This is how you can do your own searches on VAERS and find all cases in say children 12-15 years.
Put in "Age" at the top from the drop down, then click on "Covid-19 Vaccines" and then click on the drop down to see what sort of cases you want eg hospitalized or died and then in the demographics include the age range you want so for 12-15 years you need to show 12 to 16 years as this will bring up children from 12 to under 16 years.
Then click on “Find”
See images attached for what you need
You will then get a summary page and all the individual case details below
Any problems ask in the comments
Here is the link to the data: https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
Put in "Age" at the top from the drop down, then click on "Covid-19 Vaccines" and then click on the drop down to see what sort of cases you want eg hospitalized or died and then in the demographics include the age range you want so for 12-15 years you need to show 12 to 16 years as this will bring up children from 12 to under 16 years.
Then click on “Find”
See images attached for what you need
You will then get a summary page and all the individual case details below
Any problems ask in the comments
Here is the link to the data: https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
"Teenage boys more at risk from vaccines than Covid"
Young males are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems after being jabbed than be hospitalised from coronavirus, study finds"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09/09/teenage-boys-risk-vaccines-covid/
Young males are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems after being jabbed than be hospitalised from coronavirus, study finds"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09/09/teenage-boys-risk-vaccines-covid/
The Telegraph
Teenage boys more at risk from vaccines than Covid
Young males are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems after being jabbed than be hospitalised from coronavirus, study finds
"Mass vaccination campaigns conducted in the middle of a pandemic will only cause Sars-CoV-2 to engender more disease and claim more human lives. Because of this mass vaccination program, waves of morbidity will continue for much longer, as more (recovery from) disease cases will be required to compensate for the erosion of the population’s innate immunity and, therefore, to make up for the latter’s deficient contribution to HI.
A vaccine that only prevents hospitalizations and severe Covid-19 disease is not good enough to be used to combat a pandemic. From a global or even public health perspective, these are, therefore, not the right criteria to evaluate the success of mass vaccination campaigns deployed during a pandemic. Using these criteria as an indicator of the level of control over the pandemic will inevitably lead to a further escalation of this morbidity and mortality rates.
There should be no doubt that non-transmission-blocking vaccines (i.e., so-called ‘leaky’ or ‘imperfect’ vaccines) can never ever control a pandemic, even though they may temporarily protect against disease. Only temporarily? Yes, indeed. Given the globally increasing immune pressure and concomitant infectious viral pressure, genomic epidemiologists have no doubt that this pandemic roller coaster will not stop before it takes us over the cliff into the abyss of complete viral resistance to anti-spike (S) antibodies. That is where all runaway trains of the different ongoing pandemics of highly infectious variants will be coming together and converge into a big whirl where they can no longer be distinguished from one another.
The first stages of this evolution is what we now begin to see in countries which have already massively vaccinated their population (e.g., Israel). There is no doubt that other countries like the United Kingdom and the United States will soon go down the same path. Due to increasing resistance to neutralizing anti-S antibodies (Abs), these countries are now even beginning to shift from a primarily beneficial (i.e., less susceptible to severe disease) to a primarily detrimental effect (more susceptible to severe disease) in the vaccinated as compared to the unvaccinated."
Geert Vanden Bossche, vaccinologist.
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post
A vaccine that only prevents hospitalizations and severe Covid-19 disease is not good enough to be used to combat a pandemic. From a global or even public health perspective, these are, therefore, not the right criteria to evaluate the success of mass vaccination campaigns deployed during a pandemic. Using these criteria as an indicator of the level of control over the pandemic will inevitably lead to a further escalation of this morbidity and mortality rates.
There should be no doubt that non-transmission-blocking vaccines (i.e., so-called ‘leaky’ or ‘imperfect’ vaccines) can never ever control a pandemic, even though they may temporarily protect against disease. Only temporarily? Yes, indeed. Given the globally increasing immune pressure and concomitant infectious viral pressure, genomic epidemiologists have no doubt that this pandemic roller coaster will not stop before it takes us over the cliff into the abyss of complete viral resistance to anti-spike (S) antibodies. That is where all runaway trains of the different ongoing pandemics of highly infectious variants will be coming together and converge into a big whirl where they can no longer be distinguished from one another.
The first stages of this evolution is what we now begin to see in countries which have already massively vaccinated their population (e.g., Israel). There is no doubt that other countries like the United Kingdom and the United States will soon go down the same path. Due to increasing resistance to neutralizing anti-S antibodies (Abs), these countries are now even beginning to shift from a primarily beneficial (i.e., less susceptible to severe disease) to a primarily detrimental effect (more susceptible to severe disease) in the vaccinated as compared to the unvaccinated."
Geert Vanden Bossche, vaccinologist.
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post
Geert Vanden Bossche
The Last Post
Who’s wrong, who’s right? These are the key points one has to understand to be able to capture the never-ending discussion on whether or not mass vaccination campaigns work
"Their simplistic reasoning make them conclude that vaccinating the unvaccinated (i.e., younger age groups and children) is going to solve the problem, whereas each and every independent (!) knowledgeable expert understands that this is only going to further raise the population-level immune pressure on viral infectiousness and, therefore, promote the adaptation of additional mutations that will eventually enable full neutralization escape of circulating, highly infectious variants (Vanden Bossche, June 2021)."
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post
Geert Vanden Bossche
The Last Post
Who’s wrong, who’s right? These are the key points one has to understand to be able to capture the never-ending discussion on whether or not mass vaccination campaigns work
CALL OUT FOR GRAPHIC DESIGNERS: Can you make some images with selected quotes from the two posts above, signed "Geert Vanden Bossche" please and add as comments so we can share? Instagram format maybe best please.
Forwarded from The Light Paper
THE SPECTATORWhy I'm boycotting a festival of ideas
What’s the one idea that can’t be debated at a festival of ideas? The answer, it turns out, is the Covid Pass.
If we don’t want a ‘medical papers, please’ checkpoint society, then we have to refuse to comply where we can
I was delighted to be asked to give a book talk and join a debate at How The Light Gets In, the world’s largest festival of philosophy and music. I checked the website to ensure there were no discriminatory Covid Pass policies and agreed. So, I was surprised when someone who had bought tickets told me that they had cancelled their tickets because the festival had imposed the policy.
READ:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-i-m-boycotting-a-festival-of-ideas
The Light Paper Chat • Channel
MASS VACCINATION CAMPAIGNS CONDUCTED IN THE MIDDLE OF A PANDEMIC WILL ONLY CAUSE MORE DISEASE AND CLAIM MORE HUMAN LIVES.
GEERT VANDEN BOSSCHE, VACCINOLOGIST.
(Source: t.me/robinmg/8382)
GEERT VANDEN BOSSCHE, VACCINOLOGIST.
(Source: t.me/robinmg/8382)
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar Channel
"Mass vaccination campaigns conducted in the middle of a pandemic will only cause Sars-CoV-2 to engender more disease and claim more human lives. Because of this mass vaccination program, waves of morbidity will continue for much longer, as more (recovery…
⬆️ Can we use this GVB quote for Instagram/ Canva graphic posts please? Kindly share here thank you.
(WE WANT TO PROMOTE THE MESSAGE OF PRO-VAXXERS AGAINST PANDEMIC MASS VACCINATIONS)
(WE WANT TO PROMOTE THE MESSAGE OF PRO-VAXXERS AGAINST PANDEMIC MASS VACCINATIONS)
"When interviewed on Channel Four News, Professor Anthony Harnden, Deputy Chair of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation stated:“My responsibility is to the children of this country and my responsibility is not to government.” This is clearly your responsibility too and, although government is pressurising medical advisers to give the go – ahead for vaccination of 12 – 15 year olds, it is essential that you stay firm and do the right thing by refusing to bow to political interference in what is essentially a matter of medical ethics.
Professor Adam Finn of The JCVI told Sky News:“We’ve been able to get really up to date information from paediatric cardiologists in The United States who are managing children who’ve experienced this myocarditis side effect. Admittedly small numbers but still some early concerns that this might be a problem in the longer term and that very up to date information is why we’ve kept to our line actually over the last two months that we should be cautious about this.”
In a letter to The US Food and Drug Administration on 8th December 2020, Dr Patrick Whelan from The Department of Paediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at University Of California, Los Angeles, wrote: “I am a pediatric specialist caring for children with the multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C). I am concerned about the possibility that the new vaccines aimed at creating immunity against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (including the mRNA vaccines of Moderna and Pfizer) have the potential to cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys in a way that is not currently being assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs”.
Dr Whelan concluded his letter by stating: “In caring for children with MIS-C, I have been impressed with how widespread the organ involvement is, particularly given the absence of actively replicating virus in virtually all patients. Particular caution will be required with regard to the potential widespread vaccination of children before there are any real data on the safety or effectiveness of these vaccines in pediatric trials that are only now beginning”.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/medical-chiefs-take-a-stand-tell-the-politicians-you-wont-give-children-jabs/
Professor Adam Finn of The JCVI told Sky News:“We’ve been able to get really up to date information from paediatric cardiologists in The United States who are managing children who’ve experienced this myocarditis side effect. Admittedly small numbers but still some early concerns that this might be a problem in the longer term and that very up to date information is why we’ve kept to our line actually over the last two months that we should be cautious about this.”
In a letter to The US Food and Drug Administration on 8th December 2020, Dr Patrick Whelan from The Department of Paediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at University Of California, Los Angeles, wrote: “I am a pediatric specialist caring for children with the multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C). I am concerned about the possibility that the new vaccines aimed at creating immunity against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (including the mRNA vaccines of Moderna and Pfizer) have the potential to cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys in a way that is not currently being assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs”.
Dr Whelan concluded his letter by stating: “In caring for children with MIS-C, I have been impressed with how widespread the organ involvement is, particularly given the absence of actively replicating virus in virtually all patients. Particular caution will be required with regard to the potential widespread vaccination of children before there are any real data on the safety or effectiveness of these vaccines in pediatric trials that are only now beginning”.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/medical-chiefs-take-a-stand-tell-the-politicians-you-wont-give-children-jabs/
The Conservative Woman
Medical chiefs, take a stand! Tell the politicians you won’t give children jabs - The Conservative Woman
My responsibility is to the children of this country and my responsibility is not to government.
Professor Anthony Harnden, Deputy Chair of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation
Professor Anthony Harnden, Deputy Chair of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation
⬆️ Can we use this quote for Instagram/ Canva graphic posts please? Kindly share here thank you.
(WE WANT TO PROMOTE THE MESSAGE OF PRO-VAXXERS AGAINST MASS CHILD VACCINATIONS)
(WE WANT TO PROMOTE THE MESSAGE OF PRO-VAXXERS AGAINST MASS CHILD VACCINATIONS)
Forwarded from Genie Lamp Productions
This new QR code directs young people here: https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/immunization-expert-unvaccinated-people-are-not-dangerous-vaccinated-people-are-dangerous-for-others/#
Forwarded from Genie Lamp Productions
This QR code directs young people here https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports A new "Indy" theme like this example is to follow shortly. To attempt to appeal to such a large target audience of young people, all styles must be considered 🙏
Forwarded from No More Lockdowns UK
Dear Head Teacher,
I am the parent/guardian/advocate for …………………………(child at your school).
I have sought expert advice and established that my child named above is at unacceptable risk of suffering a life threatening adverse event following the Covid-19 vaccination.
As a result of this I demand you do not allow anyone to vaccinate my child at any time.
The JCVI advice upon which the decision to proceed with the vaccine rollout is generalised for all children, and has NOT BEEN INDIVIDUALISED FOR MY PARTICULAR CHILD and I will not permit you to risk ENDANGERING his/her health, or even his/her life in the interests of society at large. You should be aware that there is an injunction application currently under way to the courts https://www.laworfiction.com/2021/09/injunction-application-made-to-court-to-pause-roll-out/.
With the help of our advisors, we have investigated the various risk factors that pertain to this injection including excipient allergens, and other components. The detailed assessment has been made on an individual basis for my child and his/her health history, medication history and diet, as well as predisposition to health issues within our family .
As the parent/guardian for my child I am ultimately responsible for their safety and wellbeing and do not delegate this to you in this regard as you cannot possibly be expected to have the time to explore to this level of detail for each and every individual child in your care.
Based on the detailed findings of this risk assessment, I expressly forbid this vaccination to be given to my child and will hold you PERSONALLY both civilly and criminally responsible for any harm that arises in either the short term (anaphylactic shock) medium term or long term, including myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clotting abnormalities, neurological injury such as transverse myelitis, Bell’s palsy, damage to fertility, ovarian damage(delete if male) and impact on puberty, physical maturation etc.
Information about the uneven distribution of this novel medicine within the bodies of children has not been sufficiently considered in the decision to extend to their age group, as per Pfizer’s own pharmacokinetics data, the risk of puberty blocking and the high rates of heart inflammation in young people especially boys, as reflected in the MHRA yellow card system all of which I consider negligent, so to proceed is failing YOUR DUTY OF CARE TO MY CHILD. The concept of using ‘Gillick competency’ which was established for fully reversible contraception, has been superseded by the 2020 case Bell v. Tavistock NHS Trust, which ruled that children DO NOT HAVE CAPACITY to decide about any experimental medical treatment that has permanent life altering impact. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bell-v-Tavistock-Clinic-and-ors-Summary.pdf
An individual’s rights cannot be set aside for the benefit of society, and the welfare of the child is PARAMOUNT; yet this seems to be the intention here. Children seldom experience severe illness if they catch the infection; injecting them with a medicine that has to date killed over 1600 and caused in excess of a million injuries in the UK alone, for minimal benefit to them personally is indefensible.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Where there are conflicting human rights; the welfare of the child is paramount and enshrined in law.
My child is not deemed mature enough to purchase alcohol or cigarettes, yet you expect him/her to decide about a medical treatment that could irreversibly damage his/her health.
I will be taking civil action against YOU personally if you FAIL TO protect my child from this medical procedure which has now been clearly identified as dangerous to MY CHILD.
Date:………….. …….………………………….. signed Parent of ……………………………..
I am the parent/guardian/advocate for …………………………(child at your school).
I have sought expert advice and established that my child named above is at unacceptable risk of suffering a life threatening adverse event following the Covid-19 vaccination.
As a result of this I demand you do not allow anyone to vaccinate my child at any time.
The JCVI advice upon which the decision to proceed with the vaccine rollout is generalised for all children, and has NOT BEEN INDIVIDUALISED FOR MY PARTICULAR CHILD and I will not permit you to risk ENDANGERING his/her health, or even his/her life in the interests of society at large. You should be aware that there is an injunction application currently under way to the courts https://www.laworfiction.com/2021/09/injunction-application-made-to-court-to-pause-roll-out/.
With the help of our advisors, we have investigated the various risk factors that pertain to this injection including excipient allergens, and other components. The detailed assessment has been made on an individual basis for my child and his/her health history, medication history and diet, as well as predisposition to health issues within our family .
As the parent/guardian for my child I am ultimately responsible for their safety and wellbeing and do not delegate this to you in this regard as you cannot possibly be expected to have the time to explore to this level of detail for each and every individual child in your care.
Based on the detailed findings of this risk assessment, I expressly forbid this vaccination to be given to my child and will hold you PERSONALLY both civilly and criminally responsible for any harm that arises in either the short term (anaphylactic shock) medium term or long term, including myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clotting abnormalities, neurological injury such as transverse myelitis, Bell’s palsy, damage to fertility, ovarian damage(delete if male) and impact on puberty, physical maturation etc.
Information about the uneven distribution of this novel medicine within the bodies of children has not been sufficiently considered in the decision to extend to their age group, as per Pfizer’s own pharmacokinetics data, the risk of puberty blocking and the high rates of heart inflammation in young people especially boys, as reflected in the MHRA yellow card system all of which I consider negligent, so to proceed is failing YOUR DUTY OF CARE TO MY CHILD. The concept of using ‘Gillick competency’ which was established for fully reversible contraception, has been superseded by the 2020 case Bell v. Tavistock NHS Trust, which ruled that children DO NOT HAVE CAPACITY to decide about any experimental medical treatment that has permanent life altering impact. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bell-v-Tavistock-Clinic-and-ors-Summary.pdf
An individual’s rights cannot be set aside for the benefit of society, and the welfare of the child is PARAMOUNT; yet this seems to be the intention here. Children seldom experience severe illness if they catch the infection; injecting them with a medicine that has to date killed over 1600 and caused in excess of a million injuries in the UK alone, for minimal benefit to them personally is indefensible.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Where there are conflicting human rights; the welfare of the child is paramount and enshrined in law.
My child is not deemed mature enough to purchase alcohol or cigarettes, yet you expect him/her to decide about a medical treatment that could irreversibly damage his/her health.
I will be taking civil action against YOU personally if you FAIL TO protect my child from this medical procedure which has now been clearly identified as dangerous to MY CHILD.
Date:………….. …….………………………….. signed Parent of ……………………………..