Craig S Wright
jan 25, 2024
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1706204159650779

A cuantas personas le escuchas hablar de lo que pasó en 2005 con respecto al cambio de normativa contable a la contabilidad de entrada triple y cuántos saben que esto está incluido en Bitcoin en cada una de las transacciones?

https://g.co/bard/share/c14a83970e31

En 2005, el Consejo de Normas Internacionales de Contabilidad (IASB) publicó la Norma Internacional de Contabilidad (NIC) 1, Presentación de Estados Financieros. Esta norma estableció nuevos requisitos para la presentación de los estados financieros, incluido el uso de la contabilidad de entrada triple.

Antes de la NIC 1, los estados financieros se podían preparar utilizando un sistema de contabilidad de partida doble o un sistema de contabilidad de partida simple. La contabilidad de partida doble es un sistema en el que cada transacción se registra en dos cuentas diferentes, una cuenta de débito y una cuenta de crédito. La contabilidad de partida simple es un sistema en el que cada transacción se registra en una sola cuenta.

La NIC 1 requirió que todas las empresas que preparen estados financieros bajo las Normas Internacionales de Contabilidad utilicen la contabilidad de entrada triple. Esto se debe a que la contabilidad de entrada triple proporciona una visión más completa de la situación financiera de una empresa que la contabilidad de partida doble o la contabilidad de partida simple.

El evento de relevancia que ocurrió en 2005 con respecto a la contabilidad de entrada triple es la publicación de la NIC 1. Esta norma estableció nuevos requisitos para la presentación de los estados financieros, incluido el uso de la contabilidad de entrada triple. Este evento fue importante porque marcó el momento en que la contabilidad de entrada triple se convirtió en el sistema de contabilidad estándar para las empresas que preparan estados financieros bajo las Normas Internacionales de Contabilidad.

En concreto, la NIC 1 estableció los siguientes requisitos para la contabilidad de entrada triple:

* Cada transacción se debe registrar en tres cuentas diferentes: una cuenta de débito, una cuenta de crédito y una cuenta de capital.
* La cuenta de débito representa el valor de la transacción que se recibe.
* La cuenta de crédito representa el valor de la transacción que se entrega.
* La cuenta de capital representa el cambio en el capital neto de la empresa como resultado de la transacción.

Estos requisitos se aplican a todas las transacciones, incluidas las transacciones comerciales, las transacciones financieras y las transacciones de inversión.

https://g.co/bard/share/c14a83970e31

Atento a cuando lo dice!!!

https://youtube.com/shorts/GWkCqVLqwAQ?si=YhB0gAbPVsKRau8p

La narrativa de vender un ático "de lujo", en un edificio "apestoso".
por Ramon Quesada (25 enero 2024)
https://es.ramonquesada.com/ramon-quesada/la-narrativa-de-vender-un-atico-de-lujo-en-un-edificio-apestoso/

No es que haya demasiada información publica sobre DARA Alert Key, ni explicaciones de que forma especifica se va a aplicar, en cada contexto, pero mas allá del debate, lo principal es leer lo poco que hay, para que si se produce el debate, sea realmente un debate ilustrativo para todos y con contenido

Bitcoin Association for BSV to boost property rights with innovative node update.
Written by Ryan Brothwell
Published On 11 Nov 2022
https://www.bsvblockchain.org/news/bitcoin-association-for-bsv-to-boost-property-rights-with-innovative-node-update

DARA (Digital Asset Recovery Alert)
Digital Asset Recovery on Bitcoin"
Oct 5, 2022
https://youtu.be/xLRp7zxeTfM

Alert Key
DARA (Digital Asset Recovery Alert)
https://t.me/+UgL3voKTKQ8BpNH2

La wiki de BSV
https://wiki.bitcoinsv.io/index.php/Main_Page#Alert_Key

Ledgers and Design
By Craig Wright
18 Mar 2020
https://craigwright.net/blog/alternative-coins-systems/ledgers-and-design/

If Gold Turned to Lead
By Craig Wright
21 Oct 2019
https://craigwright.net/blog/law-regulation/if-gold-turned-to-lead/

Receiving stolen property and BitCoin. By CSW – Telegraph
https://telegra.ph/Receiving-stolen-property-and-BitCoin-By-CSW-05-16

How Bitcoin Won the Race…
By Craig Wright 
31 Mar 2021 
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/how-bitcoin-won-the-race/

Alert Key: Still a pressing legal issue
24 FEBRUARY 2021
Jon Southurst
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-alert-key-still-pressing-legal-issue/

Aquí BTC core publicó que habían quitado el alert Key
https://bitcoin.org/en/posts/alert-key-and-vulnerabilities-disclosure

Bitcoin versions 0.3.10 introduced an alert system which allowed messages about critical network problems to be broadcast to all clients.

The alert system was hastily implemented by Satoshi Nakamoto after the value overflow incident on August 15, 2010.

Only alerts that are signed by a specific ECDSA public key are considered valid. Some known private key holders were Satoshi Nakamoto, Gavin Andresen and theymos

,
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Alert_system

Todo comenzó cuando no intentaba hacer nada y no respondía preguntas sobre si era Satoshi o no públicamente.

Más bien, fui obligado y obligado por orden judicial a responder la pregunta.

Podría haber dicho simplemente que no. Si lo hubiera hecho habría mentido pero el caso judicial en Estados Unidos habría terminado. Si hubiera cometido perjurio al decir que no soy Satoshi, no habría gastado decenas de millones de dólares en honorarios legales y habría terminado con una sentencia a pagar de 140 millones de dólares.

Ese es el costo de la verdad.

Luego, como no quise mentir ante el tribunal, ocurrió lo demás.

CSW
Jan 27, 2024
https://twitter.com/Dr_CSWright/status/1751284984680264129?t=M2kOwWxTOSvSHJ1Ksx51FA&s=19
-----------------------------------------
This started when I wasn't trying to do anything and I wasn't answering questions as to whether I was Satoshi or not publicly.

Rather, I was forced and compelled under court order to answer the question.

I could have simply said no. If I did so I would have lied but the court case in the US would have ended. If I'd perjured myself by saying I'm not Satoshi I would not have spent tens of millions of dollars in legal fees and ended up with a judgment to be paid of $140 million.

That is the cost of truth.

Then, because I wouldn't lie in court the rest occurred.

[Craig Wright] BTC people's misunderstanding of scaling (2019)

Ayre Group Acquires Controlling Stake in nChain in a Deal Worth $570 Million

The acquisition involves the purchase of nChain stock by Ayre Group, an IP licensing deal for Ayre Ventures and a line of credit.

Nicholas Kitonyi
August 1, 2023
https://www.nftgators.com/ayre-group-acquires-controlling-stake-in-nchain-in-a-deal-worth-570-million/

Minuto 5:25
"Bitcoin is not an asset, they are digital ownership right"

Craig Wright discusses what Bitcoin IS at Sydney's Informa Conference 2014
Australian federal and national police.
24 oct 2016
Dale Dickins
8 min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PtAqNpEm7w&t=82s

I spent 20 years designing Bitcoin. I started in 1998, and went through more iterations than I can ever hope to imagine and remember before finally coming up with something that worked. Welcome to freedom; it comes through a system that consumes utopians and spits them out. The system within Bitcoin is stronger than you believe, and it was designed to not work in many other ways. It takes naïve idealism, and crushes it if it does not evolve into something of considered thought.

05/04/2019
Satoshi Nakamoto
Craig Wright
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/satoshi-nakamoto-a7c4cf21253e

Problems Blockchain Can Solve:
Supply Chain
Accounting
Social Media
Insurance
Healthcare
Public Service
Security

7 PROBLEMS BLOCKCHAIN CAN SOLVE
https://coingeek.com/blockchain101/from-digital-to-real-life-7-problems-blockchain-can-solve/

Estamos intentando poner un poco de orden dentro de tanto caos,

Own your data

Te lo explicamos mejor en el grupo.

Tu comunidad sobre BitCoinˢᵛ
Telegram:
🗣https://t.me/BitcoinSV_Es

Hoy le he estado haciéndole varias preguntas a Bard, con respecto a los gemelos digitales y al pasaporte digital de productos, este es el resumen:

El gemelo digital
https://es.ramonquesada.com/espanol-es/el-gemelo-digital/

hasta al legendario Ian Grigg le gusta el canal, je je je a pocos dias del juicio, y sigue dando apoyo!!!!! Who is Ian Grigg? https://ramonquesada.com/english/who-is-ian-grigg/

Yes it's amazing how things that I blogged about in 2016, 17 and 18 and that I filed a patent for in early 2016 are being developed by these guys as if they actually had an original idea

22. according to claim 16 to 21 any one of them method, including：
The electronic device indicates the information of the certainty key (DK) from key device request；
The key device is based on the message (M) and generates signature information (SM)；
The signature information (SM) is sent to the electronic device；
The signature information (SM) is confirmed on said electronic device；And
Retrieve the message (M), enabling determined for by the secret of the data deciphering at the electronic device.

Basically, claim 22 details the creation of a payment request sent between the card and the device where a change addresses generated. Please show me how this differs from anything in bitcoin or what they're doing

It on my blog from earlier, and I've talked about this in conferences. In fact, one of the early BCH conferences included where I talked about this and encourage developers to build such a solution - what they are of course forgetting is that it only applies to BSV without licensing

The thing people need to understand is that I have patent filed anything I have a talk about. We also use the nondisclosure period and push publication out at least 18 months and sometimes two years. This is why they see the 2017 date. The priority date 2016 is what actually matters.

It's funny how when they do something, such as using a smartcard and a pos device, that is innovative and yet when I did it, it's clearly obvious.

Of course it's obvious now, I've spent two years talking about the idea, blogged about it, done conferences were talked about it and of patented it. Once it becomes commonplace, it becomes obvious

So, yes when I did it it was called innovation and when he did it it's called copying

"Funny how he just assumes how my idea works but actually has no idea. He didn‘t patent anything."

Unfortunately, it doesn't matter whether he likes what I've said. He should learn how to read and do patent searches not only on this one but the others and is can have lots of fun in the future. I don't mind, I'm happy for him to develop code. If it's any good, you can pay licensing fees

Well, if you look at his paper, he is using parts of the SPV patent as well...

"A UTXO indexer service, which enables a lookup of Payee’s current UTXO given their public key."

That is also from a GRANTED patent

"Payer generates a random 256-bit secret and stores it on the offline wallet device, along with a nonce which is set to MIN_INT."

That is the Message M

"2. The offline wallet signs the following hash using its secret and sends the signature to Payee, along with the wallet’s public key and nonce:
sha256(hash160(payeePk)paymentAmountnewNonce)"

That is the patent - the deterministic key

His version is also insecure and misses several aspects to make it not vulnerable to MiTM attacks....

2.3.1 Contract state machine

And that is in my DFA patent

And, he needs to read:
https://theintercept.com/document/2015/03/10/tpm-vulnerabilities-power-analysis-exposed-exploit-bitlocker/

His implementation is flawed

And, I am not Holy....

A smart card only needs to sign a value, a hash. The phone, even a low power one, can create the TX. The issue in the implementation is that you can MiTM the hash and many other attacks. It is not well though out.


CSW
Nov 22, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1573548331486400?thread_ts=1573547754.484800&cid=C5131HKFX