Nurse whistleblower from the US speaks out. UK midwives have told me the same - quote “at the end of some shifts we have more dead babies in the mortuary than live ones in maternity “ Euthanasia is also happening.Which is why the Dimmock inquest is so important, restarts 1/12/25.

https://t.me/ABridgen

"- Google's 2024 antitrust lawsuit by the DOJ accuses it of monopolizing search through $26 billion in payments to Apple and others to default Google Search, maintaining 90% U.S. market share, with a 2025 ruling ordering divestiture of Android, as per the complaint filing.

- The company's 2018 EU fine of $5 billion for Android violations demonstrates predatory behavior, forcing manufacturers to pre-install Google apps, stifling competition, and harming consumers, as the European Court of Justice upheld in 2022.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_18_4581

- Google's 2023 "helpful content update" deprioritized 70% of independent sites, favoring corporate media, resulting in 40% traffic loss for small publishers, per a 2025 Search Engine Journal analysis, exemplifying destructive gatekeeping.


- The 2019 Cambridge Analytica scandal exposed Google's data practices, with internal emails revealing 500 million users' information shared without consent. This led to a $5 billion FTC fine in 2020 for privacy violations, showcasing psychopathic disregard for user rights.

- Google's AI Overviews in 2024 spread misinformation in 20% of queries, such as advising "eat rocks" or "glue on pizza," harming users and small creators by reducing traffic 15%, per a 2025 Wired investigation into algorithmic flaws.

- The 2022 Google antitrust case in the EU fined $4.34 billion for favoring its services in search results, destroying competition in shopping and maps, with 2025 impacts showing a 30% market share loss for rivals.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_18_4581

- Google's 2018 Project Dragonfly for censored search in China complied with state demands to suppress human rights content, prioritizing profits over ethics, as leaked documents showed, leading to employee resignations and 2020 cancellation.


- The 2021 Google-Facebook "Jedi Blue" agreement, revealed in the Texas AG lawsuit, rigged ad auctions to exclude competitors, costing publishers $1 billion annually, exemplifying evil collusion per 2025 DOJ filings.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-google-monopolizing-digital-advertising-technologies

- Google's 2020 COVID misinformation policy censored 1 million videos, including legitimate debates on vaccines, aligning with WHO mandates but suppressing free speech, as a 2025 House Judiciary report found 80% removals favored left-leaning narratives.
https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/google-admits-censorship-under-biden-promises-end-bans-youtube-accounts


- The company's 2019 employee walkout over sexual harassment handling revealed a culture of protection for executives, with $90 million payouts to accused leaders, exemplifying psychopathic internal governance per the New York Times 2019 exposé.

- Google's 2024 election interference, as per the MRC report, showed 91% negative coverage for Trump in search results, destroying balanced information access and influencing 58% of undecided voters per the 2025 Pew poll.

- The 2022 antitrust suit by Epic Games found Google destroyed evidence, with 2025 sanctions of $1 million for spoliation, exemplifying criminal malfeasance in legal proceedings.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63229094/epic-games-inc-v-google-llc/

- Google's 2017 diversity memo firing of James Damore for critiquing DEI policies highlighted suppression of internal dissent, with a 2025 class-action lawsuit awarding $1.2 billion to 15,000 employees for bias against conservatives.

- Despite human rights abuses, the company's 2020 collaboration with China on AI projects over ethics, as per Amnesty International's 2024 report on surveillance tech exports.

- Google's 2023 $5 billion fine for tracking users in incognito mode, by the U.S. District Court, destroyed privacy expectations for 136 million users, exemplifying psychopathic data

How with Starmer neoliberalism signals its complete take over of the remains of the British empire

"This duality divides the public: white nationalists see him as a Muslim "protector," while pro-Palestine groups decry his complicity. The grooming gangs inquiry he announced in June 2025, a U-turn amid Elon Musk's attacks, further stokes ethnic tensions, distracting from elite cover-ups in scandals like Savile or Epstein [20]. Historically, neoliberal regimes have allowed powerful abusers—royals like Mountbatten linked to Kincora, or MPs like Peter Morrison under Thatcher—to evade justice, sealing files until 2065 [21]. Starmer's DPP failures fit this pattern, protecting the system that now bombs innocents abroad for profit.”

In the twilight of the British Empire, a subtle yet inexorable transformation has unfolded, one that has seen the once-dominant liberal ideals of social welfare, democratic sovereignty, and equitable progress give way to the cold calculus of neoliberalism. This shift, which began to accelerate in the interwar period before World War II, has culminated in the election of Keir Starmer as Prime Minister in July 2024—a figure whose membership in the Trilateral Commission and policy decisions mark the final consolidation of neoliberal hegemony over what remains of Britain's global influence. Neoliberalism, characterized by privatization, deregulation, and the commodification of public assets, has not only eroded the social contract but has also weaponized identity politics to maintain control. Nowhere is this more evident than in Starmer's handling of hostilities toward Muslims: he pays lip service to tolerance and inclusion, stoking divisions that portray him as overly sympathetic, while his actions—such as continuing arms sales to Israel amid allegations of genocide—reveal a disdain for the very communities he pretends to protect. This article traces the historical arc from liberalism's decline to neoliberalism's triumph, examining how Britain's assets were sold off, how elite networks like the Trilateral Commission facilitated this takeover, and how Starmer's regime represents its completion, all while exploiting anti-Muslim sentiment as a distraction.

The roots of neoliberalism's ascendancy can be traced to the economic and ideological crises of the interwar years, when classical liberalism—rooted in free markets tempered by social reforms—began to falter under the weight of global depression and rising fascism. As early as the 1930s, thinkers like Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises, exiled from Europe and finding refuge in institutions such as the London School of Economics, laid the groundwork for a new economic orthodoxy that prioritized market fundamentalism over state intervention [1]. This was not merely an academic exercise; it was a response to the perceived threats of socialism and Keynesian welfare states. The Mont Pelerin Society, founded in 1947 by Hayek and others, became the intellectual cradle of neoliberalism, advocating for the rollback of government controls and the opening of economies to private capital [2]. In Britain, the empire's decline after World War II provided fertile ground. The war had bankrupted the nation, forcing the sale of overseas assets and the acceptance of American loans under the Marshall Plan, which subtly imposed neoliberal strings: open markets and reduced tariffs in exchange for aid [3]. This marked the beginning of Britain's transformation from imperial power to neoliberal vassal, where national assets—from utilities to colonies—were gradually commodified and sold to the highest bidder.

The postwar era accelerated this shift, as liberalism's promises of social mobility and equality clashed with the realities of austerity and decolonization. Clement Attlee's Labour government (1945–1951) attempted to salvage liberalism through the welfare state—the NHS, nationalization of key industries—but this was short-lived. By the 1970s, stagflation and the oil crisis exposed the limits of Keynesianism, paving the way for neoliberal reformers.

Margaret Thatcher, elected in 1979, became the avatar of this transition, drawing inspiration from Hayek and Milton Friedman. Her privatization spree—selling off British Telecom, British Gas, and British Airways—signaled that even core national assets were up for grabs [4]. Thatcher's alliance with Ronald Reagan amplified this globally; Reagan's tax cuts and deregulation echoed Thatcher's policies, while both supported Augusto Pinochet's Chile as a neoliberal laboratory, where U.S.-backed economists (the "Chicago Boys") privatized pensions and utilities under a dictatorship [5]. Britain's empire remnants—Commonwealth ties, financial hubs like the City of London—were repurposed as nodes in a global neoliberal network, where assets flowed to multinational corporations rather than serving public good.

This neoliberal wave was not accidental but orchestrated through elite networks that transcended national borders. The Trilateral Commission, founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller, played a pivotal role, uniting leaders from North America, Europe, and Asia to promote free markets, deregulation, and global integration [6]. By the 1980s, the Commission had influenced policies that accelerated asset sales across the West: in Britain, Thatcher's deregulated financial sector turned London into a haven for global capital, while in the U.S., Reagan's Savings and Loan crisis led to taxpayer bailouts of private failures [7]. The end of the Cold War in 1991 further entrenched neoliberalism; the "Washington Consensus"—promoted by the IMF and World Bank—demanded privatization and austerity from debtor nations, effectively putting sovereign assets on the auction block [8]. Britain's North Sea oil, once a national treasure, was privatized, and public housing stock was sold off under Thatcher's "Right to Buy" scheme, creating a property bubble that benefited speculators [9].

Theresa May's tenure as Home Secretary (2010–2016) and Prime Minister (2016–2019) exemplified how neoliberalism intertwined with security state interests, further eroding public trust. May's Investigatory Powers Act (2016) expanded surveillance, ostensibly for national security but aligning with neoliberal goals of controlling dissent amid austerity protests [10]. Her commissioning of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) in 2014, following the Jimmy Savile scandal, was presented as a pursuit of justice, but the inquiry's multiple chair resignations and limited scope raised suspicions of containment rather than exposure [11]. May's close ties to the security apparatus—overseeing MI5 and counter-terrorism—mirrored Starmer's own DPP role, where he collaborated with intelligence agencies on terrorism cases while failing to prosecute high-profile abusers like Savile [12]. This period saw Britain's assets further commodified: the sale of Royal Mail (2013) and NHS privatization through private finance initiatives, all while May's "hostile environment" policy flamed anti-immigrant sentiment, distracting from economic dispossession [13].

The election of Keir Starmer in July 2024 marks the neoliberal takeover's completion, transforming Britain's political landscape into a uniparty facade where Labour and Conservatives converge on market-driven policies. Starmer's membership in the Trilateral Commission (2017–2020) is no coincidence; the organization, with its emphasis on transatlantic alliances and open economies, groomed him as a "safe pair of hands" for elite interests [14]. His May 2025 UK-EU deal, granting access to a £150 billion defense fund and easing trade barriers, exemplifies this: assets like fishing rights and military procurement are surrendered to supranational control, echoing neoliberal asset sales [15]. Starmer's cabinet, including Morgan McSweeney as chief of staff, has been accused of hiding £740,000 in thinktank donations, as revealed by Declassified UK and MintPress in 2025 allegations, suggesting a "plot without precedent" to install him and purge left-wing elements [16].