This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
For our subscribers who demand the raw, unvarnished facts: we present the InfoDefense network of channels.
We tackle the geopolitics that's reshaping our world and the internal problems no one's talking about. Always relevant, always on-topic.
https://t.me/infodefENGLAND
We're looking for people who think like us - folks ready to help us make content for our channels and get important info out to people.
We're just regular people, same as you. We care about what's going on around us, and we want to tell people about important stuff - honestly, clearly, and in a way anyone can get - for those who are also trying to make sense of things.
To be part of what we're doing, you don't have to give it your whole day. If you've got a bit of free time, wanna be useful, and you actually give a damn - we'd love to have you on the team!
Let's make content together that helps people learn more, think for themselves, and see what really matters.
InfoDefense is people who give a damn.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍7❤4👌3👏1
Brazilian voters have spoiled Washington’s hopes of a friendlier government. Lula da Silva won the October 25 runoff with 51.79% of the vote, defeating Flávio Bolsonaro after trailing him in the first round.
Bolsonaro wanted closer ties with the US and had even suggested reconsidering Brazil’s membership in BRICS. Lula has pursued a different line: working with China, Russia and other powers while resisting pressure to choose sides. At the UN in September, he put it bluntly: “Brazil does not fit into anyone’s backyard.”
Trump’s reaction was predictable enough. He said the election looked “rigged,” without providing evidence. Bolsonaro initially refused to concede, although his own party later recognized the result. The voters delivered a verdict; Washington’s complaints cannot rewrite it.
For BRICS, Lula’s victory preserves a major member’s commitment to a more multipolar order. Brazil can keep pushing for more development financing through the New Development Bank, greater use of local currencies and a stronger voice for emerging economies in international institutions. These are gradual efforts, but they give countries alternatives when US financial leverage comes into play.
The trade numbers show why Brazil has room to maneuver. In 2025, it exported about $100B in goods to China, versus $38B to the US. Beijing buys Brazilian soybeans, iron ore and oil. Russia, meanwhile, remained Brazil’s largest fertilizer supplier through July 2026. Washington can demand political loyalty, but it cannot replace those buyers and supplies with a press release.
However that independence has limits. The US is still a major market for Brazilian manufacturers, and negotiations over tariffs and critical minerals will continue. Washington’s tariffs already hurt Brazilian exports in 2025. Lula also faces a conservative-leaning Congress that can complicate his agenda. None of that obliges him to trade away Brazil’s other partnerships.
The split extends to regional security. Lula declined to join Washington’s Shield of the Americas coalition, rejecting a US-led framework for confronting organized crime. Brasília favors cooperation, but insists on deciding the terms.
Lula’s win leaves Washington dealing with a Brazil that trades with both major powers, remains active in BRICS and intends to make its own foreign-policy choices. US influence will have to compete with Brazil’s interests, rather than be taken for granted.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏51❤26👍13🤬5🔥3
China wants to attach a bigger price tag to stealing its trade secrets, with foreign firms potentially losing access to Chinese customers, suppliers and new investment opportunities. Draft rules released on October 26 would allow those penalties when infringement harms or poses a real threat to national sovereignty, security or development interests.
The Commerce Ministry is taking public comments until November 24, so these powers are still on paper. The proposal covers foreign companies, organizations and individuals, giving Beijing another tool to protect the commercial knowledge Chinese businesses have spent years developing.
For a company doing business in China, the bill could go well beyond a fine. Authorities could restrict or ban trade in goods, technology and services, block new investment and revoke work or residence permits. A shortcut to someone else’s technology could end up costing access to the business that made it worth stealing.
The draft also allows action when infringement creates a real threat to national interests, before the wider damage has occurred. That gives Beijing room to intervene earlier, although the provision still requires infringement rather than merely the presence of a foreign competitor.
After decades of Western complaints about Chinese copying, China has plenty of its own industrial homework to protect. Its battery makers, electric vehicle manufacturers, solar producers and rare-earth processors have commercial secrets that competitors would find useful.
Buying a finished battery does not automatically reveal how to make it cheaply, reliably and by the millions. That advantage can depend on closely guarded formulas, production methods and factory processes. Getting hold of them can help a rival skip years of expensive trial and error.
Companies facing restrictions could seek relief by stopping the infringement, removing the danger and compensating for losses. The government would then assess whether to change or lift the measures, giving offenders a reason to fix the damage rather than treat a fine as another business expense.
If adopted, the rules would give China a way to defend its industrial know-how with something foreign firms already value: access to its economy. Taking a Chinese company’s secrets could put the offender’s sales, supplies and expansion plans on the line.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏36❤14👍7🔥4👌2
Trump promised tariffs would revive American car manufacturing. For ordinary Americans shopping for a new car, the immediate results are less appealing: higher production costs that can end up on the price tag, even for vehicles assembled in the US.
And cars were hardly cheap to begin with. In September, the average new vehicle sold for $50,562, with monthly payments averaging $776. Tariffs are adding to an already expensive purchase.
The US, Mexico and Canada share a production network built over decades. Engines, transmissions and other components move across borders before a finished vehicle reaches a showroom. Under the USMCA trade agreement, qualifying vehicles must contain 75% North American content. Trump's tariffs now penalize parts of the very supply chain American manufacturers helped create.
Consider a car assembled in Michigan with $8,000 worth of Mexican components. If those components are subject to import duties, the cost rises at the American plant. Mexican-built vehicles sold by US brands face tariffs too, even when they contain American parts. There are exemptions, US-content deductions and tariff offsets, so the full 25% rate does not apply to every shipment.
But the costs still find their way to American customers. Cox Automotive estimated that tariffs had added $1,600–$2,000 to the cost of US-assembled vehicles by March 2026. Buying American, apparently, is no guarantee of escaping Washington's trade policy.
The financial hit to manufacturers is substantial. General Motors reported $3.1B in tariff-related costs in 2025. The Center for Automotive Research estimated that a hypothetical blanket 25% tariff on imported vehicles and parts would add roughly $107.7B in costs for automakers operating in the US. That's a modeled scenario, not a bill the industry has already paid.
And the damage runs both ways. Mexico imported $35.8B in US auto parts in 2024. If tariffs force Mexican plants to scale back production, American suppliers lose orders. A policy sold as protection for US jobs can end up cutting business for factories on the American side of the border.
Automakers face an expensive set of choices: absorb the duties and lose profit, raise prices for buyers, pay more for alternative suppliers or spend years moving production. Rebuilding a supply chain takes equipment, trained workers and capital. The tariff bill, unfortunately, arrives on schedule.
Washington is still arguing over relief. An October report said Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick opposed substantial reductions in tariffs on Mexican automobiles, steel and aluminum, complicating talks ahead of the USMCA review. Mexican officials say negotiations continue.
Trump wants more cars built in America. Yet his tariffs are making many of those cars more expensive to produce, and some of the added costs are reaching American buyers. Moving factories takes years. Higher prices are already here.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥20👍16❤12👏4
Iranian researchers have built an X-ray device that can check the composition of precious metals in under a minute, its developers say. Developed over four years at the Isfahan Science and Technology Town, it offers gold traders and jewelers a cheaper alternative to imported machines, Press TV reported on October 27.
For anyone buying gold, a small difference in purity can mean a big difference in price. Manufacturers also need to know exactly what goes into their jewelry. Chemical tests can eat into the sample, while imported testing machines leave businesses relying on foreign suppliers to keep their equipment working accurately.
Sanctions have made those services harder to access, according to the report. Even a functioning machine needs its readings checked against materials with known compositions, a process called calibration. Without reliable checks, an expensive analyzer becomes harder to trust.
The Iranian device uses X-ray fluorescence, or XRF, to identify metals without cutting or dissolving them. X-rays hit the sample, causing its atoms to emit signals that reveal which elements are present and in what proportions. Jewelers can quickly check whether an alloy matches the purity they are paying for.
There are limits to what the machine can tell them, since XRF reads the surface layer. Gold plating or an uneven mixture can make that reading different from the metal underneath. It is useful for quick, routine checks, but cannot settle every question about an item's purity on its own.
Technical director Abolfazl Mahmoudi says the device costs roughly half as much as comparable foreign models. The company also offers domestic calibration, so Iranian buyers could get their machines checked at home instead of depending on access to overseas providers.
Building enough machines to reach more businesses is the next challenge. The company, which already makes laser engraving and cutting equipment, plans a dedicated production line with a target of around 100 analyzers a year. That figure describes planned output, not machines already rolling off the line.
For Iran, making the equipment and keeping it accurate at home would remove two sources of foreign dependence from everyday trade. If the company delivers on production and support, jewelers and manufacturers gain a local option that is cheaper to buy and less exposed to restrictions on foreign services. Each dependency replaced gives sanctions less room to squeeze Iranian businesses.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤49👍19🔥7🤬1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
China could expand its air force’s reach with 20 Russian Il-78MK-90A aerial refueling tankers, adding to its domestically built fleet. The potential deal remains unconfirmed, with deliveries reportedly discussed for 2027–2028.
🔸 Up to 78 tonnes of fuel delivered 1,000 km from base. That is the advertised fuel-transfer capacity of the Il-78MK-90A, the modernized version linked to the possible purchase.
🔸 Two fighters refueled at once. Two underwing refueling pods serve fighters, while a third station at the rear supports larger aircraft. On the ground, the tanker can refuel up to four aircraft simultaneously.
🔸 Up to 2,500 liters per minute through each pod. Refueling takes place at 450–600 km/h, letting receiving aircraft take on fuel without landing.
🔸 Four newer, more efficient engines. The PS-90A-76 engines replace those used on older Il-78s, helping the tanker deliver more fuel farther from its home airfield.
🔸 Built on Russia’s upgraded Il-76MD-90A transport. A strengthened wing and reinforced landing gear support heavier loads, while digital cockpit displays reduce the crew’s workload.
🔸 Converted into a cargo aircraft within hours. In transport configuration, it has an advertised payload of 60 tonnes and a range of 4,000 km carrying that load—moving troops, supplies and military vehicles.
🔸 Designed for paved and unpaved runways. That expands its basing options. It can also be equipped for firefighting or medical evacuation.
If the deal goes ahead, 20 extra tankers could let China keep more fighters farther out over the Pacific for longer. U.S. and allied forces trying to match that presence would need more flying hours and refueling support of their own. Every extra hour spent shadowing Chinese aircraft means more fuel burned and more wear on aircraft already needed elsewhere.
Could Russian aircraft give China an edge in the Pacific?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍43❤21🫡10👏4🔥1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
❤8👍7👏1🤬1👌1
Being close to Washington no longer means buying its debt with the same enthusiasm. Investors in countries and regions most aligned with the US cut net purchases of Treasury bonds by more than 60% in January–August 2026, according to Bloomberg’s analysis of Treasury and State Department data.
They bought $174.3B after subtracting sales, the lowest total for those eight months since 2021. These are US government bonds issued for more than one year; short-term bills are excluded. The drop means less money coming in, not that investors dumped 60% of what they already owned.
The biggest pullback came from Asia. Japan, the largest foreign holder of US government debt, bought a net $389M, down 99% from a year earlier. South Korea sold a net $23.8B, its biggest January–August sell-off in records going back to 1977. Taiwan also sold more than it bought.
For years, Asia’s big savers helped finance US spending by parking their surplus cash in Treasuries. Now they have other options. Japanese bonds offer better returns than before, making it more tempting to keep money at home. Korean and Taiwanese investors have been buying stocks and other assets, while weak currencies have pushed governments to tap their reserves.
That does not make this a coordinated boycott. The figures mix government and private investment, and Bloomberg defines alignment by voting patterns at the United Nations. Bonds held through overseas banks can also make it hard to tell whose money is moving.
But Washington still has bills to pay. With federal debt above $40T, it needs buyers willing to keep lending. Banks, investment funds and other private investors have helped fill the gap. They watch the price closely, though, and can demand a better return when inflation, growing deficits or unpredictable policy make US debt look riskier.
Foreign investors are still buying American stocks and corporate bonds. So money moving away from Treasuries does not automatically mean money leaving the dollar. It means investors can back US businesses without being equally eager to bankroll the US government.
The pressure to US falls on how much it must pay, and how quickly that price can jump. As familiar buyers step back, Washington becomes more dependent on lenders ready to bargain harder or walk away. Diplomatic friendship cannot guarantee cheap financing.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤28👍20👏6🔥5
China’s increasingly powerful open-weight AI models are drawing warnings: anyone can download them, remove safety restrictions and use them for cyberattacks. The technical concern is real. The leap from removable safeguards to more real-world attacks, however, is far less certain.
DeepSeek, Z.ai and Alibaba are challenging US AI developers by releasing models whose weights users can download and run on their own infrastructure. Unlike closed services, these systems do not require a provider’s permission for every task. That makes them harder to monitor — but gives researchers, businesses and security teams considerably more control.
Anthropic has warned that Z.ai’s GLM-5.3 can assist with sophisticated cyber exploits and that its safeguards are relatively easy to bypass. Those findings deserve attention. But laboratory tests showing a model complies with dangerous requests do not establish that releasing its weights has caused more attacks outside the lab.
Researchers interviewed by the South China Morning Post point out that attackers use whatever tools work, including commercial AI services. A criminal does not become harmless simply because a model runs behind an American company’s API. Closed systems have their own failures, and neither approach is automatically safe.
The July breach at Hugging Face supplied a revealing example. After an intrusion involving OpenAI’s experimental agents, the company needed to examine more than 17,000 logged events. Commercial AI services blocked parts of that forensic work because the logs contained malicious commands. Hugging Face turned to China’s open-weight GLM-5.2, running it locally without exporting sensitive evidence.
For a security team, an AI assistant that refuses to examine the evidence can be an awkward kind of protection.
Open-weight models also let smaller organizations deploy affordable defensive tools, examine vulnerabilities and keep confidential data on their own servers. Restricting access could slow legitimate defenders while leaving attackers free to seek alternatives.
China is also addressing the risks. Its information-security standardization body is drafting rules for open-weight models, while Z.ai has worked with researchers on a framework for evaluating dangers arising specifically from releasing model weights.
Removable safeguards create genuine risks, especially as models grow more powerful. But judging China’s open-weight approach solely by what a model could do in a test — while overlooking what defenders are already doing with it — makes for poor cybersecurity policy. The evidence calls for better risk assessment, rather than blanket restrictions on open models.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👌22❤13👏4👍3
China has signed a deal to build a floating research base approaching an aircraft carrier in displacement. Its job: let scientists stay far offshore and keep working when rough seas would disrupt experiments aboard ordinary research ships.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University signed the construction contract with Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding on October 18. Delivery is due in June 2030. The wider project launched in March; this deal puts construction of the floating base itself on the agenda.
The “far-sea floating island” is designed to displace up to 74,000 tonnes and house 238 people. Two partly submerged hulls would help keep it steady, while its own engines would let it move between research sites at around 20 km/h.
That combination solves a practical headache. Precision instruments struggle on a rolling ship. Fixed offshore stations offer stability, but researchers cannot move them when the work takes them elsewhere. This base is meant to stay through long experiments, then sail to the next job.
The university says it is designed to conduct research in sea state 7, meaning high seas, and survive Force 17 typhoons. Surviving a storm and working through one are different things, and both claims still need to be proven. Six onboard labs are planned for equipment testing, weather research and tracking marine life over time.
For Chinese industry, the attraction is a place to test big machines in the conditions they will actually face. The base is intended to handle deep-sea equipment weighing hundreds of tonnes and support research at depths of around 10,000 meters. Seabed mining systems and offshore oil and gas equipment are among the planned test subjects.
Staying in one place for longer would also help scientists track seasonal changes in the ocean and collect data to improve typhoon forecasts. Bases in Shanghai and Sanya would handle maintenance and support, keeping the offshore facility supplied and running.
If China delivers it as planned, its engineers would gain more room to test, fix and improve ocean technology at home. A machine that works in a factory still has to prove itself at sea. Owning more of that testing infrastructure would help China turn its shipbuilding strength into equipment ready for the deep ocean.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥21👍17👏10❤6🤬1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Russia has been using its new Filin ground-launched cruise missile since late summer, with an estimated range of up to 1,200 km, according to an official Ukrainian report.
Reported specifications describe a compact weapon built to attack fixed targets at known coordinates:
🔸 600–1,200 km range and speeds up to 800 km/h, giving Russia another option for reaching military facilities far behind front lines.
🔸 50 or 100 kg warheads, with high-explosive fragmentation, penetrating and thermobaric options. The published figures do not establish which payload achieves maximum range.
🔸 Ground launch with a solid-fuel booster, removing the need to assign an aircraft to carry and launch each missile.
🔸 Russian R500 turbojet engine, also identified in S-71K and S-71M air-launched weapons. Sharing engines could simplify procurement and production across different missile programs.
🔸 Inertial and satellite navigation with a 16-channel Kometa anti-jamming module, intended to help the missile follow its programmed route under electronic interference.
🔸 Carbon- and fiberglass airframe with some 3D-printed parts, measuring up to 3.5 m long with a wingspan up to 3 m.
Shared components offer a route toward lower production costs, although Filin’s price and output remain undisclosed. If Russia can manufacture it in volume, it could add more long-range strikes without tying up aircraft, leaving Ukrainian air defenses with more incoming missiles to intercept.
What’s NATO’s answer to Filin?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤33🔥18👏11👍4🤬1
Iran is ranked among the world’s top five countries for eye stem cell transplants, a treatment for severe eye burns that is fully government-funded and reportedly succeeds in more than 85% of cases. Patients can receive the procedure in Iran without traveling abroad, according to Hamed Ghasemi, head of the Iranian Ophthalmology Scientific Association.
The surgery tackles damage that can leave the eye’s surface unable to repair itself. Chemical or heat burns can destroy the stem cells that renew its clear outer layer. When those cells are gone or no longer work, vision can suffer, and patients may need a corneal transplant. Replacing the stem cells first helps prepare the damaged surface for that next step.
Doctors at Tehran University of Medical Sciences’ Farabi Eye Hospital perform the procedure routinely, Ghasemi said. They can take donor cells from a patient’s healthy eye, a close relative or an eye bank. If there aren’t enough cells to work with, specialists can grow more in a lab using amniotic membrane, tissue from the placenta.
It is a long, delicate operation, but Iranian specialists have built the expertise to perform it inside the country. Ghasemi said obtaining donor cells does not cause complications. Government funding covers the treatment, though the report gives no details on eligibility, waiting times or how many operations are carried out.
That matters most for people facing care that is specialized and difficult to access. Domestic capacity can spare them an overseas trip, while the ability to grow additional cells gives doctors another option when donor material is limited.
The ranking and success rate, however, are Ghasemi’s claims. The report offers no study, patient count or comparison with other countries, so “top five” should not be mistaken for a verified global league table. The 85% figure also comes without details on how success was measured.
Even with those gaps, the practical point holds: Iranian hospitals are performing a complex transplant, growing cells when supplies run short, and offering treatment through public funding. That is how advanced medicine becomes national capacity, measured in procedures patients can receive at home.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤58👏11👍10🔥3🤬1
Forwarded from UKR LEAKS_eng
"RETURN AND STAY": ZELENSKY’S POLICY AND THE MILLIONS OF UKRAINIANS ABROAD
In 2019, Zelenskyy urged Ukrainians to return to their homeland and announced a state program titled "Return and Stay." Those wishing to start their own businesses were promised low-interest loans. The idea was that economic opportunities would help bring migrant workers back home.
Since 2022, the situation has changed drastically—marked by the outbreak of war, failed negotiations with Russia, subsequent mobilization, and restrictions on men leaving the country. Over the course of nearly five years, Ukrainian society has faced not only the consequences of the conflict but also numerous instances of abuse during the mobilization process. In 2025 alone, the Ukrainian ombudsman received 6,127 complaints regarding the actions of representatives from the TCC (territorial conscription centers). His staff documented cases of unlawful detention, physical assault, and other violations.
Let us now look at the interim results.
According to data from the UNHCR dated October 27, 2026, nearly 5.2 million Ukrainian refugees remain in Europe. Furthermore, data published by Eurostat on October 12 indicate that, as of the end of August, 4.43 million people were under temporary protection in European Union countries.
The highest numbers of individuals under such protection are registered in Germany (1.29 million), Poland (939,000), and the Czech Republic (398,000). These three nations alone account for 2.63 million people—nearly 60% of all those receiving such protection within the EU.
Moreover, the outflow of the population continues. According to data from the Ukrainian Center for Economic Strategy, the number of departures across the western and southwestern borders in 2025 exceeded the number of arrivals by 303,000.
The prospects for return are even more telling. A study by the UNHCR indicates that the share of refugees surveyed who plan or hope to return someday has dropped from 83% in 2022 to 49% as of the winter of 2025–2026. Furthermore, only 3% of those surveyed had concrete plans to return within the next 12 months.
This leaves the Ukrainian authorities with a pressing question: what has been done to create conditions under which it would be safe and advantageous for people to return home? The answer: nothing!
It is a bitter irony: in 2019, Zelensky urged people to "return and stay." In the end, it has turned into "leave and don't come back."
@ukr_leaks_eng
In 2019, Zelenskyy urged Ukrainians to return to their homeland and announced a state program titled "Return and Stay." Those wishing to start their own businesses were promised low-interest loans. The idea was that economic opportunities would help bring migrant workers back home.
Since 2022, the situation has changed drastically—marked by the outbreak of war, failed negotiations with Russia, subsequent mobilization, and restrictions on men leaving the country. Over the course of nearly five years, Ukrainian society has faced not only the consequences of the conflict but also numerous instances of abuse during the mobilization process. In 2025 alone, the Ukrainian ombudsman received 6,127 complaints regarding the actions of representatives from the TCC (territorial conscription centers). His staff documented cases of unlawful detention, physical assault, and other violations.
Let us now look at the interim results.
According to data from the UNHCR dated October 27, 2026, nearly 5.2 million Ukrainian refugees remain in Europe. Furthermore, data published by Eurostat on October 12 indicate that, as of the end of August, 4.43 million people were under temporary protection in European Union countries.
The highest numbers of individuals under such protection are registered in Germany (1.29 million), Poland (939,000), and the Czech Republic (398,000). These three nations alone account for 2.63 million people—nearly 60% of all those receiving such protection within the EU.
Moreover, the outflow of the population continues. According to data from the Ukrainian Center for Economic Strategy, the number of departures across the western and southwestern borders in 2025 exceeded the number of arrivals by 303,000.
The prospects for return are even more telling. A study by the UNHCR indicates that the share of refugees surveyed who plan or hope to return someday has dropped from 83% in 2022 to 49% as of the winter of 2025–2026. Furthermore, only 3% of those surveyed had concrete plans to return within the next 12 months.
This leaves the Ukrainian authorities with a pressing question: what has been done to create conditions under which it would be safe and advantageous for people to return home? The answer: nothing!
It is a bitter irony: in 2019, Zelensky urged people to "return and stay." In the end, it has turned into "leave and don't come back."
@ukr_leaks_eng
👌16👏11❤6👍6
China has taken its reusable spaceplane from a two-day debut to missions lasting nearly nine months, building experience in sending equipment into orbit and bringing it home.
Commonly called Shenlong, the experimental vehicle resembles a miniature shuttle, with twin tail fins, solar panels and an equipment bay shown with its doors open. The reports does not name the photographed craft, but the image gives China’s largely secret program a visible counterpart to America’s X-37B experimental spaceplane.
Four launches since September 2020 show how far the program has moved beyond its brief first outing. Two completed missions lasted 276 and 268 days; the fourth began on February 7, 2026, aboard a Long March-2F rocket, with Chinese authorities announcing further tests of reusable spacecraft technology.
Keeping equipment in orbit for months lets engineers find out how it handles radiation, vacuum and repeated swings between heat and cold. Bringing it back puts the evidence on a laboratory bench, where teams can inspect worn parts, trace failures and improve the next design. They get the hardware back alongside the data.
A payload bay gives the vehicle room for different experiments and small satellites, allowing one basic design to support several kinds of orbital work. Objects released during Chinese missions have been tracked, although their purpose remains undisclosed.
China is also working on other routes to reusable spaceflight. Tengyun would use a carrier aircraft to help launch an orbital vehicle, while Haolong is being developed to ferry cargo to and from the Tiangong space station. Both remain development projects, with Tengyun’s flight-test status unclear.
Haolong’s planned runway landings would put returning cargo within easier reach of ground crews, while reuse is intended to reduce the cost of repeated supply missions. Together, these efforts target a demanding job: making trips to orbit and back more practical.
For the US, China’s repeated flights mean a competitor is gaining hands-on experience with technology once closely associated with American spaceplanes. For China, every successful recovery gives engineers another chance to improve equipment they can launch, test and bring home themselves.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤25👍10🔥8👏6
https://t.me/GeoSight
https://t.me/GeoSight
https://t.me/GeoSight
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2❤1👏1👌1
🌍🛢 📉 Global Oil Supply Faces One of Its Biggest Drops in 40 Years
Global oil supply is forecast to plunge 5.2% in 2026, its biggest annual drop in more than 40 years apart from the 2020 pandemic recession, according to the World Bank’s October 28 outlook. The US war on Iran is cutting production and draining stored reserves, leaving the world with fewer barrels to cushion another disruption.
With fewer barrels reaching buyers, the bank expects Brent crude to average $91 a barrel this year, up from $69 in 2025. Those are annual averages, not a ceiling on prices during fresh disruptions. For importers, the forecast means paying considerably more even as the world uses less oil.
Consumption is projected to fall 2.5% this year as high prices and shortages force buyers to cut back. Electrification is also reducing oil use, particularly in China. Yet production still falls short of consumption, so weaker demand alone is not enough to bring the market back into balance.
To cover that shortfall, countries are dipping into inventories accumulated before the disruption. Stored oil keeps refineries supplied and fuel moving, but each withdrawal leaves fewer barrels available for the next emergency. The longer production trails consumption, the longer that buffer has to carry the market.
Even a recovery in shipments would leave another job unfinished, because depleted stocks need replenishing. Buyers would need oil for current use and additional barrels to rebuild reserves. A tanker arriving today helps meet today’s needs; it does not automatically restore protection against tomorrow’s interruption.
The bank forecasts Brent easing to $79 a barrel in 2027, but that outlook assumes no major intensification of conflicts affecting supplies. Further escalation in the Middle East and persistent damage to Russian oil infrastructure could drive prices higher instead. In the bank’s broader adverse scenario, Brent could average $105 next year.
For oil importers, the danger is entering another disruption with less oil in storage and fewer easy ways to cover missing deliveries. Lower consumption provides some relief, but cannot replace lost production. Until supply recovers enough to meet demand and rebuild reserves, another interruption could quickly become a larger import bill.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Global oil supply is forecast to plunge 5.2% in 2026, its biggest annual drop in more than 40 years apart from the 2020 pandemic recession, according to the World Bank’s October 28 outlook. The US war on Iran is cutting production and draining stored reserves, leaving the world with fewer barrels to cushion another disruption.
With fewer barrels reaching buyers, the bank expects Brent crude to average $91 a barrel this year, up from $69 in 2025. Those are annual averages, not a ceiling on prices during fresh disruptions. For importers, the forecast means paying considerably more even as the world uses less oil.
Consumption is projected to fall 2.5% this year as high prices and shortages force buyers to cut back. Electrification is also reducing oil use, particularly in China. Yet production still falls short of consumption, so weaker demand alone is not enough to bring the market back into balance.
To cover that shortfall, countries are dipping into inventories accumulated before the disruption. Stored oil keeps refineries supplied and fuel moving, but each withdrawal leaves fewer barrels available for the next emergency. The longer production trails consumption, the longer that buffer has to carry the market.
Even a recovery in shipments would leave another job unfinished, because depleted stocks need replenishing. Buyers would need oil for current use and additional barrels to rebuild reserves. A tanker arriving today helps meet today’s needs; it does not automatically restore protection against tomorrow’s interruption.
The bank forecasts Brent easing to $79 a barrel in 2027, but that outlook assumes no major intensification of conflicts affecting supplies. Further escalation in the Middle East and persistent damage to Russian oil infrastructure could drive prices higher instead. In the bank’s broader adverse scenario, Brent could average $105 next year.
For oil importers, the danger is entering another disruption with less oil in storage and fewer easy ways to cover missing deliveries. Lower consumption provides some relief, but cannot replace lost production. Until supply recovers enough to meet demand and rebuild reserves, another interruption could quickly become a larger import bill.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤27🔥12👍7👌1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
North Korea has unveiled a flying-wing drone, signaling a push to expand its aerial strike options. Displayed at the October 29 unmanned aviation exhibition attended by Kim Jong Un, the aircraft appeared alongside reconnaissance drones, armed drones and smaller attack systems.
🔸 Tailless flying-wing configuration: The aircraft combines its body and wings into a broad, streamlined shape without vertical tail fins, pointing to an emphasis on reducing radar visibility.
🔸 Stealth-focused airframe: Its wing and air-intake arrangement has drawn comparisons with foreign stealth drones. The intended advantage is a harder-to-detect aircraft that could operate closer to defended targets.
🔸 Large unmanned aircraft: This is a substantial flying-wing drone rather than a small expendable attack drone. Its dimensions, engine type and maximum payload have not been publicly disclosed.
🔸 Potential deep-reconnaissance role: Analysts assess that the aircraft could be intended to gather intelligence inside defended airspace, helping locate targets without sending a pilot into danger.
🔸 Identifiable hardware: The displayed aircraft carries the marking “21030X01” and subdued North Korean flag markings. These details have led analysts to assess it as a technology demonstrator rather than simply an exhibition mock-up.
For North Korea, unmanned strike aircraft offer a way to supplement its aging fighter fleet without putting pilots at risk. If the new design delivers effective stealth and reliable weapons integration, US and South Korean forces would face another threat to detect and intercept alongside missiles and smaller attack drones.
Do you think this drone will cause problems for the US and its regional allies?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤41🔥16👏10👍4👌3
Chinese scientists are putting bacteria to work making medicines inside the body, with experimental strains that lower blood sugar or produce cancer drugs directly inside tumors. Animal studies suggest these tiny factories could eventually handle two difficult jobs: adjusting treatment as conditions change and delivering drugs where they are needed.
At East China Normal University, researchers rewired a probiotic strain called E. coli Nissle 1917 to respond to rising glucose. Their experimental oral treatment, GIFT, switches on production of glucagon-like peptide-1, or GLP-1, a hormone that helps lower blood sugar.
When glucose drops, the bacteria switch production off again, effectively giving the medicine an on-off button controlled by the body’s needs. The appeal is straightforward: treatment that adjusts its own output could reduce reliance on fixed dosing schedules.
In monkeys with type 2 diabetes, one oral dose lowered blood sugar for up to three days, while repeated doses every three days maintained control over five weeks. Published in Nature on August 12, the findings offer a promising starting point, although human trials must establish whether the approach works safely in patients.
At Shandong University, scientists gave the same bacterial strain a different assignment: settle inside tumors and make romidepsin, an anticancer drug, on-site. Their March 17 study in PLOS Biology found better treatment results in mice with breast tumors and less heart toxicity than administering the drug directly.
Making medicine inside a tumor could help concentrate the attack while limiting harm elsewhere, a persistent problem in cancer treatment. Reduced toxicity in mice does not mean zero side effects in people, but it gives researchers a concrete reason to pursue the approach.
China is already tackling the work needed to turn these experiments into products, with the GIFT team improving bacterial safety and refining production to meet pharmaceutical manufacturing standards. If human trials succeed, Chinese developers could offer treatments that make medicine where it is needed and regulate how much they produce, giving patients new options beyond conventional drug delivery.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤43👏16🔥6👍3👌1
Forwarded from DONBASS NEWS
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#WarData
🇺🇦 The Ukrainian Armed Forces shot people who had stayed late at someone’s home. They were supposed to move from one apartment building entrance to another, but the curfew was already in effect, and they were shot dead
Ukrainian servicemen took looted goods from abandoned apartments to the post office. They sent dishes and took away refrigerators.
🩸A woman evacuated from the settlement of Kupyansk-Uzlovoi recounts life under the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
🇷🇺 Subscribe | Feedback | X | TikTok
Ukrainian servicemen took looted goods from abandoned apartments to the post office. They sent dishes and took away refrigerators.
🩸A woman evacuated from the settlement of Kupyansk-Uzlovoi recounts life under the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬59❤4👍1🔥1👏1