Forwarded from Robin Monotti
“We are a small group of concerned parents and medical professionals who have been following the situation carefully over the past year. We’ve recently been made aware of the COVID-19 vaccination teaching resources being offered to schoolteachers for class presentation (attached).
In light of this, the recent announcements that COVID-19 vaccine trials have begun on children and infants and speculation that the government will begin the vaccination of children this summer, we feel it is now a matter of some urgency to speak-up and offer balance to the hasty and ill-considered approach that’s being taken.”
Our concern is not only regarding the potential health risks to children (with no associated benefit) but also the apparent attempt to coerce and bypass legitimate informed consent; a cornerstone of medical ethics and fundamental human right.
Our website presents a fully referenced open letter (attached) intended for teachers, head teachers, parents etc. We address key errors and significant omissions from the resources and offer a broader look at the current research, data, risk-benefit, etc. more generally.
Time is of the essence here and we feel it’s important that as many teachers, head teachers and parents are aware of this as schools head into the summer term.
Any help and support would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Parents Following The Science
https://parentsfts.wixsite.com/website
In light of this, the recent announcements that COVID-19 vaccine trials have begun on children and infants and speculation that the government will begin the vaccination of children this summer, we feel it is now a matter of some urgency to speak-up and offer balance to the hasty and ill-considered approach that’s being taken.”
Our concern is not only regarding the potential health risks to children (with no associated benefit) but also the apparent attempt to coerce and bypass legitimate informed consent; a cornerstone of medical ethics and fundamental human right.
Our website presents a fully referenced open letter (attached) intended for teachers, head teachers, parents etc. We address key errors and significant omissions from the resources and offer a broader look at the current research, data, risk-benefit, etc. more generally.
Time is of the essence here and we feel it’s important that as many teachers, head teachers and parents are aware of this as schools head into the summer term.
Any help and support would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Parents Following The Science
https://parentsfts.wixsite.com/website
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Dear Robin,
My message is a plea not to be fooled by the Great Lie of 2021, that “variants escape our immune defences so we’ll need repeated vaccination”.
I am deeply concerned about this lie & what it may portend.
Would you please share this as widely as you can?
Many thanks,
Mike
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.06.21254882v2
Dear humanity,
I just read this ‘study’ claiming that, in vaccinated individuals, a variant of concern (VoC) appeared more frequently than in non-vaccinated individuals.
They’re implying that such VoC ‘escape our immunity’, attacking us as if we had no immunity.
It’s complete nonsense.
They tested ‘carriers’ (note choice of the word, which you’d never use, because the clear implication is of an ability to infect others with this VoC, something for which there’s absolutely no evidence) & these people are clinically well, with no symptoms.
They did find the VoC more often than in a claimed matching group of unvaccinated individuals.
So what? There are numerous possible reasons for this, the most likely being that they’re not measuring what they think they are.
Crucially, the VoC differs so little from the original virus that it’s impossible that, despite being immune after vaccination, it somehow “escapes their immune system”.
The referenced work, showing that certain circulating antibodies are less effective in blocking the interaction involving a VoC (a synthesised portion of the virus & an artificial binding receptor for spike protein) is an example of very poor science.
The whole set up plays to the idea that it is mostly or wholly just the antibodies that confer & are responsible for the functional immunity acquired after vaccination (or natural infection). Yet there’s no evidence for this at all.
Indeed, it’s intrinsically unlikely. Antibodies are very large molecules which are mostly considered to be outside cells, either in blood or in the spaces between cells outside of the blood supply or, in some specialised circumstances, secreted onto outward-facing body surfaces (as described by Sucharit earlier in this thread).
Plausibly, such antibodies could play an important role in preventing reinfection, during the period while the invading virus pathogen is in those compartments described, outside cells.
But no serious immunologist would fail to recognise that, during clinically relevant illness caused by this virus, most of the battle between virus-infected tissues & our immune systems takes place when the virus is INSIDE OUR CELLS.
The virus must be inside our cells in order to take over the replication apparatus of the cell, that being the only way in which the virus can multiply. Our cells are forced to make multiple copies of the virus, before that cell dies, liberating many more virus particles.
During this process, repeated again & again, it’s not possible that antibodies, mostly restricted to the outside of cells, has any important function in host defence.
That role is mostly performed by CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (aka “T-cells” or “T-memory cells”). An infected cell has no choice but to signal that it’s occupied & it does so by placing on its external surface fragments of the invading virus.
These signals are detected in a highly-specific way by T-memory cells, which then attack the infected cells & kill them, along with viruses inside.
They do not attack healthy cells.
Now, the breadth & detail of recognition of the virus and EVERY VARIANT of the virus is so great that it’s literally impossible for infected cells not to be detected as infected. This is because the changes to the virus are minuscule & so at most, only a few of the flags placed on the outside of infected cells are different from those our immune systems have seen before.
Conversely almost all the infection-signalling flags are identical to those we’ve seen before & our cellular immunity (T-cells) easily & speedily mop up infected tissues so readily that clinical infection is prevented.
This isn’t a theory or speculation.
My message is a plea not to be fooled by the Great Lie of 2021, that “variants escape our immune defences so we’ll need repeated vaccination”.
I am deeply concerned about this lie & what it may portend.
Would you please share this as widely as you can?
Many thanks,
Mike
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.06.21254882v2
Dear humanity,
I just read this ‘study’ claiming that, in vaccinated individuals, a variant of concern (VoC) appeared more frequently than in non-vaccinated individuals.
They’re implying that such VoC ‘escape our immunity’, attacking us as if we had no immunity.
It’s complete nonsense.
They tested ‘carriers’ (note choice of the word, which you’d never use, because the clear implication is of an ability to infect others with this VoC, something for which there’s absolutely no evidence) & these people are clinically well, with no symptoms.
They did find the VoC more often than in a claimed matching group of unvaccinated individuals.
So what? There are numerous possible reasons for this, the most likely being that they’re not measuring what they think they are.
Crucially, the VoC differs so little from the original virus that it’s impossible that, despite being immune after vaccination, it somehow “escapes their immune system”.
The referenced work, showing that certain circulating antibodies are less effective in blocking the interaction involving a VoC (a synthesised portion of the virus & an artificial binding receptor for spike protein) is an example of very poor science.
The whole set up plays to the idea that it is mostly or wholly just the antibodies that confer & are responsible for the functional immunity acquired after vaccination (or natural infection). Yet there’s no evidence for this at all.
Indeed, it’s intrinsically unlikely. Antibodies are very large molecules which are mostly considered to be outside cells, either in blood or in the spaces between cells outside of the blood supply or, in some specialised circumstances, secreted onto outward-facing body surfaces (as described by Sucharit earlier in this thread).
Plausibly, such antibodies could play an important role in preventing reinfection, during the period while the invading virus pathogen is in those compartments described, outside cells.
But no serious immunologist would fail to recognise that, during clinically relevant illness caused by this virus, most of the battle between virus-infected tissues & our immune systems takes place when the virus is INSIDE OUR CELLS.
The virus must be inside our cells in order to take over the replication apparatus of the cell, that being the only way in which the virus can multiply. Our cells are forced to make multiple copies of the virus, before that cell dies, liberating many more virus particles.
During this process, repeated again & again, it’s not possible that antibodies, mostly restricted to the outside of cells, has any important function in host defence.
That role is mostly performed by CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (aka “T-cells” or “T-memory cells”). An infected cell has no choice but to signal that it’s occupied & it does so by placing on its external surface fragments of the invading virus.
These signals are detected in a highly-specific way by T-memory cells, which then attack the infected cells & kill them, along with viruses inside.
They do not attack healthy cells.
Now, the breadth & detail of recognition of the virus and EVERY VARIANT of the virus is so great that it’s literally impossible for infected cells not to be detected as infected. This is because the changes to the virus are minuscule & so at most, only a few of the flags placed on the outside of infected cells are different from those our immune systems have seen before.
Conversely almost all the infection-signalling flags are identical to those we’ve seen before & our cellular immunity (T-cells) easily & speedily mop up infected tissues so readily that clinical infection is prevented.
This isn’t a theory or speculation.
medRxiv
Evidence for increased breakthrough rates of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in BNT162b2 mRNA vaccinated individuals
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been raging for over a year, creating global detrimental impact. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has demonstrated high protection levels, yet apprehension exists that several variants of concerns (VOCs) can surmount the immune defenses…
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
It’s been known & shown for decades that this is the prominent process conferring host immunity.
Do we see this crucial, central, unequivocally involved immune process even mentioned in the attached paper?
No. The authors don’t even bother to mention it.
Different authors have more than once demonstrated that the T-cell immune repertoire directed towards infected cells easily recognises any & all variants, eg:
https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR290585
In conclusion, this paper deliberately ignores the most fundamental component of host immunity, whips up unfounded fear that immune escape occurs with variants & prompts readers to be ready to accept ‘variant or top-up vaccines’, which are entirely superfluous.
Imagine for a moment that what they’re implying was true. You’d need vaccinating every few months as new variants were detected. As variants spontaneously appear, due to errors in fidelity of copying, this cycle would continue forever. If it was like this, then the first time humans encountered even a slowly mutating respiratory virus, the virus would, in due course, escape immunity & eventually wipe out humanity. Yet here we all are.
It’s all utter nonsense. I came to the conclusion that, if the dominant lies of 2020 were that a PCR test faithfully identifies who has clinically relevant infection & that people can infect others despite showing no symptoms, the lie of 2021 is of ‘variants escaping immunity’,
It’s flatly a falsehood.
If you consider why otherwise accomplished scientists would act in this way about variants, I cannot see any good reasons & so am forced to contemplate bad reasons.
Being compelled to receive injections of materials called top-up vaccines, which clearly aren’t what we’re told they are, provides an open-ended cycle of innocent-looking medical interventions. I cannot know what those behind this plan to do with this power but I argue it would be a tragically negligent response to say nothing at all. Because it’s plausible (not claiming it’s certain) that this lie-based methodology could be exploited for any purpose at all, including mass depopulation.
Please share this push-back against the lie of 2021!!!
Are any of us good with visual representation of what I’ve written?
I ask because it’s complicated to explain unless you already have a good understanding of immune defence systems.
Yet it is essential that ways quickly be found to explain this lie swiftly to millions of people.
If we fail to accomplish this, I fear that, within a few months, large numbers of people will indeed start to receive these “top-up vaccines”.
All I know is that I do not know how to do this. In my narrow way, I’ve been trying for nine months to persuade others. Yet, my reach is tiny (<<1% of our fellow humans).
I don’t seek guidance on how to do this, but I want others, skilled in the art & technicalities of crisp, effective communication of complex matters, to just get on with it. Hence my desperate suggestion & request.
With best wishes,
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
Do we see this crucial, central, unequivocally involved immune process even mentioned in the attached paper?
No. The authors don’t even bother to mention it.
Different authors have more than once demonstrated that the T-cell immune repertoire directed towards infected cells easily recognises any & all variants, eg:
https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR290585
In conclusion, this paper deliberately ignores the most fundamental component of host immunity, whips up unfounded fear that immune escape occurs with variants & prompts readers to be ready to accept ‘variant or top-up vaccines’, which are entirely superfluous.
Imagine for a moment that what they’re implying was true. You’d need vaccinating every few months as new variants were detected. As variants spontaneously appear, due to errors in fidelity of copying, this cycle would continue forever. If it was like this, then the first time humans encountered even a slowly mutating respiratory virus, the virus would, in due course, escape immunity & eventually wipe out humanity. Yet here we all are.
It’s all utter nonsense. I came to the conclusion that, if the dominant lies of 2020 were that a PCR test faithfully identifies who has clinically relevant infection & that people can infect others despite showing no symptoms, the lie of 2021 is of ‘variants escaping immunity’,
It’s flatly a falsehood.
If you consider why otherwise accomplished scientists would act in this way about variants, I cannot see any good reasons & so am forced to contemplate bad reasons.
Being compelled to receive injections of materials called top-up vaccines, which clearly aren’t what we’re told they are, provides an open-ended cycle of innocent-looking medical interventions. I cannot know what those behind this plan to do with this power but I argue it would be a tragically negligent response to say nothing at all. Because it’s plausible (not claiming it’s certain) that this lie-based methodology could be exploited for any purpose at all, including mass depopulation.
Please share this push-back against the lie of 2021!!!
Are any of us good with visual representation of what I’ve written?
I ask because it’s complicated to explain unless you already have a good understanding of immune defence systems.
Yet it is essential that ways quickly be found to explain this lie swiftly to millions of people.
If we fail to accomplish this, I fear that, within a few months, large numbers of people will indeed start to receive these “top-up vaccines”.
All I know is that I do not know how to do this. In my narrow way, I’ve been trying for nine months to persuade others. Yet, my reach is tiny (<<1% of our fellow humans).
I don’t seek guidance on how to do this, but I want others, skilled in the art & technicalities of crisp, effective communication of complex matters, to just get on with it. Hence my desperate suggestion & request.
With best wishes,
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
europepmc.org
Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees - Abstract…
Forwarded from Coronavirus Plushie
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
2 YEAR OLD GIRL, HOSPITALISED FOR 17 DAYS, THEN DIES, AFTER PFIZER INJECTION
🙏❤️🕊
Link to VAERS record:
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php
Link for sharing video outside Telegram:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZvVUtvlF494p/
🙏❤️🕊
Link to VAERS record:
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php
Link for sharing video outside Telegram:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZvVUtvlF494p/
Evil is real folks, it has always been, it will always be. This is another, more direct version of me quoting Umberto Eco on Ur-Fascism or Eternal Fascism and our generation having to fight it again. It was there all along but many chose not to see it for one or two generations. We cannot afford to do that anymore. If we do not accept that evil is real we will either be confused and lost or simply be crushed psychologically. The first step of resolving a problem is to stop denying that it is there. To stop denying it we need to call it with its real name. It is a great evil that is unfolding in front our very eyes. To fight it we need to dig deep in our spiritual roots and the ones of our culture. People have been fighting This Great Evil for millennia. There are many spiritual examples there that we can draw from. The facing of evil in contrast and in parallel to the beauty of the natural world is one of the themes of Terrence Malick's WW2 film The Thin Red Line, where he started to think and to name the problem of evil. As some of you may know we worked with Terry on my last film and he is one of my figures of reference in thinking through the problem of evil in this film but also in his last WW2 film called A Hidden Life, which shows that by digging deep into one's spirituality it is possible to never surrender to evil. But my reference is also my first mentor, a biomolecular physicist who fought against the Nazis in the Resistance in Naples. He told me they were very active. It's not like in the movies where people are largely passive to the evil of Nazism. The Nazis were very scared of the Resistance. I do not forget this message he told me and I am passing it onto you, so that it shall not be forgotten.
https://youtu.be/Cb8rHfuN8rk
https://youtu.be/Cb8rHfuN8rk
YouTube
The Thin Red Line - This Great Evil Scene
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The brave people of Bologna, Italy. Note that masks are mandatory also outdoors in Italy and not wearing them makes you subject to fines if not arrest.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Scenes of ordinary daily Resistance, the brave lady Rossana in Chivasso near Turin, Italy who has kept her cake shop throughout lockdowns and curfews and ignored fines and Police intimidation is now a national heroine of the Resistance
"More than 1,000 vicars vow to defy any vaccine passport plans for churches: Proposals would be a 'fundamental betrayal' of Christian beliefs, leaders warn, adding it could lead to the rise of a surveillance state" https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/04/17/1000-vicars-vow-defy-vaccine-passport-plans-churches/
The Telegraph
More than 1,000 vicars vow to defy any vaccine passport plans for churches
Proposals would be a 'fundamental betrayal' of Christian beliefs, leaders warn, adding it could lead to the rise of a surveillance state
DR ROGER HODKINSON
14 minutes of medical truth:
https://odysee.com/@TruthPills:5/Roger-Hodkinson-Alberta:2
14 minutes of medical truth:
https://odysee.com/@TruthPills:5/Roger-Hodkinson-Alberta:2
Odysee
Dr. Roger Hodkinson summarizes it ALL (again)
Dr. Roger "Mic Drop" Hodkinson summarizes the case against the CoViD nonsense.
"Gates Foundation paid PR firm to secretly stack UN Expert process on controversial extinction technology – Gene Drive Files"
"Gene drives are a gene-editing application that allows genetic engineers to drive a single artificial trait through an entire population by ensuring that all of an organism’s offspring carry that trait. For example, recent experiments are fitting mice with “daughterless” gene drives that will cascade through mouse populations so that only male pups are born, ensuring that the population becomes extinct after a few generations.
Proponents have framed gene drives as a breakthrough tool for eradicating pests or invasive species. However, the Gene Drive Files reveal that these “conservation” efforts are primarily supported by military funds."
http://genedrivefiles.synbiowatch.org/2017/12/01/gates_foundation_pr/
"Gene drives are a gene-editing application that allows genetic engineers to drive a single artificial trait through an entire population by ensuring that all of an organism’s offspring carry that trait. For example, recent experiments are fitting mice with “daughterless” gene drives that will cascade through mouse populations so that only male pups are born, ensuring that the population becomes extinct after a few generations.
Proponents have framed gene drives as a breakthrough tool for eradicating pests or invasive species. However, the Gene Drive Files reveal that these “conservation” efforts are primarily supported by military funds."
http://genedrivefiles.synbiowatch.org/2017/12/01/gates_foundation_pr/
"Those that promote the benefits of “democracy” leave one thing out; it is always replaced with an oligarchy. Where the wealthy people control the government and eventually reduce the rest of society to slave or serfs serving them. Here, we take a look at the Athenian “democracy” and as we read about it, keep in mind the terrible parallels"
How Democracy ended in Athens; it was replaced by an Oligarchy.
https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/how-democracy-ended-in-athens-it-was-replaced-by-an-oligarchy
How Democracy ended in Athens; it was replaced by an Oligarchy.
https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/how-democracy-ended-in-athens-it-was-replaced-by-an-oligarchy
Metallicman
How Democracy ended in Athens; it was replaced by an Oligarchy.
Those that promote the benefits of "democracy" leave one thing out; it is always replaced with an oligarchy. Where the wealthy people control the government and eventually reduce the rest of society to slave or serfs serving them. Here, we take a look at…
Would you do this knowing all people at risk have been offered vaccinations which you have been telling them that work? Or would you only do this knowing the vaccinations do not work?
500 Renault vans to serve as mobile Covid testing units
The Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) has ordered 500 converted Renault Master vans for use as mobile Covid-19 testing units.
The 500 vans will replace – and nearly double – DHSC’s existing fleet of 258 vehicles. The bespoke conversion offers twice the daily testing capacity of the previous vans, with each vehicle able to store 1,000 Covid test kits.
https://www.motoringresearch.com/car-news/renault-vans-mobile-covid-testing/
500 Renault vans to serve as mobile Covid testing units
The Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) has ordered 500 converted Renault Master vans for use as mobile Covid-19 testing units.
The 500 vans will replace – and nearly double – DHSC’s existing fleet of 258 vehicles. The bespoke conversion offers twice the daily testing capacity of the previous vans, with each vehicle able to store 1,000 Covid test kits.
https://www.motoringresearch.com/car-news/renault-vans-mobile-covid-testing/
Forwarded from King Travis
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
THE RECKONING IS COMING: Family of Italian woman who died after Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine launch legal action | World News | Sky News
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-family-of-italian-woman-who-died-after-oxford-astrazeneca-vaccine-launches-legal-action-12278855
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-family-of-italian-woman-who-died-after-oxford-astrazeneca-vaccine-launches-legal-action-12278855
Sky News
COVID-19: Family of Italian woman who died after Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine launch legal action
Augusta Turiaco, 55, fell into a coma and died 19 days after having the injection.
THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
EDITORIAL
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine–Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia [VITT]
"thrombosis and thrombocytopenia developed 5 to 24 days after initial vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), a recombinant chimpanzee adenoviral vector encoding the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.3-5 These persons were healthy or in medically stable condition, and very few were known to have had previous thrombosis or a preexisting prothrombotic condition. Most of the patients included in these reports were women younger than 50 years of age, some of whom were receiving estrogen-replacement therapy or oral contraceptives. A remarkably high percentage of the patients had thromboses at unusual sites — specifically, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis or thrombosis in the portal, splanchnic, or hepatic veins. Other patients presented with deep venous thrombi, pulmonary emboli, or acute arterial thromboses. The median platelet counts at diagnosis were approximately 20,000 to 30,000 per cubic millimeter (range, approximately 10,000 to 110,000), but the rate of decline in platelet counts that preceded thrombosis is unknown. High levels of d-dimers and low levels of fibrinogen were common and suggest systemic activation of coagulation. Approximately 40% of the patients died, some from ischemic brain injury, superimposed hemorrhage, or both conditions, often after anticoagulation"
"cases of immune thrombocytopenia and bleeding without thrombosis that were induced or revealed after exposure to the messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccines produced by Moderna (mRNA-1273) and Pfizer–BioNTech (BNT162b2) have been reported"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2106315
EDITORIAL
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine–Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia [VITT]
"thrombosis and thrombocytopenia developed 5 to 24 days after initial vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), a recombinant chimpanzee adenoviral vector encoding the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.3-5 These persons were healthy or in medically stable condition, and very few were known to have had previous thrombosis or a preexisting prothrombotic condition. Most of the patients included in these reports were women younger than 50 years of age, some of whom were receiving estrogen-replacement therapy or oral contraceptives. A remarkably high percentage of the patients had thromboses at unusual sites — specifically, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis or thrombosis in the portal, splanchnic, or hepatic veins. Other patients presented with deep venous thrombi, pulmonary emboli, or acute arterial thromboses. The median platelet counts at diagnosis were approximately 20,000 to 30,000 per cubic millimeter (range, approximately 10,000 to 110,000), but the rate of decline in platelet counts that preceded thrombosis is unknown. High levels of d-dimers and low levels of fibrinogen were common and suggest systemic activation of coagulation. Approximately 40% of the patients died, some from ischemic brain injury, superimposed hemorrhage, or both conditions, often after anticoagulation"
"cases of immune thrombocytopenia and bleeding without thrombosis that were induced or revealed after exposure to the messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccines produced by Moderna (mRNA-1273) and Pfizer–BioNTech (BNT162b2) have been reported"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2106315
NEJM
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine–Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia
The coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) stimulated the development of highly effective vaccines that were produced wi...
"Two New Studies Point to How AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccine Is Linked to Blood Clots
In both papers, researchers found that people getting the vaccine had higher levels of antibodies directed against a cluster of immune-related cells that the body might form in response to the vaccine. These clusters include platelets, which help blood to clot when you get cut or injured, and the antibodies stick to the platelet-complex and form dangerous clots that can block blood flow in veins and arteries. The researchers are referring to the condition as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia."
https://time.com/5953653/astrazeneca-vaccine-blood-clots-studies/
In both papers, researchers found that people getting the vaccine had higher levels of antibodies directed against a cluster of immune-related cells that the body might form in response to the vaccine. These clusters include platelets, which help blood to clot when you get cut or injured, and the antibodies stick to the platelet-complex and form dangerous clots that can block blood flow in veins and arteries. The researchers are referring to the condition as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia."
https://time.com/5953653/astrazeneca-vaccine-blood-clots-studies/
Time
Two New Studies Point to How AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccine Is Linked to Blood Clots
The studies provide a possible explanation for the clotting side effects
Family of Italian woman who died after Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine launch legal action
https://youtu.be/jFn_JRkTOUM
https://youtu.be/jFn_JRkTOUM
YouTube
Sky News: Italian Woman Dies 19 Days After AstraZeneca Jab, Family Launch Legal Case
India’s Health Ambassador & Tamil Actor Vivek Dies One Day After Taking COVID Vaccine
He took the COVID-19 vaccine Covaxin in Tamil Nadu Government Multi Super Speciality Hospital in Chennai and urged many others to come forward to take the vaccine.
His vaccination was at a public event with TV channels carrying photographs of him taking the shot. As the cardiac arrest happened less than 24 hours after the inoculation, there were questions raised whether he died due to the side-effects of the vaccine.
https://greatgameindia.com/india-health-ambassador-vivek-dies-vaccine/
He took the COVID-19 vaccine Covaxin in Tamil Nadu Government Multi Super Speciality Hospital in Chennai and urged many others to come forward to take the vaccine.
His vaccination was at a public event with TV channels carrying photographs of him taking the shot. As the cardiac arrest happened less than 24 hours after the inoculation, there were questions raised whether he died due to the side-effects of the vaccine.
https://greatgameindia.com/india-health-ambassador-vivek-dies-vaccine/
GreatGameInternational
India’s Health Ambassador & Tamil Actor Vivek Dies One Day After Taking COVID Vaccine - GreatGameInternational
Well known Indian actor and the Tamilnadu state's ambassador for creating public health messages has passed away a day after he received the COVID-19 vaccine.