"In 2010, Bill Gates visited an unremarkable building in an industrial estate on the outskirts of Shenzhen, China. With row after row of high-tech machinery humming inside, the place could easily be mistaken for an anonymous data warehouse. But Mr Gates and Ray Yip, head of the Gates Foundation’s China operation, saw something else that day. As they toured the BGI headquarters, the two men were stunned by the ambition of the scientists working at the biotech company. Inside, more than 150 state of the art genetic sequencing machines were analysing the equivalent of thousands of human genomes a day. The company is working towards a goal of building a huge library based on the DNA of many millions of people."
EXC: Bill Gates Foundation Funded Genomics Firm 'Mining' DNA Data Through COVID Tests.
https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/bgi-genomics-gates-foundation-collab/
EXC: Bill Gates Foundation Funded Genomics Firm 'Mining' DNA Data Through COVID Tests.
https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/bgi-genomics-gates-foundation-collab/
The National Pulse
EXC: Bill Gates Foundation Funded Genomics Firm ‘Mining’ DNA Data Through COVID Tests.
BGI Genomics—the Chinese Communist Party-linked genomics firm flagged by U.S. officials as “mining” the DNA of Americans—has collaborated extensively with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, The National Pulse can reveal. The company has recently come under…
👍1
"The Gates Foundation has also funded BGI projects relating to genome sequencing alongside Chinese Communist Party bodies such as the Ministry of Science and Technology and Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
Similarly, Dr. Tadataka Yamada, the former president of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s global health program, serves as the Chairman of BGI’s Scientific Advisory Board.
And in 2016, BGI launched a U.S.-based office in Washington—the home state of Microsoft and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
BGI’s ties to Washington also appear to have influenced the firm’s decision to target the state with its COVID-19 test kits, part of the company’s plot to “mine” the data of Americans.
“Early last March, the state of Washington was the site of the first major coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. As COVID rates and the need for tests were spiking, BGI Group, the world’s largest biotech firm—a global giant based in China—approached the state of Washington with an enticing offer. In a strikingly personal letter to the governor, BGI proposed to build and help run state-of-the-art COVID testing labs,” 60 Minutes summarized.
But officials ultimately turned down the offer at the request of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence over BGI’s ties to the Chinese government."
ALL CLEAR NOW?
Similarly, Dr. Tadataka Yamada, the former president of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s global health program, serves as the Chairman of BGI’s Scientific Advisory Board.
And in 2016, BGI launched a U.S.-based office in Washington—the home state of Microsoft and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
BGI’s ties to Washington also appear to have influenced the firm’s decision to target the state with its COVID-19 test kits, part of the company’s plot to “mine” the data of Americans.
“Early last March, the state of Washington was the site of the first major coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. As COVID rates and the need for tests were spiking, BGI Group, the world’s largest biotech firm—a global giant based in China—approached the state of Washington with an enticing offer. In a strikingly personal letter to the governor, BGI proposed to build and help run state-of-the-art COVID testing labs,” 60 Minutes summarized.
But officials ultimately turned down the offer at the request of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence over BGI’s ties to the Chinese government."
ALL CLEAR NOW?
Commander SO15 (CTC)
New Scotland Yard
Victoria Embankment
London
SW1A 2JL
Dear Sirs,
Request for formal investigation
I wish to draw your attention to conduct and omissions by the Government (and individual ministers within the Government) that I consider to be crimes against humanity.
I formally request that you undertake a comprehensive and diligent investigation into all matters detailed below, ensuring appropriate action is pursued.
I believe that the Government has engaged in the termination of British lives and committed numerous crimes against the British public - the public that they are duty bound to serve.
I understand a crime against humanity to be a deliberate act, typically committed as part of a widespread and/or systematic attack directed at a civilian population with knowledge of the attack that causes human suffering or death on a large scale.
The Government, since the introduction of The Coronavirus Act 2020, has taken intentional and reckless decisions and actions that have led to the Government being guilty of domestic and national terrorism and of removing each individual’s unalienable rights, as detailed below:
1. The Government has denied early life saving treatment for COVID-19; denied life- saving treatment for non COVID-19 medical issues; failed to advise the public of proven non-medical treatment options;
2. The Government mandated “do not resuscitate orders” for the elderly and the disabled. These were put in place without the knowledge and consent of the individual or next of kin;
3. The Government mandated social distancing and mask wearing despite evidence that such measures are at best ineffective and at worst, harmful; has denied contact with family and friends; access to general medical treatment; access to work and school; and access to leisure;
4. The Government forced the closure of “non-essential” businesses resulting in millions of citizens having to rely on Government furlough schemes to survive and introduced stimulus packages which, combined, have led to enormous national debt. Those business closures have led to the suicide of 33 individuals (to date) from one group alone;
5. The Government’s “stay at home” orders have imprisoned citizens in their own homes and the closing of the borders has removed the right of citizens to freely travel;
6. Government policy has denied those in care homes access to visitors; prevented citizens from seeing family and loved ones in hospital and many citizens have consequently died alone; denied citizens the right to attend funerals; and denied children the right to visit grandparents;
7. The Government has intentionally deprived citizens of their fundamental human rights contrary to international law; and
8. The Government has:
embarked upon state terrorism in the form of a relentless fear and propaganda campaign spearheaded by the Behavioural Insights Team and implemented by the BBC and other MSM – it has been admitted that these psychological measures were covert, without the knowledge or consent of the British people and now recognised in many cases to have caused irreversible harm;
introduced disproportionate and draconian policies in response to COVID-19 that have eroded civil liberties and human rights of the citizens;
rolled-out an experimental vaccine with no consideration of immediate, medium and long-term adverse effects. Most people are not aware that the vaccines have Black Triangle status, which “cannot be removed until safety is well-established” (as per the Government guidelines), nor that the vaccines are in trial until 2023 therefore the Government has not received an individual’s informed consent to vaccinate. Regulating bodies such as MHRA are not independent, as claimed, having received substantial financial donations from The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (on record);
repeatedly lied to citizens about the lifting of lock down measures, PCR testing, asymptomatic spread, case numbers, death numbers, vaccinations.. @ukcitizen2021
http://ukcitizen2021.org/police/
New Scotland Yard
Victoria Embankment
London
SW1A 2JL
Dear Sirs,
Request for formal investigation
I wish to draw your attention to conduct and omissions by the Government (and individual ministers within the Government) that I consider to be crimes against humanity.
I formally request that you undertake a comprehensive and diligent investigation into all matters detailed below, ensuring appropriate action is pursued.
I believe that the Government has engaged in the termination of British lives and committed numerous crimes against the British public - the public that they are duty bound to serve.
I understand a crime against humanity to be a deliberate act, typically committed as part of a widespread and/or systematic attack directed at a civilian population with knowledge of the attack that causes human suffering or death on a large scale.
The Government, since the introduction of The Coronavirus Act 2020, has taken intentional and reckless decisions and actions that have led to the Government being guilty of domestic and national terrorism and of removing each individual’s unalienable rights, as detailed below:
1. The Government has denied early life saving treatment for COVID-19; denied life- saving treatment for non COVID-19 medical issues; failed to advise the public of proven non-medical treatment options;
2. The Government mandated “do not resuscitate orders” for the elderly and the disabled. These were put in place without the knowledge and consent of the individual or next of kin;
3. The Government mandated social distancing and mask wearing despite evidence that such measures are at best ineffective and at worst, harmful; has denied contact with family and friends; access to general medical treatment; access to work and school; and access to leisure;
4. The Government forced the closure of “non-essential” businesses resulting in millions of citizens having to rely on Government furlough schemes to survive and introduced stimulus packages which, combined, have led to enormous national debt. Those business closures have led to the suicide of 33 individuals (to date) from one group alone;
5. The Government’s “stay at home” orders have imprisoned citizens in their own homes and the closing of the borders has removed the right of citizens to freely travel;
6. Government policy has denied those in care homes access to visitors; prevented citizens from seeing family and loved ones in hospital and many citizens have consequently died alone; denied citizens the right to attend funerals; and denied children the right to visit grandparents;
7. The Government has intentionally deprived citizens of their fundamental human rights contrary to international law; and
8. The Government has:
embarked upon state terrorism in the form of a relentless fear and propaganda campaign spearheaded by the Behavioural Insights Team and implemented by the BBC and other MSM – it has been admitted that these psychological measures were covert, without the knowledge or consent of the British people and now recognised in many cases to have caused irreversible harm;
introduced disproportionate and draconian policies in response to COVID-19 that have eroded civil liberties and human rights of the citizens;
rolled-out an experimental vaccine with no consideration of immediate, medium and long-term adverse effects. Most people are not aware that the vaccines have Black Triangle status, which “cannot be removed until safety is well-established” (as per the Government guidelines), nor that the vaccines are in trial until 2023 therefore the Government has not received an individual’s informed consent to vaccinate. Regulating bodies such as MHRA are not independent, as claimed, having received substantial financial donations from The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (on record);
repeatedly lied to citizens about the lifting of lock down measures, PCR testing, asymptomatic spread, case numbers, death numbers, vaccinations.. @ukcitizen2021
http://ukcitizen2021.org/police/
Forwarded from Alex Bull
(letter to a school withdrawing consent for covid jab of children)
Dear Mr/Mrs
I am writing to you with to expressly forbid my child/children from being vaccinated for COVID 19 in the event that the Government implements a policy of doing so.
In the absence of parental consent, should the Government, vaccinator and/or school seek to apply the 'Gillick Competency Test' then I will submit the following:
1. As of 18 May 2021, 33 Children between the ages of 10 and 19 have sadly died with COVID (*1). However, as of 13 May 2021 there have been 374 reported deaths following the Pfizer Vaccine, 786 from the Oxford/Astra Zeneca (AZ) Vaccine and 4 from the Moderna Vaccine (*2). It cannot therefore be argued that the benefits of COVID vaccines for children outweigh the risks. Of course, clinical trials regarding the efficacy the AZ Vaccine on children were paused following concerns relating to fatal blood clotting (*3).
2. Participants of the Phase Ill trial will be monitored for a further 2 years (*4). As such the phase Ill trial is not yet complete and accordingly, the long-term side effects are unknown. The Gillick Competency test requires that a child is advised on the potential risks and implications arising from 'treatment'(*5). It is not therefore possible to advise any lay person; let alone a child as to the potential side effects. As such the Gillick Test cannot be satisfied.
3. Given the fact that the long-term side effects are unknown, children must be advised as to the potential long terms side effects such as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) (*6) and Vaccine Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED) (*7). These complex vaccine induced conditions are not easily comprehendible, particularly for children.
4. Side effects from coronavirus vaccination are not without precedent. In 2009 6 million [mostly] children were vaccinated against the swine flu, many of whom suffered brain injury. As a result, the government were ordered to pay £60m in compensation.(*8)
*1 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weekl yprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales
*2 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirusvaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
*3 https:/ /www.ft.com/content/9748269c-3f40-40e5-9606-2d2cc0d4946f
*4 https://www.nejm.org/doi/fu 11/10.1056/N EJ Moa20345 77
*5 https:/ /learning.nspcc.org.uk/child-protection-system/gillick-competence-fraser-guidelines
*6 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-020-00789-5
*7 https:/ /www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC790l381/#b0070
*8 https:/ /www.thetimes.eo.uk/article/victims-of-swine-flu-jab-to-get-pound60m-payout-02ptvlnlzqk
This is not an exhaustive list but I trust that you understand my concerns regarding the ethical issues regarding consent and the potential unknown side effects. I fear that children will be killed and/or seriously injured by these vaccines and the benefit does not outweigh the potential harm. It should be borne in mind that the manufacturers of the vaccines have been granted immunity from liability for any harm caused by their vaccines (*9) Therefore any liability could fall on the government, the vaccinator or the school.
Kind regards.
NAME
*9 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-astrazeneca-results-vaccine-1iability-idUSKCN24V2EN
Dear Mr/Mrs
I am writing to you with to expressly forbid my child/children from being vaccinated for COVID 19 in the event that the Government implements a policy of doing so.
In the absence of parental consent, should the Government, vaccinator and/or school seek to apply the 'Gillick Competency Test' then I will submit the following:
1. As of 18 May 2021, 33 Children between the ages of 10 and 19 have sadly died with COVID (*1). However, as of 13 May 2021 there have been 374 reported deaths following the Pfizer Vaccine, 786 from the Oxford/Astra Zeneca (AZ) Vaccine and 4 from the Moderna Vaccine (*2). It cannot therefore be argued that the benefits of COVID vaccines for children outweigh the risks. Of course, clinical trials regarding the efficacy the AZ Vaccine on children were paused following concerns relating to fatal blood clotting (*3).
2. Participants of the Phase Ill trial will be monitored for a further 2 years (*4). As such the phase Ill trial is not yet complete and accordingly, the long-term side effects are unknown. The Gillick Competency test requires that a child is advised on the potential risks and implications arising from 'treatment'(*5). It is not therefore possible to advise any lay person; let alone a child as to the potential side effects. As such the Gillick Test cannot be satisfied.
3. Given the fact that the long-term side effects are unknown, children must be advised as to the potential long terms side effects such as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) (*6) and Vaccine Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED) (*7). These complex vaccine induced conditions are not easily comprehendible, particularly for children.
4. Side effects from coronavirus vaccination are not without precedent. In 2009 6 million [mostly] children were vaccinated against the swine flu, many of whom suffered brain injury. As a result, the government were ordered to pay £60m in compensation.(*8)
*1 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weekl yprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales
*2 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirusvaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
*3 https:/ /www.ft.com/content/9748269c-3f40-40e5-9606-2d2cc0d4946f
*4 https://www.nejm.org/doi/fu 11/10.1056/N EJ Moa20345 77
*5 https:/ /learning.nspcc.org.uk/child-protection-system/gillick-competence-fraser-guidelines
*6 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-020-00789-5
*7 https:/ /www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC790l381/#b0070
*8 https:/ /www.thetimes.eo.uk/article/victims-of-swine-flu-jab-to-get-pound60m-payout-02ptvlnlzqk
This is not an exhaustive list but I trust that you understand my concerns regarding the ethical issues regarding consent and the potential unknown side effects. I fear that children will be killed and/or seriously injured by these vaccines and the benefit does not outweigh the potential harm. It should be borne in mind that the manufacturers of the vaccines have been granted immunity from liability for any harm caused by their vaccines (*9) Therefore any liability could fall on the government, the vaccinator or the school.
Kind regards.
NAME
*9 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-astrazeneca-results-vaccine-1iability-idUSKCN24V2EN
Has nothing to do with controlling a virus, has to do with controlling us
https://www.bitchute.com/video/USPqr12TMshS/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/USPqr12TMshS/
Forwarded from World Doctors Alliance
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr Charles Hoffe explains why you must say ‘No’ to child vaccination
"Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19"
International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research2(1), May 10, 2021
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/46
International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research2(1), May 10, 2021
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/46
"The assumption that a “public health crisis” is one to be addressed by the natural sciences (particularly biology, medicine, etc.), is a flawed one. Anything involving human behaviours must call upon a broader range of sciences, including the social sciences and even the humanities. When locking down, in the name of “following the science,” it was usually an overly restrictive and thus profoundly flawed notion of “science” that politicians adopted. A doctor of medicine is not someone you let lead where issues of social relationships, political legitimacy, business, finance, and production are concerned.
At no point does the documentary explain why a “world health organization” is even necessary. One might just as well conclude that something like the WHO exists as a neo-imperial means of exercising tutelage over the newly decolonized states that joined the UN from the 1950s to the 1980s, and lacked sufficient means to erect a public health infrastructure of their own—thus some of the very tools of independent statehood were, ironically, imported."
https://zeroanthropology.net/2021/05/24/the-world-health-organization-who-a-problem-of-trust/
At no point does the documentary explain why a “world health organization” is even necessary. One might just as well conclude that something like the WHO exists as a neo-imperial means of exercising tutelage over the newly decolonized states that joined the UN from the 1950s to the 1980s, and lacked sufficient means to erect a public health infrastructure of their own—thus some of the very tools of independent statehood were, ironically, imported."
https://zeroanthropology.net/2021/05/24/the-world-health-organization-who-a-problem-of-trust/
ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY
The World Health Organization (WHO): A Problem of Trust
Over the past twenty years or so, what has been the record of the World Health Organization when it comes to major public health crises? Has the WHO itself invented at least some of those crises? W…
"No child who was not already profoundly ill has died of Covid-19 in Britain, a large study has indicated:
All children who died of Covid-19 were already seriously ill | News | The Times"
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/all-children-who-died-of-covid-19-were-already-seriously-ill-jlxr8mkxq
All children who died of Covid-19 were already seriously ill | News | The Times"
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/all-children-who-died-of-covid-19-were-already-seriously-ill-jlxr8mkxq
www.thetimes.co.uk
All children who died of Covid-19 were already seriously ill
No child who was not already profoundly ill has died of Covid-19 in Britain, a large study has indicated, with the researchers saying that the results should reassure parents as a new school term begins.The study looked at 260 hospitals in England, Wales…
"Last week, here in “New Normal” Germany, the government (which, it goes without saying, bears no resemblance to the Nazi regime, or any other totalitarian regime) implemented a social-segregation system that bans anyone who refuses to publicly conform to the official “New Normal” ideology from participating in German society. From now on, only those who have an official “vaccination pass” or proof of a negative PCR test are allowed to sit down and eat at restaurants, shop at a “non-essential” stores, or go to bars, or the cinema, or wherever."
Greetings from “New Normal” Germany! – Consent Factory, Inc.
https://consentfactory.org/2021/05/25/greetings-from-new-normal-germany/
Greetings from “New Normal” Germany! – Consent Factory, Inc.
https://consentfactory.org/2021/05/25/greetings-from-new-normal-germany/
Consent Factory, Inc.
Greetings from “New Normal” Germany!
On April 1, 1933, shortly after Hitler was appointed chancellor, the Nazis staged a boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany. Members of the Storm Troopers (“die Sturmabteilung,” or the …
Good news: Even mild COVID-19 induces lasting antibody protection – People who have had mild illness develop antibody-producing cells that can last lifetime: Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
https://medicine.wustl.edu/news/good-news-mild-covid-19-induces-lasting-antibody-protection/
https://medicine.wustl.edu/news/good-news-mild-covid-19-induces-lasting-antibody-protection/
WashU Medicine
Good news: Mild COVID-19 induces lasting antibody protection | WashU Medicine
People who have had mild illness develop antibody-producing cells that can last lifetime