En el futuro el cambio de gusto por una blockchain favorita a otra distinta, puede ser casi inmediato, sería algo así como cambiar de banco o de proveedor de servicios telefónico.
la idea es que a diferencia del culto a algo intangible, si se hace una comparativa entre dos religiones por ejemplo, no se puede medir, cual es mejor, porque estan basadas en cuestiones espirituales (intangible, no se pueden medir con numeros), sin embargo, en la tecnología blockchain prácticamente todo tiene un valor numérico y esto hace muy fácil la comparación entre dos o mas blockchains diferentes, es por eso que aunque te hayas decidido por una blockchain favorita, si otra, hace lo mismo pero mejorado, la migración puede ser casi inmediata.
Una de las tremendisimas cosas buenas que tiene ésta tecnología es que al margen de tus creencias, tu ideología y el culto que le quieras rendir a la blockchain que mas te guste, hay números que no se pueden manipular, al menos no durante algún tiempo, así como el precio está en manos del mercado y éste ya se sabe que está manipulado por Tether y compañía, hay otros baremos técnicos que si se cumplen unas cifras concretas, no creo que haya mucha discusión:
- El precio de la comisión (fee), por transacción.
- La velocidad en que le llega a la otra parte, tu transacción.
- El número de transacciones que es capaz de soportar tu blockchain favorita en un segundo.
- Las limitaciones que tiene tu blockchain favorita a la hora de hacer una transacción entre dos partes:
* Hay que estar en linea para realizar la transacción?
* Hay que abrir un canal?
* Qué pasa si el canal se queda sin corriente electrica, o sin cobertura de internet?
* En caso de cierre del canal de forma inesperada durante una transacción, se pueden perder los fondos.
* El pago queda trazado desde Alice a Bob?
* Se puede hacer una transacción 24/24 los 365 dias del año, sin pasar por un tercero de confianza, es decir es una transacción p2p
* Se puede transaccionar cualquier cantidad económica sean millones, o un centimo?
* La wallet utilizada permite hacer transacciones multifirma?
* La wallet te permite custodiar tus claves privadas?
Y lo más importante, todo lo anterior se puede demostrar (SIN PEROS) aquí y ahora?
la idea es que a diferencia del culto a algo intangible, si se hace una comparativa entre dos religiones por ejemplo, no se puede medir, cual es mejor, porque estan basadas en cuestiones espirituales (intangible, no se pueden medir con numeros), sin embargo, en la tecnología blockchain prácticamente todo tiene un valor numérico y esto hace muy fácil la comparación entre dos o mas blockchains diferentes, es por eso que aunque te hayas decidido por una blockchain favorita, si otra, hace lo mismo pero mejorado, la migración puede ser casi inmediata.
Una de las tremendisimas cosas buenas que tiene ésta tecnología es que al margen de tus creencias, tu ideología y el culto que le quieras rendir a la blockchain que mas te guste, hay números que no se pueden manipular, al menos no durante algún tiempo, así como el precio está en manos del mercado y éste ya se sabe que está manipulado por Tether y compañía, hay otros baremos técnicos que si se cumplen unas cifras concretas, no creo que haya mucha discusión:
- El precio de la comisión (fee), por transacción.
- La velocidad en que le llega a la otra parte, tu transacción.
- El número de transacciones que es capaz de soportar tu blockchain favorita en un segundo.
- Las limitaciones que tiene tu blockchain favorita a la hora de hacer una transacción entre dos partes:
* Hay que estar en linea para realizar la transacción?
* Hay que abrir un canal?
* Qué pasa si el canal se queda sin corriente electrica, o sin cobertura de internet?
* En caso de cierre del canal de forma inesperada durante una transacción, se pueden perder los fondos.
* El pago queda trazado desde Alice a Bob?
* Se puede hacer una transacción 24/24 los 365 dias del año, sin pasar por un tercero de confianza, es decir es una transacción p2p
* Se puede transaccionar cualquier cantidad económica sean millones, o un centimo?
* La wallet utilizada permite hacer transacciones multifirma?
* La wallet te permite custodiar tus claves privadas?
Y lo más importante, todo lo anterior se puede demostrar (SIN PEROS) aquí y ahora?
Si estás interesado en crear algún Meetup por la zona donde vives, no dudes en hacerlo, éste es el momento de aprovechar esta segunda oportunidad que nos brinda Bitcon, con la timidez no se llega a ninguna parte!!!
Para la gente de Bitcoin SV que vive por Alicante (España) o alrededores, Tomás AKA @Samooth ha ceado un chat @BitcoinSVAlicante para coordinar los meetups de la zona.
Por supuesto contáis con todo nuestro apoyo chicos, enhorabuena!!!!
Para la gente de Bitcoin SV que vive por Alicante (España) o alrededores, Tomás AKA @Samooth ha ceado un chat @BitcoinSVAlicante para coordinar los meetups de la zona.
Por supuesto contáis con todo nuestro apoyo chicos, enhorabuena!!!!
Forwarded from 2016 RBF Replace By Fee (@RamonQuesada)
Ryan Taylor: Dash Backporting Bitcoin, Rejects Lightning, Segwit, Replace-By-Fee
“We’re based on Bitcoin’s codebase and we do maintain backporting of the features that are rolled out to Bitcoin. We don’t deploy everything. There are some obvious ones that we wouldn’t want to do like RBF which is “Replace-By-Fee.”
Taylor explained that Replace-By-Fee is not only unnecessary for Dash, but in fact diminishes its usability as digital cash:
“In fact, it would be detrimental. Replaced by fee basically allows a stuck transaction to get unstuck by sending a second transaction with the same inputs to another address. But that could also be used to attack a merchant, say who accepted a zero-confirmation transaction. I run out to my car and get on my laptop real quick and send an RBF and back to myself. And so that’s obviously something we don’t want to incorporate. Solves a problem for Bitcoin, doesn’t and actually would not be advantageous for us. Segwit is not one that we’ve deployed. We do have other plans to address some of those things that Segwit addressed.”
https://dashnews.org/ryan-taylor-dash-backporting-bitcoin-rejects-lightning-segwit-replace-by-fee/
“We’re based on Bitcoin’s codebase and we do maintain backporting of the features that are rolled out to Bitcoin. We don’t deploy everything. There are some obvious ones that we wouldn’t want to do like RBF which is “Replace-By-Fee.”
Taylor explained that Replace-By-Fee is not only unnecessary for Dash, but in fact diminishes its usability as digital cash:
“In fact, it would be detrimental. Replaced by fee basically allows a stuck transaction to get unstuck by sending a second transaction with the same inputs to another address. But that could also be used to attack a merchant, say who accepted a zero-confirmation transaction. I run out to my car and get on my laptop real quick and send an RBF and back to myself. And so that’s obviously something we don’t want to incorporate. Solves a problem for Bitcoin, doesn’t and actually would not be advantageous for us. Segwit is not one that we’ve deployed. We do have other plans to address some of those things that Segwit addressed.”
https://dashnews.org/ryan-taylor-dash-backporting-bitcoin-rejects-lightning-segwit-replace-by-fee/
Dash News
Ryan Taylor: Dash Backporting Bitcoin, Rejects Lightning, Segwit, Replace-By-Fee
According to Dash Core Group CEO Ryan Taylor, Dash is focused on keeping up to date with the Bitcoin codebase while rejecting updates such as Replace-By-Fee and Segwit, made unnecessary by Dash pursuing scaling solutions other than the Lightning Network.…
Forwarded from 2008 361 Satoshi Nakamoto SN (@RamonQuesada)
Telegram
CSW. 300 Patent - nChain
CSW Patent - nChain
https://t.me/CSW_Patent
https://www.cbinsights.com/company/nchain-patents
https://bitcoinassociation.net/open-bsv-license/
http://lnkd.in/drCksE4n
https://t.me/CSW_Patent
https://www.cbinsights.com/company/nchain-patents
https://bitcoinassociation.net/open-bsv-license/
http://lnkd.in/drCksE4n
NO ES TAN IMPORTANTE LO QUE SABES DEL PASADO, LO MÁS IMPORTANTE ES LO QUE ESTAS DISPUESTO A APRENDER Y CAMBIAR DE AHORA EN ADELANTE.
Hay un refrán muy sabio que dice: "No van lejos los de delante, si los de atrás corren bien".
Hay un refrán muy sabio que dice: "No van lejos los de delante, si los de atrás corren bien".
Forwarded from 430 Peter Todd (@RamonQuesada)
Did Wikileaks Destroy Bitcoin as Satoshi Nakamoto Predicted?
"Two days later, on December 7th 2010, Peter Todd joins the forum where the above statement was made by Nakamoto, and says: “Will buy 1 invite for $2, msg privately.”
https://www.trustnodes.com/2019/11/27/did-wikileaks-destroy-bitcoin-as-satoshi-nakamoto-predicted
"Two days later, on December 7th 2010, Peter Todd joins the forum where the above statement was made by Nakamoto, and says: “Will buy 1 invite for $2, msg privately.”
https://www.trustnodes.com/2019/11/27/did-wikileaks-destroy-bitcoin-as-satoshi-nakamoto-predicted
Trustnodes
Did Wikileaks Destroy Bitcoin as Satoshi Nakamoto Predicted? – Trustnodes
All the latests news on Crypto, Blockchain, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tokens, ICOs, Fintech, and more.
A partir de esta fecha ya no podrás comerciar Monero (XMR) en BitBay
| Criptomonedas e ICOs
"BitBay, con sede en Estonia, reveló que Monero ya no sería comercializable a partir del 19 de febrero de 2020.
Por otro lado, el exchange cesará los depósitos de XMR a partir de este viernes. Bloquearán los retiros temporalmente desde el viernes hasta el 5 de diciembre en el momento de una bifurcación dura planificada de Monero."
https://www.criptomonedaseico.com/noticias/a-partir-de-esta-fecha-ya-no-podras-comerciar-monero-xmr-en-bitbay/
| Criptomonedas e ICOs
"BitBay, con sede en Estonia, reveló que Monero ya no sería comercializable a partir del 19 de febrero de 2020.
Por otro lado, el exchange cesará los depósitos de XMR a partir de este viernes. Bloquearán los retiros temporalmente desde el viernes hasta el 5 de diciembre en el momento de una bifurcación dura planificada de Monero."
https://www.criptomonedaseico.com/noticias/a-partir-de-esta-fecha-ya-no-podras-comerciar-monero-xmr-en-bitbay/
Criptomonedas e ICOs
A partir de esta fecha ya no podrás comerciar Monero (XMR) en BitBay | Criptomonedas e ICOs
Monero ha estado ganando popularidad este año a pesar de las fluctuaciones de los precios de las criptomonedas. El interés de los entusiastas de las criptomonedas en la moneda orientada a la privacidad ha aumentado este año, a pesar de la alta volatilidad…
Forwarded from 420 Mike Hearn (@RamonQuesada)
Soft block size limit reached, action required by YOU
Quote from: satoshi
"Hi Mike,
I'm glad to answer any questions you have. If I get time, I ought to write a FAQ to supplement the paper.
There is only one global chain.
The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide. Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost. It never really hits a scale ceiling. If you're interested, I can go over the ways it would cope with extreme size.
By Moore's Law, we can expect hardware speed to be 10 times faster in 5 years and 100 times faster in 10. Even if Bitcoin grows at crazy adoption rates, I think computer speeds will stay ahead of the number of transactions.
I don't anticipate that fees will be needed anytime soon, but if it becomes too burdensome to run a node, it is possible to run a node that only processes transactions that include a transaction fee. The owner of the node would decide the minimum fee they'll accept. Right now, such a node would get nothing, because nobody includes a fee, but if enough nodes did that, then users would get faster acceptance if they include a fee, or slower if they don't. The fee the market would settle on should be minimal. If a node requires a higher fee, that node would be passing up all transactions with lower fees. It could do more volume and probably make more money by processing as many paying transactions as it can. The transition is not controlled by some human in charge of the system though, just individuals reacting on their own to market forces.
Eventually, most nodes may be run by specialists with multiple GPU cards. For now, it's nice that anyone with a PC can play without worrying about what video card they have, and hopefully it'll stay that way for a while. More computers are shipping with fairly decent GPUs these days, so maybe later we'll transition to that.
Satoshi said back in 2010 that he intended larger block sizes to be phased in with some simple if (height > flag_day) type logic, theymos has linked to the thread before.
I think he would be really amazed at how much debate this thing has become. He never attributed much weight to it, it just didn't seem important to him. And yes, obviously, given the massive forum dramas that have resulted it'd have been nice if he had made the size limit floating from the start like he did with difficulty. However, he didn't and now we have to manage the transition."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=149668.80
Quote from: satoshi
"Hi Mike,
I'm glad to answer any questions you have. If I get time, I ought to write a FAQ to supplement the paper.
There is only one global chain.
The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide. Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost. It never really hits a scale ceiling. If you're interested, I can go over the ways it would cope with extreme size.
By Moore's Law, we can expect hardware speed to be 10 times faster in 5 years and 100 times faster in 10. Even if Bitcoin grows at crazy adoption rates, I think computer speeds will stay ahead of the number of transactions.
I don't anticipate that fees will be needed anytime soon, but if it becomes too burdensome to run a node, it is possible to run a node that only processes transactions that include a transaction fee. The owner of the node would decide the minimum fee they'll accept. Right now, such a node would get nothing, because nobody includes a fee, but if enough nodes did that, then users would get faster acceptance if they include a fee, or slower if they don't. The fee the market would settle on should be minimal. If a node requires a higher fee, that node would be passing up all transactions with lower fees. It could do more volume and probably make more money by processing as many paying transactions as it can. The transition is not controlled by some human in charge of the system though, just individuals reacting on their own to market forces.
Eventually, most nodes may be run by specialists with multiple GPU cards. For now, it's nice that anyone with a PC can play without worrying about what video card they have, and hopefully it'll stay that way for a while. More computers are shipping with fairly decent GPUs these days, so maybe later we'll transition to that.
Satoshi said back in 2010 that he intended larger block sizes to be phased in with some simple if (height > flag_day) type logic, theymos has linked to the thread before.
I think he would be really amazed at how much debate this thing has become. He never attributed much weight to it, it just didn't seem important to him. And yes, obviously, given the massive forum dramas that have resulted it'd have been nice if he had made the size limit floating from the start like he did with difficulty. However, he didn't and now we have to manage the transition."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=149668.80
Forwarded from 420 Laszlo Hanyecz - Pizzas (@RamonQuesada)
June 17, 2010, 06:50:31 PM
"How long have you been working on this design Satoshi? It seems very well thought out, not the kind of thing you just sit down and code up without doing a lot of brainstorming and discussion on it first. Everyone has the obvious questions looking for holes in it but it is holding up well "
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611
"How long have you been working on this design Satoshi? It seems very well thought out, not the kind of thing you just sit down and code up without doing a lot of brainstorming and discussion on it first. Everyone has the obvious questions looking for holes in it but it is holding up well "
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611
Forwarded from Ramon Quesada (Es) (@RamonQuesada)
La palabra HONESTO aparece 15 veces en el White Paper de Bitcoin, mientras DESCENTRALIZADO no aparece ni una sola, personalmente me gusta el concepto de descentralización por la robustez que ofrece en la seguridad y la potencia en la gobernanza, pero si todo eso no está regido con honestidad, no creo que valga de mucho.
Me pregunto, si como comunidad estamos poniendo las cosas en su sitio
Me pregunto, si como comunidad estamos poniendo las cosas en su sitio
Forwarded from 2008 361 Satoshi Nakamoto SN (@RamonQuesada)
Craig Wright: Don’t get fooled by the fraud cycle.
- CoinGeek
2019 11 28
Charles Miller
"For every new technology, there are chancers and criminals who see opportunities – especially when public interest is combined with public ignorance. And Bitcoin was no different".
https://coingeek.com/craig-wright-dont-get-fooled-by-the-fraud-cycle/
- CoinGeek
2019 11 28
Charles Miller
"For every new technology, there are chancers and criminals who see opportunities – especially when public interest is combined with public ignorance. And Bitcoin was no different".
https://coingeek.com/craig-wright-dont-get-fooled-by-the-fraud-cycle/
CoinGeek
Craig Wright: Don’t get fooled by the fraud cycle - CoinGeek
There are chancers and criminals who see opportunities - especially when public interest is combined with public ignorance.
Forwarded from 2009 361 Halving & Subsidy BitCoin (@RamonQuesada)
¿Qué significará el próximo halving de Bitcoin?
- tuCriptomoneda
28 noviembre, 2019
Por IGOR DOMSAC
"La guerra de las recompensas
BTC cuenta en la actualidad con el 96,2% de la potencia de cálculo, mientras que BCH tiene el 2,8% y BSV el 1,1% restante. En términos de capitalización bursátil, BTC también ocupa una posición dominante, con un 66,6%, y continúa siendo a su vez la criptomoneda líder en el número de nodos que sustentan la red. Sin embargo, tanto en la cifra de transacciones como en el tamaño de los bloques, Bitcoin SV ya ha tomado la delantera a las otras dos cadenas. En efecto, Bitcoin (BTC) ha sido la criptodivisa dominante hasta la fecha. Sin embargo, el cambio de tendencia puede encontrarse muy cerca".
https://www.tucriptomoneda.com/halving-de-bitcoin/
- tuCriptomoneda
28 noviembre, 2019
Por IGOR DOMSAC
"La guerra de las recompensas
BTC cuenta en la actualidad con el 96,2% de la potencia de cálculo, mientras que BCH tiene el 2,8% y BSV el 1,1% restante. En términos de capitalización bursátil, BTC también ocupa una posición dominante, con un 66,6%, y continúa siendo a su vez la criptomoneda líder en el número de nodos que sustentan la red. Sin embargo, tanto en la cifra de transacciones como en el tamaño de los bloques, Bitcoin SV ya ha tomado la delantera a las otras dos cadenas. En efecto, Bitcoin (BTC) ha sido la criptodivisa dominante hasta la fecha. Sin embargo, el cambio de tendencia puede encontrarse muy cerca".
https://www.tucriptomoneda.com/halving-de-bitcoin/
tuCriptomoneda
¿Qué significará el próximo halving de Bitcoin? - tuCriptomoneda
El halving de Bitcoin se encuentra cada día más cerca. ¿Qué supondrá este evento para las diferentes cadenas? ¿Sobrevivirán tras reducirse la recompensa?
Forwarded from 400 Hal Finney - prebitcoin (@RamonQuesada)
Re: [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1 released
From: <hal@fi...> - 2009-01-11 03:16:43
Satoshi Nakamoto writes:
> Announcing the first release of Bitcoin, a new electronic cash
> system that uses a peer-to-peer network to prevent double-spending.
> It's completely decentralized with no server or central authority.
>
> See bitcoin.org for screenshots.
>
> Download link:
> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/bitcoin/bitcoin-0.1.0.rar
Congratulations to Satoshi on this first alpha release. I am looking
forward to trying it out.
> Total circulation will be 21,000,000 coins. It'll be distributed
> to network nodes when they make blocks, with the amount cut in half
> every 4 years.
>
> first 4 years: 10,500,000 coins
> next 4 years: 5,250,000 coins
> next 4 years: 2,625,000 coins
> next 4 years: 1,312,500 coins
> etc...
It's interesting that the system can be configured to only allow a
certain maximum number of coins ever to be generated. I guess the
idea is that the amount of work needed to generate a new coin will
become more difficult as time goes on.
One immediate problem with any new currency is how to value it. Even
ignoring the practical problem that virtually no one will accept it
at first, there is still a difficulty in coming up with a reasonable
argument in favor of a particular non-zero value for the coins.
As an amusing thought experiment, imagine that Bitcoin is successful and
becomes the dominant payment system in use throughout the world. Then the
total value of the currency should be equal to the total value of all
the wealth in the world. Current estimates of total worldwide household
wealth that I have found range from $100 trillion to $300 trillion. With
20 million coins, that gives each coin a value of about $10 million.
So the possibility of generating coins today with a few cents of compute
time may be quite a good bet, with a payoff of something like 100 million
to 1! Even if the odds of Bitcoin succeeding to this degree are slim,
are they really 100 million to one against? Something to think about...
Hal
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/?viewmonth=200901
From: <hal@fi...> - 2009-01-11 03:16:43
Satoshi Nakamoto writes:
> Announcing the first release of Bitcoin, a new electronic cash
> system that uses a peer-to-peer network to prevent double-spending.
> It's completely decentralized with no server or central authority.
>
> See bitcoin.org for screenshots.
>
> Download link:
> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/bitcoin/bitcoin-0.1.0.rar
Congratulations to Satoshi on this first alpha release. I am looking
forward to trying it out.
> Total circulation will be 21,000,000 coins. It'll be distributed
> to network nodes when they make blocks, with the amount cut in half
> every 4 years.
>
> first 4 years: 10,500,000 coins
> next 4 years: 5,250,000 coins
> next 4 years: 2,625,000 coins
> next 4 years: 1,312,500 coins
> etc...
It's interesting that the system can be configured to only allow a
certain maximum number of coins ever to be generated. I guess the
idea is that the amount of work needed to generate a new coin will
become more difficult as time goes on.
One immediate problem with any new currency is how to value it. Even
ignoring the practical problem that virtually no one will accept it
at first, there is still a difficulty in coming up with a reasonable
argument in favor of a particular non-zero value for the coins.
As an amusing thought experiment, imagine that Bitcoin is successful and
becomes the dominant payment system in use throughout the world. Then the
total value of the currency should be equal to the total value of all
the wealth in the world. Current estimates of total worldwide household
wealth that I have found range from $100 trillion to $300 trillion. With
20 million coins, that gives each coin a value of about $10 million.
So the possibility of generating coins today with a few cents of compute
time may be quite a good bet, with a payoff of something like 100 million
to 1! Even if the odds of Bitcoin succeeding to this degree are slim,
are they really 100 million to one against? Something to think about...
Hal
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/?viewmonth=200901
El Criptodiario Noticioso: libertad implica responsabilidad.
- tuCriptomoneda
30 noviembre, 2019
Por MERCURIUS GALLOBELGICUS
"La libertad nos hace responsables
El doctor Craig Wright, creador de Bitcoin, pronunció una interesante charla sobre fraude y criptomonedas en la conferencia SIGMA19, que se celebró esta semana en Malta. Wright afirmó que la diferencia entre el verdadero Bitcoin y los tokens anteriores es que Bitcoin suponía un libro de contabilidad abierto. «La única innovación de Bitcoin fue hacerlo público», aseguró."
"...Friedrich A. Hayek, «la libertad no solo significa que el individuo tiene la oportunidad y la carga de la elección, sino también que debe soportar las consecuencias de sus acciones y recibir alabanzas o censuras por ellas. La libertad y la responsabilidad son inseparables»."
https://www.tucriptomoneda.com/criptodiario-noticioso-libertad-responsabilidad/
- tuCriptomoneda
30 noviembre, 2019
Por MERCURIUS GALLOBELGICUS
"La libertad nos hace responsables
El doctor Craig Wright, creador de Bitcoin, pronunció una interesante charla sobre fraude y criptomonedas en la conferencia SIGMA19, que se celebró esta semana en Malta. Wright afirmó que la diferencia entre el verdadero Bitcoin y los tokens anteriores es que Bitcoin suponía un libro de contabilidad abierto. «La única innovación de Bitcoin fue hacerlo público», aseguró."
"...Friedrich A. Hayek, «la libertad no solo significa que el individuo tiene la oportunidad y la carga de la elección, sino también que debe soportar las consecuencias de sus acciones y recibir alabanzas o censuras por ellas. La libertad y la responsabilidad son inseparables»."
https://www.tucriptomoneda.com/criptodiario-noticioso-libertad-responsabilidad/