RIP DOM BUSBY, BBC Radio.

https://itself.blog/2020/05/02/giorgio-agamben-medicine-as-religion/

"As has happened many times in the course of history, philosophers must again enter into conflict with religion, which is no longer Christianity, but science or that part of it that has assumed the form of a religion. I do not know if bonfires will return and books will be put on the Index, but clearly the thought of those who continue to seek the truth and reject the dominant lie will be, as is already happening before our eyes, excluded and accused of spreading fake news (news, not ideas, because news is more important than reality!). As in all moments of emergency, real or simulated, we see once again the ignorant slander philosophers and scoundrels seeking to profit from the disasters that they themselves have provoked. All this has already happened and will continue to happen, but those who testify to the truth will not stop doing so, because no one can bear witness for the witness"

Just finished watching an INCREDIBLE interview with Dr. Michael Yeadon PhD, live with Del Bigtree on The Highwire.

PLEASE do yourself a favour and make time to watch and share this interview. There is so much important information here.

Dr. Yeadon clearly explains:

- Covid-19 mortality is no worse than that of a bad flu season

- Why the variants pose no conceivable threat

- Lockdowns do NOT work and should never have been attempted

- PCR tests are NOT effective in diagnosing infectious disease

- Face masks do NOT offer any significant protection, and in fact cause harm

- How the vaccines are causing blood clots

- Why Covid-19 vaccines are “the most dangerous vaccines ever”

- We all have a duty to reject vaccine passports

And SO much more.

Enormous respect to Dr. Yeadon, and of course to The Highwire. From start to finish, this was phenomenal.

Watch the interview here:
thehighwire.com/videos/in-harms-way/
(interview starts at 1hr 30mins)

Del pretty much summed it up in closing: “REFUTE THIS”

Published online 2020 Jul 10.

"Preparations must be made within countries for COVID-19 vaccines safety surveillance on an urgent basis. Safety surveillance must be capable of investigating adverse events of special interest (AESI) and adverse events following immunization to determine a change in the benefit-risk profile of the vaccine, and to be able to anticipate coincidental events that might be attributed to the vaccine.

Other AESIs relevant to COVID-19 disease could potentially include respiratory (including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome), cardiac (including cardiogenic shock, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, coronary artery disease, myocarditis and pericarditis), acute renal, and hepatic injury, neurological (including encephalopathy, encephalitis, GBS, anosmia and ageusia), sepsis and septic shock, hypercoagulability, rhabdomyolysis and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children [11]. AESIs related to novel adjuvants and vaccine platforms (e.g. cardiac AE including myo/pericarditis with MVA, and arthritis with VSV platforms); and vaccination (e.g. anaphylaxis, thrombocytopenia, seizures, GBS) should also be considered."

"aGlobal Healthcare Consulting, India

bDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, United States

cInstitute for Vaccine Safety, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351416/#__ffn_sectitle

The real reason most people wear masks is because they're scared of not fitting in, not because they're scared of a virus, as demonstrated by this famous experiment.

Theresa May does a better job at leading the opposition than anybody in the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn included.
https://youtu.be/Q-0g1qM3sHU

No one in parliament. Presumably on Zoom with camera and sound off... no debate, largely irrelevant institution.

POTEMKIN PARLIAMENT
In politics and economics, a Potemkin village is any construction (literal or figurative) whose sole purpose is to provide an external façade to a country which is faring poorly, making people believe that the country is faring better. The term comes from stories of a fake portable village built solely to impress Empress Catherine II by her former lover Grigory Potemkin, during her journey to Crimea in 1787. While modern historians agree that accounts of this portable village are exaggerated, the original story was that Potemkin erected phony portable settlements along the banks of the Dnieper River in order to impress the Russian Empress; the structures would be disassembled after she passed, and re-assembled farther along her route to be viewed again as if another example. The term is a translation of the Russian: потёмкинские деревни

Today at 2pm!!

Keir Starmer constituency office
7 Crowndale Road NW1 1TU

https://t.me/astandatyourmp

👇 IT'S FINALLY HERE! 🔥

"How to create your very own 'SCARIANT' - in 10 easy steps"

A T4Recovery guide to creating and maintaining fear with a never-ending stream of 'new variants.'

Thread by @T4Recovery on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1403042440223862786.html

'SCARIANT' from MP Games!

If you want to talk about your experiences with #midazolam use on your family members you can join the group below. We have changed the policy in so far as we will only share what you say anywhere else, if you give your permission.

https://t.me/WeNeedToTalkAboutMidazolam

ANYONE LISTENING TO THIS AND IT SOUNDS NORMAL HAS LOST THEIR MIND
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LU0z5J4FYMeB/

ARE GOVERNMENTS PREPARING & IMPLEMENTING AN AMBUSH ON OUR CHILDREN?

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
28 SEPTEMBER 2020

" In a BBC report last week which seemed so fanciful I was inclined to ignore it products were injudiciously codenamed by government agencies as “Triumph” and “Ambush” .

The report by Michele Paduano, however, is still there and states [2]:
“Mass vaccination sites and mobile facilities are being commissioned as part of as a "fairly massive exercise"...According to the document, the two vaccines are called Ambush and Triumph...Ambush needs to be stored at -70C (-94F) and kept in hospitals due to regulations set down by the Medicines Health Regulatory Authority.“
The “Triumph“ vaccine is believed to be the Oxford Astra Zeneca product which has to be administered twice within 28 days. The refrigeration requirements for the “Ambush” vaccine fit the the profile of both the Moderna and Pfizer products [3]. A similar but less detailed report has now appeared in the Sun newspaper [4].
All three vaccines have been criticised for their effectiveness by Peter Doshi and Eric Topol in the New York Times [5] and by William Haseltine in the Washington Post [6]. Both the Oxford and Moderna vaccines are known to have unpleasant side-effects [7]. The Oxford vaccine when I last heard was still under investigation by the FDA [8].
Against which background one can only echo once again the editor’s call a few weeks ago for “Less haste, more safety”.

https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3757/rr-3

Sure. The vaccines didnt came because of the virus. The virus came to implement the vaccines

One of my guiding lights throughout all this: Albert Camus.

Camus, Albert. (1956) The Rebel. New York: Vintage Books.
Part One: The Rebel
What is a rebel?

What is a rebel? A man who says no, but whose refusal does not imply a renunciation.
He is also a man who says yes, from the moment he makes his first gesture of rebellion.
A slave who has taken orders all his life suddenly decides that he cannot obey some new command. What does he mean by saying "no"?
He means, for example, that "this has been going on too long," "up to this point yes, beyond it no," "you are going too far," or, again, "there is a limit beyond which you shall not go." In other words, his no affirms the existence of a borderline. The same concept is to be found in the rebel's feeling that the other person "is exaggerating," that he is exerting his authority beyond a limit where he begins to infringe on the rights of others.
Thus the movement of rebellion is founded simultaneously on the categorical rejection of an intrusion that is considered intolerable and on the confused conviction of an absolute right which, in the rebel's mind, is more precisely the impression that he "has the right to . . ." Rebellion cannot exist without the feeling that, somewhere and somehow, one is right. It is in this way that the rebel slave says yes and no simultaneously. He affirms that there are limits and also that he suspects—and wishes to preserve—the existence of certain things on this side of the borderline. He demonstrates, with obstinacy, that there is something in him which "is worth while . . ."
and which must be taken into consideration. In a certain way, he confronts an order of things which oppresses him with the insistence on a kind of right not to be oppressed beyond the limit that he can tolerate.
In every act of rebellion, the rebel simultaneously experiences a feeling of revulsion at the infringement of his rights and a complete and spontaneous loyalty to certain aspects of himself. Thus he implicitly brings into play a standard of values so far from being gratuitous that he is prepared to support it no matter what the risks. Up to this point he has at least remained silent and has abandoned himself to the form of despair in which a condition is accepted even though it is considered unjust. To remain silent is to give the impression that one has no opinions, that one wants nothing, and in certain cases it really amounts to wanting nothing. Despair, like the absurd, has opinions and desires about everything in general and nothing in particular. Silence expresses this attitude very well. But from the moment that the rebel finds his voice—even though he says nothing but "no"—he begins to desire and to judge. The rebel, in the etymological sense, does a complete turnabout. He acted under the lash of his master's whip. Suddenly he turns and faces him. He opposes what is preferable to what is not. Not every value entails rebellion, but every act of rebellion tacitly invokes a value.

Albert Camus, The Rebel (1956)