But why would the antibodies be suboptimal? There are two reasons in my view apart from the single variant reason that GVB is offering us. These are:
1 The infection was asymptomatic or not severe enough or to create enough or good quality antibodies: antibodies are low quantity and perhaps even low quality as the immune system didn't need to produce them: it fought the virus off with T & NK cells.
2 They are suboptimal because they are induced by a vaccine which creates non neutralizing antibodies.

If we look at route 1 above, or natural infection, then we can conclude that the immune system of the person above was able to mount a strong enough cellular immune response to defeat one strain of SARSCoV2, it is likely to be able to mount the same immune response to another strain, HOWEVER if there are suboptimal antibodies which nay enhance the disease in that 1-6 week window then in my view it is possible to get reinfected. The question is, would the cellular response not ultimately prevent this reinfection becoming severe or would the suboptimal antibodies enhance the disease so much to potentially overwhelm the cellular response? I think it is possible that under sustained re-exposure a reinfection may occur in that 1-6 week window precisely because of the suboptimal antibodies. I am not sure a variant plays a role in this, whether that is indeed a red herring.

If we look at route 2, then look at India, we have a model of what is happening in India. The doctors are being vaccinated. They become immune suppressed in the first week after vaccination, then they may have suboptimal or non neutralising antibodies for up to 6 weeks as this is the window of reinfection proposed by GVB. In this 6 week window they are exposed to a large concentration of SARSCoV2 virions from symptomatic patients, these latch onto their vaccine induced suboptimal antibodies and overwhelm their cellular immune response. They are not given either Ivermectin or Azithromycin and they die.

If you look at when the doctors are dying in India, it is indeed in a 1-6 week window post vaccination.

There are some good news in all the above. The mechanisms of ADE & AMIE may indeed pose the biggest risk when the suboptimal antibody counts are highest, in the 1-6 week window post infection or vaccination proposed by GVB. Antibodies then recede, all that remains is a memory of how to produce them if need be. But that mechanisms of production upon re-exposure may not be fast enough to overwhelm a cellular immune response. Therefore I would like to propose, and hope that I am right in this, that ADE & AMIE may not be a significant risk next December provided that people do not go and get vaccinated in that 1-6 week window before. Meaning that the people really at risk of ADE or AMIE (let's just call it VED or vaccine enhanced disease from now on as it includes both) next December when coronavirus season begins in the Northern hemisphere will be the people who got injected in the months of October and November, if not even September.

⚠️ The very bad news and this is where I would like all of you to pay attention, is that the months of September-November are precisely the months in which they want to inject the children. This means that the children, of all age groups, will be at the highest risk of developing vaccine enhanced disease when coronavirus season begins next December if they have been injected in the autumn term. I hope you all realise the implications of this, that children who would have been perfectly fine mounting an immune response to the virus will be placed at the highest timeframe risk of developing vaccine enhanced disease if injected shortly before December 2021 ⚠️

Gay activist to Fauci in 1988 amid AIDS crisis: ‘You are an incompetent idiot’ | News | LifeSite
https://www-lifesitenews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/news/gay-activist-to-fauci-in-1988-amid-aids-crisis-you-are-an-incompetent-idiot

“This is a novel virus, so there’ll be no protection in the population & everyone will be susceptible. There’ll be huge loss of life if we don’t lock down....”

What a bunch of LIARS. It was never a difference of opinion, but a deliberate, carefully considered campaign to mislead & frighten the population.

The reality was clear as soon as the sequence of the “new” virus was published. Sure, it’s a new sequence, but there’s no such thing as an ancestorless virus. Turns out there are multiple, common cold causing coronaviruses & also previous nastier CoVs. As a result, 20-50% of naive subjects had prior immunity as evidenced by T-cell responsiveness to epitopes from the new virus.

There is a wealth of good quality, peer reviewed journal articles showing this feature from around the world.

Don’t believe the lies.

I want you to glance at the abstract & appreciate that WE HAVE ALL BEEN LIED TO. And the lies haven’t stopped.

Best wishes
Mike

Here’s another paper making the same, empirically determined point of prior or cross-immunity in non-exposed individuals:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2598-9

And yet another, this one from the Francis Crick Institute in London:

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6522/1339.full

And finally, for now, a March 2021 paper showing a very high % of the population had some level of prior immunity to sections of the “novel” virus. They’ve been very careful in developing antibody tests, choosing lower bounds for interfering substances.

We’ve been lied to for over a year, not only about this most basic information but about EVERYTHING.

https://df6sxcketz7bb.cloudfront.net/manuscripts/146000/146316/cache/146316.2-20210401143655-covered-e0fd13ba177f913fd3156f593ead4cfd.pdf

RIP Franco Battiato, Italian musician.

"Many are the paths
but only one
the one which leads to the truth

Until we're free
We will return again
Again and again and again"

...............................

"Molte sono le vie
ma una sola
quella che conduce alla verità

Finché non saremo liberi
Torneremo ancora
Ancora e ancora e ancora"

https://youtu.be/MCKZiu2IdXM

Franco Battiato in the 1980s..
https://youtu.be/hFGz-t5R0BE

LinkedIn has removed my post of Dr Mike Yeadon's communication this morning. So I have been banned (my main account) from twitter, had multiple posts removed from Instagram, a video on the science of spike proteins removed from YouTube, and now they are removing my posts quoting Mike Yeadon from LinkedIn. I guess "the virus" is scared of the killer cells of the lies..

Bad bad me for violating the "policy on misinformation".

This is a very enjoyable interview. But if you’ve just two minutes, scroll to 54minutes.
What happens when people realise they have been fooled & outliers like Ivor Cummins & Mike Yeadon were right after all, what happens?
Do they say “well done, I now understand what happened”?
No, they don’t.
They cannot bear the realisation. The cognitive dissonance is eventually going to make them ill.

COVID-19 vaccines: " A prior COVID-19 infection was associated with an increased risk of any side effect (risk ratio 1.08, 95% confidence intervals (1.05–1.11)), fever (2.24 (1.86–2.70)), breathlessness (2.05 (1.28–3.29)), flu-like illness (1.78 (1.51–2.10)), fatigue (1.34 (1.20–1.49)) and local reactions (1.10 (1.06–1.15)). It was also associated with an increased risk of severe side effects leading to hospital care (1.56 (1.14–2.12)). While mRNA vaccines were associated with a higher incidence of any side effect (1.06 (1.01–1.11)) compared with viral vector-based vaccines, these were generally milder (p < 0.001), mostly local reactions."

Life | Free Full-Text | Self-Reported Real-World Safety and Reactogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Vaccine Recipient Survey
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/3/249

Ok back to GEERT VANDEN BOSSCHE. Mike Yeadon's short reply to my reply: ⬇️