Ivermectin found to suppresses tumour development

“Researchers in Japan and the United States have found that ivermectin, a drug used to kill parasites, suppresses tumor development in epithelial ovarian cancer. Ivermectin exerts an anti-tumor effect on epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells by interacting with the new gene target KPNB1. Because ivermectin is already approved to treat parasitic infections in patients, experiments for its effectiveness in an anti-cancer regimen is expected to significantly lower costs compared to untested drug compounds.”

https://www.europeanpharmaceuticalreview.com/news/67444/ivermectin-anti-cancer-effect/

The Telegraph is asking for people's opinions... a form to have your say at the end of the article. Be heard! https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/09/03/child-covid-vaccines-rollout-pushed-ministers/

Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer

"We show that treatment with the FDA-approved anti-parasitic drug ivermectin induces immunogenic cancer cell death (ICD) and robust T cell infiltration into breast tumors. As an allosteric modulator of the ATP/P2X4/P2X7 axis which operates in both cancer and immune cells, ivermectin also selectively targets immunosuppressive populations including myeloid cells and Tregs.."

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41523-021-00229-5

Speech was from February 2021 rather than August as the article suggests, but the Chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association highlights the difference in Covid cases and deaths in African countries using Ivermectin for Parasitic Infections and those not, as highlighted in the table.

Link: https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/breaking-news-chairman-of-tokyo-medical-association-tells-doctors-to-prescribe-ivermectin-for-covid-treatment

Up until recently Bill Gates was providing research grants on the use of Ivermectin (at least $18 million, as attached).

He probably stopped investing in this research and possible alternative uses when it ran into conflict with his vaccine business.

Link: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants#q/k=GlaxoSmithKline

We have reverted to a pre-Enlightenment sensibility, where having irrefutable evidence of a proposition isn’t enough even to have the proposition considered.
Cheers
Mike

"This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity."

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1

🇸🇮 Pro Freedom Protesters visits Slovenian TV channel HQ

Article (Gab, Tw)

Resources and letters – Related to issues around Covid-19 and Children

"The JCVI said children were at such a low risk from the virus that jabs would offer only a marginal benefit.

The UK's four chief medical officers have now been asked to have the final say, and to consider the wider impact on schools and society."

The JCVI daren't approve this and this is down to all of us up and down the UK working so hard to challenge these people. They know we are turning the tables. We must keep going. Turn up the heat on people like Chris Whitty to let them know we're going to have them banged up.

The decision now lies in the hands of:
Chris Whitty - England
Email c.whitty@nhs.net
Tel: 020 3447 9645

Michael McBride - Northern Ireland
Email: Michael.McBride@health-ni.gov.uk
Tel: 028 9052 0563

Gregor Smith - Scotland
Email: cmo@gov.scot

Frank Atherton - Wales
Email: pschiefmedicalofficer@gov.wales


We have to hammer their inboxes with emails and flood their phone lines. Tell them we are going to see that their crimes are brought to an end and we are not going to let them murder children.

⚠️ For more truth, raw knowledge, guidance and wisdom follow our telegram messenger group. ⚠️

https://t.me/darkuniverse09

ACTION NEEDED

Strategy One

There are strong indications that schools & health authorities will try to use “Gillick Competence” to circumvent parental consent to vaccination. In other words, they may not send advance warning of vaccination day and may inject your child after “assessing” them to be Gillick competent. This is despite there being legal precedent set in the recent Bell v Tavistock case that children do not have capacity to give consent for experimental treatments, as it is impossible for them to be fully informed on their potential impact.
Further reading: Article on Laywers of Light

Strategy Two
If you prefer to keep your child in the state education system, then we have identified a process that we believe is the next best way to protect your child. Read more

Download Notice Templates
Download instructions & FAQs

For more visit: The UK FreedomProject

The Light Paper Chat • Channel

Another very detailed account which sticks closely to central themes and doesn’t stray into “conspiracy fact”.
It is long, but there may be pieces in it which those on our side might find useful in trying to alert others close to us.
Best wishes
Mike

Is it just a coincidence that these “diseases”/ adverse reactions /side effects all seem to have the same symptoms or was that always part of the plan to help support two separate narratives and maximise the divide about what is really going on?

Each one is just covering up the damage the govt is doing while they tell us to look somewhere else or believe something else!

Links:
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/219615#symptoms

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/radiation-sickness/symptoms-causes/syc-20377058

https://www.drugs.com/sfx/midazolam-side-effects.html


https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html

Don’t let anyone tell a parent that this is a disease that is a real risk to children or the healthy.

Note: not all pre-existing health conditions are monitored by the govt and not all conditions were monitored since the start of the “pandemic”, e.g. ischaemic heart disease, a leading cause of death in the UK, was not included on the govts list of “monitored pre-existing conditions” until May after a number of people had already died.

In addition, the NHS does not provide details on what acute issues may have lead to a child or adult being tested in hospital for Covid and then included in the figures of those who died “with Covid”.

Link to data NHS England: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-daily-deaths/?fbclid=IwAR1ZsWVbyLBLbpmsiFVpb41nyCWIpxc-u2sdpKuD_nsSE_4cVHEyu-5-Y28

Table shows the fatality risks to children from Covid-19 (see notes below).

There is a much greater risk that a child will suffer an adverse reaction to the injection than the risk of a child dying with Covid.

Each case of an adverse reaction in an adult has on average over three injuries associated with it and many injuries have been life altering or life limiting.

These are only the risks we know of in adults injected so far and not those in children which are as yet unknown.

As we know children are not just “small adults” , the risks to them are unknown,
unpredictable and will be long lived.

In addition, injecting children will also mean a cycle of continuous injections (“boosters”)

Note 1: Numbers dying with Covid only indicate a positive Covid test, death may have been due to an acute or underlying issue.

Note 2: A number of countries such as the US are reporting greater number of deaths and adverse reactions following the Covid-19 injections than the UK

Table shows that the risk is 500 times greater of a death or injury from a Covid-19 injection in a child over their risk of death from Covid-19, (110 times greater in a child with pre-existing conditions).

This rises dramatically given that probably only 1-10% of adverse events and deaths ever get reported.

To check the calculations take the risk of an MHRA reported injury/death in an adult post injection which is 0.74% and divide it by the risk for a child of dying with Covid (0.0015% in a healthy child and 0.0068% in a child with underlying conditions, see post above).

Given that adverse events and fatalities are as we know under reported you can multiply that number by 100 (if 1% reported) or 10 (assuming 10% are reported).

The 0.74% is calculated from the latest MHRA numbers (355,268 adverse reaction / fatality cases divided by the number of people with at least one injection which is 47,800,000 which means that 0.74% of those injected have had an adverse reaction).

👏🏻👏🏻** CHILDREN ARE NOT SUPER-SPREADERS ** 👏🏻👏🏻


👀 here this study from the highly reputable NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK concludes that children are super spreaders.

All the data collected does not indicate this is the case. The paper comes from Southampton which has a good reputation in child medicine. It says the only way to really to really test this is to do blood samples. So the government is making all this super spreader up to scare.

https://adc.bmj.com/content/105/7/618