• Two masked individuals on motorcycles, affiliated with the de-facto authority, stormed the village of Anaz.
• They fired directly at:
• Martyr Wisam Mansour (killed)
• Martyr Shafiq Mansour (his cousin, killed)
• Pierre Hariqs (injured)

The perpetrators are identified:
• The crime was carried out by specific individuals by name, and not “remnants”, contrary to attempts by some to spread misinformation.

🔎 For a serious investigation, it is essential to include:
• Those who filed the malicious complaint against Wisam Mansour,
• And individuals who have systematically incited and threatened the residents of Wadi al-Nasara under the pretext of “seeking victims’ rights.”

Their rhetoric portrays Wadi al-Nasara as the aggressor in prior incidents, while the historically and legally established truth is that the attacks originated from the other party, not the victims.

• Incitement and threats against Wadi al-Nasara have been ongoing for a period, carried out by the same parties, in an attempt to distort facts and portray the valley as the aggressor, while it is in fact the victim.
• There is a documented list of 43 martyrs from Wadi al-Nasara who were previously killed by the same entities without accountability.
• The pretext of “remnants’ actions to disrupt elections” is misleading the public, especially given the absence of genuine elections and the existence of pre-arranged appointments.

• The perpetrators are identified by name and must be immediately handed over to the judiciary.
• Impunity encourages the repetition of crimes, especially given the ongoing threats against Wadi al-Nasara.
• The current authority has proven completely incapable of protecting civilians, with its members being directly involved in both incitement and execution of these crimes.
• The protection of Wadi al-Nasara must be entrusted to its own residents, as the current authority has transformed from a supposed protector into a direct participant and overseer of the crimes.