Vanden Bossche: "As mass vaccination campaigns are first targeting vulnerable subjects (e.g., elderly, subjects with underlying or immunocompromising conditions or at high risk of viral exposure), viral transmission will increasingly occur among vaccinees and non-vaccinated, asymptomatically infected persons. Suboptimal S-directed immune pressure provides a competitive advantage to spontaneously emerging variants of which the S protein carries one or more mutations that enable stronger binding to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of susceptible epithelial cells. Stronger binding of S to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) translates into higher viral infectiousness. Consequently, when there is an opportunity for the virus to regularly encounter suboptimal S-directed immune pressure, as is typically the case when people are mass-vaccinated in the heat of a pandemic, immune escape variants with enhanced infectiousness will be selected and reproduce more effectively."

However I personally do not see why enhanced infectiousness is a problem if it comes with less virulence or a lower mortality rate:

"We must not conflate transmissibility with virulence, which is the actual level of danger.
The two are often confused, and lead to hysterical headlines regarding mutation. Generally, they have an inversely proportional relationship; viral mutations to higher transmissibility tend to become less virulent. A virus can change to spread more easily; however, this does not mean that it becomes more lethal. This simple fact can help to deflate the fear from much of the variant discussion.
Looking at the table, (fig 1), there are multiple mutations of SARS-CoV-2; however, all of the chatter about them causing harm is just that—noise. Evidence shows that our own T-cell recognition from previous viral infections is enough to combat these “scariants”. The most important metric to consider with variants is the daily mortality rate (fig 2). While the media typically focuses on cases which induces fear, the mortality rate is what determines virulence. It is true that case numbers spike as the virus becomes more transmissible, but if the lethality drops, it is clear that the neutralizing effect of T-cells within the population, as well as the lessening lethality of the virus, is causing the overall danger to shrink, not to increase. For instance, the common cold is very transmissible but not at all lethal." @LynnFynn

.https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/blog/variants-or-scariants

Here comes the "apology":

"SAGE-SPI-B scientists on a committee that encouraged the use of fear to control people’s behaviour during the Covid pandemic have admitted its work was “unethical” and “totalitarian”....

One SAGE scientist told Ms Dodsworth:
"There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear. The way we have used fear is dystopian."

Another SAGE member said: "You could call psychology ‘mind control’..."

The Telegraph reports:

“One SAGE member warned that 'people use the pandemic to grab power and drive through things that wouldn’t happen otherwise…

We have to be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creeping in'.”

Telegraph:

“Another member of SAGE said they were 'stunned by the weaponisation of behavioural psychology' during the pandemic... 'psychologists didn’t seem to notice when it stopped being altruistic and became manipulative.

They have too much power and it intoxicates them'.”

As SAGE SPI-B know very well, fear is our most powerful emotion. It is rooted deep within the inner reaches of our minds. When we're afraid, we do dangerous and irrational things.

Manipulating our most primitive instincts to change behaviour is taken from the textbook of tyrants

Over the past year, we have seen the biggest Campaign of Fear the world has ever seen.

And it has been at its worst in the UK, where SAGE + the Govt took a conscious decision to use fear to ensure compliance.

We now face an unprecedented mental health crisis..."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/05/14/scientists-admit-totalitarian-use-fear-control-behaviour-covid/

Ian Brown on the protest outside the BBC which some of us were at on Saturday. The crowd actually shouted "Shame on you! Shame on you!"

And the prophet's name was Ian Brown... 😉

https://youtu.be/7wK9on_AL-k

Still applies after all these years, probably always will. Perpetual motion..

The vaccine deaths are now equivalent to the casualties of a small war. I am using as reference the estimated casualties of the ongoing war in Ukraine (ongoing since 2014) and the combined US, EU & UK Covid19 vaccine deaths in 4 months. The numbers are now over 10,000 deaths but below 15,000 deaths in both cases. Crickets from the BBC on both. Just a statistic, the Covid19 vaccine show must go on. The silence of the media must continue unperturbed.

Code of ethics of the British Psychological Society. All SAGE-SPI-B psychologists should be struck off:

"Discussion

In this study of immunogenicity of the first dose of the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among solid organ transplant recipients, the majority of participants did not mount appreciable antispike antibody responses. However, younger participants, those not receiving anti–metabolite maintenance immunosuppression, and those who received the mRNA-1273 vaccine were more likely to develop antibody responses. These results contrast with the robust early immunogenicity observed in mRNA vaccine trials, including 100% antispike seroconversion by day 15 following vaccination with mRNA-12735 and by day 21 following vaccination with BNT162b2.6
Limitations include a convenience sample that may lack generalizability, lack of serial measurements after vaccination, and lack of a concurrent control group without immunosuppression. In addition, these data represent the humoral response to the first dose of a 2-dose series.
These findings of poor antispike antibody responses in organ transplant recipients after the first dose of mRNA vaccines suggest that such patients may remain at higher early risk for COVID-19 despite vaccination. "

Immunogenicity of a Single Dose of SARS-CoV-2 Messenger RNA Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients | Surgery | JAMA | JAMA Network
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777685

Guess what? The gene modifying injections are not even required, even if they did work and were safe, for 90% of people:

"A majority of uninfected adults show preexisting antibody reactivity against SARS-CoV-2

"Using a highly sensitive multiplex assay and positive/negative thresholds established in infants in whom maternal antibodies have waned, we determined that more than 90% of uninfected adults showed antibody reactivity against the spike protein, receptor-binding domain (RBD), N-terminal domain (NTD), or the nucleocapsid (N) protein from SARS-CoV-2. This seroreactivity was evenly distributed across age and sex, correlated with circulating coronaviruses’ reactivity, and was partially outcompeted by soluble circulating coronaviruses’ spike. Using a custom SARS-CoV-2 peptide mapping array, we found that this antibody reactivity broadly mapped to spike and to conserved nonstructural viral proteins. We conclude that most adults display preexisting antibody cross-reactivity against SARS-CoV-2, which further supports investigation of how this may impact the clinical severity of COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses."

https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/146316

Science is amazing. The above research says only 10% of people don't already have pre-existing antibody reactivity to many SARSCoV2 proteins. Working backwards from first principles on my pinned post I figured out only 5% of people are at risk of severe Covid19 (OK in a cruise ship situation they are exposed to sunlight, without it in the middle of winter the figure is probably closer to 10%). Does this reflect the picture presented by the media and government psychologists? Does this justify the indiscriminate mass vaccination campaign?

SCIENTISTS ADMIT: USE OF FEAR TO CONTROL BEHAVIOUR IN COVID CRISIS WAS ‘TOTALITARIAN’ & 'UNETHICAL'

The Telegraph, 14 May, 2021.
(article has a pay wall, but the full article is in the video)

“Scientists on a committee that encouraged the use of fear to control people’s behaviour during the Covid pandemic have admitted its work was ‘unethical’, ‘totalitarian’ and ‘dystopian’

“Without a vaccine, psychology is your main weapon. Psychology has had a really good epidemic, actually.”

“The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable. It’s been like a weird experiment.

“people use the pandemic to grab power and drive through things that wouldn’t happen otherwise… We have to be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creep

Video in Bitchute
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lfagQz0zGnc6/
…………………………………………………............................

No doubt there will be a surprise outbreak....

Short video showing how they planned to induce mass vaccination way before 2019-2020

Covid passports, PCR tests were all a part of the plan

Quick review of some of the planned material for the pandemic

Robin, this was posted in another channel:

Forwarded to me by an anonymous paramedic who wishes me to share their message to you patriots.

@NicholasVeniamin

“I am a paramedic
I don't know you and you don't know me
But I chose to be what I am...
I wanted to help.
I will come if you call
My role is to help you
To act in YOUR best interest.
"Primum non nocere"
That means "First, do no harm"
That is my oath.
Many of my brother's and sisters who chose this role have forgotten our oath. Some have sadly never learnt it.
Doctors take their own oath...but the rest us, paramedics, nurses, HCAs, technicians, physio's, etc are also bound morally to ours.
Something bad has happened.
Something really bad.
We have done something bad.
I will not be at peace ever if I don't speak now.
We have broken our oath to you...
"Trust Policy"...
These words are an evil.
They are a curse, a spell, a hex, a tool of sinister intent and blackmail.
I'll explain why.
We have been fooled...the worst kind of trickery. They have slowly but surely trained us away from compassion, away from empathy, away from integrity and instead they have led and trained us into fear and submission. 
There is no longer any training of positivity or kindness. It's all clinical, all cold, all policy driven and fear motivated. 
This transfers onto our patients, the vulnerable we chose to care for.
Every single day I take my poorly people to hospital I witness them being stripped of their human rights...
Nurses are not gaining consent anymore.
Stop and let that resonate.....
Nurses have STOPPED gaining consent!!!!!!!
Every single day I witness a nurse say "I need to swab you" and then literally shove a swab up the person's nasal cavities! 
THIS IS NOT CONSENT!!!!
THIS IS ABUSE!!!!
How the fuck are they getting away with this you say???
I'll tell you.... They say a spell.
"Trust policy states...."
And boom! You're gone!
If the person wishes to have this procedure then they should make an informed decision and give consent. They should then take the swab from the nurse or HCA or doctor and do it THEMSELVES!
I took an elderly lady into A&E...she was having a TIA/mini stroke. 
Her speech was altered but her mind was clear. The TIA was clearly resolving.  As I was verbally handing over to the doctor a nurse came at her and states "I need to swab you" she then shoved away! My lady jerked her head back and stared in horror as the nurse walked off....the nurse hurt her, the nurse did not gain consent.
My heart broke and I felt like shit. The lady looked at me and two big tears fell. 
I'm not doing this anymore.
I have been a part of this... ignorantly but still a part of it, believing I was doing the right thing following "Trust policy"
Let me tell you all...
Your body is yours alone
No doctor no nurse no paramedic no health care worker has rights to your body.
Consent must be gained.
Your consent.
Anything else is false.
We cannot hold you hostage to the curse "Trust policy" unless you consent!
We can't do that shit! But we are.
Because you are allowing it.
Please stop it. 
Please please please.
Take back your consent.
Take back your power.
If something feels wrong there's a reason why. Trust yourself. 
Stop believing the lies..
If you need to go to hospital and refuse to be swabbed then do you really believe they can refuse you treatment??????
I'm sorry I was ever a part of this..
Truly deeply sorry..
I will protect as many of you as I can I promise. But please share the truth xx 
All my love and light 
Me, the people's paramedic x”

DR MICHAEL YEADON'S REPLY TO GEERT VANDEN BOSSCHE COMING UP NEXT ⬇️

Robin,
As usual, GVB skirts the entire issue of T-cells and their breadth of antigenic virus recognition and appears to want to base his fear mongering solely on the role of antibodies.
As for the mechanism of host protection I describe - which is absolutely classical & not considered theoretical at all - how else does GVB propose host immunity works? If you’ve acquired immunity from surviving infection or having been vaccinated, but then don’t see the virus again for months, most likely you won’t have appreciable quantities of circulating antibodies. But you will have circulating T-cells capable of recognising up to several dozen virus short peptides which he’s right to point out are presented in conjunction with appropriate MHC. It’s therefore also true that some of your cells do need to become infected before your immune system recognises that the virus is present. And this is fine, because immunity doesn’t necessarily prevent SUBCLINICAL infection, but it does protect you against CLINICAL illness.
No variant so far differs sufficiently from the original virus to have ANY chance of escaping immunity conferred in the way which has been demonstrated in several peer reviewed journal articles over the last year.
If this wasn’t true, by now we’d be seeing reinfection accompanied by CLINICAL illness all over the world. And we’re not seeing that, anywhere.
Do please remember, PCR tests don’t distinguish reliably clinical illness from sub clinical infection (or downright errors in the test). So when I see news articles claiming reinfection, notice they always & only speak of the distorted language of ‘cases’, entirely the wrong term for a symptomless person with a positive PCR at high cycle threshold.
SARS-CoV-2 creates a great many variants but it’s easiest to distinguish the effect of these on resilience of host protection by reference to how DIFFERENT these variants are from the original virus. If you were to create an image of the original virus & then superimpose all the variants, one after another, it would seem as if the virus remains where it is, vibrating, as it were. Much activity, but little change in its overall structure. In every case to date, the changes are irrelevantly tiny, a handful of amino acids out of almost 10,000. This means the majority of those MHC-restricted peptides are unchanged from variant to variant. Our immune systems have absolutely no difficulty whatsoever in recognising these as a virus we’ve encountered before & this means we rapidly recruit T-cell clones, selected-for during the acquisition of immune memory, and it is these rapidly available T-cells which protect us from clinical illness by killing those small numbers of virus-infected cells. This all happens without us even becoming aware of our wonderful protective immune system.
We will not remain sub clinically infected for long enough to grow a sufficiently large virus load to become infectious. So this notional selection pressure won’t get much of a chance to operate.
In fact, think about it: when was the longest time during which the virus was able to replicate unhindered? That’s right: during the initial infection. That allowed several days to a couple of weeks before an immunocompetent host mounts a sufficient response to overwhelm the virus.
And it’s during that process that a selection pressure could operate, yet it’s out of this activity that the variants arose. Yet still, almost everyone clears the infection. So much for “variants formed under selection pressure are likely to be more dangerous & escape immunity”.
Clearly, this is precisely NOT occurring. The only variants forming are those so close-in to the original virus that they’re not escaping immunity at all.

To state again: the number of variants of SARS-CoV-2 formed is theoretically very large but, so long as they are all nearly identical to the original - which ALL of them are - they’re irrelevant from an immunological standpoint.
(I recognise that some might have different behaviours as infectious agents, but that’s a separate topic entirely).