Forwarded from BlackBox (Security) Archiv
TLDR Digital Safety Checklist
🤔 Who this guide is for
💡 You use the internet on a day-to-day basis – for work, social media, financial transactions, etc.
💡 You feel you could be doing more to ensure your digital safety and privacy, but you're also not in immediate danger. (If you are, seek out an expert for a 1:1 consult.)
💡 You're comfortable with technology. For example, you're comfortable going into the settings section of your computer/smartphone.
👀 How this guide works
💡 Recommendations have been sorted in ascending levels of difficulty. Start from level one and work your way up!
💡 I recommend doing everything in levels one, two and three. I did, and I'm only a mildly technically-competent person.
💡 Then scan the scenarios to see if any of them apply to you. (They assume that you've done everything in levels 1-3.)
💡 This guide is a living document – please feel free to submit a pull request or fork your own version of this guide on GitHub.
🕒 Last updated: 23 October 2019
👉🏼 Read more:
https://hongkonggong.github.io/tldr-digital-security/
👉🏼 GitHub:
https://github.com/hongkonggong/tldr-digital-security
#digital #safety #checklist #guide
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_DE
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_EN
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_ES
🤔 Who this guide is for
💡 You use the internet on a day-to-day basis – for work, social media, financial transactions, etc.
💡 You feel you could be doing more to ensure your digital safety and privacy, but you're also not in immediate danger. (If you are, seek out an expert for a 1:1 consult.)
💡 You're comfortable with technology. For example, you're comfortable going into the settings section of your computer/smartphone.
👀 How this guide works
💡 Recommendations have been sorted in ascending levels of difficulty. Start from level one and work your way up!
💡 I recommend doing everything in levels one, two and three. I did, and I'm only a mildly technically-competent person.
💡 Then scan the scenarios to see if any of them apply to you. (They assume that you've done everything in levels 1-3.)
💡 This guide is a living document – please feel free to submit a pull request or fork your own version of this guide on GitHub.
🕒 Last updated: 23 October 2019
👉🏼 Read more:
https://hongkonggong.github.io/tldr-digital-security/
👉🏼 GitHub:
https://github.com/hongkonggong/tldr-digital-security
#digital #safety #checklist #guide
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_DE
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_EN
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_ES
GitHub
GitHub - narwhalacademy/zebra-crossing: Zebra Crossing: an easy-to-use digital safety checklist
Zebra Crossing: an easy-to-use digital safety checklist - narwhalacademy/zebra-crossing
For those who tell you that the Covid-19 injection is authorised, approved or licensed remind them of these facts, especially if they are considering that the C19 injection is a good idea for children:
The injections are still in Stage 3 Clinical Trials that do not finish until early 2023:
Currently given emergency approval (EUA), Conditional Marketing Authorisation (CMA) etc all these terms mean they are only being used because of an “emergency” situation. These injections have not been fully licensed anywhere in the world.
AstraZeneca Trials: AZ Trials
Pfizer Trials :Pfizer Trials
AZ example short term approval terms: AZ Approval Terms
Pfizer example short term approval terms : Pfizer Approval Terms
The public should only begin to use drugs or vaccines that are in Stage 4 clinical trials
Pfizer tells us this : Stage 3 not normal
The animals trials for coronavirus vaccines have always failed because the animals got sick and/or died :
Studies in Ferrets : https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421
Cats: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jvms/60/1/60_1_49/_article
Mice : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
Mice: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17194199/
Mice: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18941225/
The initial trials were short and flawed:
More information on the vaccines is shown in the links below:
Pfizer Trials
AZ Trials
Covid-19 Injection information leaflet
What is the latest scientific evidence saying on the efficacy/ effectiveness of these Vaccines:
Absolute Risk Reduction i.e. the true impact that the injection itself was shown to have at reducing your chances of getting sick with Covid-19 was just 0.84% for Pfizer and 1.28% for AZ (per the Lancet study linked below).
Link https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext
The injections have numerous serious and fatal short term side effects and no long term safety data
Link Adverse Reaction :https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
If the injections don’t work on “the variants” (given people are still getting sick and dying and indeed in increasing numbers) , why continue to inject people with these same experimental injections that has shown themselves not to work?
#studies #efficacy #safety
The injections are still in Stage 3 Clinical Trials that do not finish until early 2023:
Currently given emergency approval (EUA), Conditional Marketing Authorisation (CMA) etc all these terms mean they are only being used because of an “emergency” situation. These injections have not been fully licensed anywhere in the world.
AstraZeneca Trials: AZ Trials
Pfizer Trials :Pfizer Trials
AZ example short term approval terms: AZ Approval Terms
Pfizer example short term approval terms : Pfizer Approval Terms
The public should only begin to use drugs or vaccines that are in Stage 4 clinical trials
Pfizer tells us this : Stage 3 not normal
The animals trials for coronavirus vaccines have always failed because the animals got sick and/or died :
Studies in Ferrets : https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421
Cats: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jvms/60/1/60_1_49/_article
Mice : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
Mice: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17194199/
Mice: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18941225/
The initial trials were short and flawed:
More information on the vaccines is shown in the links below:
Pfizer Trials
AZ Trials
Covid-19 Injection information leaflet
What is the latest scientific evidence saying on the efficacy/ effectiveness of these Vaccines:
Absolute Risk Reduction i.e. the true impact that the injection itself was shown to have at reducing your chances of getting sick with Covid-19 was just 0.84% for Pfizer and 1.28% for AZ (per the Lancet study linked below).
Link https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext
The injections have numerous serious and fatal short term side effects and no long term safety data
Link Adverse Reaction :https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
If the injections don’t work on “the variants” (given people are still getting sick and dying and indeed in increasing numbers) , why continue to inject people with these same experimental injections that has shown themselves not to work?
#studies #efficacy #safety
Scientists call for Protection from Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Field Exposure
We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF).
https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal
FAQs on radio frequency safety
https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/electromagnetic-compatibility-division/radio-frequency-safety/faq/rf-safety
>Bluetooth transmitter operates at a much lower power than the cell phone
#emf #rf #wireless #safety
We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF).
https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal
FAQs on radio frequency safety
https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/electromagnetic-compatibility-division/radio-frequency-safety/faq/rf-safety
>Bluetooth transmitter operates at a much lower power than the cell phone
#emf #rf #wireless #safety
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Horror Stories from the Automotive Industry | Chaos Computer Club Berlin - Video
In this talk, we will revisit some of the scariest stories we faced during more than 50 penetration testing and security research projects, with a twist. In the ever-emerging industry of automotive, with old and new OEMs trying to get a share of the pie, many things are at stake, with many things getting overlooked, forgotten, or even deliberately covered.
We will go through a journey of critical findings in different targets and the constant battle between penetration testers, developers, and mid to upper management. This will help the audience get an understanding of how the industry behaves right now, what they (and what we) are doing wrong, and how the future of automotive security should be shaped, not only for the sake of security, but also for the sake of safety and reliability.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAA-agcNeeg
#cars #OEM #Automobile #PenTesting #Automotive #security #safety #CCCde
In this talk, we will revisit some of the scariest stories we faced during more than 50 penetration testing and security research projects, with a twist. In the ever-emerging industry of automotive, with old and new OEMs trying to get a share of the pie, many things are at stake, with many things getting overlooked, forgotten, or even deliberately covered.
We will go through a journey of critical findings in different targets and the constant battle between penetration testers, developers, and mid to upper management. This will help the audience get an understanding of how the industry behaves right now, what they (and what we) are doing wrong, and how the future of automotive security should be shaped, not only for the sake of security, but also for the sake of safety and reliability.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAA-agcNeeg
#cars #OEM #Automobile #PenTesting #Automotive #security #safety #CCCde