Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚡️#EU Breaks Its Own Law, Forcing Use of #Google for Age Verification
The EU just took a major step forward in their Digital #ID program with an age verification app now being tested in 5 countries.
It’s pitched as a “private” way to verify your age — but here’s the catch: it recommends Google attestation, meaning it won’t work on alternative or de-Googled phones.
By enforcing this, the app will only run on Google-approved devices, even though this method is less secure. This could force everyone in the EU to use Big Tech phones when using apps tied to the system.
How did the EU respond to backlash — and what does this mean for the future of de-Googled devices in the EU?
📖 Read the full article on Substack
🎙 Follow the show
🛡 Back to School Tech Awareness Webinar. Register here.
#why
The EU just took a major step forward in their Digital #ID program with an age verification app now being tested in 5 countries.
It’s pitched as a “private” way to verify your age — but here’s the catch: it recommends Google attestation, meaning it won’t work on alternative or de-Googled phones.
By enforcing this, the app will only run on Google-approved devices, even though this method is less secure. This could force everyone in the EU to use Big Tech phones when using apps tied to the system.
How did the EU respond to backlash — and what does this mean for the future of de-Googled devices in the EU?
📖 Read the full article on Substack
🎙 Follow the show
🛡 Back to School Tech Awareness Webinar. Register here.
#why
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Joe Rogan criticizes #UK’s push for digital IDs and the arrest of citizens for social media posts.
#why this is being attempted:
“Once they do digital #ID, they’re going to attach it to a social credit score, they’re going to attach it to a carbon footprint score, and then they’ll be able to control your movement and control you entirely.”
“If I was going to destroy a country, I would do it exactly the way they’re doing it. I’d take away their freedom, take away their ability to protest, take away their guns, which they did in the 1990s. And then you start tightening that noose tighter and tighter.”
#why this is being attempted:
“Once they do digital #ID, they’re going to attach it to a social credit score, they’re going to attach it to a carbon footprint score, and then they’ll be able to control your movement and control you entirely.”
“If I was going to destroy a country, I would do it exactly the way they’re doing it. I’d take away their freedom, take away their ability to protest, take away their guns, which they did in the 1990s. And then you start tightening that noose tighter and tighter.”
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This guy knows what's going on and explains it so well
Ignore the title. He covers the UK too
https://youtu.be/clJvy-5Gqg0
Digital #id #agenda2030
Ignore the title. He covers the UK too
https://youtu.be/clJvy-5Gqg0
Digital #id #agenda2030
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Only REAL Solution to #DigitalID
https://corbettreport.com/the-only-real-solution-to-digital-id-solutionswatch
Hakeem Anwar of AbovePhone.com returns to the de-program to discuss his latest report: “Life Under Digital #ID: A Global Analysis with Solutions.” We talk about what digital ID is, the broader question of digital public infrastructure, the control grid vs. the surveillance grid, and the counter-economy that is the only solution to this impending threat to free humanity.
https://corbettreport.com/the-only-real-solution-to-digital-id-solutionswatch
Hakeem Anwar of AbovePhone.com returns to the de-program to discuss his latest report: “Life Under Digital #ID: A Global Analysis with Solutions.” We talk about what digital ID is, the broader question of digital public infrastructure, the control grid vs. the surveillance grid, and the counter-economy that is the only solution to this impending threat to free humanity.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#Palantir, he is the one that uses drones combined with facial #ID to coordinate strikes to kill Palestinians in Gaza.
His company had only one client for its first few years, the #CIA & then #Mossad.
Now it is embedded in #NATO.
Basically they privatised the #AI attack part of the CIA - so it has less accountability to govt or electorate.
His company had only one client for its first few years, the #CIA & then #Mossad.
Now it is embedded in #NATO.
Basically they privatised the #AI attack part of the CIA - so it has less accountability to govt or electorate.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#Spain's CIA dictator #Pedro Sánchez demands the end of online anonymity — calling for every social media account to be linked to an EU Digital #ID Wallet. At the #WEF, Sánchez declared: “No one can walk the streets with a mask, so why allow people to roam online without revealing their identity?”
- From the same criminal that imposed mask obligations sold by their corrupt accomplices and restricted movements illegally during the plandemic.
He, his wife, brother and party mafia have too many corruption cases open, including having brothels or extortion ring recording rooms in government owned buildings, Epstein style, allegedly
#stalking #surveillance
- From the same criminal that imposed mask obligations sold by their corrupt accomplices and restricted movements illegally during the plandemic.
He, his wife, brother and party mafia have too many corruption cases open, including having brothels or extortion ring recording rooms in government owned buildings, Epstein style, allegedly
#stalking #surveillance
This misleading #Australia Labor Government ‘survey’ is designed to show that you WANT a digital #ID and broad social media #surveillance
If you tick ANYTHING except NONE OF THE ABOVE – you are in fact ASKING the Australian Government to IMPOSE a DIGITAL ID on you and you family.
From George Christensen
There is a LABOR GOV 'survey' circulating that is designed to manipulate you into agreeing to the DIGITAL ID.
The URL for the survey is https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/have-your-say/digital-duty-care and here GREAT CARE is SUGGESTED in selecting the responses you give to that survey:
Q1: What kinds of harmful experiences or content should platforms prevent for Australians UNDER 18?
• Bullying and harassment, including volumetric attacks (‘pile ons’)
• Online hate speech against individuals or groups
• Pornography
• Content that promotes harmful behaviour (e.g. self-harm, suicide, extreme dieting)
• Online dares and challenges that could cause injury
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q2: What harmful features or products should platforms prevent for UNDER 18s?
• Algorithms that push harmful content
• Addictive features (autoplay, notifications)
• AI companions that behave inappropriately
• Ephemeral content (e.g. disappearing messages)
• Quantifiable social metrics (e.g. likes)
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q3: What harmful content should platforms prevent for ADULTS?
• Bullying and harassment
• Hate speech
• Violent pornography
• Content that promotes self-harm or drug use
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q4: What harmful features or products should platforms prevent for ADULTS?
• Algorithms that push harmful content
• Addictive design
• AI chatbots
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q5: What should platforms include in their dispute systems?
• Reports about harmful content
• Disputes over removed material
• Disputes about banned accounts
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q6: What types of platforms should the duty of care apply to?
• Social media
• Dating apps
• Messaging apps
• Gaming platforms
• App stores
• Search engines
• AI tools like ChatGPT
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q7: Do you have other comments?
Paste this or write something like it in your own words:
I do not support any Digital Duty of Care. This appears to be an attempt to revive the rejected “misinformation and disinformation” agenda, which would give the government indirect control over what adults may read, watch, or say online. Adults should be free to access lawful material without state permission. Protecting children from pornography and other harms can be achieved through existing laws, enforcement, and parental tools, not a new censorship regime.
If you tick ANYTHING except NONE OF THE ABOVE – you are in fact ASKING the Australian Government to IMPOSE a DIGITAL ID on you and you family.
From George Christensen
There is a LABOR GOV 'survey' circulating that is designed to manipulate you into agreeing to the DIGITAL ID.
The URL for the survey is https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/have-your-say/digital-duty-care and here GREAT CARE is SUGGESTED in selecting the responses you give to that survey:
Q1: What kinds of harmful experiences or content should platforms prevent for Australians UNDER 18?
• Bullying and harassment, including volumetric attacks (‘pile ons’)
• Online hate speech against individuals or groups
• Pornography
• Content that promotes harmful behaviour (e.g. self-harm, suicide, extreme dieting)
• Online dares and challenges that could cause injury
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q2: What harmful features or products should platforms prevent for UNDER 18s?
• Algorithms that push harmful content
• Addictive features (autoplay, notifications)
• AI companions that behave inappropriately
• Ephemeral content (e.g. disappearing messages)
• Quantifiable social metrics (e.g. likes)
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q3: What harmful content should platforms prevent for ADULTS?
• Bullying and harassment
• Hate speech
• Violent pornography
• Content that promotes self-harm or drug use
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q4: What harmful features or products should platforms prevent for ADULTS?
• Algorithms that push harmful content
• Addictive design
• AI chatbots
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q5: What should platforms include in their dispute systems?
• Reports about harmful content
• Disputes over removed material
• Disputes about banned accounts
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q6: What types of platforms should the duty of care apply to?
• Social media
• Dating apps
• Messaging apps
• Gaming platforms
• App stores
• Search engines
• AI tools like ChatGPT
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q7: Do you have other comments?
Paste this or write something like it in your own words:
I do not support any Digital Duty of Care. This appears to be an attempt to revive the rejected “misinformation and disinformation” agenda, which would give the government indirect control over what adults may read, watch, or say online. Adults should be free to access lawful material without state permission. Protecting children from pornography and other harms can be achieved through existing laws, enforcement, and parental tools, not a new censorship regime.