This misleading #Australia Labor Government ‘survey’ is designed to show that you WANT a digital #ID and broad social media #surveillance

If you tick ANYTHING except NONE OF THE ABOVE – you are in fact ASKING the Australian Government to IMPOSE a DIGITAL ID on you and you family.

From George Christensen

There is a LABOR GOV 'survey' circulating that is designed to manipulate you into agreeing to the DIGITAL ID. 

The URL for the survey is https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/have-your-say/digital-duty-care and here GREAT CARE is SUGGESTED in selecting the responses you give to that survey:

Q1: What kinds of harmful experiences or content should platforms prevent for Australians UNDER 18?
    • Bullying and harassment, including volumetric attacks (‘pile ons’)
    • Online hate speech against individuals or groups
    • Pornography
    • Content that promotes harmful behaviour (e.g. self-harm, suicide, extreme dieting)
    • Online dares and challenges that could cause injury
    • None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)

Q2: What harmful features or products should platforms prevent for UNDER 18s?
    • Algorithms that push harmful content
    • Addictive features (autoplay, notifications)
    • AI companions that behave inappropriately
    • Ephemeral content (e.g. disappearing messages)
    • Quantifiable social metrics (e.g. likes)
    • None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)

Q3: What harmful content should platforms prevent for ADULTS?
    • Bullying and harassment
    • Hate speech
    • Violent pornography
    • Content that promotes self-harm or drug use
    • None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)

Q4: What harmful features or products should platforms prevent for ADULTS?
    • Algorithms that push harmful content
    • Addictive design
    • AI chatbots
    • None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)

Q5: What should platforms include in their dispute systems?
    • Reports about harmful content
    • Disputes over removed material
    • Disputes about banned accounts
    • None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)

Q6: What types of platforms should the duty of care apply to?
    • Social media
    • Dating apps
    • Messaging apps
    • Gaming platforms
    • App stores
    • Search engines
    • AI tools like ChatGPT
    • None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)

Q7: Do you have other comments?
Paste this or write something like it in your own words:

I do not support any Digital Duty of Care. This appears to be an attempt to revive the rejected “misinformation and disinformation” agenda, which would give the government indirect control over what adults may read, watch, or say online. Adults should be free to access lawful material without state permission. Protecting children from pornography and other harms can be achieved through existing laws, enforcement, and parental tools, not a new censorship regime.

#Australia #stalking #surveillance #id

#USA Nationwide #Facial Recognition #Surveillance with #Ring & #Flock

This video discusses Amazon sidewalk, Ring, Flock, their involvement in surveillance, and cooperation with law enforcement. In a few days, Ring will enable facial recognition on their doorbell cameras.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeXIgKuX_zY

Rise of the Safety State
@gregreesevideoreports
#flock #ring #cameras #surveillance

#China has a system that warns people on #WeChat when someone nearby is on a debt blacklist, telling users to keep their distance so their own #social #credit #score does not fall

https://fixupx.com/TansuYegen/status/1997995148198785157
#surveillance

#EU intends to read and process all messages on your devices BEFORE they’re encrypted.

Means you write a message to your mum and to EU

#ChatControl #stalking #surveillance

SOCIAL MEDIA SPIES EXPOSED: PROFILES VANISH AFTER

https://www.mintpressnews.com/social-media-spies-exposed/290506/

A network of hundreds of former agents of the CIA, FBI, and other three-letter agencies, as well as high State Department and NATO officials working at social media giants, such as Facebook, Google, TikTok, and Twitter. These individuals are overwhelmingly concentrated in politically sensitive departments, such as trust and safety, security, and content moderation, meaning that these ex-spies and intelligence officials are helping to influence what billions of people around the world see, read and hear (and deciding who is promoted and who is suppressed).

Social media is not a neutral global town square, but rather a battleground being silently fought over. Over the past decade, the U.S. national security state has infiltrated major social media platforms, in a successful attempt to manipulate the public debate and influence what the world sees and does not see. This influence operation dwarfs any schemes of which official enemy nations are accused.

#why #privacy #surveillance #CIA #NATO #Google #fb #Meta #tiktok #twitter