On the discussion of the right to bear arms
At first glance, it seems that the spread of weapons leads to chaos. In reality, this is merely an illusion, and I strongly suspect it is one of the pathological effects of the modern state.
The modern state is a real prison, and its inmates have spent so long inside it, and have been injected with its ideas, that they no longer see it as a prison, but rather as order, progress, and precision.
If you brought someone who grew up in prison and knew nothing else, and was filled with these ideas, then showed him scenes of people living outside the prison, he would think they were living in terrifying chaos. He would fear ending up in such a situation, where his affairs are in his own hands, his life proceeds according to his own will, and no one has control or authority over him.
This illusion, “the spread of weapons leads to chaos” is contradicted by several things, all of which are sufficient evidence to refute it. Among them:
First: human history before the modern state, when carrying weapons was something natural. If not for self-defense against thieves and robbers, then at least against stray dogs or snakes… and certainly against oppression from authority.
The spread of weapons causes general deterrence, not rampant chaos. That is why conflicts rarely erupt in armed societies, because everyone knows that if conflict begins, the cost will be devastating for all sides.
A simple example: one of the famous theories of the twentieth century is that one of the main reasons for the limited wars between major powers was the existence of nuclear weapons. Their existence deterred, and pushed them to seek alternatives before sliding into total war.
You can look into Kissinger’s memoirs to see how nuclear weapons were a burden and constraint on American policy, constantly forcing diplomatic thinking. Kissinger himself began his political life in a center working on the project of ‘how to defeat the Soviet Union without war.’
Second: human history after the modern state, especially in countries ruled by oppressive regimes. People became like chickens and sheep before the butcher, unable to defend themselves. Horrific stories emerged about massacres, humiliating torture, home invasions, and violations of honor. Armed soldiers taking pleasure in powerless victims.
In our Arab world, we do not even need examples. Our lives are filled with such tragedies and stories. Whoever has lived in safety should read prison literature to understand what was hidden from them.
Third: even in countries that “respect the law’’ and have democratic systems, statistical studies have shown that crime rates decrease the more people possess weapons. The images attached are from the book More Guns, Less Crime by the American John Lott.
1/2
At first glance, it seems that the spread of weapons leads to chaos. In reality, this is merely an illusion, and I strongly suspect it is one of the pathological effects of the modern state.
The modern state is a real prison, and its inmates have spent so long inside it, and have been injected with its ideas, that they no longer see it as a prison, but rather as order, progress, and precision.
If you brought someone who grew up in prison and knew nothing else, and was filled with these ideas, then showed him scenes of people living outside the prison, he would think they were living in terrifying chaos. He would fear ending up in such a situation, where his affairs are in his own hands, his life proceeds according to his own will, and no one has control or authority over him.
This illusion, “the spread of weapons leads to chaos” is contradicted by several things, all of which are sufficient evidence to refute it. Among them:
First: human history before the modern state, when carrying weapons was something natural. If not for self-defense against thieves and robbers, then at least against stray dogs or snakes… and certainly against oppression from authority.
The spread of weapons causes general deterrence, not rampant chaos. That is why conflicts rarely erupt in armed societies, because everyone knows that if conflict begins, the cost will be devastating for all sides.
A simple example: one of the famous theories of the twentieth century is that one of the main reasons for the limited wars between major powers was the existence of nuclear weapons. Their existence deterred, and pushed them to seek alternatives before sliding into total war.
You can look into Kissinger’s memoirs to see how nuclear weapons were a burden and constraint on American policy, constantly forcing diplomatic thinking. Kissinger himself began his political life in a center working on the project of ‘how to defeat the Soviet Union without war.’
Second: human history after the modern state, especially in countries ruled by oppressive regimes. People became like chickens and sheep before the butcher, unable to defend themselves. Horrific stories emerged about massacres, humiliating torture, home invasions, and violations of honor. Armed soldiers taking pleasure in powerless victims.
In our Arab world, we do not even need examples. Our lives are filled with such tragedies and stories. Whoever has lived in safety should read prison literature to understand what was hidden from them.
Third: even in countries that “respect the law’’ and have democratic systems, statistical studies have shown that crime rates decrease the more people possess weapons. The images attached are from the book More Guns, Less Crime by the American John Lott.
1/2
💯10✍7⚡1❤1
WarfareAnalysis News 🔻
On the discussion of the right to bear arms At first glance, it seems that the spread of weapons leads to chaos. In reality, this is merely an illusion, and I strongly suspect it is one of the pathological effects of the modern state. The modern state…
Many people may not know that Muhammad Ali Pasha thought about disarming the people at the strangest possible moment. If we asked people what incident pushed Muhammad Ali to disarm the population, everyone would expect a civil war, tribal conflict, or rebellion against authority.
But the first moment he considered it was after a glorious victory achieved by ordinary people against foreign occupation: the people of Rasheed defeating the British Fraser colonial Campaign in 1807.
Muhammad Ali himself feared the campaign and hesitated to confront it, even considering withdrawing from the country entirely. When scholars and dignitaries told him to wage jihad, he made a revealing statement reflecting the mentality of the “modern state” he founded:
‘‘It is not the duty of the subjects of the country to go out and fight; rather their role is to support the army financially.”
Yet the people won through popular effort alongside volunteer soldiers. Everyone rose up without permission from the Pasha or orders from the state.
And what was the reward for the people? Listen to Al-Jabarti, who said:
“Instead of thanking the ordinary people or attributing the achievement to them, everything was attributed to the Pasha and his soldiers, while the people received the opposite of reward.”
We are now in a special situation:
The matter is not only related to human dignity under tyranny, but also to the ability to confront occupation.
For two centuries we have suffered from a deep and complex problem: once the modern state monopolized weapons, if its official army was defeated in just one battle, the entire country fell under occupation, and it became difficult for the people to resist or repel it.
The weapon of the masses is one of the pillars of preserving nations and homelands. It guarantees support for armies when they fight, and serves as an alternative if they are defeated and withdraw.
Do you not see how what disturbs Israel and worries it most is the disarmament of Gaza and the disarmament of Hezbollah?
Do you think it does that to preserve peace? Has the weaponry of the Palestinian Authority ever troubled it, when that force is trained under Israeli and American supervision?
Have you not noticed that any international or American envoy who comes to our “countries” is always concerned with “unifying weapons under the official army”?!
Do you think this is for the benefit of our “countries” and peoples, or because it is the ideal way to control us and guarantee our occupation?
By: Muhammad Elhamy.
2/2
V
But the first moment he considered it was after a glorious victory achieved by ordinary people against foreign occupation: the people of Rasheed defeating the British Fraser colonial Campaign in 1807.
Muhammad Ali himself feared the campaign and hesitated to confront it, even considering withdrawing from the country entirely. When scholars and dignitaries told him to wage jihad, he made a revealing statement reflecting the mentality of the “modern state” he founded:
‘‘It is not the duty of the subjects of the country to go out and fight; rather their role is to support the army financially.”
Yet the people won through popular effort alongside volunteer soldiers. Everyone rose up without permission from the Pasha or orders from the state.
And what was the reward for the people? Listen to Al-Jabarti, who said:
“Instead of thanking the ordinary people or attributing the achievement to them, everything was attributed to the Pasha and his soldiers, while the people received the opposite of reward.”
We are now in a special situation:
The matter is not only related to human dignity under tyranny, but also to the ability to confront occupation.
For two centuries we have suffered from a deep and complex problem: once the modern state monopolized weapons, if its official army was defeated in just one battle, the entire country fell under occupation, and it became difficult for the people to resist or repel it.
The weapon of the masses is one of the pillars of preserving nations and homelands. It guarantees support for armies when they fight, and serves as an alternative if they are defeated and withdraw.
Do you not see how what disturbs Israel and worries it most is the disarmament of Gaza and the disarmament of Hezbollah?
Do you think it does that to preserve peace? Has the weaponry of the Palestinian Authority ever troubled it, when that force is trained under Israeli and American supervision?
Have you not noticed that any international or American envoy who comes to our “countries” is always concerned with “unifying weapons under the official army”?!
Do you think this is for the benefit of our “countries” and peoples, or because it is the ideal way to control us and guarantee our occupation?
By: Muhammad Elhamy.
2/2
V
💯19❤6👌4✍3⚡1🖕1
The Israeli army has issued orders to evacuate an entire residential block in the "Al-Faluja" area north of the Gaza Strip.
[Ak]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬28😁1
WarfareAnalysis News 🔻
Gaza sources
An Israeli airstrike targeted the Rahma camp near the Al-Nimnim restaurant in Al-Faluja, Jabalia camp, northern Gaza.
[Ak]
An Israeli airstrike targeted the Rahma camp near the Al-Nimnim restaurant in Al-Faluja, Jabalia camp, northern Gaza.
[Ak]
🤬34❤2😁2😭2💔1
The Israeli army is carrying out a large-scale demolition operation east of Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip.
[Ak]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬22
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The American proffesor Richard Mortel after learning Arabic:
“I firmly believe that the Arabic language is superior to any other language, and I do not accept debate on this matter.”
Richard mocks Arab academics who say, “Arabic is incapable of expressing my thoughts,” by asking: “What thoughts do you even have?”
V
“I firmly believe that the Arabic language is superior to any other language, and I do not accept debate on this matter.”
Richard mocks Arab academics who say, “Arabic is incapable of expressing my thoughts,” by asking: “What thoughts do you even have?”
V
🏆37💯11❤8🫡2😴1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
DJI & Western Sanctions –
DJI, founded in China in 2006, is the world’s leading drone maker.
US actions: 2017: US Army bans DJI drones over security concerns.
Dec 2020: Added to US Entity List (export restrictions).
2021–2024: Listed as Chinese military-linked company.
Dec 23, 2025: Automatically added to FCC Covered List → new DJI drone models blocked from US market.
Existing drones can still be used.
No full consumer ban in the EU/UK/Canada: No import bans as of 2026.
DJI denies allegations and offers data localization.
Check your local laws.
Video DJI Ronin kit 2026
[TT]
DJI, founded in China in 2006, is the world’s leading drone maker.
US actions: 2017: US Army bans DJI drones over security concerns.
Dec 2020: Added to US Entity List (export restrictions).
2021–2024: Listed as Chinese military-linked company.
Dec 23, 2025: Automatically added to FCC Covered List → new DJI drone models blocked from US market.
Existing drones can still be used.
No full consumer ban in the EU/UK/Canada: No import bans as of 2026.
DJI denies allegations and offers data localization.
Check your local laws.
Video DJI Ronin kit 2026
[TT]
❤13🔥1
An Israeli airstrike targeted land near the tents of displaced people in the Al-Qarara area, north of Khan Younis city.
[Ak]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬27💔2
Israeli airstrike targets the town of Al-Maashouq in the Tyre district of southern Lebanon.
[Ak]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬19
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A terrorist attack targeted the Islamic Center of San Diego.
The terrorist attack resulted in 3 Muslim worshippers murdered, including the mosque security guard who sacrificed himself to prevent an even larger massacre.
V
The terrorist attack resulted in 3 Muslim worshippers murdered, including the mosque security guard who sacrificed himself to prevent an even larger massacre.
V
💔60🤬3👎2
WarfareAnalysis News 🔻
A terrorist attack targeted the Islamic Center of San Diego. The terrorist attack resulted in 3 Muslim worshippers murdered, including the mosque security guard who sacrificed himself to prevent an even larger massacre. V
The hero Amin Abdullah, the mosque security guard who prevented a bigger massacre.
V
V
❤58🫡38💔5👍1
WarfareAnalysis News 🔻
The hero Amin Abdullah, the mosque security guard who prevented a bigger massacre. V
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
More on the CHRISTIANIST terrorist attack from the Muslim cowboy
V
V
💯44❤6🤷♀1👍1😭1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚡️Al-Qassam Brigades:
The late field commander Anas Khaled Abu Nasr.
V
The late field commander Anas Khaled Abu Nasr.
V
🫡61💔14❤7🖕1
WarfareAnalysis News 🔻
This is not the West Bank, and these are not Duvdevan These are Egyptian security forces who stormed Al-Warraq Island and are trying to abduct residents by forcing them into white minibuses with civilian license plates, to disappear them, torture them…
The Egyptian regime army is attacking residents of Warraq Island in order to forcibly displace them from their homes.
Media reports say the island was sold to Emirati or Saudi investor.
In the first video, a resident is shouting at the Egyptian security and army forces:
“You sons of bitches, you immoral government.”
V
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥20🤷♀2
⚡️Egyptian sources:
Ashraf El-Sayed Abdel Samad, the father of the young detainee “Shehab,” who has been imprisoned since 2024 over “showing support to Palestine” died after suffering a heart attack while visiting his son in prison.
He passed away immediately after the visit, according to lawyer Nabih Al-Janadi.
V
Ashraf El-Sayed Abdel Samad, the father of the young detainee “Shehab,” who has been imprisoned since 2024 over “showing support to Palestine” died after suffering a heart attack while visiting his son in prison.
He passed away immediately after the visit, according to lawyer Nabih Al-Janadi.
V
💔41😢5😁1