BSV Lost Coins
"sunken treasure"
https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEmB34wzToZnkTvyaw

"Don’t underestimate stupidity

Things like “Law”, “Enterprise”, etc. Are not sexy."

Es bastante probable que a raíz de lo que va suceder en el juzgado de la Florida, en el caso Kleiman vs Wright, la narrativa cambie completamente de:

Craig no es Satoshi o Craig es un fraude,

a:
Satoshi estaba equivocado, el White Paper no es la biblia, Satoshi y el WP forman parte del pasado y por tanto ya no tienen ninguna importancia, porqué os tomáis el WP y Satoshi como si fuera una religión?

Cualquier cosa será válida salvo mirar al pasado y comprobar que lo que dice Craig hoy, tiene los mismos valores que en el pasado 2008, 2009, y 2010
Una frase que se repite en criptoland es "Don't trust verify", o lo que es lo mismo: no confíes verifica", pero me da la impresión que ni los que dicen esto han verificado si, lo que dice Craig hoy, tiene los mismos valores que en el pasado 2008, 2009, y 2010.

Eso es algo que he estado haciendo últimamente y para ello me he tenido que leer muchos de los documentos originales de la época:

Satoshi Nakamoto Emails
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails?s=09

CONTENTS

Wei Dai
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/wei-dai/?s=09

Cryptography Mailing List
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/cryptography/?s=09

[bitcoin-list]
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/bitcoin-list/?s=09

Gavin Andresen
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/gavin-andresen/?s=09

Mike Hearn
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/mike-hearn/?s=09

Laszlo Hanec
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/laszlo-hanec/?s=09

[p2p-research]
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/p2p-research/?s=09

Jon Matonis
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/jon-matonis/?s=09

Hal Finney
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/hal-finney/?s=09

Dustin Trammel
https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/emails/dustin-trammel/?s=09

“Alert Key” and Reversible payments: possible with third party involvement

There was a so-called “alert key” in the original Bitcoin protocol, but the Core developers removed it bit by bit. According to Dr. Wright and Charles, people didn’t understand the vision and potential of Bitcoin and subsequently deleted what they did not understand. These developers were also motivated in the wrong direction—they were anarchists, Dr. Wright said"


https://coingeek.com/theory-of-bitcoin-the-bitcoin-whitepaper-first-paragraph-key-takeaways/

"According to the SEC's complaint, from at least July 2016 to February 2021, LBRY, which offers a video sharing application, sold digital asset securities called "LBRY Credits" to numerous investors, including investors based in the US. The complaint alleges that LBRY did not file a registration statement for the offering, and that the offering failed to satisfy any exemption from registration. The complaint further alleges that by failing to file a registration statement, LBRY denied prospective investors the information required for such an offering to the public. As alleged, LBRY received more than $11 million in U.S. dollars, Bitcoin, and services from purchasers who participated in its offering."

LBRY, Inc. (Release No. LR-25060; Mar. 29, 2021)
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2021/lr25060.htm

"Según la denuncia de la SEC, desde al menos julio de 2016 hasta febrero de 2021, LBRY, que ofrece una aplicación para compartir vídeos, vendió valores de activos digitales denominados" Créditos LBRY "a numerosos inversores, incluidos inversores con sede en EE. UU. La denuncia alega que LBRY no presentó una declaración de registro para la oferta, y que la oferta no cumplió con ninguna exención de registro. La demanda alega además que al no presentar una declaración de registro, LBRY negó a los posibles inversores la información requerida para dicha oferta al público. Como se alega, LBRY recibió más de $ 11 millones en dólares estadounidenses, Bitcoin y servicios de compradores que participaron en su oferta ".

LBRY, Inc. (No. de versión LR-25060; 29 de marzo de 2021)
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2021/lr25060.htm

https://www.coindesk.com/sec-lbry-unregistered-securities?

Satoshi didn't have a 1MB limit in it. The limit was originally Hal Finney's idea.  Both Satoshi and I objected that it wouldn't scale at 1MB.  Hal was concerned about a potential DoS attack though, and after discussion, Satoshi agreed.  The 1MB limit was there by the time Bitcoin launched.  But all 3 of us agreed that 1MB had to be temporary because it would never scale."

Re: Permanently keeping the 1MB (anti-spam) restriction is a great idea ...
February 07, 2015
Cryddit / @RayDillinger

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946236.msg10388435#msg10388435

¿Cuáles son los cargos específicos?

En pocas palabras, la SEC considera que los créditos LBRY son valores y deberían haberse registrado en la SEC antes de su venta. Este caso trata de un exceso de regulación. La SEC no alega fraude y no acusa a ninguna persona.

Sin embargo, la SEC cree que, como mínimo, las siguientes transacciones eran ofertas de valores no registradas
ofertas de valores no registradas:

10.000 dólares en ventas de créditos a Shapeshift en julio de 2016 para facilitar la distribución a sus usuarios.

Varios cientos de miles de dólares en ventas de Créditos a Flipside Crypto en 2017 y 2018, a pesar de que Flipside dice explícitamente que son para usar en la red.

Varios millones de dólares de ventas de créditos en las bolsas, durante un periodo de varios años, sólo después de que el protocolo LBRY fuera completamente funcional y llevara más de un año en uso, y siempre una pequeña parte de las ventas privadas.

En ocasiones, la SEC ha manifestado que incluso la entrega de créditos por valor de 0,25 dólares para un GIF inteligente es una transacción de valores no registrada que debe ser registrada y rastreada. Sin embargo, no está claro en este momento si la SEC seguirá haciendo esta alegación en los tribunales.

En el Apéndice A figura un cuadro completo de las ventas. Todo el uso de nuestros créditos ha sido diligentemente rastreado en lbry.com/credit-reports.

https://odysee.com/@Lbrylatam:2/faqES:e

BitCoin's unilateral contract
https://t.me/joinchat/VeI-ddmiIaBhMzVk

U°Today
🔥 BREAKING: PayPal Customers Now Allowed to Use Crypto to Pay Merchants Globally https://u.today/breaking-paypal-customers-now-allowed-to-use-crypto-to-pay-merchants-globally?amp
@

"Researchers in Australia have achieved a world record internet speed of 44.2 terabits per second, allowing users to download 1,000 HD movies in a single second".

WORLD’S FASTEST INTERNET SPEED SEES DOWNLOAD SPEEDS 1 MILLION TIMES FASTER THAN CURRENT BROADBAND

Anthony Cuthbertson
Friday 22 May 2020
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/internet-speed-world-record-fastest-download-a9527236.html

If anyone can falsify my claims, I go to prison. I have sworn in testimony that I am Satoshi Nakamoto, and I created bitcoin. To journalists, there is no way to prove. Anything can be taken and twisted in social media. You can't do that in court if you twist the narrative and you lie you face the consequences.

Others who claim to be Satoshi so that they can gain fame have to prove their point. Each point of evidence needs to be falsifiable. If it can be falsified, they face prison time. There is nothing from any of these people that I cannot falsify. I can demonstrate categorically in court with evidence that all of these people have created a false narrative to either defraud people or engage in other scams.

Those like Gizmodo and Wired were not interested in the real story. It's the same as that author who wanted to paint me in the same light Julian Assage. But of course, is the false narrative we get to take part. The way that that story was written was to sell a populist idea of what bitcoin and Satoshi mean, and it is not what I intended. It is not why I invented bitcoin, and it is not the story that needs to be told.

What I expect to happen is that people like Roger and Vitelik will oppose me because they know their scams require that I do not get a voice. They will seek to censor me and will be seen to do such. Then, everything that there claiming will be shown to be false and malicious. Next, we would expect many of the other scammers who have to double down to attack, and they can claim that they worked with me and that they were part of this and this is why we need to keep some things close. If everything is out there, I cannot discredit others who seek to say that they were part of the Satoshi group.

That idiot in BCH, David and others he worked with planned Jihan and wanted me to be a part of a larger group early on which gives them power. People like Bear, Hal and Dave, helped me, but they did not create bitcoin. They didn't even really know what bitcoin was. Even Dave wrote not a single line of code. He gave me a few grammatical suggestions on the Whitepaper and his real role was keeping me psychologically sane as I dealt with these people. He was a sounding board and a friend.

What we are going to find is the narrative changes to say that these were part of my group. We already see this. If they know the full story, these people can twist and become seemingly part of it and lie, it becomes hard for us to weed them out.
But going forward, I have things they don't know. And they won't be able to give them before we get them in court and tear them apart. Once we have a few people torn apart, preferably people who are under oath and then demonstrated to have perjured themselves we can ensure that others know that if they do this if they seek to add themselves to my story, I always have something that will ruin them.

This is why we need court because otherwise other people are going to twist the story and continue their scams.

CSW
May 25, 2019

https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1558795610306000?thread_ts=1558795604.305900&cid=C5131HKFX

Craig Wright on Lightning
https://t.me/joinchat/4wvKqNu3D5s1MTg0

BitCoin Issuier
https://t.me/joinchat/jC3vw2NSEdY3ODRk