Si no sabes lo que es Agora y lo que va a suponer para el futuro próximo, deberÃas echarle un vistazo a éste "catalogo futurista", jejeje
"AGORA
- Alpha Release"
en YouTube
https://youtu.be/3xHA7LGsjiIz
"AGORA
- Alpha Release"
en YouTube
https://youtu.be/3xHA7LGsjiIz
YouTube
AGORA - Alpha Release
Your Homepage on the Metanet https://www.agora.icu
Si Satoshi era Cypherpunk como algunos piensan (yo no), ¿porqué NO dejo un cypherpunk a cargo del desarrollo de Bitcoin?, teniendo muchisimos a su eleccion, sin embargo eleigio a Gavin, ¿porqué Satoshi se querÃa desmarcar de Wikileaks? mi teoria es que simplemente no era cypherpunk, pero si utilizó sus herramientas, porque le parecieron muy valiosas y juntandolas con otras "no cypherpunk", crear su invento sin paragón.
Gavin Andresen
https://t.me/GavinAndresen1
Gavin Andresen
https://t.me/GavinAndresen1
Telegram
420 Gavin Andresen
Gavin Andresen
https://t.me/GavinAndresen1
@GavinAndresen1
gavinandresen@gmail.com (2011)
https://ramonquesada.com/glossary/gavin-andresen-chief-scientist-at-the-bitcoin-foundation/
Created May 2019
https://t.me/GavinAndresen1
@GavinAndresen1
gavinandresen@gmail.com (2011)
https://ramonquesada.com/glossary/gavin-andresen-chief-scientist-at-the-bitcoin-foundation/
Created May 2019
Forwarded from 200 MetaNet (@RamonQuesada)
About Metaflix
Metaflix is a MVP, minimum viable product to distribute paid videos from Blockchain Metanet, an immutable commodity ledger. We use Metanet as a CDN, content delivery network. All the video content data are delivered to nodes all over the world and permanently stored on Bitcoin SV network. We are aiming to create thousands of Metanet Websites which will transform Internet more secure, transparent and trustable.
https://www.metaflix.icu/MWH
Metaflix is a MVP, minimum viable product to distribute paid videos from Blockchain Metanet, an immutable commodity ledger. We use Metanet as a CDN, content delivery network. All the video content data are delivered to nodes all over the world and permanently stored on Bitcoin SV network. We are aiming to create thousands of Metanet Websites which will transform Internet more secure, transparent and trustable.
https://www.metaflix.icu/MWH
Empecemos por el principio!!!
P2P
"Stands for "Peer to Peer." In a P2P network, the "peers" are computer systems which are connected to each other via the Internet. Files can be shared directly between systems on the network without the need of a central server. In other words, each computer on a P2P network becomes a file serveras well as a client.
The only requirements for a computer to join a peer-to-peer network are an Internet connection and P2P software. Common P2P software programs include Kazaa, Limewire, BearShare, Morpheus, and Acquisition. These programs connect to a P2P network, such as "Gnutella," which allows the computer to access thousands of other systems on the network."
https://techterms.com/definition/p2p
P2P
"Stands for "Peer to Peer." In a P2P network, the "peers" are computer systems which are connected to each other via the Internet. Files can be shared directly between systems on the network without the need of a central server. In other words, each computer on a P2P network becomes a file serveras well as a client.
The only requirements for a computer to join a peer-to-peer network are an Internet connection and P2P software. Common P2P software programs include Kazaa, Limewire, BearShare, Morpheus, and Acquisition. These programs connect to a P2P network, such as "Gnutella," which allows the computer to access thousands of other systems on the network."
https://techterms.com/definition/p2p
TechTerms.com
P2P Definition - What is a peer-to-peer network?
A simple definition of P2P that is easy to understand.
"Public Service Announcement: There has been an attack on the Bitcoin network. This attack is extremely effective and has been in execution phase since 2011.
Known as the ‘Small Block Attack’ the strategy uses a centralised team to enforce decisions which stifle the ability of the network to function as an economic system. This is a sophisticated and detailed strategy that requires high level understanding of the network.
The attack uses social engineering to propagate the belief that scaling is not possible using technology and that ‘decentralisation’ is the most important aspect of Bitcoin. It was created by people who need Bitcoin to fail.
One of the major strategies is to employ personal attacks against proponents of the truth and to disseminate fake information as ‘proof’ of fraud. There is an effort ongoing to stop this through the courts.
This attack has so far been enormously successful. Bitcoin has twice been forced to separate from attackers who need to prevent global adoption and has had its development stifled for several years.
By limiting access to the network, the attack has also encouraged or forced the creation of thousands of projects that seek to bastardise the original innovation of bitcoin into meaningless repeats of the original network formation. These are collectively known as ‘Crypto’.
Thankfully the stewards of the Bitcoin protocol have kept the ideals and original protocol alive on the BitcoinSV network. Don’t be fooled by the ‘value’ being traded on exchanges or the storage of value narrative. BTC is on its last legs. More information to come.
Learn more about the potential fate of BTC here:
Chain Death: One potential future for BTC.
Brendan Lee
https://streamanity.com/video/BhFHtpjhxq13XJ
Known as the ‘Small Block Attack’ the strategy uses a centralised team to enforce decisions which stifle the ability of the network to function as an economic system. This is a sophisticated and detailed strategy that requires high level understanding of the network.
The attack uses social engineering to propagate the belief that scaling is not possible using technology and that ‘decentralisation’ is the most important aspect of Bitcoin. It was created by people who need Bitcoin to fail.
One of the major strategies is to employ personal attacks against proponents of the truth and to disseminate fake information as ‘proof’ of fraud. There is an effort ongoing to stop this through the courts.
This attack has so far been enormously successful. Bitcoin has twice been forced to separate from attackers who need to prevent global adoption and has had its development stifled for several years.
By limiting access to the network, the attack has also encouraged or forced the creation of thousands of projects that seek to bastardise the original innovation of bitcoin into meaningless repeats of the original network formation. These are collectively known as ‘Crypto’.
Thankfully the stewards of the Bitcoin protocol have kept the ideals and original protocol alive on the BitcoinSV network. Don’t be fooled by the ‘value’ being traded on exchanges or the storage of value narrative. BTC is on its last legs. More information to come.
Learn more about the potential fate of BTC here:
Chain Death: One potential future for BTC.
Brendan Lee
https://streamanity.com/video/BhFHtpjhxq13XJ
Esto es una prueba de como hay un documento alojado el la blockchain de BSV y hay que pagar para poder verlo
https://www.bitpaste.app/tx/88ae1f197b4a35c85dafc4aeafe0daeb1649df18ceef48348f3eb3f92dbcf257
https://www.bitpaste.app/tx/88ae1f197b4a35c85dafc4aeafe0daeb1649df18ceef48348f3eb3f92dbcf257
Forwarded from Teoria del origen del BitCoin (@RamonQuesada)
CSW World 1º Draw. - 2019 05 18 - https://www.bitpaste.app/tx/6d555a23ad27c77f388d00290ed7c65f2fb08a34f3dd5cd3b2294ef433cef173
Me pregunto porque algunas personas tienden a desechar la obra de Satoshi Nakamoto, sin apenas haber valorado toda la lección que hay en ese papel de ocho hojas.
"They use a proof-of-work chain to solve the problem. Once each general receives whatever attack time he hears first, he sets his computer to solve an extremely difficult proof-of-work problem that includes the attack time in its hash. The proof-of-work is so difficult, it's expected to take 10 minutes of them all working at once before one of them finds a solution. Once one of the generals finds a proof-of-work, he broadcasts it to the network, and everyone changes their current proof-of-work computation to include that proof-of-work in the hash they're working on. If anyone was working on a different attack time, they switch to this one, because its proof-of-work chain is now longer."
http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/014849.html
"They use a proof-of-work chain to solve the problem. Once each general receives whatever attack time he hears first, he sets his computer to solve an extremely difficult proof-of-work problem that includes the attack time in its hash. The proof-of-work is so difficult, it's expected to take 10 minutes of them all working at once before one of them finds a solution. Once one of the generals finds a proof-of-work, he broadcasts it to the network, and everyone changes their current proof-of-work computation to include that proof-of-work in the hash they're working on. If anyone was working on a different attack time, they switch to this one, because its proof-of-work chain is now longer."
http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-November/014849.html
Forwarded from CSW 360 Myths Cripto Mitos (@RamonQuesada)
Si te quieres aferrar al mito de que cada usuario debe rodar su propio nodo, hazlo!! Eres libre de hacerlo, pero por favor, no digas que eso fue lo que dijo Satoshi.
"First of all, let’s look at how Bitcoin itself was presented to the world. In contrast to modern trends, Bitcoin was not unveiled on some popular conference with journalists covering the event to millions.
....The main properties: Double-spending is prevented with a peer-to-peer network. No mint or other trusted parties. Participants can be anonymous. New coins are made from Hashcash style proof-of-work. The proof-of-work for new coin generation also powers the network to prevent double-spending.
..., it would be safe for users to use Simplified Payment Verification (section 8) to check for double spending, which only requires having the chain of block headers, or about 12KB per day. Only people trying to create new coins would need to run network nodes. At first, most users would run network nodes, but as the network grows beyond a certain point, it would be left more and more to specialists with server farms of specialized hardware. A server farm would only need to have one node on the network and the rest of the LAN connects with that one node."
The First Thread — depicting the moment of divergence in perception of Bitcoin evolution.
Billion
Apr 18, 2018
https://medium.com/billion-crypto-stories/the-first-thread-depicting-the-moment-of-divergence-in-perception-of-bitcoin-evolution-ca0a3acb1e49
"First of all, let’s look at how Bitcoin itself was presented to the world. In contrast to modern trends, Bitcoin was not unveiled on some popular conference with journalists covering the event to millions.
....The main properties: Double-spending is prevented with a peer-to-peer network. No mint or other trusted parties. Participants can be anonymous. New coins are made from Hashcash style proof-of-work. The proof-of-work for new coin generation also powers the network to prevent double-spending.
..., it would be safe for users to use Simplified Payment Verification (section 8) to check for double spending, which only requires having the chain of block headers, or about 12KB per day. Only people trying to create new coins would need to run network nodes. At first, most users would run network nodes, but as the network grows beyond a certain point, it would be left more and more to specialists with server farms of specialized hardware. A server farm would only need to have one node on the network and the rest of the LAN connects with that one node."
The First Thread — depicting the moment of divergence in perception of Bitcoin evolution.
Billion
Apr 18, 2018
https://medium.com/billion-crypto-stories/the-first-thread-depicting-the-moment-of-divergence-in-perception-of-bitcoin-evolution-ca0a3acb1e49
Medium
The First Thread — depicting the moment of divergence in perception of Bitcoin evolution
In a world of cryptocurrencies, the year 2017 was the most heated yet. Putting ICO rush aside, the two most significant events took place in the late summer. A fork of the Bitcoin network called…
El programa de CBS "60 Minutes", conducido por el prestigioso presentador estadounidense Andreson Cooper, hizo este domingo un reportaje sobre Bitcoin: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bitcoins-wild-ride-60-minutes-2019-05-19/
CBS News
Bitcoin's wild ride
Anderson Cooper reports on how bitcoin was started, where it may go and some of the people who have ridden the cryptocurrency roller coaster over the last 10 years
"Then on July 24, with the Quasar Protocol Upgrade, the mainnet and testnet will have their block size settings increase. The current maximum acceptable block size of 128MB will increase to 2GB, and the default produced block sizes will increase to 128MB."
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-sv-version-0-2-0-takes-the-next-step-towards-unlimited-scaling/
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-sv-version-0-2-0-takes-the-next-step-towards-unlimited-scaling/
CoinGeek
Bitcoin SV version 0.2.0 takes the next step towards unlimited scaling
"Changes of note include:
-New mining API
- Support for Quasar upgrade
- Change of the license to Open BSV license
- Default maximum OP_RETURN size to 100kb
- Default transaction relay delay to 150ms
- Upgrade to C++17
-Removal of support for 32-bit and ARM architectures
- Cleanup of defunct code – magnetic upgrade activation, ABC forced obsolescence"
https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/05/20/bitcoin-sv-node-v0-2-0-released/
-New mining API
- Support for Quasar upgrade
- Change of the license to Open BSV license
- Default maximum OP_RETURN size to 100kb
- Default transaction relay delay to 150ms
- Upgrade to C++17
-Removal of support for 32-bit and ARM architectures
- Cleanup of defunct code – magnetic upgrade activation, ABC forced obsolescence"
https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/05/20/bitcoin-sv-node-v0-2-0-released/
Entiendo que esto va ser duro de digerir, si llevas algún tiempo en la comunidad y solo has escuchado la versión de los hechos pir parte de Bitcoin Core, pero las pruebas son las pruebas y en el momento que pase el tiempo, se calmen las aguas y se vea todo con mas frialdad, las evidencias serán simplemente irrefutables.
Ahora es entendible que haya mucha confusión, por parte de los que no han tenido tiempo de estudiar en profundidad éste caso.
"...., the registrations issued by the U.S. Copyright Office recognize Wright as the author – under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto – of both the white paper and code. This is the first government agency recognition of Craig Wright as Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin."
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/
Ahora es entendible que haya mucha confusión, por parte de los que no han tenido tiempo de estudiar en profundidad éste caso.
"...., the registrations issued by the U.S. Copyright Office recognize Wright as the author – under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto – of both the white paper and code. This is the first government agency recognition of Craig Wright as Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin."
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/
El MÃtico Hombre-Mes: Ensayos de ingenierÃa de Software (en inglés The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering) es un libro de administración de proyectos de Software de Fred Brooks, cuyo tema central está en que «añadir recursos humanos a un proyecto retrasado lo hace demorarse aún más». Esta idea es conocida como la «Ley de Brooks».
La obra fue publicado en 1975, y republicado como una versión aniversario en 1995 (ISBN 0-201-83595-9) junto al ensayo «Sin balas de plata» y comentarios por el autor.
Las observaciones de Brooks están basadas en sus experiencias en IBM mientras administraba el desarrollo de OS/360. Para acelerar el desarrollo, se trató infructuosamente de agregar más trabajadores al proyecto que ya estaba retrasado. También apostó que escribir un compilador en ALGOL requerÃa "6 meses de mano de obra" adicional. La tendencia de los administradores de proyecto de repetir estos errores llevaron a Brooks a la conclusión de que a su libro se le llamaba "La biblia de la ingenierÃa de software" porque "todos la citan, algunas personas la leen, pero casi nadie la practica". https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_M%C3%ADtico_Hombre-Mes
La obra fue publicado en 1975, y republicado como una versión aniversario en 1995 (ISBN 0-201-83595-9) junto al ensayo «Sin balas de plata» y comentarios por el autor.
Las observaciones de Brooks están basadas en sus experiencias en IBM mientras administraba el desarrollo de OS/360. Para acelerar el desarrollo, se trató infructuosamente de agregar más trabajadores al proyecto que ya estaba retrasado. También apostó que escribir un compilador en ALGOL requerÃa "6 meses de mano de obra" adicional. La tendencia de los administradores de proyecto de repetir estos errores llevaron a Brooks a la conclusión de que a su libro se le llamaba "La biblia de la ingenierÃa de software" porque "todos la citan, algunas personas la leen, pero casi nadie la practica". https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_M%C3%ADtico_Hombre-Mes
"Lo nuevo de BSV
El 20 de mayo, la Scaling Test Network (STN) verá los primeros impactos de esta actualización. Aumentará su tamaño de bloque máximo aceptable a unos asombrosos 10GB, con bloques producidos por defecto a 128MB."
https://www.tucriptomoneda.com/bsv-escalada-sin-limites/
El 20 de mayo, la Scaling Test Network (STN) verá los primeros impactos de esta actualización. Aumentará su tamaño de bloque máximo aceptable a unos asombrosos 10GB, con bloques producidos por defecto a 128MB."
https://www.tucriptomoneda.com/bsv-escalada-sin-limites/
Forwarded from CSW. 300 Interviews Videos (@RamonQuesada)
"Intellectual Property Debate - Stephan Kinsella vs. Dr. Craig Wright".
Emitido en directo
el 27 ene. 2018
"In this debate, the question of whether or not Intellectual Property has a place in the world of cryptocurrencies and the blockchain will be on the table.
Stephan Kinsella is an attorney in Houston, director of the Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom, and editor of Libertarian Papers. He is one of the foremost libertarian experts on Intellectual Property.
Craig Wright is an inventor, computer scientist and businessman, who is one of the earliest minds behind Bitcoin. He is the Chief Scientist at nChain, research and development company involved in bitcoin and blockchain technologies."
en YouTube
https://youtu.be/-BRT3deUv1E
Emitido en directo
el 27 ene. 2018
"In this debate, the question of whether or not Intellectual Property has a place in the world of cryptocurrencies and the blockchain will be on the table.
Stephan Kinsella is an attorney in Houston, director of the Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom, and editor of Libertarian Papers. He is one of the foremost libertarian experts on Intellectual Property.
Craig Wright is an inventor, computer scientist and businessman, who is one of the earliest minds behind Bitcoin. He is the Chief Scientist at nChain, research and development company involved in bitcoin and blockchain technologies."
en YouTube
https://youtu.be/-BRT3deUv1E
YouTube
Intellectual Property Debate - Stephan Kinsella vs. Dr. Craig Wright
In this debate, the question of whether or not Intellectual Property has a place in the world of cryptocurrencies and the blockchain will be on the table. St...