"The second part of Hamelink’s quick excursion into theoretical analysis in this film involves the triangle that constitutes what he sees as the COVID-19 system. Hamelink explains what makes up this triangle: “It consists of the cartels, clearly defined and with a clear agenda, and the political decision-makers, and the helpers”. The cartels in this case are the large transnational firms, pharmaceutical companies, online retailers, and financial interests. The cartels exercises influence on politics through lobbyists. The politicians, in Hamelink’s view, “muddle along” and work in a “grey zone” of determined ambiguity, of claiming to know less than they do. “And then there are the helpers, the assistants,” the third leg of Hamelink’s triangle: “those are the think-tanks, the lobbyists. Politics is driven mainly by lobbyists”. Hamelink singles out one group of “helpers”: “the key helpers in this case have especially been the media. Helpers are needed because decisions are made, not in the interests of the vast majority, but of the small minority”.
(Helpers of course include technocrats, actors such as Anthony Fauci—scientist and bureaucrat—whose connections span the political and corporate worlds. Fauci was constantly in front of the camera, speaking as if he were an elected political leader and had the final say on what hundreds of millions of people would be allowed to do, or not. Such overlaps inevitably produce a now routine phenomenon: the conflict of interest. One of the best representatives of this, in the present context, is Peter Daszak and his EcoHealth Alliance. Daszak has been responsible for both “investigating” the virus’ alleged origins as the only US member of the WHO team that went to China earlier this year, and yet he was also responsible for funding gain-of-function research at the same Wuhan Institute of Virology at the epicentre of the pandemic. Daszak insists that the virus was not even accidentally leaked from a lab [which has happened several times in the last 20 years in China], but rather spread from animals to humans. He has made these claims without offering any evidence, and despite serious evidence to the contrary. Allegations of a cover-up now seem to stand on more solid ground than ever and, at the very least, such a cover-up ought to have been expected.)
Ignoring the extent of know-how that exists in a society, Sloot observed that it has been the case that governments speak to the public as if it consisted entirely of pre-schoolers; addressing them as irrational creatures is not something that can be sustained (thus somewhat departing from Hamelink’s approach). I was worried that this phenomenon, of officials lecturing the public as if it consisted of infants, was one that prevailed mostly in North America. It is disappointing to see that the pattern of infantilizing citizens, in order to rationalize discipline and punishment, is one that stretched across the globe. The message was always fear. Nico rightly observes that a particular kind of regime specializes in fear-mongering: a dictatorship."
(Helpers of course include technocrats, actors such as Anthony Fauci—scientist and bureaucrat—whose connections span the political and corporate worlds. Fauci was constantly in front of the camera, speaking as if he were an elected political leader and had the final say on what hundreds of millions of people would be allowed to do, or not. Such overlaps inevitably produce a now routine phenomenon: the conflict of interest. One of the best representatives of this, in the present context, is Peter Daszak and his EcoHealth Alliance. Daszak has been responsible for both “investigating” the virus’ alleged origins as the only US member of the WHO team that went to China earlier this year, and yet he was also responsible for funding gain-of-function research at the same Wuhan Institute of Virology at the epicentre of the pandemic. Daszak insists that the virus was not even accidentally leaked from a lab [which has happened several times in the last 20 years in China], but rather spread from animals to humans. He has made these claims without offering any evidence, and despite serious evidence to the contrary. Allegations of a cover-up now seem to stand on more solid ground than ever and, at the very least, such a cover-up ought to have been expected.)
Ignoring the extent of know-how that exists in a society, Sloot observed that it has been the case that governments speak to the public as if it consisted entirely of pre-schoolers; addressing them as irrational creatures is not something that can be sustained (thus somewhat departing from Hamelink’s approach). I was worried that this phenomenon, of officials lecturing the public as if it consisted of infants, was one that prevailed mostly in North America. It is disappointing to see that the pattern of infantilizing citizens, in order to rationalize discipline and punishment, is one that stretched across the globe. The message was always fear. Nico rightly observes that a particular kind of regime specializes in fear-mongering: a dictatorship."
"Ad Broere, an economist and author who collaborated with Sloot, appears in the film, and he shares his view on what is really happening at present:
Ad Broere, economist and author
“I think the coronavirus is just one part of an action that has now been set in motion that really just pulls the strings tighter from the position of those who are in power at the moment and who want to retain that power whatever the cost and who have certain ideas about what to do with that power. Who have a vision of humanity and the future of humanity which they want to bring about in reality. A few people are going to determine our future effectively taking away our right to self-determination, effectively leading us towards a goal set by them with no regard for us”.
Broere observes that in The Netherlands, where roughly 10% of the people own 75% of “everything there is to own”, such inequality has greatly increased during the lockdown and it is set to increase further as a result. As small businesses collapsed, and the self-employed were ruined, big business made enormous gains and will likely expand as a result of the termination of their many smaller competitors.
Sloot then mounts a very effective presentation, showing the distribution of wealth in the European Union. Focusing specifically on The Netherlands, he notes how it took eight years to deal with the aftermath of the 2008-2009 financial crisis, with the bailout of the financial sector costing the country about 50 billion Euros and the cost was borne primarily by working citizens and small- and medium-sized enterprises. However, The Netherlands has now added about 100 billion Euros in debt to deal with the effects of the lockdown. The last crisis (2008-2009) resulted in hospital beds being cut from 2,200 to 1,100 in the country. One can only imagine what the next set of cuts will bring. If the last crisis took eight years to pay off, then it’s possible that the latest one could take 16 years (more or less).
The biggest winners are the massive corporations that have hoarded most of the wealth in the world, Broere explains, and that essentially pay no tax because they have countless ways of avoiding taxation. The new debt acquired by states will be paid by workers and small- and medium-sized businesses—and therefore, as Broere states, citizens themselves have “been given as security for the repayment of the debt”. No wonder the state now suddenly seems so desperately concerned about our state of health."
Ad Broere, economist and author
“I think the coronavirus is just one part of an action that has now been set in motion that really just pulls the strings tighter from the position of those who are in power at the moment and who want to retain that power whatever the cost and who have certain ideas about what to do with that power. Who have a vision of humanity and the future of humanity which they want to bring about in reality. A few people are going to determine our future effectively taking away our right to self-determination, effectively leading us towards a goal set by them with no regard for us”.
Broere observes that in The Netherlands, where roughly 10% of the people own 75% of “everything there is to own”, such inequality has greatly increased during the lockdown and it is set to increase further as a result. As small businesses collapsed, and the self-employed were ruined, big business made enormous gains and will likely expand as a result of the termination of their many smaller competitors.
Sloot then mounts a very effective presentation, showing the distribution of wealth in the European Union. Focusing specifically on The Netherlands, he notes how it took eight years to deal with the aftermath of the 2008-2009 financial crisis, with the bailout of the financial sector costing the country about 50 billion Euros and the cost was borne primarily by working citizens and small- and medium-sized enterprises. However, The Netherlands has now added about 100 billion Euros in debt to deal with the effects of the lockdown. The last crisis (2008-2009) resulted in hospital beds being cut from 2,200 to 1,100 in the country. One can only imagine what the next set of cuts will bring. If the last crisis took eight years to pay off, then it’s possible that the latest one could take 16 years (more or less).
The biggest winners are the massive corporations that have hoarded most of the wealth in the world, Broere explains, and that essentially pay no tax because they have countless ways of avoiding taxation. The new debt acquired by states will be paid by workers and small- and medium-sized businesses—and therefore, as Broere states, citizens themselves have “been given as security for the repayment of the debt”. No wonder the state now suddenly seems so desperately concerned about our state of health."
Ad Broere's Blog
een vernieuwende visie op mens, geld en waarde
"De Wit’s argument is that because they have amassed such spectacular wealth, these global giants also have more power than states. Then De Wit modifies his argument, and says that such corporate giants are more powerful than most states (clearly implying not all states). This is an important, but too subtle concession: his argument is that “in the past,” rules were made by countries, societies, and politicians, and corporations had to adapt to the laws of states—but apparently that is less true now.
De Wit explains that in this age of transition, there is heightened turmoil and instability as new rules are being created—and the coronavirus is the least of our problems, he adds. De Wit cautions that as long as we allow ourselves to be divided, we will not be able to challenge these new powers and create a better society."
De Wit explains that in this age of transition, there is heightened turmoil and instability as new rules are being created—and the coronavirus is the least of our problems, he adds. De Wit cautions that as long as we allow ourselves to be divided, we will not be able to challenge these new powers and create a better society."
"De Wit offers a refreshing, very human perspective:
“if we can create a civil movement that says: ‘We don’t want this. We want to get back to what matters: to friendship, being close, having fun, having parties, normal human things. If we all agree that we want to go back to a humane society, that movement can provide opposition. The good news in all this is that the technology we’re talking about—digital technology, biotech, a number of technological developments—the platforms you mentioned, blockchains, artificial intelligence…they can make the elite more powerful but they can also empower the citizens. The technology is neutral, it depends on how we use it. We can use technology to create a decentralized, local economy”.
“if we can create a civil movement that says: ‘We don’t want this. We want to get back to what matters: to friendship, being close, having fun, having parties, normal human things. If we all agree that we want to go back to a humane society, that movement can provide opposition. The good news in all this is that the technology we’re talking about—digital technology, biotech, a number of technological developments—the platforms you mentioned, blockchains, artificial intelligence…they can make the elite more powerful but they can also empower the citizens. The technology is neutral, it depends on how we use it. We can use technology to create a decentralized, local economy”.
"“The science” was really the silence: the silencing of a much needed diversity of expertise to inform and guide our decisions. THE SILENCE has been far more oppressive, a smothering force, than the virus itself ever could be. Here Sloot lists in quick succession the names we typically heard, all with connections and interests vested in the pharmaceutical industry: Christian Drosten (PCR testing); Anthony Fauci; Neil Ferguson (discussed in a previous review); Ab Osterhaus in The Netherlands (also mentioned before here). Sloot then points to how questionable this situation is: “I don’t understand why, when we seek advice about public health, our health, these are the kinds of people that are chosen to tell us what we should do”.
ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY
The World Health Organization (WHO): A Problem of Trust
Over the past twenty years or so, what has been the record of the World Health Organization when it comes to major public health crises? Has the WHO itself invented at least some of those crises? W…
"Nico Sloot almost closes the documentary with these vital observations:
“If you scare people enough, they can’t think straight. This experiment in fear has been going on for seven months now. It will be a big problem trying to reverse that in due course. It’s not going to be easy. If we’d acted on what we found out at the end of April, we would have incurred under a third of the debt we have now, maybe even less. We would have had fewer deaths too. We would have protected care homes right away, where most deaths occurred. They’re doing it again in this second wave: fear, panic, a kind of experiment—just because the ray of hope is a vaccine. That’s the cause of all the trouble”.
“If you scare people enough, they can’t think straight. This experiment in fear has been going on for seven months now. It will be a big problem trying to reverse that in due course. It’s not going to be easy. If we’d acted on what we found out at the end of April, we would have incurred under a third of the debt we have now, maybe even less. We would have had fewer deaths too. We would have protected care homes right away, where most deaths occurred. They’re doing it again in this second wave: fear, panic, a kind of experiment—just because the ray of hope is a vaccine. That’s the cause of all the trouble”.
Forwarded from Deleted Account
So what we are now thinking is Parliament to Depertment of education and then to St James Park.
Or other way round I'm going to walk a root.
Also can all children wear bright coloured T.Shirts. my Daughter is getting one with ov on it that is of course upto you.
Bring balloons (again up to you) placards, musical instruments make as much noise as possible.
Lastly we are getting close so can we keep sharing the poster and keep all chat on here about the children's march👍👍👍
Or other way round I'm going to walk a root.
Also can all children wear bright coloured T.Shirts. my Daughter is getting one with ov on it that is of course upto you.
Bring balloons (again up to you) placards, musical instruments make as much noise as possible.
Lastly we are getting close so can we keep sharing the poster and keep all chat on here about the children's march👍👍👍
Forwarded from Deleted Account
👍👍Yes 1pm
I'll confirm root by the end of the week but definitely in a park for the end
I'll confirm root by the end of the week but definitely in a park for the end
If you are looking for a T-shirt for your kids to wear at the children's march on the 19th June at 1pm you can try our LOVE not fear ones here. Please note they are prototypes as I or the team have not seen them yet but if they look anything like in the photos which I sincerely hope they will, they will be perfect for the children's march! Maybe just buy 1 to look at it first before buying multiple ones if you have a large family. The share of money that goes to LOVE not fear will be used for marketing and administration costs.
https://lovenotfearmankind.org/product-category/merchandise/
https://lovenotfearmankind.org/product-category/merchandise/
"First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2
By postmortem molecular mapping, we found viral RNA in nearly all organs examined.
A previously symptomless 86-year-old man received the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. He died 4 weeks later from acute renal and respiratory failure. Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G, while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited. Acute bronchopneumonia and tubular failure were assigned as the cause of death at autopsy; however, we did not observe any characteristic morphological features of COVID-19. Postmortem molecular mapping by real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed relevant SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values in all organs examined (oropharynx, olfactory mucosa, trachea, lungs, heart, kidney and cerebrum) except for the liver and olfactory bulb."
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(21)00364-7/fulltext
By postmortem molecular mapping, we found viral RNA in nearly all organs examined.
A previously symptomless 86-year-old man received the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. He died 4 weeks later from acute renal and respiratory failure. Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G, while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited. Acute bronchopneumonia and tubular failure were assigned as the cause of death at autopsy; however, we did not observe any characteristic morphological features of COVID-19. Postmortem molecular mapping by real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed relevant SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values in all organs examined (oropharynx, olfactory mucosa, trachea, lungs, heart, kidney and cerebrum) except for the liver and olfactory bulb."
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(21)00364-7/fulltext
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
I really, really wish I was wrong on this, but I had already deduced that the most likely method for a mass cull is through administration of 3rd & subsequent vaccines, which won’t be vaccines.
It is beyond the slightest glimmer of hope that these monsters aren’t lying.
This Moderna Chief Scientist knows full well that a dozen or more peer reviewed journal articles show conclusively that human immunity gained from natural infection or by vaccination is completely able to recognise & neutralise all the variants.
There is unequivocally no need for “booster shots”, modified vaccines targeting variants.
So the question I’m asking, with a hollow feeling in my chest, is what on Earth is in these vials?
I genuinely fear the possibility that the vials will contain mRNA sequences that will bring about pathology in recipients, and ultimately kill them. It’s easy conceptually to come up with biotechnology designs to do this, including with delayed effects & even to produce illnesses which could be consistent with whatever actual or claimed new pandemic is going on.
It’s fiendishly clever because many people will think this story “sounds right”, because they’re familiar with annual influenza vaccines, which are edited to better match the then-circulating strains. They don’t know that the way influenza viruses mutate is completely different from the way coronaviruses mutate.
Please, whatever you do, I implore you not to permit administration of 3rd & subsequent vaccines.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Moderna chief scientific officer Melissa Moore stated, "As the virus spreads, it is rapidly mutating." She added, "Some of these new viral strains appear to be even more transmissible than the original strain."
The good news is that vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer, in particular, have been highly effective so far. The bad news is, in Moore's words, "We already know that some of these new strains are less susceptible to neutralization by our current vaccine."
Moderna's researchers have found lower neutralizing antibody levels against several key coronavirus variants to be of concern, which suggests a risk of reduced duration of protection against infection. Because some of these variants are more transmissible, Moderna thinks that "new epidemic waves are undoubtedly on the way."
Vaccine market implications
What does all of this mean for Americans and for the COVID-19 vaccine market? The bottom line is that booster shots and new vaccines targeting the variants will likely be needed.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical advisor to President Biden and longtime head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, thinks that we won't know for sure if booster doses are needed until the fall. Moderna's research appears to indicate that it's not a question of if but when booster shots will be required.
It is beyond the slightest glimmer of hope that these monsters aren’t lying.
This Moderna Chief Scientist knows full well that a dozen or more peer reviewed journal articles show conclusively that human immunity gained from natural infection or by vaccination is completely able to recognise & neutralise all the variants.
There is unequivocally no need for “booster shots”, modified vaccines targeting variants.
So the question I’m asking, with a hollow feeling in my chest, is what on Earth is in these vials?
I genuinely fear the possibility that the vials will contain mRNA sequences that will bring about pathology in recipients, and ultimately kill them. It’s easy conceptually to come up with biotechnology designs to do this, including with delayed effects & even to produce illnesses which could be consistent with whatever actual or claimed new pandemic is going on.
It’s fiendishly clever because many people will think this story “sounds right”, because they’re familiar with annual influenza vaccines, which are edited to better match the then-circulating strains. They don’t know that the way influenza viruses mutate is completely different from the way coronaviruses mutate.
Please, whatever you do, I implore you not to permit administration of 3rd & subsequent vaccines.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Moderna chief scientific officer Melissa Moore stated, "As the virus spreads, it is rapidly mutating." She added, "Some of these new viral strains appear to be even more transmissible than the original strain."
The good news is that vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer, in particular, have been highly effective so far. The bad news is, in Moore's words, "We already know that some of these new strains are less susceptible to neutralization by our current vaccine."
Moderna's researchers have found lower neutralizing antibody levels against several key coronavirus variants to be of concern, which suggests a risk of reduced duration of protection against infection. Because some of these variants are more transmissible, Moderna thinks that "new epidemic waves are undoubtedly on the way."
Vaccine market implications
What does all of this mean for Americans and for the COVID-19 vaccine market? The bottom line is that booster shots and new vaccines targeting the variants will likely be needed.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical advisor to President Biden and longtime head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, thinks that we won't know for sure if booster doses are needed until the fall. Moderna's research appears to indicate that it's not a question of if but when booster shots will be required.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Robin,
I just received this email. I’ve removed the senders name.
I’m sharing this because I find it uplifting that an obscure ‘fact checker’ (aka professional liar for money) feels the need to smear someone they know nothing about. The messages are getting out & about.
I bumped into a Polish lady here in Kent. She recognised me from subtitled videos she’d been sent from home!
Best wishes
Mike
A L'ATTENTION DE MIKE YEADON
Bonjour Mike Yeadon,
a relatively insignificant fact checker portal in Bosnia, in the Balkans, attack you, claiming that you are telling a lie about vaccines... Since I am constantly at war with the fact checkers from AFP (France, where I live), and I am currently in the country of my origin in Serbia, I saw this by chance, so I am sending it. My team of psychiatrists, psychologists and lawyers is working with Dr. R Fuellmich and we have just filed a lawsuit CRIME AGAINST HUMANTY (for France and for Southeast Europe).
Best regards !
with our password: WWW (We Will Win!)
PS
RASKRINKAVANJE.BA
https://twitter.com/raskrinkavanje/status/1399347559865401351?s=20
I just received this email. I’ve removed the senders name.
I’m sharing this because I find it uplifting that an obscure ‘fact checker’ (aka professional liar for money) feels the need to smear someone they know nothing about. The messages are getting out & about.
I bumped into a Polish lady here in Kent. She recognised me from subtitled videos she’d been sent from home!
Best wishes
Mike
A L'ATTENTION DE MIKE YEADON
Bonjour Mike Yeadon,
a relatively insignificant fact checker portal in Bosnia, in the Balkans, attack you, claiming that you are telling a lie about vaccines... Since I am constantly at war with the fact checkers from AFP (France, where I live), and I am currently in the country of my origin in Serbia, I saw this by chance, so I am sending it. My team of psychiatrists, psychologists and lawyers is working with Dr. R Fuellmich and we have just filed a lawsuit CRIME AGAINST HUMANTY (for France and for Southeast Europe).
Best regards !
with our password: WWW (We Will Win!)
PS
RASKRINKAVANJE.BA
https://twitter.com/raskrinkavanje/status/1399347559865401351?s=20
Twitter
Raskrinkavanje
Dezinformacije o imunizaciji protiv bolesti Covid-19, koje u javnost iznosi bivši zaposlenik kompanije Pfizer Michael Yeadon, ponovo se dijele društvenim mrežama. #prenošenjelažnihvijesti #teorijazavjere raskrinkavanje.ba/analiza/nove-d…
11-13th is the G7 summit in Carbis Bay, Cornwall. Some people have booked a hotel nearby for this. Just going on their own to do what they can. I imagine security will be extremely high so very little chance of getting anywhere near to protest.
Mad Mix is organising / assisting with the 14th June, 12pm at Parliament. Be there. It's a Monday. But it's the day they are supposed to announce the restrictions will be confirmed as ending on the 20th June, so the 21st is back to normal.
On Wednesday 16th June is the court case. 11am Royal courts of Justice, Strand WC2. Sister Georgia from CTJ, will be taking the Home Office to court. Go and support her.
On 19th June at 1pm is the children's march. Details TBC.
On 20th June Official Voice is doing a massive outreach day in South London.
The 21st June, Monday, a very early meet and greet in Central London. Start from 6am.
26th June another London march.
Mad Mix is organising / assisting with the 14th June, 12pm at Parliament. Be there. It's a Monday. But it's the day they are supposed to announce the restrictions will be confirmed as ending on the 20th June, so the 21st is back to normal.
On Wednesday 16th June is the court case. 11am Royal courts of Justice, Strand WC2. Sister Georgia from CTJ, will be taking the Home Office to court. Go and support her.
On 19th June at 1pm is the children's march. Details TBC.
On 20th June Official Voice is doing a massive outreach day in South London.
The 21st June, Monday, a very early meet and greet in Central London. Start from 6am.
26th June another London march.