The Trust Machine
(the history of Bitcoin)
37.414 visualizaciones (2019 04 11)
Publicado el 28 may. 2018

"Overview of how Bitcoin works for general audiences without skipping the key technical insights. Covers history of money, value, gold, blockchain & proof of work."

https://youtu.be/ZKwqNgG-Sv4
Estoy muy interesado en comprender la importancia de SegWit y lo que supone para la malebilidad de las transacciones, espero que en algún Meetup, alguien tenga el conocimiento y la amabilidad de poder explicarlo en detalle, como si se lo estuviera explicando a niño de 5 años, jejeje

"Bitcoin Q&A: SegWit and transaction malleability" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/Vux6o7gSnhE
Algunos detalles te pueden dar una pista de lo podría suceder en un futuro no muy lejano.

"Blocks WILL be full sooner or later. We’re not making smart use of block space, so we’re likely to experience a bumpy fee ride until people adjust their behavior,” he wrote."

Full Blocks ‘Only Way’ For Bitcoin to Stay Trustless, Say Seoul Meetup Founder

https://bitcoinist.com/high-bitcoin-fees-only-way-to-stay-trustless-says-seoul-meetup-founder/
Forwarded from DocuVideos
Bitcoin: "El dinero mágico". | Documentos TV. https://goo.gl/G4hxNJ
OH NO, NOT ANOTHER BLOODY SATOSHI SIGHTING...
May 04, 2017


"Craig has more knowledge than just about anyone else I've come across in the field. Certainly of Bitcoin, and a lot besides. Here's the clanger: Craig S Wright has the capability to integrate many diverse fields. He's a polymath, which is the roadblock that stops most others no matter how good they are at their select discipline. That's what I mean by transcendent financial cryptographer on this blog, and what I wrote my old fc7 paper about; it's not about what you know, it's about how you integrate the disparate, discordant fields together."

http://financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/001617.html
hay gente que no sabe que la justicia existe y lleva sus protocolos, cuando llegue la fase final no le va a hacer mucha gracia, je je je
Pre-action Protocol for Defamation
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/protocol/prot_def
"Many people comment on the headline but it seems very very few have taken the time to read the article. The article wrote about the erosion of markets through government intervention. Following a £37 billion nationalisation, the government was considering devaluing the currency further. "

https://medium.com/@adam_selene/genesis-c5b4edff6b9c
La imagen del encuentro ha quedado inmortalizada en la blockchain de Satoshi Vision BSV

2º Meetup Bitcoin Satoshi Vision Valencia.

Muchísimas gracias a todos los que han hecho muchos kilómetros, desde Albacete, Madrid, Alicante, Sagunto, etc
Ha sido como siempre un verdadero placer
Un fuerte abrazo a todos

https://www.bitpaste.app/tx/1de6614b00cf5e915ccb4fad6947526e0baa16dc643a638108703ef45245aba8
Empiezan a redactarse artículos en la blockchain que permanecerán para siempre?

Really, Really Big Blocks

"The original source code for Bitcoin did not have a block size cap. The 1 MB block size cap was added later on when Satoshi Nakamoto was convinced by Hal Finney that not having a cap was a DOS attack vector."

https://www.bitpaste.app/tx/5e411500d728f27badb2dfc6d804c9a9e42003f5ed6078ebd0744b4569009e42
taxonomy-schema-2018-05-07.pdf
81.9 KB
taxonomy-schema-2018-05-07.pdf
[Cryptography] Proof-of-Satoshi fails Proof-of-Proof.

ianG iang@iang.org 
Wed May 4 2016

Previous message: [Cryptography] Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto



On May 2, 2016, at 2:17 PM, Erik Granger <erikgranger at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'll believe it when he signs arbitrary messages with satoshis key. No signature, no story. > > Spend the coins. > > Pics or it didn’t happen. > > Cheers, > RAH

"That ain't gonna happen, sorry folks!
Not to rag at RAH,

I'm just picking up his perfect foil, and for reasons he'll wryly smile to: Physics. Humanity. Frailty. Complexity. Of the sort that we've all being talking about since forever on this list and many others. Let's break it down. Firstly, we all on this list know that cryptographic keys prove that a private key did a maths transform that a public key can confirm. Full Stop.

What cryptographic proofs do not confirm is that a human said something meaningful to another human. Indeed, the more that the Bitcoin community and the tabloid press demand a proof-of-spend and examine the results they're given, the more it demonstrates how humans seem to be isolated by cryptography not joined. In theory, keys are mathware, humans are wetware and the two do not easily mix".

http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2016-May/029323.html
Cada cierto tiempo tengo la costumbre de releer ciertos documentos, para comparar lo que comprendo hoy, en relación a lo que entendí la última vez que lo leí, evidentemente deben ser documentos originales de gente original, este es uno de esos casos, donde hoy lo que voy leyendo de Hal y las explicaciones que voy recibiendo de Craig, hacen que muchas piezas encajen.

Para evitar, que por algún motivo pueda desaparecer, dejo una copia del documento original y una traducción al castellano en la blockchain.
Por favor no tengas prisa, disfruta de este momento.
Buena lectura!!!!!!!

Bitcoin and me (Hal Finney)
March 19, 2013, 08:40:02 PM
Last edit: March 25, 2013, 08:37:28 PM by Hal
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=155054.0