Robin Monotti
66.8K subscribers
15.8K photos
8.73K videos
625 files
30.1K links
Official Robin Monotti Channel
Donations:
robinmonotti.substack.com/
Group is @robinmggroup
We don't DM from this channel account.
Rule: Be polite & respectful.
Download Telegram
SARS‐CoV‐2‐induced remission of Hodgkin lymphoma
"We hypothesise that the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection triggered an anti‐tumour immune response..The putative mechanisms of action include cross‐reactivity of pathogen‐specific T cells with tumour antigens and natural killer cell activation by inflammatory cytokines."
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bjh.17116
⬆️ The discussion on my Bayes Theorem thread of 9th December continues.
Red brain: you think through this, read the science, come to your own conclusions
Blue mask: you muzzle up and do exactly as you are told.
#BayesTheorem in simple terms: when medical mass testing includes asymptomatics & the disease affects a minority of the population, as some of you commented, below 10% although valid for up to 30% a very small margin of error in the testing process will mathematically result in the false positives being many times more than the real true positives. What prevalence is being estimated currently, including random testing of asymptomatic people travelling? COVID19 PREVALENCE: No factoring of #BayesTheorem on the mass testing of asymptomatics (eg travel) to define it, means it's much lower than this: "Riley - presenting his latest data covering 7 January to 16 January - said prevalence rates were at 1.58%"
https://amp.rnz.co.nz/article/cd458731-3085-4e00-bd03-9898ee0b41c2
WEF's "Great Reset": an attempt to put a techno-progressive gloss on the neoliberal world of austerity, exploitation, dispossession, & destruction imposed by the globalized oligarchy on the people & ecologies of our planet' https://t.co/lncDgRlr1o
Effect of changing case definitions for COVID-19 on the epidemic curve and transmission parameters in mainland China: a modelling study


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(20)30089-X/fulltext
How the statistical hoax began: when WHO said that in China only a PCR test on asymptomatics is required for a case. Note the date. Later China wisely stopped listening to the WHO.
https://twitter.com/PenguinSix/status/1227262277344165895?s=19
Let's take away science from conflicts of interest (eg SAGE).
➡️ HART is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts:
https://www.hartgroup.org/bios/
🌍 GLOBAL STRIKE AGAINST THE GREAT RESET 🚫
NO ONLINE PURCHASES FROM 30th JANUARY 2021 UNTIL LIFTING OF ALL LOCKDOWNS & MANDATORY FACE MASKS
#GLOBALSTRIKE
#STOPGREATRESET
"From Jan 15 to March 3, 2020, seven versions of the case definition for COVID-19 were issued by the National Health Commission in China. We estimated that when the case definitions were changed, the proportion of infections being detected as cases increased by 7·1 times" That is 710% more cases just by changing a definition, see how a casedemic is manufactured? It's case definition plus asymptomatic random mass testing
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(20)30089-X/fulltext
Thanks for drawing my attention to this. It corresponds to all the research I have also read. What I find not convincing is the evidence less based insistence that it was an accidental release from the lab, rather than a deliberate release. As we do not know both options should remain on the table.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6225847837001#sp=show-clips
"The term gain of function is itself a euphemism; the Obama White House more accurately described this work as “experiments that may be reasonably anticipated to confer attributes to influenza, MERS, or SARS viruses such that the virus would have enhanced pathogenicity and/or transmissibility in mammals via the respiratory route.”
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/coronavirus-lab-escape-theory.html
I find this extremely suspicious:
"In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted to acknowledge a funding source, USAID-EPT-PREDICT [a CIA front] funding from EcoHealth Alliance [Peter Daszak], to Z.-L.S. [Zeng Li Shi] The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0416-446d
Here Peter Daszak is peddling Remdesivir, which was much less effective than hydroxychloroquine and zinc, or ivermecting, indicating ties to GILEAD. Trump understood what was going on, this article makes it seem irresponsible to cut funding to Daszak and WHO but it was the right thing to do:
"Peter Daszak: We're a nonprofit research organization that focuses on understanding where the pandemics come from, what's the risk of future pandemics and can we get in between this pandemic and the next one and disrupt it and stop it.
In China, EcoHealth has worked for 15 years with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Together they've catalogued hundreds of bat viruses, research that is critical right now. 
Peter Daszak: The "breakthrough drug, Remdesivir"..!
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-administration-coronavirus-vaccine-researcher-covid-19-cure-60-minutes/