Parallel Experiments
1.71K subscribers
62 photos
1 video
3 files
811 links
Stay informed. Stay authentic.

Welcome to the public part of my brain. Here I share curations and thoughts.

Created with ❤️ by @linghao.
Download Telegram
https://stratechery.com/2022/meta-meets-microsoft

Takeaway: VR adoption would probably look more like the PC than it did smartphones:

> Implicit in assuming that augmented reality is more important than virtual reality is assuming that this new way of accessing the Internet will develop like mobile did. Smartphone makers like Apple, though, had a huge advantage: people already had and wanted mobile phones; selling a device that you were going to carry anyway, but which happened to be infinitely more capable for only a few hundred more dollars, was a recipe for success in the consumer market.

> PCs, though, didn’t have that advantage: the vast majority of the consumer market had no knowledge of or interest in computers; rather, most people encountered computers for the first time at work. Employers bought their employees computers because computers made them more productive; then, once consumers were used to using computers at work, an ever increasing number of them wanted to buy a computer for their home as well. And, as the number of home computers increased, so did the market opportunity for developers of non-work applications like games.

> I suspect that this is the path that virtual reality will take. Like PCs, the first major use case will be knowledge workers using devices bought for them by their employer, eager to increase collaboration in a remote work world, and as quality increases, offer a superior working environment. Some number of those employees will be interested in using virtual reality for non-work activities as well, increasing the market for non-work applications.
👍2🤯1
https://unfashionable.substack.com/p/the-death-of-intellectual-curiosity

To me the most interseting takeaway is "simplicity on the other side of complexity":

> An important counter-intuitive observation is that mental models do not keep increasing in complexity. Things get simpler after putting enough time and energy into understanding them. This is known as simplicity on the other side of complexity.

> For any given subject or phenomenon, the y-axis (vertical) represents the complexity and the x-axis (horizontal) represents your degree of understanding. For any new subject, you start on the left with low complexity and low understanding. This means you have a lot of wrong assumptions and do not know how all the pieces fit together; you might think you know, but you are most likely wrong. As your understanding grows, the complexity increases as well. You learn that many of the assumptions you had were wrong or overly simplistic and that there is a lot more complexity to the interactions of all different variables than you taught. But after you understand more, things get simpler again. Everything “makes sense” and you know which factors matter so you can now focus on these few variables when analyzing the subject. Depending on the understanding you started with, the mental model “on the other side” is also simpler.

See also https://unfashionable.substack.com/p/elon.
Forwarded from Reorx’s Forge
🐦 Backpack Hero, 超好玩的 Roguelike 地牢探索游戏,可以免费在 itch 试玩。
游戏的机制是根据物品的形状、效果,合理安排背包的空间和布局,构建独特的装备搭配,满足暗黑玩家整理背包的癖好😛
https://thejaspel.itch.io/backpack-hero

#tweet
Forwarded from 散步中
Google出了个纪录片系列Hacking Google讲网络安全,题材有趣,制作精良。

第一集上来就介绍了Operation Aurora,aka极光行动:09年由中国解放军发起的针对美国互联网企业的大规模网络攻击,目的是获取中国人权活动人士的Gmail信息。

该事件直接导致了Google决定退出中国。

https://youtu.be/przDcQe6n5o
https://coke.do/issues/115-1468280
推荐可乐周报,质量很棒,比如最新这期就有两个非常好的 insight:

- 免费贡献99%的部分,对剩下的1%收费。https://dailywritinghabits.substack.com/p/give-away-99-for-free-monetize-the
- 四种作者,你想成为哪一种?https://qr.ae/pvux48
https://evantravers.com/articles/2022/06/30/dating-other-task-managers/

Great insights. The main takeaway for me is to have "the List" and "the Brain", where "the List" is things you committed to do soon (say today).

I have been using a similar system where there is a list of "immediate todos" and a backlog. The difference is my "immediate todos" are not actually what I committed to do soon. And that sometimes leads to procrastination. I will be trying out this new "the List vs. the Brain" approach to see if it helps.

> Still more intriguing: Brain and List could be separate systems.
E.g. copy items from the List to a piece of paper first thing in the morning.
👍2