Forwarded from Zero Tolerance Media UK News (Zero Tolerance Media UK)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Police are actively patrolling streets to enforce the 'Green Pass' vaccine certification in Paris today.
Tyranny, in your face! 😳
Tyranny, in your face! 😳
Forwarded from Nikki Hanson
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Covid Outbreak Hits Carnival Cruise Despite Every Guest and Staff Member Being ‘Vaccinated’
"Somewhere near Cozumel in the Caribbean Sea, there’s a cruise ship that had zero unvaccinated people aboard but that still suffered an outbreak of Covid-19. This goes against the narrative that the reason for “breakthrough cases” is due to too many unvaccinated people mingling with those who have taken the experimental injections.
The Carnival Vista, which departed from Galveston, Texas, on July 31, has issued strict face mask protocols and ordered infected people aboard into isolation. Mainstream media is already busy blowing it off while the cruise company is patting itself on the back for reacting to swiftly."
https://thelibertydaily.com/covid-outbreak-hits-carnival-cruise-despite-every-guest-and-staff-member-being-vaccinated/
"Somewhere near Cozumel in the Caribbean Sea, there’s a cruise ship that had zero unvaccinated people aboard but that still suffered an outbreak of Covid-19. This goes against the narrative that the reason for “breakthrough cases” is due to too many unvaccinated people mingling with those who have taken the experimental injections.
The Carnival Vista, which departed from Galveston, Texas, on July 31, has issued strict face mask protocols and ordered infected people aboard into isolation. Mainstream media is already busy blowing it off while the cruise company is patting itself on the back for reacting to swiftly."
https://thelibertydaily.com/covid-outbreak-hits-carnival-cruise-despite-every-guest-and-staff-member-being-vaccinated/
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Dan Stock explains how the current measures to combat COVID-19 do not work. He spoke at the Mt. Vernon school board meeting.
Forwarded from Rich Official_Voice
We made it in most MSM headlines after todays BBC shutdown
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1474509/Andrew-neil-bbc-news-protest-anti-vax-west-london-police-white-city
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/tv/anti-vaxxers-target-bbc-but-protest-at-building-broadcaster-left-eight-years-ago/ar-AAN7bYQ
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/08/09/anti-vaxxers-target-bbc-protest-building-broadcaster-left/
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1474387/bbc-news-protest-anti-vax-met-police-clash-storm-studios-white-city-one-latest-video
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1474509/Andrew-neil-bbc-news-protest-anti-vax-west-london-police-white-city
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/tv/anti-vaxxers-target-bbc-but-protest-at-building-broadcaster-left-eight-years-ago/ar-AAN7bYQ
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/08/09/anti-vaxxers-target-bbc-protest-building-broadcaster-left/
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1474387/bbc-news-protest-anti-vax-met-police-clash-storm-studios-white-city-one-latest-video
Express.co.uk
Loose Women stormed! Andrew Neil brutally MOCKS 'stupid' anti-vaxx mob who targeted BBC
ANDREW NEIL has mocked anti-vaccination protestors after the group targeted a BBC building which the broadcaster vacated in 2013.
Forwarded from Dr. Simon
Vitamin D is an immunomodulatory hormone. Low vitamin D levels are associated with several diseases throughout the human body and higher prevalence of multimorbidity.
The vitamin D level in the blood should be at least 50 ng/mL (i.e. 125 nmol/L) to guarantee a properly functioning immune system. However, the WHO and the NHI already consider 20 ng/mL sufficient (https://bit.ly/3jJo6Oe).
Another issue is the skin color. The darker the skin, the less vitamin D is synthesized (https://bit.ly/3iwCcDk - see Figure 1).
My hypothesis is that this intended crisis could be solved overnight. The evidence is there and can be found on the website of my friend Robin Whittle (https://bit.ly/3Au4JzD), this vitamin D meta analysis (https://bit.ly/3CvWvsC), and in my very own publication (https://bit.ly/3xAbPAO).
My personal daily supplementation advice is as follows:
👉🏼 >5000 IU Vitamin D
👉🏼 200µg K2-MK7 (see my publication)
👉🏼 250mg magnesium citrate
👉🏼 30mg zinc citrate or picolinate
☀️☀️☀️
The vitamin D level in the blood should be at least 50 ng/mL (i.e. 125 nmol/L) to guarantee a properly functioning immune system. However, the WHO and the NHI already consider 20 ng/mL sufficient (https://bit.ly/3jJo6Oe).
Another issue is the skin color. The darker the skin, the less vitamin D is synthesized (https://bit.ly/3iwCcDk - see Figure 1).
My hypothesis is that this intended crisis could be solved overnight. The evidence is there and can be found on the website of my friend Robin Whittle (https://bit.ly/3Au4JzD), this vitamin D meta analysis (https://bit.ly/3CvWvsC), and in my very own publication (https://bit.ly/3xAbPAO).
My personal daily supplementation advice is as follows:
👉🏼 >5000 IU Vitamin D
👉🏼 200µg K2-MK7 (see my publication)
👉🏼 250mg magnesium citrate
👉🏼 30mg zinc citrate or picolinate
☀️☀️☀️
Dr Simon Goddek's advice above corresponds to point 2 of the MONOTTI PROTOCOL:
THE MONOTTI PROTOCOL PART 2
Take Vitamin D (2,000 IU minimum) in winter
The seasonal peaks of coronaviruses and of most respiratory diseases correlate with the troughs in the amounts of vitamin D in the human body. It can be deduced that respiratory viruses exploit vitamin D deficiencies. A comprehensive analysis of the correlation of vitamin D with incidence and outcomes of Covid19 disease was published by The Royal Society in December 2020. The levels of UVB light at many latitudes during the winter months are not sufficient to allow the skin to produce optimal levels of vitamin D, and nutrition is unlikely to be enough to compensate for the lack of vitamin D from sunlight in Winter.
For this reason the Monotti Protocol recommends a daily minimum level of vitamin D supplementation of 2,000 IU a day, and an optimal supplementation of 4,000 IU per day for an average sized adult with no contraindications in late Autumn, all of Winter and early Spring. There is no requirement or need for supplementation in Spring, Summer and early Autumn for people who spend a good portion of daily time outdoors. This level of supplementation has been proved to reduce both the incidence and the severity of respiratory disease.
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/
Take Vitamin D (2,000 IU minimum) in winter
The seasonal peaks of coronaviruses and of most respiratory diseases correlate with the troughs in the amounts of vitamin D in the human body. It can be deduced that respiratory viruses exploit vitamin D deficiencies. A comprehensive analysis of the correlation of vitamin D with incidence and outcomes of Covid19 disease was published by The Royal Society in December 2020. The levels of UVB light at many latitudes during the winter months are not sufficient to allow the skin to produce optimal levels of vitamin D, and nutrition is unlikely to be enough to compensate for the lack of vitamin D from sunlight in Winter.
For this reason the Monotti Protocol recommends a daily minimum level of vitamin D supplementation of 2,000 IU a day, and an optimal supplementation of 4,000 IU per day for an average sized adult with no contraindications in late Autumn, all of Winter and early Spring. There is no requirement or need for supplementation in Spring, Summer and early Autumn for people who spend a good portion of daily time outdoors. This level of supplementation has been proved to reduce both the incidence and the severity of respiratory disease.
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/
No Place Without Spirit
The Monotti Protocol For Keeping Society Open
The Monotti Protocol, 2021 The Monotti Protocol aims to be at the same time extremely simple yet extremely effective. It consists of three main epidemic or pandemic control approaches, to be implem…
Folks,
Please don’t be offended. I no longer believe the “climate change models”. I did previously, because I’d invested no time in looking at any of it & like most of us, assumed good faith on the part immersed in the field.
And of course, we “know it’s true”, right? Or we wouldn’t have been going on about it for decades, surely?
This is what you’ll have to do, according to the modellers, if we’re to halt man made global warming:
“The big actions are: travel less distance by train or in small (or full) electric cars and stop flying; use the heating less and electrify the boiler when next upgrading; lobby for construction with half the material for twice as long; stop eating beef and lamb. Each action we take to reduce emissions, at home or at work, creates a positive ripple effect”
https://ukfires.org/absolute-zero/
I’m a scientist, though not in fields that bear on AGW & CC.
I’m perfectly qualified to ask about the methods they use; what the data are & with what tools they’re used to make predictions.
Finally, how well connected are the things we measure to the things we care about by can’t measure (only model).
The long & short is we can directly & empirically measure very little. Atmospheric [CO2] for example.
That is measured accurately & we have been able to do that for quite some time.
One of the facts that had me accepting CC modellers is that [CO2] itself has risen by a noticeable amount during my little life. In my school text books late 1960s/early 1970s, it was stated as being 300 ppm (parts per million) & it’s now over 420 ppm.
As I understand it, isotope analyses are consistent with the proposition that it’s risen mainly because we’ve been burning fossil fuels & releasing the stored CO2.
I’d also understood that, CO2 being a so-called greenhouse gas, more CO2 must mean a warmer world.
I also ‘knew’ that “the temperature” is a very slippery concept & that there’d been quite a lot of bad behaviour here. Problem is that we’ve had good temperature data for so little time.
Even directly observed temperatures are far from easy when the extent of the change claimed is small in relation to the intrinsic variability in what is being measured.
Where to measure temperature, with what to measure it & how reliable are the indirect methods used?
That’s where it starts to get controversial, which I didn’t expect. I thought we had a straightforward & unarguable hold on “temperature” and how it’s changed over time. Well, we don’t.
Even getting the baseline temperature agreed, above which we’re persuaded that “global mean temperatures are increased” is so much harder than I’d imagined.
Among the bigger factors in relation to this temperature business, we have very sketchy direct evidence of an increase.
It’s not because I’m a smart alek. No, it’s because we’ve repeatedly changed the measuring techniques used to determine temperature. Each has its own intrinsic variability inside the very measurement you’re trying to nail down.
As we cannot with 100% certainty agree what the pre-industrial revolution “temperature” was, and we’ve struggling to measure it now (with high accuracy as well as high precision) this is where the “direct measurement” crew face one of the most important questions of our era.
It gets worse. I had assumed there was a “natural constant”, linking X change in atmospheric [CO2] & atmospheric temperature.
Just as with Boyle’s Law, we know there’s a fixed relationship between pressure, temperature & volume of gasses.
Or an equation linking the key parameters, as there is in the Arrhenius equation, which an astonishing discovery & its implications which I use very often (the relationship between temperature & rate of chemical, including biochemical, reactions depends on Aarhenius’ equation).
Or perhaps g-force, the acceleration due to gravity, recalled roughly at 9,8 metres per second per second (yes, we need the repeat because acceleration is the rate of change of the rate of change).
Please don’t be offended. I no longer believe the “climate change models”. I did previously, because I’d invested no time in looking at any of it & like most of us, assumed good faith on the part immersed in the field.
And of course, we “know it’s true”, right? Or we wouldn’t have been going on about it for decades, surely?
This is what you’ll have to do, according to the modellers, if we’re to halt man made global warming:
“The big actions are: travel less distance by train or in small (or full) electric cars and stop flying; use the heating less and electrify the boiler when next upgrading; lobby for construction with half the material for twice as long; stop eating beef and lamb. Each action we take to reduce emissions, at home or at work, creates a positive ripple effect”
https://ukfires.org/absolute-zero/
I’m a scientist, though not in fields that bear on AGW & CC.
I’m perfectly qualified to ask about the methods they use; what the data are & with what tools they’re used to make predictions.
Finally, how well connected are the things we measure to the things we care about by can’t measure (only model).
The long & short is we can directly & empirically measure very little. Atmospheric [CO2] for example.
That is measured accurately & we have been able to do that for quite some time.
One of the facts that had me accepting CC modellers is that [CO2] itself has risen by a noticeable amount during my little life. In my school text books late 1960s/early 1970s, it was stated as being 300 ppm (parts per million) & it’s now over 420 ppm.
As I understand it, isotope analyses are consistent with the proposition that it’s risen mainly because we’ve been burning fossil fuels & releasing the stored CO2.
I’d also understood that, CO2 being a so-called greenhouse gas, more CO2 must mean a warmer world.
I also ‘knew’ that “the temperature” is a very slippery concept & that there’d been quite a lot of bad behaviour here. Problem is that we’ve had good temperature data for so little time.
Even directly observed temperatures are far from easy when the extent of the change claimed is small in relation to the intrinsic variability in what is being measured.
Where to measure temperature, with what to measure it & how reliable are the indirect methods used?
That’s where it starts to get controversial, which I didn’t expect. I thought we had a straightforward & unarguable hold on “temperature” and how it’s changed over time. Well, we don’t.
Even getting the baseline temperature agreed, above which we’re persuaded that “global mean temperatures are increased” is so much harder than I’d imagined.
Among the bigger factors in relation to this temperature business, we have very sketchy direct evidence of an increase.
It’s not because I’m a smart alek. No, it’s because we’ve repeatedly changed the measuring techniques used to determine temperature. Each has its own intrinsic variability inside the very measurement you’re trying to nail down.
As we cannot with 100% certainty agree what the pre-industrial revolution “temperature” was, and we’ve struggling to measure it now (with high accuracy as well as high precision) this is where the “direct measurement” crew face one of the most important questions of our era.
It gets worse. I had assumed there was a “natural constant”, linking X change in atmospheric [CO2] & atmospheric temperature.
Just as with Boyle’s Law, we know there’s a fixed relationship between pressure, temperature & volume of gasses.
Or an equation linking the key parameters, as there is in the Arrhenius equation, which an astonishing discovery & its implications which I use very often (the relationship between temperature & rate of chemical, including biochemical, reactions depends on Aarhenius’ equation).
Or perhaps g-force, the acceleration due to gravity, recalled roughly at 9,8 metres per second per second (yes, we need the repeat because acceleration is the rate of change of the rate of change).
There is no such natural constant in climate sciences. I really was shocked when I learned this. It means it’s not possible to build models that are based on unarguable things. We’ve got difficult measurements of temperature itself & all those unknown offsets & imprecision.
It goes rapidly downhill from there. We’ve not got natural laws & physical constants, connecting [CO2], temperature & global climate.
I do believe our burning of fossil fuels has raised atmospheric CO2 & I’m ready to believe that’s a forcing factor on temperature. But the extent of temperature change there has been (if any) especially during my lifetime & the relationship between small & uncertain changes in temperature & the climate itself is almost all modelling.
Add to this technically difficult situation the geopolitics & incredible amounts of money at stake and it’s not so surprising that things don’t seem to be known with anything like the certainty I thought we had.
Those who’ve followed my dissection of the covid19 lies & deception know that among my concerns is the reasoned belief that “it’s to turn down global warming” is what is being used to misdirect attention away from objecting to the undemocratic & brutal treatment of humanity.
Given a free choice I do think it’s right to minimised our use of FF & to diversify the energy mix.
I also realise that unavoidable imprecision in the climate models also means it’s possible that things will turn out catastrophically (or completely benignly). No one really knows & the pretend consensus has been bought
But there’s no scientific justification for “climate change lockdowns”, none at all.
Dr Mike Yeadon
It goes rapidly downhill from there. We’ve not got natural laws & physical constants, connecting [CO2], temperature & global climate.
I do believe our burning of fossil fuels has raised atmospheric CO2 & I’m ready to believe that’s a forcing factor on temperature. But the extent of temperature change there has been (if any) especially during my lifetime & the relationship between small & uncertain changes in temperature & the climate itself is almost all modelling.
Add to this technically difficult situation the geopolitics & incredible amounts of money at stake and it’s not so surprising that things don’t seem to be known with anything like the certainty I thought we had.
Those who’ve followed my dissection of the covid19 lies & deception know that among my concerns is the reasoned belief that “it’s to turn down global warming” is what is being used to misdirect attention away from objecting to the undemocratic & brutal treatment of humanity.
Given a free choice I do think it’s right to minimised our use of FF & to diversify the energy mix.
I also realise that unavoidable imprecision in the climate models also means it’s possible that things will turn out catastrophically (or completely benignly). No one really knows & the pretend consensus has been bought
But there’s no scientific justification for “climate change lockdowns”, none at all.
Dr Mike Yeadon
How many of you were aware of the 2009 flu pandemic?
It too was fake.
Drug companies & corrupt WHO officials announced a pandemic & that triggered expensive pre-negotiated contracts for drugs & vaccines.
Notice my colleague Dr Wolfgang Wodarg working with the Council of Europe to expose the corruption.
Notice Jon Snow of Ch4 News.
Just 11 years later, they’ve conveniently forgotten Ch4’s role in uncovering the scandal.
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/05/10/flashback-channel-4-news-exposes-swine-flu-scandal/
It too was fake.
Drug companies & corrupt WHO officials announced a pandemic & that triggered expensive pre-negotiated contracts for drugs & vaccines.
Notice my colleague Dr Wolfgang Wodarg working with the Council of Europe to expose the corruption.
Notice Jon Snow of Ch4 News.
Just 11 years later, they’ve conveniently forgotten Ch4’s role in uncovering the scandal.
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/05/10/flashback-channel-4-news-exposes-swine-flu-scandal/
Dear Corporate Media
.
What joins together the people demonstrating against Covid Passes and coerced or mandatory experimental injections is not anti-vaxxerism, it is the defense of our inalienable & fundamental human rights, from the Nuremberg Code to the UNESCO Bioethics declaration 2005, via the Declaration of Helsinki 1964.
Therefore it is factually incorrect to call all of us anti-vaxxers, and the correct description is pro-human rights demonstrators.
Best regards
Robin Monotti Graziadei
Grandson of the first President of the CCBE
The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE), founded in 1960, is an international non-profit association which has been, since its creation, at the forefront of advancing the views of European lawyers and defending the legal principles upon which democracy and the rule of law are based.
https://www.ccbe.eu/about/who-we-are/
.
What joins together the people demonstrating against Covid Passes and coerced or mandatory experimental injections is not anti-vaxxerism, it is the defense of our inalienable & fundamental human rights, from the Nuremberg Code to the UNESCO Bioethics declaration 2005, via the Declaration of Helsinki 1964.
Therefore it is factually incorrect to call all of us anti-vaxxers, and the correct description is pro-human rights demonstrators.
Best regards
Robin Monotti Graziadei
Grandson of the first President of the CCBE
The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE), founded in 1960, is an international non-profit association which has been, since its creation, at the forefront of advancing the views of European lawyers and defending the legal principles upon which democracy and the rule of law are based.
https://www.ccbe.eu/about/who-we-are/