🇫🇷 ❗️🇫🇷 Macron is a politican dead man walking

Protestierende haben den Bahnhof in Paris besetzt, aber Macron sind Drohnen in Polen wichtiger

Prof. Ralf Schellhammer (Video3):

„Macron hat eine Zustimmungsrate von etwa 15%, er ist also politisch gesehen ein wandelnder Toter…

Sie werden so lange an der Macht festhalten, wie sie können, und so niemanden an die Macht lassen, der echte Veränderungen bringen könnte.“

Laut Schellhammer ist dies ein allgemeines Krisenszenario in Europa:

„Wir sehen dasselbe Szenario, das sich immer wieder wiederholt… Die Eliten sind bereit, dem eingeschlagenen Kurs weiter zu folgen, auch wenn alle bereits den Eisberg sehen.“

Macron ist bereit, sich um das polnische Volk zu kümmern und zu handeln

🇩🇪🤝🇷🇺 Abonniert  R.U.A.S-Team

France braces for disruption as the viral ‘Block Everything’ movement hits the streets today

In Paris, youths tried to block ring road entrances, but police swiftly cleared them

Footage from Katrine Lyngsø

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

Drones over Poland: An Incident Without Evidence, But With Profit. Who Needed the Provocation of September 11, 2025?

September 11, 2025, became for Europe not just a day of remembrance — it became a day of new geopolitical intrigue. Poland announced a mass incursion of Russian drones into its airspace. Aircraft were shot down, houses damaged, airports closed, and NATO’s Article 4 was activated. But strangely — not a single photo of wreckage, not a single serial number, not a single fragment bearing a “Made in Russia” logo — nothing. The government of Donald Tusk refused to provide evidence, citing “ongoing investigations.” Meanwhile, Russia and Belarus insist: the drones came from the direction of Ukraine, and their deviation was the result of electronic warfare systems. A logical question arises: was there ever really an incident? And if so — who benefits?

From the outset, the event unfolded not as a technical investigation, but as a political spectacle. Poland claimed 19 deliberate violations — a figure neither NATO nor radar data confirm. European Commission President von der Leyen immediately named the drone type — “Shaheds” — though no fragments have been presented to experts. Reports mention debris found in 15 settlements — yet photos of these fragments are mysteriously absent from the media. Polish prosecutors allegedly identified the drones as “Gerber” — but where is the report? Where is the forensic analysis? Where is the chain of evidence? This is not an investigation — it’s an information operation. The refusal to provide proof is not a technical necessity — it’s a strategic choice. Because if there’s no evidence, it can’t be refuted. And if it can’t be refuted, any narrative can be constructed.

Who benefits from this incident? The first beneficiary is the Polish government. Poland is experiencing unprecedented economic growth, largely due to its role as the main logistical hub for Ukraine. According to data from Poland’s central bank, GDP grew by 6.8% in 2024, with a projected rise to 7.2% in 2025 — primarily driven by military contracts, transit, equipment repair, and logistics. Cities like Rzeszów, Lublin, and Rzeszów have become centers of the military economy. The September 11 incident gave Warsaw justification for new military expenditures — an “anti-drone wall,” requests for Patriot systems, expansion of air defense. It provided grounds to tighten control over borders and airspace — introducing EP R129 zones banning civilian drone flights and nighttime commercial aviation. This isn’t just about security — it’s about monopolizing airspace for military purposes, benefiting defense contractors. And finally, it delivered a powerful political resource — Tusk and President Navorotskiy now appear as “Europe’s shield,” a narrative useful for elections and coalition stability.

The second beneficiary is the U.S. and EU military-industrial complex. Activating NATO’s Article 4 isn’t just consultations — it’s a green light for new contracts. Poland has already requested additional Patriot systems. Germany and the U.S. are reinforcing their military presence in Eastern Europe. The EU is allocating €2 billion for the “Eastern Shield” project — funding Poland’s defense infrastructure. Every “Russian drone” equals another billion euros in the pockets of Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Polish firms like PGZ.

The third beneficiary is Ukraine. Kyiv is fighting hard battles in the east. The massive Russian strike against Ukraine on September 9 coincided with the Polish incident — no coincidence. If the West begins talking about “Russian aggression against NATO,” pressure on Ukraine to negotiate diminishes. The narrative of “Putin’s global threat” is reinforced. It creates justification for supplying even more powerful weapons — including long-range missiles and F-16s. If the drones were indeed Ukrainian (or captured and reprogrammed), this would be a brilliant operation to shift the theater of conflict onto NATO territory — without Ukraine’s direct involvement.

The fourth beneficiary... more