#RememberWhen in 2001, Mossad agents posing as Pakistani nationals entered Mexican Parliament in a failed attempt to commit a massacre? The media buried the story, and shipped the israeli's home
https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~ijdavis/america/sept11/blowup.htm
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/2001_Mexican_legislative_assembly_attack
https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~ijdavis/america/sept11/blowup.htm
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/2001_Mexican_legislative_assembly_attack
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How 53mb of code EXPOSED #Discord overnightโฆ
On February 16, things took an extremely dark turn as researchers stumbled across 53 megabytes of exposed code that would open an insane rabbit hole forever, involving ties to mass #surveillance, #OpenAI, and even the USA government
https://youtu.be/KNjmJbMsvYU
#why #gov
On February 16, things took an extremely dark turn as researchers stumbled across 53 megabytes of exposed code that would open an insane rabbit hole forever, involving ties to mass #surveillance, #OpenAI, and even the USA government
https://youtu.be/KNjmJbMsvYU
#why #gov
Forwarded from ResistanceTrench mirror (Resistance Trench)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ฆ๐ช ๐บ๐ธโก๏ธExclusive footage from Dubai International Airport after it was hit by a drone this morning.
Iran hasnโt claimed responsibility for any of this incident.
Source: IRIB
Iran hasnโt claimed responsibility for any of this incident.
Source: IRIB
Forwarded from ResistanceTrench mirror (Dew)
๐ฎ๐ทโก๏ธ๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฑ Iranโs IRGC in Hormozgan succeeded in destroying the Hermes 900 drone of the Zionist regime and the criminal America on the coasts of the province.
--
Beginning
As for the direct course of military actions, - based on the "picture" provided by the media (and in the absence of any more or less objective sources of information) - any conclusions will be, at a minimum, "superficial" and resemble "fortune-telling".
Nevertheless, I cautiously assume that: 1) within a week or two, Iran will be "bombarded into chaos", - its air defense, fleet, main missile bases, communication and control centers, administrative and other objects will be finished off.
2) Then - if this is not enough for a complete "chaos" - strikes on energy infrastructure objects, bridges, railways and roads will begin - first of strategic, and then of regional importance;
3) If this is not enough - after some time, simply by air strikes, major cities will be "isolated" to cause a humanitarian/social collapse, which (as they hope - and not without reason - in Washington) will provoke riots and - ultimately - the disobedience of entire regions.
And only after that (perhaps) - "at the invitation of the suffering Iranian people and their representatives" - US ground troops may appear in Iran - but they will "take only the most important and tasty" - the Bushehr nuclear power plant, oil complexes by the sea, etc.
Separate special forces operations - short and "effective"? - Yes, that will happen. But no more than that.
"Finishing off" Iran will be done by the hands of its citizens - including Kurds and Azeris, but also the Persians themselves. (Similar to how, now, against the Russians in the so-called "Ukraine", almost exclusively Russian soldiers are fighting)
And what about us? - And I predict (under the influence of the fear of our "VIPs" of the ease with which the States "get rid of" Iran, despite all its accumulated missiles and drones) - an "increase in pliability" at the upcoming negotiations - on our part and - accordingly - a "growth in appetites" on the part of the "esteemed Kiev partners" (not mine).
However, our "not giving in at all" (i.e., agreeing to a 3 - 4-year "truce without preconditions")
will not happen - simply in the hope that since the USA are "stuck" in Iran, - then (perhaps) "this will distract them from Ukraine" and somehow "help" Moscow to "bargain for a light slap - another one". (As a result, the Kremlin will "get both, and much worse").
So my earlier prediction that "Moscow" will "drag its feet as long as possible", not daring either to seek a decisive victory or to capitulate - remains unchanged for now. But the "balance" is gradually shifting towards "we can't fight, we can't capitulate!" (However, before a "full stop" in this variant - there will be months of "continuous victories" on the fields of the Special Military Operation and new and new fierce bombardments of Russia's deep rear).
With respect and gratitude, I. V. Girkin
04.03.2026 ะณ.
(Letter to a colleague Frol Vladimirov)
https://t.me/strelkovii
#Iran #Russia
Beginning
As for the direct course of military actions, - based on the "picture" provided by the media (and in the absence of any more or less objective sources of information) - any conclusions will be, at a minimum, "superficial" and resemble "fortune-telling".
Nevertheless, I cautiously assume that: 1) within a week or two, Iran will be "bombarded into chaos", - its air defense, fleet, main missile bases, communication and control centers, administrative and other objects will be finished off.
2) Then - if this is not enough for a complete "chaos" - strikes on energy infrastructure objects, bridges, railways and roads will begin - first of strategic, and then of regional importance;
3) If this is not enough - after some time, simply by air strikes, major cities will be "isolated" to cause a humanitarian/social collapse, which (as they hope - and not without reason - in Washington) will provoke riots and - ultimately - the disobedience of entire regions.
And only after that (perhaps) - "at the invitation of the suffering Iranian people and their representatives" - US ground troops may appear in Iran - but they will "take only the most important and tasty" - the Bushehr nuclear power plant, oil complexes by the sea, etc.
Separate special forces operations - short and "effective"? - Yes, that will happen. But no more than that.
"Finishing off" Iran will be done by the hands of its citizens - including Kurds and Azeris, but also the Persians themselves. (Similar to how, now, against the Russians in the so-called "Ukraine", almost exclusively Russian soldiers are fighting)
And what about us? - And I predict (under the influence of the fear of our "VIPs" of the ease with which the States "get rid of" Iran, despite all its accumulated missiles and drones) - an "increase in pliability" at the upcoming negotiations - on our part and - accordingly - a "growth in appetites" on the part of the "esteemed Kiev partners" (not mine).
However, our "not giving in at all" (i.e., agreeing to a 3 - 4-year "truce without preconditions")
will not happen - simply in the hope that since the USA are "stuck" in Iran, - then (perhaps) "this will distract them from Ukraine" and somehow "help" Moscow to "bargain for a light slap - another one". (As a result, the Kremlin will "get both, and much worse").
So my earlier prediction that "Moscow" will "drag its feet as long as possible", not daring either to seek a decisive victory or to capitulate - remains unchanged for now. But the "balance" is gradually shifting towards "we can't fight, we can't capitulate!" (However, before a "full stop" in this variant - there will be months of "continuous victories" on the fields of the Special Military Operation and new and new fierce bombardments of Russia's deep rear).
With respect and gratitude, I. V. Girkin
04.03.2026 ะณ.
(Letter to a colleague Frol Vladimirov)
https://t.me/strelkovii
#Iran #Russia
Forwarded from Intel Slava
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from DD Geopolitics
The sale includes 12,000 BLU-110A/B general purpose 1,000-pound bomb bodies.
Rubio declared an "emergency" requiring immediate sale, waiving congressional review requirements under the Arms Export Control Act.
This is on top of the $4 billion Rubio already fast-tracked. And on top of the $12 billion in total arms sales approved since Trump took office.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from DD Geopolitics
๐บ๐ธ๐ฏ๐ด Destroyed AN/TPY-2 Radar at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan.
๐ด @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from ๐ฆ๐บAussieCossack๐ท๐บ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โ๏ธAzerbaijan is deploying heavy artillery to it's land border with Iran.
Azerbaijan = Israeli proxy.
@AussieCossack
Azerbaijan = Israeli proxy.
@AussieCossack
Forwarded from Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel
๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ท๐จ๐ณ The US War on Iran is a US War on China
โช๏ธUS planners likely realized as a result of attrition in its proxy war on Russia and considering the outcome of ongoing war with Iran in the Middle East, that even a "distant blockade" in the Asia-Pacific against China was unlikely to succeed;
โช๏ธDegrading or toppling Iran was already a prerequisite to further isolating Russia and then China, thus attacking Iran and shutting down energy exports from the entire region, no matter the cost, has effectively implemented the "distant blockade" on China at the very source of most of China's energy imports;
โช๏ธAt the same time, the US continues expanding its international blockade against the so-called "shadow fleet" through maritime drone strikes attributed to "Ukraine" and the interdiction and seizure of vessels by US proxies and in the case of Venezuela, by the US itself.
This can be expanded to target ALL Russian and Chinese maritime shipping - not just energy shipments;
โช๏ธNote that the US invaded and captured Venezuela, halting energy exports to China in the lead up to this second war of aggression targeting the majority of China's remaining energy imports from the Middle East.
โช๏ธThe US CIA continues carrying out long-range drone strikes into Russia targeting energy production specifically to degrade both Russia's own economy and its ability to export significant amounts of energy to China.
These operations will only continue to increase in scale and scope with likely operations moving to target pipelines into China directly;
โช๏ธThe US is also carrying out terrorist strikes on China's Belt and Road Initiative, particularly in Pakistan and Myanmar, specifically striking at alternative routes for energy used to bypass a potential Asia-Pacific blockade.
These type of attacks can be organized and directed at whatever infrastructure China attempts to use next to mitigate the US-imposed shortages China now faces.
This is a systematic global war to strangle China;
โช๏ธChina has prepared for this for years - building out a massive 100+ day reserve and scaling out renewables, nuclear power, and coal-to-liquid energy production domestically.
It will still likely take years to replace dependency on the Middle East - about 5 years - a closing window the US knew was closing - prompting this reckless war of aggression now taking place;
โช๏ธThe US has also built-up and armed proxies in the Asia-Pacific region including Japan, the Philippines, and the island province of Taiwan - not to "beat" China - but to use long-range missiles/drones to strike and degrade domestic efforts to circumvent the US-imposed blockade - such as striking refineries, data centers, energy infrastructure, etc. just as the US uses "Ukraine" to do so against Russia - all while avoiding a direct confrontation with China itself;
โช๏ธThe US believes that rapid "initiative" can overcome the growing number of disadvantages the US has created for itself and faces due to China's rapid rise (like modernization, and surpassing of the US in terms of industry, military, and technology).
It hopes that is willingness to indulge in globally-destabilizing war of aggression is greater than China and the rest of the multipolar world's ability to unite and meaningfully fight back.
The US also believe that the wars it has ignited across the planet will primarily destabilize Eurasia leaving North America - just like during WW2 - relatively insulated.
So far that has been true.
Russia and China know about all of this. They have made their own plans.
Only time will tell who planned better.
โช๏ธUS planners likely realized as a result of attrition in its proxy war on Russia and considering the outcome of ongoing war with Iran in the Middle East, that even a "distant blockade" in the Asia-Pacific against China was unlikely to succeed;
โช๏ธDegrading or toppling Iran was already a prerequisite to further isolating Russia and then China, thus attacking Iran and shutting down energy exports from the entire region, no matter the cost, has effectively implemented the "distant blockade" on China at the very source of most of China's energy imports;
โช๏ธAt the same time, the US continues expanding its international blockade against the so-called "shadow fleet" through maritime drone strikes attributed to "Ukraine" and the interdiction and seizure of vessels by US proxies and in the case of Venezuela, by the US itself.
This can be expanded to target ALL Russian and Chinese maritime shipping - not just energy shipments;
โช๏ธNote that the US invaded and captured Venezuela, halting energy exports to China in the lead up to this second war of aggression targeting the majority of China's remaining energy imports from the Middle East.
โช๏ธThe US CIA continues carrying out long-range drone strikes into Russia targeting energy production specifically to degrade both Russia's own economy and its ability to export significant amounts of energy to China.
These operations will only continue to increase in scale and scope with likely operations moving to target pipelines into China directly;
โช๏ธThe US is also carrying out terrorist strikes on China's Belt and Road Initiative, particularly in Pakistan and Myanmar, specifically striking at alternative routes for energy used to bypass a potential Asia-Pacific blockade.
These type of attacks can be organized and directed at whatever infrastructure China attempts to use next to mitigate the US-imposed shortages China now faces.
This is a systematic global war to strangle China;
โช๏ธChina has prepared for this for years - building out a massive 100+ day reserve and scaling out renewables, nuclear power, and coal-to-liquid energy production domestically.
It will still likely take years to replace dependency on the Middle East - about 5 years - a closing window the US knew was closing - prompting this reckless war of aggression now taking place;
โช๏ธThe US has also built-up and armed proxies in the Asia-Pacific region including Japan, the Philippines, and the island province of Taiwan - not to "beat" China - but to use long-range missiles/drones to strike and degrade domestic efforts to circumvent the US-imposed blockade - such as striking refineries, data centers, energy infrastructure, etc. just as the US uses "Ukraine" to do so against Russia - all while avoiding a direct confrontation with China itself;
โช๏ธThe US believes that rapid "initiative" can overcome the growing number of disadvantages the US has created for itself and faces due to China's rapid rise (like modernization, and surpassing of the US in terms of industry, military, and technology).
It hopes that is willingness to indulge in globally-destabilizing war of aggression is greater than China and the rest of the multipolar world's ability to unite and meaningfully fight back.
The US also believe that the wars it has ignited across the planet will primarily destabilize Eurasia leaving North America - just like during WW2 - relatively insulated.
So far that has been true.
Russia and China know about all of this. They have made their own plans.
Only time will tell who planned better.
Forwarded from Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel
Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel
๐บ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ท๐จ๐ณ The US War on Iran is a US War on China โช๏ธUS planners likely realized as a result of attrition in its proxy war on Russia and considering the outcome of ongoing war with Iran in the Middle East, that even a "distant blockade" in the Asia-Pacific againstโฆ
The implications of Iran denying any involvement in striking energy infrastructure in the region (including specific denials regarding Saudi Arabia and Qatar) are that the US is carrying out false flags specifically to ensure the energy to China is shut off long-term.
These strikes hurt China, an Iranian ally, more than the US to answer the question "to whose benefit?"
These strikes hurt China, an Iranian ally, more than the US to answer the question "to whose benefit?"