Forwarded from IainB π³πΏπ΄ π€
Assuming you're not trolling me:
Sorry. I didn't mean to offend anyone, but it seems you may have taken offense to what I wrote.
I assure you, I was just making a hypothetical comment.
When things seem completely crazy, "wrong" or mixed up in this world, I often ask myself the question:
π "Under what conditions would this bonkers situation/problem make sense?"π€·
As RTNews keeps reminding us:
π "Question everything."
For example, at the start of the SMO, when the US threatened to excommunicate Russia from SWIFT (and later did so, which was a huge breach of trust and of the Bretton Woods Areement), the repeated narrative of the West came out about "To the last (Ukrainian) man", and I wondered WHY that particular narrative was being pushed so strongly.π€
It was like a mantra that all the main Western actors, puppets and their lamestream media had evidently been told to repeat - e.g., similar to the Covid-19 vax "Safe and effective", or "Build back better", and it just didn't make sense.
Why that narrative though?π€ π€·
So, I went looking for answers.
This already blew my mind:
- the third in a set of 3 lectures at Yale by Prof. John J. Mearsheimer:
π βThe Case for Restraintβ (2017).
https://youtu.be/TsonzzAW3Mk
He basically predicted in 2017 exactly what was going to happen 4 or 5 years hence - America's proxy war in Ukraine - and why it was going to happen (America's critical objectives), all driven by a remorseless "American liberal hegemony".
π The USA is/was responsible for fomenting the #RussiaUkraineWar.
So I looked further back into history and found this:
Fertiliser/consumable...
...the Ukrainian destiny?π₯
From the archives:
π British Lord Palmerstone on the Crimean war in 1854:
π "Ukrainians are the firewood that we will throw into the furnace of the anti-Russian rebellion."
This was apparently in the context of his views on the geopolitical situation in Eastern Europe during the mid-19th century.
So what is happening today in Ukraine is apparently the extension of British/American racial hatred of Russia, where Russia is being literally obliged to act as executioner, culling the despicable and expendable (in British/US perception) Ukrainian population.π±
π β οΈ β°οΈβ°οΈ β°οΈ
π The Russians don't Want to do this, they are being obliged to do it, by Britain/US.
This is just evil.π
How cruelly cynical is that?π± π€·
"Plus Γ§a change, plus c'est la mΓͺme chose."
~ Confucius.π§ π¨π³
ββββββββ ⬀ ββββββββ
#Nullius_in_verba
Sorry. I didn't mean to offend anyone, but it seems you may have taken offense to what I wrote.
I assure you, I was just making a hypothetical comment.
When things seem completely crazy, "wrong" or mixed up in this world, I often ask myself the question:
π "Under what conditions would this bonkers situation/problem make sense?"
As RTNews keeps reminding us:
π "Question everything."
For example, at the start of the SMO, when the US threatened to excommunicate Russia from SWIFT (and later did so, which was a huge breach of trust and of the Bretton Woods Areement), the repeated narrative of the West came out about "To the last (Ukrainian) man", and I wondered WHY that particular narrative was being pushed so strongly.
It was like a mantra that all the main Western actors, puppets and their lamestream media had evidently been told to repeat - e.g., similar to the Covid-19 vax "Safe and effective", or "Build back better", and it just didn't make sense.
Why that narrative though?
So, I went looking for answers.
This already blew my mind:
- the third in a set of 3 lectures at Yale by Prof. John J. Mearsheimer:
π βThe Case for Restraintβ (2017).
https://youtu.be/TsonzzAW3Mk
He basically predicted in 2017 exactly what was going to happen 4 or 5 years hence - America's proxy war in Ukraine - and why it was going to happen (America's critical objectives), all driven by a remorseless "American liberal hegemony".
π The USA is/was responsible for fomenting the #RussiaUkraineWar.
So I looked further back into history and found this:
Fertiliser/consumable...
...the Ukrainian destiny?
From the archives:
π British Lord Palmerstone on the Crimean war in 1854:
π "Ukrainians are the firewood that we will throw into the furnace of the anti-Russian rebellion."
This was apparently in the context of his views on the geopolitical situation in Eastern Europe during the mid-19th century.
So what is happening today in Ukraine is apparently the extension of British/American racial hatred of Russia, where Russia is being literally obliged to act as executioner, culling the despicable and expendable (in British/US perception) Ukrainian population.
π The Russians don't Want to do this, they are being obliged to do it, by Britain/US.
This is just evil.π
How cruelly cynical is that?
"Plus Γ§a change, plus c'est la mΓͺme chose."
~ Confucius.π§ π¨π³
ββββββββ ⬀ ββββββββ
#Nullius_in_verba
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
YouTube
John J. Mearsheimer, βThe Case for Restraintβ
Henry L. Stimson Lectures on World Affairs.
John J. Mearsheimer, R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science and the co-director of the Program on International Security Policy at the University of Chicago, gave a series of threeβ¦
John J. Mearsheimer, R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science and the co-director of the Program on International Security Policy at the University of Chicago, gave a series of threeβ¦
β€44π14π9π€6π―2π₯1