Forwarded from Janet1406
Apologies if this has already been posted (I checked but couldn't see it) but this is really good.
Doctors Testify Before Texas State Senate to Oppose Mandatory COVID Shots
It beggars belief that this information is not on the mainstream media, and that these shots have not been pulled from the market on grounds of being purely lethal.
https://digitalwarriorproductions.com/texas-state-senate/
Doctors Testify Before Texas State Senate to Oppose Mandatory COVID Shots
It beggars belief that this information is not on the mainstream media, and that these shots have not been pulled from the market on grounds of being purely lethal.
https://digitalwarriorproductions.com/texas-state-senate/
Forwarded from Deleted Account
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Del Bigtree reads out Eric Clapton's message at the end of his show which went live today, you can watch it here:
https://thehighwire.com/watch/
https://thehighwire.com/watch/
The HighWire
The HighWire | Watch
Watch live here every Thursday at 11 PM PT (2 PM ET) and catch up on past episodes and episode segments.
ALL EYES ON RAND PAUL. If Paul manages to turn the tables on Fauci and indicate that Fauci is indeed the Architect of the Covid19 Matrix, the entire house of cards comes down quicker than you can say "No vaccine passports". RAND PAUL is the eventuality of an anomaly, which despite Fauci-Gates' sincerest efforts they have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision. While it remains a burden assiduously avoided, it is not unexpected, and thus not beyond a measure of control. Which has led PAUL, inevitably to FAUCI. All eyes on PAUL!
PS: Rand Paul is not your average politician. He is an ophtalmologist who turned to politics because he could not just stay in the sidelines as he saw the ever greater encroachment of the oligarchy on personal freedoms and the politicians who with a veneer or progressivism were enabling this. Paul is an eye doctor, not a professional politician by training. Paul can tell which eyes can see and what they need to see. He himself has his eyes wide open..
PS: Rand Paul is not your average politician. He is an ophtalmologist who turned to politics because he could not just stay in the sidelines as he saw the ever greater encroachment of the oligarchy on personal freedoms and the politicians who with a veneer or progressivism were enabling this. Paul is an eye doctor, not a professional politician by training. Paul can tell which eyes can see and what they need to see. He himself has his eyes wide open..
Forwarded from 🌎World Wide Rally for Freedom Official 🌎 January 30
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤩 Italy invites you 🤩
World Wide Demonstration for Freedom and Human Rights
May 15, 2021
#wewillALLbethere
T.me/worldwidedemonstration
World Wide Demonstration for Freedom and Human Rights
May 15, 2021
#wewillALLbethere
T.me/worldwidedemonstration
Forwarded from 🌎World Wide Rally for Freedom Official 🌎 January 30
Press Release 05.05.2021 (2).pdf
115.6 KB
World Wide Demonstration 2.0
Press Release
Press Release
FLCCC Alliance Statement on the Irregular Actions of Public Health Agencies and the Widespread Disinformation Campaign Against Ivermectin
https://covid19criticalcare.com/videos-and-press/flccc-releases/flccc-alliance-statement-on-the-irregular-actions-of-public-health-agencies-and-the-widespread-disinformation-campaign-against-ivermectin
https://covid19criticalcare.com/videos-and-press/flccc-releases/flccc-alliance-statement-on-the-irregular-actions-of-public-health-agencies-and-the-widespread-disinformation-campaign-against-ivermectin
FLCCC | Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
FLCCC Alliance Statement on the Irregular Actions of Public Health Agencies and the Widespread Disinformation Campaign Against…
Awareness of ivermectin’s efficacy and its adoption by physicians worldwide to successfully treat COVID-19 have grown exponentially over the past several months. Oddly, however, even as the clinical trials data and successful ivermectin treatment experiences…
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
A very crisply written situation report on status of Covid19 vaccination in the USA.
“The coincidences—if that’s what they are—have especially jinxed COVID-19 vaccines. As Fox News’ Tucker Carlson reported last week to an audience of close to 3 million viewers, “In just the first four months of this year, the U.S. government has recorded more deaths after COVID vaccinations than from all other vaccines administered in the United States between mid-1997 and the end of 2013.”
“The coincidences—if that’s what they are—have especially jinxed COVID-19 vaccines. As Fox News’ Tucker Carlson reported last week to an audience of close to 3 million viewers, “In just the first four months of this year, the U.S. government has recorded more deaths after COVID vaccinations than from all other vaccines administered in the United States between mid-1997 and the end of 2013.”
Forwarded from Deleted Account
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Robin,
Here in his first video, Sceptical Nurse reviews the best quality & most recent peer reviewed scientific literature concerning lockdown.
That literature yields numerous papers with findings that lockdown & its stringency are NOT correlated with saving lives. No credible paper was identified which found in favour of the lockdown conceit.
Lockdowns haven’t saved anyone, yet are certainly associated with suffering & harm.
This policy must NEVER again be imposed. Not locally, nationally or internationally.
Please share this short, well-presented video.
Thanks,
Mike
Ps: those who struggle with the negative evidence, insisting that, as the virus is spread by contact, reducing the number of contacts “must” reduce epidemic spreading.
Sorry: but you’re making an error of logic right at the beginning, which is that all contacts have the same transmission value. If they did, you’d be right, but they’re not & you’re flat wrong.
The only contacts which matter are those which easily could give rise to infecting the next person.
In other words, an infectious person & a susceptible person.
An infectious person has a high amount of virus in their airways & are also expelling it in quantity.
But inevitably, such a person will have symptoms arising from virus attack in the cells line their respiratory tree & from their immune response to that infection.
We’ve a name for this. It’s called “being ill”. Important to understand that the most potent sources of transmission are those WITH SYMPTOMS. But because they’re feeling unwell, they’ll only exceptionally be encountered out in the community.
In fact, the majority of transmission is not out in the general community, in part for this reason.
That’s why lockdown never worked, nor could it.
So where did the bulk of the epidemic spreading take place?
The answer is obvious. It’s where symptomatic & susceptible people meet for prolonged periods. These locations are institutions like hospitals and care homes, with a minority contribution from the domestic setting.
Here in his first video, Sceptical Nurse reviews the best quality & most recent peer reviewed scientific literature concerning lockdown.
That literature yields numerous papers with findings that lockdown & its stringency are NOT correlated with saving lives. No credible paper was identified which found in favour of the lockdown conceit.
Lockdowns haven’t saved anyone, yet are certainly associated with suffering & harm.
This policy must NEVER again be imposed. Not locally, nationally or internationally.
Please share this short, well-presented video.
Thanks,
Mike
Ps: those who struggle with the negative evidence, insisting that, as the virus is spread by contact, reducing the number of contacts “must” reduce epidemic spreading.
Sorry: but you’re making an error of logic right at the beginning, which is that all contacts have the same transmission value. If they did, you’d be right, but they’re not & you’re flat wrong.
The only contacts which matter are those which easily could give rise to infecting the next person.
In other words, an infectious person & a susceptible person.
An infectious person has a high amount of virus in their airways & are also expelling it in quantity.
But inevitably, such a person will have symptoms arising from virus attack in the cells line their respiratory tree & from their immune response to that infection.
We’ve a name for this. It’s called “being ill”. Important to understand that the most potent sources of transmission are those WITH SYMPTOMS. But because they’re feeling unwell, they’ll only exceptionally be encountered out in the community.
In fact, the majority of transmission is not out in the general community, in part for this reason.
That’s why lockdown never worked, nor could it.
So where did the bulk of the epidemic spreading take place?
The answer is obvious. It’s where symptomatic & susceptible people meet for prolonged periods. These locations are institutions like hospitals and care homes, with a minority contribution from the domestic setting.
Forwarded from Robin
YouTube
Are Lockdowns Effective? 10 published peer-reviewed medical papers discussed
The papers discussed are as follows -
1. Inferring UK COVID‐19 fatal infection trajectories from daily mortality data: Were infections already in decline before the UK lockdowns?
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/biom.13462
Published on 30th March…
1. Inferring UK COVID‐19 fatal infection trajectories from daily mortality data: Were infections already in decline before the UK lockdowns?
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/biom.13462
Published on 30th March…
"This is a book about fear. Fear of a virus. Fear of death. Fear of losing our jobs, our democracy, our human connections, our health and our minds. It's also about how the government weaponised our fear against us - supposedly in our best interests - until we were the most frightened country in Europe. But why did the government deliberately frighten us, and how has this affected us as individuals and as a country? Who is involved in the decision-making that affects our lives? How are behavioural science and nudge theory being used to subliminally manipulate us? How does the media leverage fear? What are the real risks to our wellbeing? Ahead of any official inquiry into the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, Laura Dodsworth explores all these questions and more, in a nuanced and thought-provoking discussion of an extraordinary year in British life and politics. With stories from members of the general public who were impacted by fear, anxiety and isolation, and revealing interviews with psychologists, politicians, scientists, lawyers, Whitehall advisers and journalists, A State of Fear calls for a more hopeful, transparent and effective democracy."
https://www.waterstones.com/book/a-state-of-fear/laura-dodsworth/9781780667201
https://www.waterstones.com/book/a-state-of-fear/laura-dodsworth/9781780667201
Waterstones
A State of Fear by Laura Dodsworth | Waterstones
Buy A State of Fear by Laura Dodsworth from Waterstones today! Click and Collect from your local Waterstones or get FREE UK delivery on orders over £25.
Forwarded from 🇺🇦YoutubeDL - YouTube Download Bot
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Impact of COVID Vaccinations on Mortality
Forwarded from Information Retrieval
I've treated an unacceptable number of adverse reactions to the experimental Covid vaccines. I've seen more adverse reactions in the past 4 months than I've seen in the past 15 years. Capitalism in the Vaccine Industry and the lack of corporate liability is deeply disturbing to me. Safety and efficacy are not taken into consideration, only profit.