Revisiting Elon #Musk Lying About #Bolivia - #Tesla's Ties to ACISA, Which Bolivia Canceled Lithium Contracts With Days Before Coup
Musk Implied Tesla Had No Vested Interest in Bolivia's Lithium, "We Get Our Lithium From Australia" -LIE by Omission- Tesla Bought Batteries from ACISA, Whom Morales Reneged on Contracts Just Days Before Coup
In the aftermath of Musk appointing #WEF puppet shill Linda Yaccarino as Twitter / X CEO, many who are feeling betrayed and disenfranchised (as others are emanating “I told you so’s) are reflecting on red flags such as his alignment with transhumanism via Neuralink, or his contracts with the military via Space X.
But I want to revisit Bolivia, which has been effectively memory-holed.
... Tesla bought batteries from ACISA, implying that Musk, Tesla and other companies that would benefit downstream from the ACISA deal had something to gain by a coup, by consequence of being clients of ACISA.
Elon Musk later denied ties between Tesla and special interests seeking access to Bolivia’s lithium reserves, as if Tesla had nothing to gain from Bolivia’s lithium reserves opening up to ACISA, which is a blatant lie - being that Tesla bought lithium batteries from ACISA...
Elon Musk was being disingenuous, implying that Tesla had no direct ties to the situation, and they had nothing to gain from ACISA’s deal with the Bolivian government that was axed Days prior to the coup..
Why did Elon Musk get away with distancing himself from the matter, with a dismissive “Also, we get out lithium from Australia”…?
This was ignoring and trying to seemingly deflect from the reality that Tesla was buying Lithium batteries from ACISA, the company which had managed to acquire the Lithium contracts only for the deals to be reneged on by Morales
🔗Source: Themcgwire
Substack | Twitter | Minds
📡 Follow:
@G3News
Musk Implied Tesla Had No Vested Interest in Bolivia's Lithium, "We Get Our Lithium From Australia" -LIE by Omission- Tesla Bought Batteries from ACISA, Whom Morales Reneged on Contracts Just Days Before Coup
In the aftermath of Musk appointing #WEF puppet shill Linda Yaccarino as Twitter / X CEO, many who are feeling betrayed and disenfranchised (as others are emanating “I told you so’s) are reflecting on red flags such as his alignment with transhumanism via Neuralink, or his contracts with the military via Space X.
But I want to revisit Bolivia, which has been effectively memory-holed.
... Tesla bought batteries from ACISA, implying that Musk, Tesla and other companies that would benefit downstream from the ACISA deal had something to gain by a coup, by consequence of being clients of ACISA.
Elon Musk later denied ties between Tesla and special interests seeking access to Bolivia’s lithium reserves, as if Tesla had nothing to gain from Bolivia’s lithium reserves opening up to ACISA, which is a blatant lie - being that Tesla bought lithium batteries from ACISA...
Elon Musk was being disingenuous, implying that Tesla had no direct ties to the situation, and they had nothing to gain from ACISA’s deal with the Bolivian government that was axed Days prior to the coup..
Why did Elon Musk get away with distancing himself from the matter, with a dismissive “Also, we get out lithium from Australia”…?
This was ignoring and trying to seemingly deflect from the reality that Tesla was buying Lithium batteries from ACISA, the company which had managed to acquire the Lithium contracts only for the deals to be reneged on by Morales
🔗Source: Themcgwire
Substack | Twitter | Minds
📡 Follow:
@G3News
TheMcGwire
Revisiting Elon Musk Lying About Bolivia - Tesla's Ties to ACISA, Which Bolivia Canceled Lithium Contracts With Days Before Coup
Musk Implied Tesla Had No Vested Interest in Bolivia's Lithium, "We Get Our Lithium From Australia" -LIE- Tesla Bought Batteries from ACISA, Whom Morales Reneged on Contracts Just Days Before Coup
Reminder #Elon #Musk Lied About #Tesla's Connections to ACISA, Battery Company that #Bolivia Canceled Lithium Contracts With Days Before Coup, Following Up Musk's "We Will Coup Whoever We Want To!" - Excerpt From "Revisiting Elon Musk Lying About Bolivia - Tesla's Ties to ACISA, Which Bolivia Canceled Lithium Contracts With Days Before Coup"
...In 2018, following Bolivia having initially struck the deal with ACISA, EE News Europe published the article, “German Venture Taps Bolivian Lithium Deposits”
The introductory paragraph reads:
”With the planned establishment of a public-private joint venture between the Bolivian state enterprise Yacimientos de Litio Bolivianos (YLB) and the German ACI Systems Alemania GmbH (ACISA), Germany is to gain access to the raw material. ACISA’s customers include Siemens, Continental, BMW, IBM, Tesla, First Solar, Bosch and the Fraunhofer research company. “
RT reported on the matter, dedicating an entire article to it, “‘We will coup whoever we want’: Elon Musk Sparks Online Riot With Quip About Overthrow of Bolivia’s Evo Morales” - concluding with the sentence that “Although it’s true that Tesla receives lithium from Australia, it is also said to be one of ACISA’s clients.”
In other words, Elon Musk was being disingenuous, implying that Tesla had no direct ties to the situation, and they had nothing to gain from ACISA’s deal with the Bolivian government that was axed just days prior to the coup.
After coming across this, in the midst of the Bolivia story developing and breaking, I found it highly likely that the lithium issue was underpinning Bolivia’s coup, and highly improbable that the important lithium deal being axed days before the coup was a mere coincidence of timing. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck…
In My 2019 article... “Bolivia: Coup or Revolt? A Battle of Narratives”
🔗SOURCE ➡️ TheMcgwire
Related: Does Twitter Allow You to Like This Post Suggesting Elon is Controlled Opposition?
It doesn't allow me.
"This post has been deleted" [It has not been deleted.]
Reply Here Whether X Allows You➡️ TheMcgwire
Is Musk Controlled Opposition? — Excerpt from "The Suspiciously Convenient Timing of Covid for the Davos Elite and the WEF's 'Great Reset'"
Musk, a self described “free-speech absolutist” is not such an absolutist after all. In retrospect, people should acknowledge that his company, Space X, has major contracts with the US military.
[Bloomberg, 2008: The WEF just announced its new 2008 list of YGLs—Young Global Leaders.
"Elon Musk... is a new YGL."]
1/13 — Twitter PURGES Israel Critics’ Accounts!
9/27 — X CEO Linda Yaccarino Is “Successfully” Censoring “Lawful But Awful” Speech, Interview Reveals
8/19/23 — X is Hiring Staff To Combat Election “Disinformation”
8/18— The Suspiciously Convenient Timing of Covid for the Davos Elite and the WEF's 'Great Reset'
8/11/23 — X CEO Linda Yaccarino: “Lawful But Awful” Content To Be Hidden
Follow us on Minds / Twitter
Follow ➡️ @PsyopDaily
...In 2018, following Bolivia having initially struck the deal with ACISA, EE News Europe published the article, “German Venture Taps Bolivian Lithium Deposits”
The introductory paragraph reads:
”With the planned establishment of a public-private joint venture between the Bolivian state enterprise Yacimientos de Litio Bolivianos (YLB) and the German ACI Systems Alemania GmbH (ACISA), Germany is to gain access to the raw material. ACISA’s customers include Siemens, Continental, BMW, IBM, Tesla, First Solar, Bosch and the Fraunhofer research company. “
RT reported on the matter, dedicating an entire article to it, “‘We will coup whoever we want’: Elon Musk Sparks Online Riot With Quip About Overthrow of Bolivia’s Evo Morales” - concluding with the sentence that “Although it’s true that Tesla receives lithium from Australia, it is also said to be one of ACISA’s clients.”
In other words, Elon Musk was being disingenuous, implying that Tesla had no direct ties to the situation, and they had nothing to gain from ACISA’s deal with the Bolivian government that was axed just days prior to the coup.
After coming across this, in the midst of the Bolivia story developing and breaking, I found it highly likely that the lithium issue was underpinning Bolivia’s coup, and highly improbable that the important lithium deal being axed days before the coup was a mere coincidence of timing. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck…
In My 2019 article... “Bolivia: Coup or Revolt? A Battle of Narratives”
🔗SOURCE ➡️ TheMcgwire
Related: Does Twitter Allow You to Like This Post Suggesting Elon is Controlled Opposition?
It doesn't allow me.
"This post has been deleted" [It has not been deleted.]
Reply Here Whether X Allows You➡️ TheMcgwire
Is Musk Controlled Opposition? — Excerpt from "The Suspiciously Convenient Timing of Covid for the Davos Elite and the WEF's 'Great Reset'"
Musk, a self described “free-speech absolutist” is not such an absolutist after all. In retrospect, people should acknowledge that his company, Space X, has major contracts with the US military.
[Bloomberg, 2008: The WEF just announced its new 2008 list of YGLs—Young Global Leaders.
"Elon Musk... is a new YGL."]
1/13 — Twitter PURGES Israel Critics’ Accounts!
9/27 — X CEO Linda Yaccarino Is “Successfully” Censoring “Lawful But Awful” Speech, Interview Reveals
8/19/23 — X is Hiring Staff To Combat Election “Disinformation”
8/18— The Suspiciously Convenient Timing of Covid for the Davos Elite and the WEF's 'Great Reset'
8/11/23 — X CEO Linda Yaccarino: “Lawful But Awful” Content To Be Hidden
Follow us on Minds / Twitter
Follow ➡️ @PsyopDaily
TheMcGwire
Revisiting Elon Musk Lying About Bolivia - Tesla's Ties to ACISA, Which Bolivia Canceled Lithium Contracts With Days Before Coup
Musk Implied Tesla Had No Vested Interest in Bolivia's Lithium, "We Get Our Lithium From Australia" -LIE- Tesla Bought Batteries from ACISA, Whom Morales Reneged on Contracts Just Days Before Coup