This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Codirector of Standing Together, Alon Lee Green, had a gang of 15 people coming to his house after the anti-war protest.
They entered the building, tried to break into his apartment door and smash it while he was blocking it from the other side. They then poured acid on his doorstep.
This is the footage from the building's CCTV.
[RT]
They entered the building, tried to break into his apartment door and smash it while he was blocking it from the other side. They then poured acid on his doorstep.
This is the footage from the building's CCTV.
[RT]
👎16🤬16😱7👀4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The IRGC navy published footage showing US navy destroyers USS Michael Murphy and USS Frank E. Peterson being warned yesterday to turn away from the Strait of Hormuz.
[RT]
[RT]
🥰47❤11
UKMTO:
UKMTO has received a report of an incident 54NM southwest of Al Hudaydah, Yemen. A sailing vessel was approached by a skiff with approximately 10-12 people on board, 4-5 of whom were armed with automatic weapons. The crew requested that the sailing vessel stopped and when the Master refused they attempted to pull the skiff alongside the sailing vessel to board. The Master deployed a flare and the skiff turned away and departed to the southeast. Authorities are investigating.
[RT]
UKMTO has received a report of an incident 54NM southwest of Al Hudaydah, Yemen. A sailing vessel was approached by a skiff with approximately 10-12 people on board, 4-5 of whom were armed with automatic weapons. The crew requested that the sailing vessel stopped and when the Master refused they attempted to pull the skiff alongside the sailing vessel to board. The Master deployed a flare and the skiff turned away and departed to the southeast. Authorities are investigating.
[RT]
🔥34❤2🤨2
WarfareAnalysis News 🔻
Trump just announced the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. [RT]
Trump posted another long statement about the Strait of Hormuz, Iran, Asim Munir, and claimed he saved 30–50 million lives.
AE
AE
🤣52🖕6
Forwarded from WarfareAnalysis News 🔻
Saudi Arabia media warfare against Afghanistan
Saudi Arabia owns two TV stations broadcasting from London to Afghanistan:
• Afghanistan International
• Independent Persian
According to Afghan sources, both channels operate 24/7 to fuel ethnic tensions between Afghan Pashtuns, Tajiks and Uzbeks through an intense media campaign.
Both stations broadcast from bureaus in London and Washington, D.C., transmitting via satellite, cable, and social media in local languages to target audiences inside Afghanistan.
Independent Persian is owned by Saudi Research and Media Group (SRMG).
Afghanistan International (AITV) is owned by Volant Media UK Ltd. Its director is Adel Abdulkarim Alabdulkarim, a Saudi-born British national with long-standing professional ties to executives close to the Saudi royal court.
As for Arabic-speaking Saudi-owned outlets such as Al Arabiya and Al Hadath, they are running continuous media campaigns against Afghanistan and its government.
Just today, Al Hadath published a headline stating: “Taliban allows domestic violence.”
After reviewing the claim, it turned out the Taliban government had issued a law criminalizing any father or husband who beats his children or wife.
[V]
Saudi Arabia owns two TV stations broadcasting from London to Afghanistan:
• Afghanistan International
• Independent Persian
According to Afghan sources, both channels operate 24/7 to fuel ethnic tensions between Afghan Pashtuns, Tajiks and Uzbeks through an intense media campaign.
Both stations broadcast from bureaus in London and Washington, D.C., transmitting via satellite, cable, and social media in local languages to target audiences inside Afghanistan.
Independent Persian is owned by Saudi Research and Media Group (SRMG).
Afghanistan International (AITV) is owned by Volant Media UK Ltd. Its director is Adel Abdulkarim Alabdulkarim, a Saudi-born British national with long-standing professional ties to executives close to the Saudi royal court.
As for Arabic-speaking Saudi-owned outlets such as Al Arabiya and Al Hadath, they are running continuous media campaigns against Afghanistan and its government.
Just today, Al Hadath published a headline stating: “Taliban allows domestic violence.”
After reviewing the claim, it turned out the Taliban government had issued a law criminalizing any father or husband who beats his children or wife.
[V]
🖕29🤬8❤4
They claim to have destroyed and rendered irrecoverable 6 petabytes of data. Additionally, 149 terabytes of the most classified and sensitive documents have been extracted from:
- Dubai Courts Department
- Dubai Land Department
- Dubai Roads & Transport Authority
These institutions represent vital economic, legal, and infrastructural arteries of the UAE.
[RT]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤50👍9👏5🫡4
Israeli artillery shelling targets the eastern part of Khan Younis city in the southern Gaza Strip.
[Ak]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬30
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Al-Qassam Brigades published a video mourning its commander Ahmad Suweilim, who was responsible for sniping and killing 7 Israeli officers and soldiers in northern Gaza, according to the Israeli army’s admission,
in addition to his active participation in ambushes
V
in addition to his active participation in ambushes
V
❤61🫡48❤🔥6🏆4👍1🎉1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬18
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Massive Attack's Robert Del Naja unlawfully arrested under the Terrorism Act.
In this video, he explained he did it on purpose and criticises the UK government along the same lines as Banksy did in his mural.
[RT]
In this video, he explained he did it on purpose and criticises the UK government along the same lines as Banksy did in his mural.
[RT]
🫡31👏2
Two oil tankers flying the Pakistani flag, named Khairpur and Shalamar, which reportedly headed toward the Strait of Hormuz a few hours ago, have turned around and are now on their way back from the strait.
V
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁41🔥7🖕2❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trump:
I could take out Iran in one day.
V
I could take out Iran in one day.
V
🖕44🤣30🤪3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trump
"As far as China's concerned, China can send their ships to us, China can send their ships to Venezuela... we have a lot of overcapacity, and we'll probably sell [oil] for even less money."
V
"As far as China's concerned, China can send their ships to us, China can send their ships to Venezuela... we have a lot of overcapacity, and we'll probably sell [oil] for even less money."
V
🖕44😁4🤪2❤1
WarfareAnalysis News 🔻
Trump "As far as China's concerned, China can send their ships to us, China can send their ships to Venezuela... we have a lot of overcapacity, and we'll probably sell [oil] for even less money." V
Why did the US attack Iran, and what are its real objectives?
Have you ever wondered how the US is always able to fund all its contentious wars and Israel?
While the USSR collapsed during the first real war of attrition in Afghanistan, the US spent trillions of dollars for a longer period there and still did not collapse.
After the Vietnam War, the United States emerged with massive debts amounting to $168 billion, which was significant compared to the US federal budget at the time, ranging from roughly $92 billion in 1960 to $195 billion in 1970.
The US sought a solution by detaching the dollar from the gold standard and replacing it with oil, and signed a deal with King Faisal of Saudi Arabia, the largest oil exporter at the time, to sell oil only in USD in exchange for protection for the Saudi regime. This was followed by relatively easy “convincing” of the rest of the small Gulf states.
This gave the USD value and gave the US the ability to print as much money as it wanted, since energy buyers have to use USD to buy oil within the US-dominated global banking SWIFT system, which also gave the US the ability to sanction any country, since there was no alternative.
Until China introduced its alternative, CIPS. Given that China is the world’s largest manufacturer, it could potentially dictate a global payment method if it wished.
Any empire fights to remain dominant, while also fighting any potential empire that seeks to replace it or compete with it.
In this fight the US military complex funded indirectly by the Arab oil regimes through (oil in USD for protection) is the main tool used by the US to remain dominant by ensuring majority oil reserves in the world are under its direct control or indirectly via client regimes.
And to force China to use USD for energy purchases if the US controls the oil-producing “states.”
That is why regime change in Venezuela was necessary, since China also used to buy some of its oil needs from sanctioned Venezuela outside Swift and USD.
Roughly 20% of China’s oil needs also come from sanctioned Russia, and this is also outside the SWIFT system and are not paid in USD.
As for Iran, about 91% of Iran’s oil exports go to China outside the SWIFT system, paid for in Chinese yuan (RMB).
The solution the US sought to protect its global reserve currency and, most importantly, the SWIFT network was to lift the ban on Russian oil. (This was also intended to bring oil prices down due to the ongoing Hormuz Strait crisis)
In this vision, a regime change in Iran becomes necessary for two factors:
1- Control over the only oil in the Middle East that the US does not control directly or through client regimes
2- And to protect its advanced military base, Israel, whose existence is necessary near its petrodollar kingdoms and “states.” Since Iran funds Hamas and Hezbollah.
How did the US try to execute this regime change plan?
1- the collapse of Iranian currency:
Here US used sanctions, and the UAE, since the UAE was allowed to trade with Iran and was one of its largest trading partners prior to this. Iran–UAE bilateral trade was roughly $16–28 billion in 2025, according to open sources
2- Protests:
the sudden additional collapse of Iranian Riyal automatrivally caused protests that started with vendors protests and expanded. The US and its allies covered these protests extensively and even instigated them.
3- The assassination of the supreme leader:
From the first airstrikes that targeted the Iranian supreme leader and additional top leaders in Iran, Trump, overjoyed by his easy regime change in Venezuela, believed this would push additional anti-regime protests. He expected an easy, short war that would contribute massively to regime change, allowing the US to control one of the two remaining oil reserves outside SWIFT, where China would have to use USD and SWIFT to buy All its oil needs,
It’s not about oil, it’s about ensuring oil is sold only in USD and through the SWIFT network.
Have you ever wondered how the US is always able to fund all its contentious wars and Israel?
While the USSR collapsed during the first real war of attrition in Afghanistan, the US spent trillions of dollars for a longer period there and still did not collapse.
After the Vietnam War, the United States emerged with massive debts amounting to $168 billion, which was significant compared to the US federal budget at the time, ranging from roughly $92 billion in 1960 to $195 billion in 1970.
The US sought a solution by detaching the dollar from the gold standard and replacing it with oil, and signed a deal with King Faisal of Saudi Arabia, the largest oil exporter at the time, to sell oil only in USD in exchange for protection for the Saudi regime. This was followed by relatively easy “convincing” of the rest of the small Gulf states.
This gave the USD value and gave the US the ability to print as much money as it wanted, since energy buyers have to use USD to buy oil within the US-dominated global banking SWIFT system, which also gave the US the ability to sanction any country, since there was no alternative.
Until China introduced its alternative, CIPS. Given that China is the world’s largest manufacturer, it could potentially dictate a global payment method if it wished.
Any empire fights to remain dominant, while also fighting any potential empire that seeks to replace it or compete with it.
In this fight the US military complex funded indirectly by the Arab oil regimes through (oil in USD for protection) is the main tool used by the US to remain dominant by ensuring majority oil reserves in the world are under its direct control or indirectly via client regimes.
And to force China to use USD for energy purchases if the US controls the oil-producing “states.”
That is why regime change in Venezuela was necessary, since China also used to buy some of its oil needs from sanctioned Venezuela outside Swift and USD.
Roughly 20% of China’s oil needs also come from sanctioned Russia, and this is also outside the SWIFT system and are not paid in USD.
As for Iran, about 91% of Iran’s oil exports go to China outside the SWIFT system, paid for in Chinese yuan (RMB).
The solution the US sought to protect its global reserve currency and, most importantly, the SWIFT network was to lift the ban on Russian oil. (This was also intended to bring oil prices down due to the ongoing Hormuz Strait crisis)
In this vision, a regime change in Iran becomes necessary for two factors:
1- Control over the only oil in the Middle East that the US does not control directly or through client regimes
2- And to protect its advanced military base, Israel, whose existence is necessary near its petrodollar kingdoms and “states.” Since Iran funds Hamas and Hezbollah.
How did the US try to execute this regime change plan?
1- the collapse of Iranian currency:
Here US used sanctions, and the UAE, since the UAE was allowed to trade with Iran and was one of its largest trading partners prior to this. Iran–UAE bilateral trade was roughly $16–28 billion in 2025, according to open sources
2- Protests:
the sudden additional collapse of Iranian Riyal automatrivally caused protests that started with vendors protests and expanded. The US and its allies covered these protests extensively and even instigated them.
3- The assassination of the supreme leader:
From the first airstrikes that targeted the Iranian supreme leader and additional top leaders in Iran, Trump, overjoyed by his easy regime change in Venezuela, believed this would push additional anti-regime protests. He expected an easy, short war that would contribute massively to regime change, allowing the US to control one of the two remaining oil reserves outside SWIFT, where China would have to use USD and SWIFT to buy All its oil needs,
It’s not about oil, it’s about ensuring oil is sold only in USD and through the SWIFT network.
💯52❤5🔥4🫡1