"Batty" - The Daily Telegraph

NHS: "This offer of free vitamin D was only for people at high risk from coronavirus (COVID-19), also called "clinically extremely vulnerable" people.
Vitamin D is particularly important for this group of people as they may not have got enough vitamin D from sunlight last spring and summer when they were advised to stay indoors (shield)."

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/people-at-higher-risk/free-vitamin-d-supplements-for-people-at-high-risk/

Dear Robin,
The Pfizer supply agreement with Albania has come to light.
It looks genuine. I know the basic anatomy of these agreements & nothing is missing that I’d expect to be present & I’ve seen no clues that suggests it’s fake.
Two things:
1. The most stunning revelation is that it says “if there are any laws or regulations in your country under which Pfizer could be prosecuted, you agree to CHANGE THE LAW OR REGULATION to close that off”.
2. I was reading the Twitter thread & for the first time ever, the dozen or so tweets I’d just read literally disappeared from my screen, right in front of my eyes.
Rather frightening.

"PFIZERLEAK: EXPOSING THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT."

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1419653002818990085.html?s=09

Please share this simple but utterly crucial information with every I’ve you know.
Thank you
Mike

Indeed. I’ve said for months that COMMUNITY TRANSMISSION WAS ALWAYS MINIMAL.
Did you know that SARS (2003) & MERS (2012) were mostly diseases of institutions?
This is also the case with SARS-COV-2.
I say “mostly”. I’m not saying every infection occurred in institutions.
Some will no doubt have occurred at home, but those paths are short & usually self-terminating.
The reason for all this is simple. To be a source of infection, you need a high viral load. But that means you WILL be symptomatic.
Asymptomatic transmission is irrelevantly infrequent.
Transmission is between a SYMPTOMATIC person & a susceptible person.
Symptomatic people are UNWELL & most unlikely to be wandering around your community.
Bottom line, when general community is locked down, it did not slow transmission.
The authorities everywhere knew this, formally, by June 2020.
So when they locked down again, it was absolutely certain they did it to crush the economy & destroy civil society.
Remember what I’ve said: everything Govt & their advisors say is lies.
Pretty much no exceptions.
They are not our friends.
They are acting in the interests of criminal perpetrators.
Obeying their stupid lies & orders renders such a person COMPLICIT in the greatest crime in human history.
Dr Mike Yeadon

Important judgement in favour of DeSantis’ opposition to vaccine passports in Florida.

It’s very important not to accept covid19 vaccination.
As an ex pharma person, though I was by then well aware the crisis was cover for totalitarian tyranny, I assumed the risk/benefit was positive in the most vulnerable, as did Dr Peter McCullough.
As time passed & VAERS shocked, we both moved to the position of implacable opposition to them.

Worse than the adverse events risk, is that they’re being used to bring in the utterly dystopian vaccine passports database.

YOU MUST RESIST THIS. It will be quite impossible to reverse once it’s up & running.

No amount of protest even civil war will undo it. Why? Because you’ll need a valid VaxPass to feed your family.

So a country in which VaxPass is in force & being used even for a short time is completely lost.

Huxley said that unlike the tyranny of men & politics, a scientific tyranny has no natural end. It will never end.

After introduction it will be used to regulate access to all goods & services. Food, money, medicine, transport.

I expect this will be used to force child & even baby vaccination.

Next: there is no justification for “booster vaccination”. None whatsoever. As an immunologist the grounds they give you are lies.

It’s for this reason I concluded some time ago that the overall objective is depopulation & the likely tool is the booster injections.

Delayed pathology & consistent with media scare stories about what’s in the community.

This will provide “plausible deniability” as mentioned by Col Robert Kadlec many years ago in one of the many tabletop simulations that the US ran from 1993, culminating in Event 201.

The obvious conclusion is that this isn’t a Chinese initiative but a global one in which they played a role, but the main driver is US/U.K. (probably with the Five Is/Eyes including Aus, NZ & CAN).

Be in no doubt: the event horizon is VaxPass & is imminent.

Dr Mike Yeadon

A colleague asked why physicians are pushing back 100x harder in USA than in U.K.
They asked “Why?”


We appear to be mostly cowardly sheep in U.K.
I can’t know why but it maybe the structure of our medical system in U.K.
NHS is all but a cruel monopolist & the Royal College System is it’s bulwark.
If you speak out you are fired & lose your licence

Personally that has never preferred me from speaking out.

I resigned just once in the face of scientific fraud.

I was 31 & the sole breadwinner with a new baby at home

So these cowardly doctors wringing their hands get nothing but contempt from me

I even know some of them, now former friends, lacking spines & moral compasses

Mike

This is VERY important & from a physician I know and trust.
Dr Mike Yeadon

Ros Jones in BMJ RRs Re: Should the UK vaccinate children and adolescents against covid-19?
Re: Should the UK vaccinate children and adolescents against covid-19? Sonia Saxena, Helen Skirrow, Kate Wighton. 374:doi 10.1136/bmj.n1866
Dear Editor,

The authors of this paper invite adolescents to be involved in decision making and indeed that is a very appropriate plan. However, it is vital that they are also furnished with full information on which to base their opinions.

Statements such as 'Regulatory agencies globally say vaccine benefits outweigh infection risks' is making a huge assumption. Of note, our own MHRA said exactly that, but did so without referring to any data beyond that supplied by Pfizer from their trials involving only 1131 vaccinated children [1]. The JCVI[2], looking also at real world data, have come to a very different conclusion.

The authors also state that 'A few vaccinated adolescents in the US and Israel have experienced heart inflammation'. In Israel 148 people developed myocarditis, the incidence within 30 days of the second dose of Pfizer rising to 1 in 41,731 but stating in the report that this was much more common in young men aged 16-25 where estimates of 1 in 6000 have been given[3]. Similarly, reports to the CDC[4] have suggested incidence several times higher than background rates. Of the 323 cases reported by the CDC for 16-29 year-olds, 9 were still in hospital with 2 in ICU. The longer term effects for the many who appear to have made a good recovery are not yet known. Several young people are known to have died of cardiac events within 7 days of vaccination. [5]

Given that the issue of safety is still unresolved within the medical community and with many as yet unanswered questions, would it really be right to ask adolescents to decide to take a vaccine for the benefit of older members of society? Vaccination, like mask-wearing, seems to have been linked to being a good citizen, to which of course we would normally wish young people to aspire. Peer pressure and the threat of vaccine passports as the route to a full adult life, both combine to seriously undermine the concept of fully informed consent, free of any inducement or coercion. Any communications with children and families must be truly open and honest. The RCPCH research charter would be an excellent starting point [6].

Dr Rosamond A K Jones (retired consultant paediatrician, member of Health Advisory & Recovery Team)

References:
1. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...
2. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccination-of-child...
3. https://www.jpost.com/health-science/covid-health-ministry-finds-some-my...
4. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-06/03-C...
5.https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/datasets.html
6. https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/research-charter-infants-childrens-you...

Competing interests: HART is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts. We came together over shared concerns about policy and guidance recommendations relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. We continue to be concerned about the lack of open scientific debate in mainstream media and the worrying trend of censorship and harassment of those who question the narrative. Science without question is dogma.

A group of us under the Doctors4CovidEthics will be presenting tomorrow & Friday.
Please attend.
Enquiries to the organisers, please. I won’t be able to answer queries myself.
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon

This is important, the first autopsy of a vaccinated man shows viral RNA everywhere in his body.
Mike

LANGUAGE IS FUNDAMENTAL
If we use their language we allow them to frame the narrative. We need our own. The language needs to be neutral as we want it to be used by all. These are my initial suggestions:

-Medical passes not vaccine passports

-Injections not vaccines

-Vaccine failures not breakthrough cases

-Covid19 not variants

-Healthy not asymptomatic

-Vaccine injury denier or immune system denier instead of pro-vaxxer.

-PCR method not PCR test

-PCR/LF positive not Covid case

-NHS near full capacity, not NHS near collapse.

Robin