a risk to yourself or others.
The accuracy of the information provided will be the responsibility of the individual who provides it. You do not have to verify an individual’s identity for NHS Test and Trace purposes, and we advise against doing so except where organisations have a reasonable suspicion that customer or visitor details are incorrect. You may refuse to allow entry if you have reason to believe the details are inaccurate.
Failure to comply
Collecting contact details and maintaining records for NHS Test and Trace is a legal requirement and failure to comply is punishable by a fine:
first fixed penalty: £1,000
second fixed penalty: £2,000
third fixed penalty: £4,000
any further penalty notice: £10,000
The person responsible for the organisation is liable. This could be the owner, proprietor or manager with overall responsibility of the organisation, business or service.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/maintaining-records-of-staff-customers-and-visitors-to-support-nhs-test-and-trace#history
Hospitality venues must take reasonable steps to refuse entry to a customer or visitor who does not provide their name and contact details or who has not scanned the NHS QR code.
Hospitality venues should verify that an individual has checked in using the QR code by reviewing the individual’s phone screen. This is not necessary if they have already provided their contact details.
Venues in other settings do not need to refuse entry but should strongly encourage customers and visitors to scan the official NHS QR code poster or provide their contact details in order to support NHS Test and Trace. They should advise customers and visitors that this information will only be used where necessary to help stop the spread of COVID-19.
If in the rare case that a customer or visitor becomes unruly, you should follow your own security procedures. This may include calling the police if you feel the individual poses a risk to yourself or others.
The accuracy of the information provided will be the responsibility of the individual who provides it. You do not have to verify an individual’s identity for NHS Test and Trace purposes, and we advise against doing so except where organisations have a reasonable suspicion that customer or visitor details are incorrect. You may refuse to allow entry if you have reason to believe the details are inaccurate.
Failure to comply
Collecting contact details and maintaining records for NHS Test and Trace is a legal requirement and failure to comply is punishable by a fine:
first fixed penalty: £1,000
second fixed penalty: £2,000
third fixed penalty: £4,000
any further penalty notice: £10,000
The person responsible for the organisation is liable. This could be the owner, proprietor or manager with overall responsibility of the organisation, business or service.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/maintaining-records-of-staff-customers-and-visitors-to-support-nhs-test-and-trace#history
GOV.UK
[Withdrawn] Maintaining records of staff, customers and visitors to support NHS Test and Trace
Venues in certain sectors should continue to ask customers, visitors and staff to 'check in', to help stop the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19)
Forwarded from F W
It is discrimination and in clear violation of the Equality Act 2010 so if any venues refusing entry you can take them to court and seek compensation up to £5-9k. I think we all should do it. As soon enough people threathens businesses with court they will back down
⬆️ We need to articulate the belief in philosophical rather than scientific terms. Please note scientific belief is not mentioned. A philosophical belief that we should not be giving our details everywhere we go.