Similarly, if the WHO declares a new international public health emergency caused by COVID-19, a variant of it, or a similar infectious disease, the system could be reactivated.”
 
Digital Green Certificate (europa.eu)<https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_1187>
 
 
 
1. Data will not be stored centrally
Technically this statement seems to be true.
 
However, the technical documentation reveals that certificates will be validated through a central European kind of “Access gateway”.
 
And this “Access Gateway” will be compatible with a standard/system that the UN Super Government is developing:
“The Trust Framework should not prevent interoperability with the solutions designed on a global level, such as the one being developed by the WHO or ICAO. This is one of the primary design principles and it has implications in all components of the proposed trust framework.”
 
[cid:image006.png@01D74F1F.CF551880]
trust-framework_interoperability_certificates_en.pdf (europa.eu)<https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/ehealth/docs/trust-framework_interoperability_certificates_en.pdf>
 
No-one needs to be an IT expert to understand that “data will not be stored centrally” is pure semantics. The “Gateway”:
 
* Is at the center of this system
* Will be interoperable with the standard/system the UN Super Government is developing
 
 
 
1. The Certificate will only be used to validate vaccine status/immunity/negative test
That’s what we’re being told…
 
However, a simple certificate valid Y/N should suffice then, right?
 
In reality, 3 different types of certificates will be in use – as per the 3 use cases and – in my opinion – quite a few details is collected as part of each certificate:
 
* Vaccination status
* Immunity after recent infection
* Recent negative test
 
The validity of these 3 types of certificates can be managed centrally. And theoretically, health institutions could decide that e.g. a certificate of recent infection is not valid for 180 days, but only let’s say 90 (less sinister: it could also be prolonged).
 
Moreover, the functional documentation for the certificate says following:
Modularity and scalability. This is strongly linked with the previous key design principle. The trust framework architecture should be modular and easily scalable, for instance, to additional usage scenarios, use cases and types of certificates. The trust framework already supports different usage scenarios (e.g. alternative settings in which certificates may be requested or verification may take place). Examples of other types of certificates that could be supported by potential extensions of the trust framework include certificate of negative COVID-19 tests and certificates of recovery from COVID-19, while examples of other use cases that could be supported are travel or (participation in) leisure activities (i.e. proof of vaccination for non-health-related purposes in domestic or international settings). Decisions related to ethical, societal or political questions pertaining to the use cases should be tackled separately.
 
trust-framework_interoperability_certificates_en.pdf (europa.eu)<https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/ehealth/docs/trust-framework_interoperability_certificates_en.pdf>
 
Please read this carefully and let it sink in. This could have really scary consequences.
 
 
 
PRESS CONFERENCE BY LEAD NEGOTIATOR Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR
 
As mentioned previously, the press release was supported by an associated press conference by Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, who negotiated the deal between the European Council (which unites the leaders of the European member states) and the European Parliament.
 
I created a transcript of the important stuff – details in attachment.
 
I’m copying the most notable pieces here:
“Listen let me make clear one point of substance. We have a situation here which is unprecedented and poses a whole array of scientific challenges. But we are not here to come up with scientific responses but to make laws. And that’s what we do.

And the whole principle of this law is: all European citizens – every citizen that from regulation onwards 1) gets a PCR 2) a serological test OR 3) a vaccination shall be provided with a certificate. Automatically. Issued by the Health System of the member state in which the European citizens intend to enjoy free movement back again.
Because I get asked so many times: how can you makes sure the vaccination gets it right? That the vaccination is safe? Or actually that you’re immune after the vaccination? How do you make sure that the PCR is not obsolete? How do you make sure…? No, listen… Those are scientific questions that I don’t want to be answered by this LEGAL instrument. This piece of legislation. We have to ascertain some legal clarity, some rules, which are binding for the states so that we regain trust not only member states between each other but also European citizens. Trust that they can actually exert their right to free movement with no arbitrary restrictions. As a matter of principle. And that’s what we do.”
 
“Supposedly, we are heading for a situation in which all of European citizens will be finally vaccinated. Eventually, it’s going to happen. So, let’s hope that it will happen. But as so far it is not the situation, there’s people resorting to PCRs or antigen tests which are also allowed according to the member states policy.”
 
 
For those of you still reading: thanks for taking the time. I’m afraid this train can no longer be stopped and I’m genuinely concerned. I genuinely don’t know what to do.
 

"Routine immunisation in schools
Young people aged 16 and 17 are presumed, in law, to be able to consent to
their own medical treatment. Younger children who understand fully what is
involved in the proposed procedure (referred to as ‘Gillick competent’) can
also give consent, although ideally their parents will be involved.
If a person aged 16 or 17 or a Gillick-competent child consents to treatment, a
parent cannot override that consent.
If a person aged 16 or 17 or a Gillick-competent child refuses treatment that
refusal should be accepted. It is unlikely that a person with parental
responsibility could overrule such a refusal. It is possible that the court might
overrule a young person’s refusal if an application to court is made
under section 8 of the Children Act 1989 or the inherent jurisdiction of the
High Court.
There is no requirement for consent to be in writing ."
Green-Book-Chapter-2-Consent-PDF-77K.pdf

“Jesus... What Happened To Us?”

Shut your mouth, get in line
Just behave or pay the fine
They're pulling on your backbone
And taking out your spine

They want you weak, don't speak
Don't question, don't think
Keep staring at your smart phone
Get dumber every week

Now give up your freedom and shush
Oh Jesus, what happened to us?

Leave the church, kill your faith
Judge the skin and learn to hate
Make yourself the enemy
But call yourself a saint

Learn the rules, be a fool
Remove your kid from school
And apologize for everything
Apologize for you

Now give the TV all of your trust
Oh Jesus, what happened to us?

Mark, Jack, Bill, Joe
They'll tell you what you need to know
They give you your permissions
And tell you where to go

Lights, camera, action, edit
We're so pathetic
You believe it 'cause you watched it
You believe it 'cause they said it

Now everybody stay home and rust
Oh Jesus, what happened to us?

We used to stand and fight
We had a voice alright
We had a life worth living
We had a damn worth giving
Now we're watching it fall
That's the truth of it all

So shut your mouth, get in line
Just behave or pay the fine
They're pulling on your backbone
And taking out your spine

They want you weak, don't speak
Don't question, don't think
Keep staring at your smart phone
Get dumber every week

Don't nobody put up a fuss
Oh Jesus, what's happened to us?

Oh Jesus
Jesus, what happened to us?

https://youtu.be/Xu0GPo7GkPk

Interview with PAT CASH! 🔎🎾

‘It was like we were zombie eating mass murderers’

“There are going to be casualties, there’s no doubt about it. There’s quite a lot of depression.”

https://youtu.be/aMT2dH4DxRU

Turns out Mike Yeadon was right (once again) & Geert Vanden Bossche was wrong?

Review of 25 studies of Tcell immunity, w/focus on C19 convalescent patients, by preeminent US Immunology/Virology Lab, highlights robust natural Tcell immunity, making it “ unlikely SARS CoV2 variants might escape T cell recognition at population level ".
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931312821002389?via%3Dihub

The Biderman Chart of Coercion

In 1983 Dr Fauci Deceptively Attempted To Link AIDS To Children And Failed

"Press accounts, noticing Fauci’s article, immediately sounded the alarm. “Household contacts can transmit AIDS,” read one nationally syndicated report on the UPI wire dated May 5, 1983. The Associated Press queried the next day “Does AIDS spread by Routine Contact?” and quoted Fauci as their lead authority. The New York Times raised the specter of household transmission between family members, invoking Fauci’s commentary as its main authority."

https://greatgameindia.com/dr-fauci-aids-children/

Margaret Buttimer you are all of us.

"Cork granny who refuses to wear mask in shops jailed for weekend after appearing in court unmasked"
https://www.thesun.ie/news/7027458/cork-granny-refuses-wear-mask-shops-jailed/

"Covid anxiety syndrome is brought about by many factors, including inconsistent messaging around risk holding us in a state of fear with the messaging around the level of danger being slightly lifted at times and then brought back in with new threats like variants. The problem with intermittent messaging is that it keeps us in a state of constant fear. This fear ‘outcompetes’ our capacity to reason clearly. If we can't think things through anxiety will spiral and we may adopt behaviours, such as avoidance, worrying and checking that will, paradoxically, keep us stuck.
Unfortunately many are still avoiding, checking and worrying even though there is hardly any infection out there and the infection fatality rate with the vaccine rollout is comparable, according to many experts, to seasonal influenza..The study comes alongside the launch of a new book - A State of Fear - revealing how fear was used to control the public into adhering to lockdown restrictions.
It shows how hard hitting ad campaigns - which cost over £184 million last year - and warnings that youngsters could kill granny if they didn’t stick to the rules, as well as daily death figures added to the state of panic as did advice for people to stay safe assuming they had the virus. It also revealed people UK had among the highest overall levels of concern about covid in Europe, America and Asia, despite having one of the strictest lockdown policies."
https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1439827/coronavirus-news-britons-struggle-mental-health/

"who the fuck do these MPs think they are?" Ian Brown

Leonardo de Vinci

There are three classes of people: those who see, those who see when they are shown, those who do not see.

It's always been this way. Our reality is a spiritual filter. Every soul sees eventually. Some just need a few more turns of the merry go round😊

We're at the end of this ride. I'm curious to see what the next ride is😁

Love Spreads faster than the virus of fear.
https://youtu.be/ct-qa6SjRZo

Big mistake for that MP to take on Ian Bown. Big mistake. If it comes to choosing between their MPs and their most talented and visionary artists, people will always choose their artists. She pushed for a choice, and we have chosen. Ian Brown speaks for all of us, she does not, or no longer does with immediate effect. We choose Ian Brown.

Art wins this for all of us.

The New Normal

( ⬆️ My grandfather was Charlie Chaplin's Italian lawyer)