Zelenko Freedom Foundation
In its zeal to promote universal vaccination, @ gavi, the Vaccine Alliance has neglected the key issue of vaccine safety. When vaccine safety issues have come before GAVI, it has treated them not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem.โฆ
This is confusing...
"Rubio stated that while Kennedy is allowed to play a "leading role" in determining next steps, the State Department is reclaiming management of the relationship with Gavi to drive the issue to a resolution acceptable to Congress and global health goals."
So is State driving this, or HHS?
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ค91๐คจ14๐คฌ12๐4โค3๐คก1
Homesteading: The Dog Days of Summer
https://www.malone.news/p/homesteading-the-dog-days-of-summer-f8d
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
https://www.malone.news/p/homesteading-the-dog-days-of-summer-f8d
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
Homesteading: The Dog Days of Summer
Flags are flying, and we are getting ready for the fourth!
โค60
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Long ago and far away - Jill and I used to drive, as well as farm with draft horses, as well as breed and show them. Learned from the best - the Amish.
I took our senior stallion and won first with him at the 2006, World Percheron Congress. Won 2nd in the carriage class with a homebred team at the 2010 World Percheron Congress.
Great memories.
---
Our farming with those big ole drafts, was what brought us into the regenerative farming world - before it was a "thing."
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
I took our senior stallion and won first with him at the 2006, World Percheron Congress. Won 2nd in the carriage class with a homebred team at the 2010 World Percheron Congress.
Great memories.
---
Our farming with those big ole drafts, was what brought us into the regenerative farming world - before it was a "thing."
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
โค181๐37๐ฅฐ7
The problem being -that the current Senate has no interest in fixing itself or the United States of America.
They are making too much profit - to do the work to repair a broken system.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
They are making too much profit - to do the work to repair a broken system.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
๐ฏ136๐25โค8๐ข4
๐งต Most Americans think "Generally Recognized As Safe" means the FDA reviewed an ingredient and signed off on it.
It often means almost the opposite.
How the government quietly redefined what we call "food."
---
Pick up a loaf of bread. The label runs 20 or 30 items. Yogurt is full of gums, stabilizers, emulsifiers, and flavor systems. Salad dressing reads like a chemistry experiment.
Who decided this was normal?
Not consumers. Not farmers. Not physicians.
---
That "GRAS" status on thousands of ingredients works like this:
Manufacturers commission their own safety studies, hire their own experts, and conclude their own ingredient is safe.
Sometimes they never even notify the FDA before it reaches store shelves.
---
Imagine a drug company running its own safety studies, picking its own panel, declaring its own drug safe, then selling it with no mandatory FDA review.
Americans would be outraged.
Yet that is roughly how thousands of food ingredients reach your table.
---
Congress created GRAS in 1958 to do the opposite.
The goal was to spare salt, butter, vinegar, and flour from pointless red tape. Foods already proven by centuries of human consumption.
It was meant to protect real food, not to industrialize it.
---
Today the food supply holds roughly 10,000 to 12,000 intentionally added ingredients.
Most were never created for your health. They were created for longer shelf life, cheaper production, and cross country shipping.
Rational business goals. Not public health goals.
---
We have already seen where this leads.
Artificial trans fats carried GRAS status for decades. Cheap, stable, good texture. Then the science caught up: heart disease, raised LDL, inflammation.
The FDA finally pulled their status. The damage was already done.
---
The lesson was not that regulators got one ingredient wrong.
The lesson is that they asked the wrong question.
Never "do Americans actually need this in their food?"
Only "can it be manufactured safely?"
Those are profoundly different questions.
---
This is where MAHA comes in.
Banning a few dyes and preservatives one at a time may be worthwhile. But it leaves the underlying philosophy fully intact.
Lipstick on a pig.
---
The real question is not "Generally recognized by whom?"
It is "Benefiting whom?"
Consumers? Farmers? Public health? Or an industrial food system that has become extraordinarily good at making America sicker?
Full essay:
https://www.malone.news/p/how-government-quietly-redefined
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
It often means almost the opposite.
How the government quietly redefined what we call "food."
---
Pick up a loaf of bread. The label runs 20 or 30 items. Yogurt is full of gums, stabilizers, emulsifiers, and flavor systems. Salad dressing reads like a chemistry experiment.
Who decided this was normal?
Not consumers. Not farmers. Not physicians.
---
That "GRAS" status on thousands of ingredients works like this:
Manufacturers commission their own safety studies, hire their own experts, and conclude their own ingredient is safe.
Sometimes they never even notify the FDA before it reaches store shelves.
---
Imagine a drug company running its own safety studies, picking its own panel, declaring its own drug safe, then selling it with no mandatory FDA review.
Americans would be outraged.
Yet that is roughly how thousands of food ingredients reach your table.
---
Congress created GRAS in 1958 to do the opposite.
The goal was to spare salt, butter, vinegar, and flour from pointless red tape. Foods already proven by centuries of human consumption.
It was meant to protect real food, not to industrialize it.
---
Today the food supply holds roughly 10,000 to 12,000 intentionally added ingredients.
Most were never created for your health. They were created for longer shelf life, cheaper production, and cross country shipping.
Rational business goals. Not public health goals.
---
We have already seen where this leads.
Artificial trans fats carried GRAS status for decades. Cheap, stable, good texture. Then the science caught up: heart disease, raised LDL, inflammation.
The FDA finally pulled their status. The damage was already done.
---
The lesson was not that regulators got one ingredient wrong.
The lesson is that they asked the wrong question.
Never "do Americans actually need this in their food?"
Only "can it be manufactured safely?"
Those are profoundly different questions.
---
This is where MAHA comes in.
Banning a few dyes and preservatives one at a time may be worthwhile. But it leaves the underlying philosophy fully intact.
Lipstick on a pig.
---
The real question is not "Generally recognized by whom?"
It is "Benefiting whom?"
Consumers? Farmers? Public health? Or an industrial food system that has become extraordinarily good at making America sicker?
Full essay:
https://www.malone.news/p/how-government-quietly-redefined
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
How Government Quietly Redefined What Americans Call "Food"
Audio Version:
๐ฏ114โค21๐16
Forwarded from Joe M Storm Is Upon Us
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
US Supreme Court UPHOLDS BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS by striking down President Trumpโs executive order
Congress must act!
THIS IS A BLOW TO THE FUTURE OF OUR REPUBLIC.
The Supreme Courtโs decision will harm America for DECADES to come
Subscribe and share ๐ @StormIsUponUsJM
Congress must act!
THIS IS A BLOW TO THE FUTURE OF OUR REPUBLIC.
The Supreme Courtโs decision will harm America for DECADES to come
Subscribe and share ๐ @StormIsUponUsJM
๐88๐ฏ81๐คฌ36๐ข19โค5๐ฅฑ3๐2๐คฎ2๐1๐คก1
Justice Clarence Thomas is a true hero.
Robert's and Barrett and their ilk (including the country club Republican congresscritters) belong in the dustbin of history
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
Robert's and Barrett and their ilk (including the country club Republican congresscritters) belong in the dustbin of history
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
๐ฏ205๐18๐ฅ14โค13๐1๐ฅฑ1๐คฃ1
This is great news coming out of HHS - the EUAs for COVID are being terminated in a year's time Thank you Sec. Kennedy.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐190โค26๐13๐7๐คฎ2
No one is saying the โrโ word, yet here we are. Midterms coming
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ค59๐17๐คก4๐ฏ3โค2๐คฃ2๐ข1
America turns 250 this Saturday. There will be fireworks, parades, and speeches. The founders understood what the speeches often miss: freedom was never only political. A republic survives only if its citizens can govern themselves and provide for their own. ๐งต
---
Something older than politics is happening across the country. Families are reclaiming gardens, chickens, cattle, and orchards. Planting raised beds in the suburbs. Reading ingredient labels. Questioning supply chains. Rediscovering that health begins at home.
---
For most of our history, families grew food. They knew seasonality. They preserved meat. They gardened because it was necessary, not charming. Industrial abundance severed that link. Convenience replaced competence. Food became anonymous. Health became outsourced.
---
A population disconnected from land grows dependent in ways it scarcely recognizes. What we describe is a restoration. Liberty requires discipline. Property requires stewardship. Food security requires participation. This is not rebellion. It is restoration.
---
The American experiment was never built on speeches and documents alone. It was built on farmers, tradesmen, mothers, fathers, churches, and communities that governed themselves before asking distant authorities to intervene. Its strength was decentralized competence.
---
When we cultivate a garden, we practice foresight. When we raise livestock humanely, we practice stewardship. When we teach our children to work beside us, we pass down competence instead of dependency. These acts are small. They are also civilizational.
---
Health is not merely biochemical. It is cultural. Food is not merely fuel. It is sovereignty. Farming is not merely an industry. It is an inheritance. When families reclaim responsibility for their food and health, they reclaim a freedom no law can grant.
---
This is not a call for everyone to buy land. It is a call to reclaim agency. Grow something. Fix something. Know where your food comes from. Independence does not come from declarations. It comes from daily practice, earned slowly, through habit.
---
Freedom is not secured in distant institutions. It is practiced at home. Cultivate your garden. The rest will follow. Our new essay, the closing chapter of Homesteading for Health:
https://www.malone.news/p/stewardship-and-the-work-of-freedom
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
---
Something older than politics is happening across the country. Families are reclaiming gardens, chickens, cattle, and orchards. Planting raised beds in the suburbs. Reading ingredient labels. Questioning supply chains. Rediscovering that health begins at home.
---
For most of our history, families grew food. They knew seasonality. They preserved meat. They gardened because it was necessary, not charming. Industrial abundance severed that link. Convenience replaced competence. Food became anonymous. Health became outsourced.
---
A population disconnected from land grows dependent in ways it scarcely recognizes. What we describe is a restoration. Liberty requires discipline. Property requires stewardship. Food security requires participation. This is not rebellion. It is restoration.
---
The American experiment was never built on speeches and documents alone. It was built on farmers, tradesmen, mothers, fathers, churches, and communities that governed themselves before asking distant authorities to intervene. Its strength was decentralized competence.
---
When we cultivate a garden, we practice foresight. When we raise livestock humanely, we practice stewardship. When we teach our children to work beside us, we pass down competence instead of dependency. These acts are small. They are also civilizational.
---
Health is not merely biochemical. It is cultural. Food is not merely fuel. It is sovereignty. Farming is not merely an industry. It is an inheritance. When families reclaim responsibility for their food and health, they reclaim a freedom no law can grant.
---
This is not a call for everyone to buy land. It is a call to reclaim agency. Grow something. Fix something. Know where your food comes from. Independence does not come from declarations. It comes from daily practice, earned slowly, through habit.
---
Freedom is not secured in distant institutions. It is practiced at home. Cultivate your garden. The rest will follow. Our new essay, the closing chapter of Homesteading for Health:
https://www.malone.news/p/stewardship-and-the-work-of-freedom
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
Stewardship and the Work of Freedom
The concluding chapter
โค89๐33๐ฏ22๐8๐คฃ1
Answer: (in my opinion) yes.
The deeper question is what MAHA(tm) is now, and where it goes from here. The coalition remains, the issues remain, but the "leadership" has not delivered on promises made. And the reflexive knee-jerk response has been to spin like crazy, try to control unfavorable narratives rather than trying to understand and respond to concerns, and, when necessary, resort to kicking out truth-tellers and dissenters, shooting messengers, and, finally, deploy overt censorship. Old-school narrative control strategies that the MAHA coalition base is particularly good at seeing right through after what they have learned from the COVID experience. The irony is inescapable.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/maha-maga-alliance-fracture-robert-kennedy-jr-1235582070/
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
The deeper question is what MAHA(tm) is now, and where it goes from here. The coalition remains, the issues remain, but the "leadership" has not delivered on promises made. And the reflexive knee-jerk response has been to spin like crazy, try to control unfavorable narratives rather than trying to understand and respond to concerns, and, when necessary, resort to kicking out truth-tellers and dissenters, shooting messengers, and, finally, deploy overt censorship. Old-school narrative control strategies that the MAHA coalition base is particularly good at seeing right through after what they have learned from the COVID experience. The irony is inescapable.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/maha-maga-alliance-fracture-robert-kennedy-jr-1235582070/
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
๐56๐10โค7โก1
๐งต America turns 250 this Saturday. The government Americans live under today is not the one the founders built. Somewhere between the Declaration and this anniversary, the leash was cut. Here is how it happened, and what it would take to undo it.
---
The founders did not trust parchment to limit power. They trusted structure: rival sovereign states, each able to check the center. Madison, Federalist 51: ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The states were the Constitution's immune system.
---
The Austrian economists explain why this mattered. Government is a monopoly on force, and like every monopoly, it expands unless competition constrains it. Federalism supplied that competition. States competed for citizens and capital. Overtax them, and they leave.
---
Before the Civil War there were three structural brakes on Washington. The Bill of Rights bound the federal government, not the states. State legislatures chose senators, giving states a voice inside the federal government. And in the last resort, a state could leave.
---
Between 1868 and 1913, all three were removed. Quietly, by changes most Americans cannot explain and fewer still mourn. Two amendments and a single court ruling rewired the republic.
---
The Fourteenth Amendment, 1868. Born of tragedy: Southern states met emancipation with the Black Codes. Necessary. But its mechanism gave Washington permanent power to strike down state law. A channel opened from the capital down into every state.
---
The Seventeenth Amendment, 1913. Direct election of senators. Sold as democratic reform, and it did fix real corruption. But it severed the states' voice inside Washington. One amendment reached down into the states. The other removed the states' reach up into the capital.
---
Texas v. White, 1869: the Union is perpetual, secession void. Exit foreclosed. To the Austrians this was the gravest loss, because exit is the ultimate accountability. A government that cannot lose people or territory faces less pressure to govern well.
---
Now the twist. Switzerland fought its own secession war in 1847 and the centralizers won, exactly as in America fourteen years later. Two secession crises. Two victories for the center. Yet Switzerland stayed decentralized, and America consolidated. Why?
---
The tragic knot. By 1861, American state sovereignty had become the shield for slavery. A nation that fought a war to end it could not leave the defeated states sovereign over the laws that created it. Switzerland faced no such evil, and needed no such reach.
---
What Switzerland kept: the double majority. Amending the constitution needs a majority of voters AND a majority of cantons. Add the referendum and the citizen initiative, and consent must be renewed at every step. America removed its brakes. Switzerland multiplied hers.
---
The purse tells the same story. In 1913, the Sixteenth Amendment gave Washington a permanent claim on incomes. Swiss cantons kept the taxing power and still compete for residents. The clearest surviving model of what the founders intended is now a small country in the Alps.
---
What structure dismantled, structure can rebuild, and it does not wait on better men. The essay ends with five concrete reforms, from repealing the Seventeenth to reviving the states' own levers. Which would you start with?
https://www.malone.news/p/the-quiet-death-of-american-federalism
RWM/JGM
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
---
The founders did not trust parchment to limit power. They trusted structure: rival sovereign states, each able to check the center. Madison, Federalist 51: ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The states were the Constitution's immune system.
---
The Austrian economists explain why this mattered. Government is a monopoly on force, and like every monopoly, it expands unless competition constrains it. Federalism supplied that competition. States competed for citizens and capital. Overtax them, and they leave.
---
Before the Civil War there were three structural brakes on Washington. The Bill of Rights bound the federal government, not the states. State legislatures chose senators, giving states a voice inside the federal government. And in the last resort, a state could leave.
---
Between 1868 and 1913, all three were removed. Quietly, by changes most Americans cannot explain and fewer still mourn. Two amendments and a single court ruling rewired the republic.
---
The Fourteenth Amendment, 1868. Born of tragedy: Southern states met emancipation with the Black Codes. Necessary. But its mechanism gave Washington permanent power to strike down state law. A channel opened from the capital down into every state.
---
The Seventeenth Amendment, 1913. Direct election of senators. Sold as democratic reform, and it did fix real corruption. But it severed the states' voice inside Washington. One amendment reached down into the states. The other removed the states' reach up into the capital.
---
Texas v. White, 1869: the Union is perpetual, secession void. Exit foreclosed. To the Austrians this was the gravest loss, because exit is the ultimate accountability. A government that cannot lose people or territory faces less pressure to govern well.
---
Now the twist. Switzerland fought its own secession war in 1847 and the centralizers won, exactly as in America fourteen years later. Two secession crises. Two victories for the center. Yet Switzerland stayed decentralized, and America consolidated. Why?
---
The tragic knot. By 1861, American state sovereignty had become the shield for slavery. A nation that fought a war to end it could not leave the defeated states sovereign over the laws that created it. Switzerland faced no such evil, and needed no such reach.
---
What Switzerland kept: the double majority. Amending the constitution needs a majority of voters AND a majority of cantons. Add the referendum and the citizen initiative, and consent must be renewed at every step. America removed its brakes. Switzerland multiplied hers.
---
The purse tells the same story. In 1913, the Sixteenth Amendment gave Washington a permanent claim on incomes. Swiss cantons kept the taxing power and still compete for residents. The clearest surviving model of what the founders intended is now a small country in the Alps.
---
What structure dismantled, structure can rebuild, and it does not wait on better men. The essay ends with five concrete reforms, from repealing the Seventeenth to reviving the states' own levers. Which would you start with?
https://www.malone.news/p/the-quiet-death-of-american-federalism
RWM/JGM
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
The Quiet Death of American Federalism
Thoughts on the Two Hundred and Fiftieth.
๐54โค25๐9๐ฏ5๐1
Forwarded from Real-Time Daily News
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
GREAT NEWS! Thank you MAGA Mike!
MIKE LEE: "He assured me that MIRV process will guarantee the two bills are merged and received in the Senate as one bill, with the SAVE America Act in the base text."
"@ SpeakerJohnson is as committed as ever to ensuring it becomes law, including keeping it on the NDAA (a โmust passโ bill) as it comes over from the House to the Senate, and fighting for it thereafter."
All hands on deck for secure elections
โก๏ธ @RealTimeDailyNews
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐130โค38๐38๐ฅ9๐4๐คก2
Real-Time Daily News
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค63๐22๐16๐ฅ4๐1๐คก1
Friday Funnies: God Bless the USA-
"And to be clear, when Joe Rogan hosted Fear Factor, eating live insects was considered disgusting television. Amazing how quickly some ideas get rebranded.
But seriously, remember when eating insects was the punchline to a reality show challenge? Then somewhere along the way, it became a serious proposal. The global elite assured us that crickets were the future, climate change demanded dietary sacrifice, and progressive activists enthusiastically explained..."
To read more and view this week's, memes, cartoon, video and more - go to:
https://www.malone.news/p/friday-funnies-god-bless-the-usa
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
"And to be clear, when Joe Rogan hosted Fear Factor, eating live insects was considered disgusting television. Amazing how quickly some ideas get rebranded.
But seriously, remember when eating insects was the punchline to a reality show challenge? Then somewhere along the way, it became a serious proposal. The global elite assured us that crickets were the future, climate change demanded dietary sacrifice, and progressive activists enthusiastically explained..."
To read more and view this week's, memes, cartoon, video and more - go to:
https://www.malone.news/p/friday-funnies-god-bless-the-usa
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
Friday Funnies: God Bless the USA
I work the front desk at a small doctorโs office, and I wish people could see what happens on the other side of the phone.
๐48โค21๐คฃ11๐6๐ฅฑ1
Writing under the name Brutus, in 1787 New York judge Robert Yates, was the one Anti-Federalist focused on a danger almost everyone else overlooked: the federal power to tax.
---
Once Washington could tax โin all its parts,โ he warned, the states would โfind it impossible to raise monies to support their governments.โ Deprived of revenue, their powers would eventually be โabsorbed in that of the general government.โ
---
The Federal government was constrained in what it could tax until 1913, which is why many believe that it was the passage of the Sixteenth Amendment that broke the Constitution.
---
Read the full essay here:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-amendment-that-changed-america
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
---
Once Washington could tax โin all its parts,โ he warned, the states would โfind it impossible to raise monies to support their governments.โ Deprived of revenue, their powers would eventually be โabsorbed in that of the general government.โ
---
The Federal government was constrained in what it could tax until 1913, which is why many believe that it was the passage of the Sixteenth Amendment that broke the Constitution.
---
Read the full essay here:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-amendment-that-changed-america
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
๐57โค17๐6๐ฏ4๐ฅ3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Lusitano stallion Jade is my wife's pride and joy. She rides him almost daily and he never fails to try his best. Jade has produced amazing and talented foals for us and others over the last decade.
---
Finally, not all opportunities are in the big city. Star link has made states like WV places where one can work remotely.
---
I know how tough Jill and I had it - and I also know how hard it is for people just starting now. BUT - we live in a country where building a business is still possible. Don't give up on your dreams.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
---
Finally, not all opportunities are in the big city. Star link has made states like WV places where one can work remotely.
---
I know how tough Jill and I had it - and I also know how hard it is for people just starting now. BUT - we live in a country where building a business is still possible. Don't give up on your dreams.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
โค179๐39๐15๐ฅฐ9
A Founders' Fourth of July Party
Five Drinks the Founding Fathers Would Actually Recognize...
"Colonial Americans drank what they grew, what they distilled, and what survived the trip across the Atlantic. Hard cider was often safer than water. Rum arrived by the barrel. Applejack was Americaโs native spirit.
Punch bowls were the centerpiece of political gatherings, military celebrations, and long evenings spent solving the worldโs problems.
If you want to toast Americaโs 250th in something the Founders would actually recognize, start here."
Click on the link for the recipes:
https://www.malone.news/p/a-founders-fourth-of-july-party
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
Five Drinks the Founding Fathers Would Actually Recognize...
"Colonial Americans drank what they grew, what they distilled, and what survived the trip across the Atlantic. Hard cider was often safer than water. Rum arrived by the barrel. Applejack was Americaโs native spirit.
Punch bowls were the centerpiece of political gatherings, military celebrations, and long evenings spent solving the worldโs problems.
If you want to toast Americaโs 250th in something the Founders would actually recognize, start here."
Click on the link for the recipes:
https://www.malone.news/p/a-founders-fourth-of-july-party
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
A Founders' Fourth of July Party
Five Drinks the Founding Fathers Would Actually Recognize
โค54๐ฅ12๐8
You belong to yourself. Your body, your mind, and the code inside your cells are yours. For all of history that was safe, because no one could reach them. That is no longer true. So we wrote down the line. And today we open it for you to sign.
---
We now have machines that read and change the brain, edit the genes you pass to your kids, patent what is found in a drop of your blood, and tie your whole life to a digital ID someone else can switch off. Not science fiction. It exists now.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
---
We now have machines that read and change the brain, edit the genes you pass to your kids, patent what is found in a drop of your blood, and tie your whole life to a digital ID someone else can switch off. Not science fiction. It exists now.
๐Follow and Share๐๐ป
๐ฌ๐งฌ @RWMaloneMD
โค62๐ฏ45๐คฌ15๐7๐1๐ฅ1