Maybe it is NOT too late!!!!! https://powping.com/posts/7d486d27d1e3a2b40873aff07574a6ccc8cff0a96d7bf04e88417139ace6364a

The power of the Powpress concept in terms of Google juice.
Shadders.

https://powping.com/posts/0ff29c8a906f7d210b0472b0cf5594a496ed10caeb910fd04c3e380ba094c949

Did you miss the most important thing about BitCoin?
| by John Pitts | Medium
Jan 22 · 18 2020

WHAT IS MONEY?

https://medium.com/@EquityDiamonds/why-many-smart-coders-dont-get-bitcoin-6c87239253d1

Metanet: un nuevo Internet grabado en la blockchain.
Por Igor Domsac

https://es.ramonquesada.com/espanol-es/metanet-un-nuevo-internet-grabado-en-la-blockchain-por-igor-domsac/

min 1h17:40
Bitcoin is a Bailable property

2. The Global Spreadsheet, Information Theory, and Law - Bit - Dr. Craig S. Wright & Ryan X. Charles
7 sept. 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLw544oV-8I&feature=youtu.be

Minute: 1h17:40
"Bitcoin is a Bailable property".

2. The Global Spreadsheet, Information Theory, and Law - Bit - Dr. Craig S. Wright & Ryan X. Charles
7 sept. 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLw544oV-8I&feature=youtu.be

Mi amigo Miguel Angel, me está ayudando a estilizar el blog, para hacerlo mas atractivo, veremos si lo logramos, je je je https://ramonquesada.com/

IBM Sage Computer Ad, 1960 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCCL4INQcFo&feature=emb_title

Cracking the NAZI Enigma Code Machine
1.114.860 visualizaciones•
11 oct. 2010
10 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb44bGY2KdU&feature=emb_title

"The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server. The design supports letting users just be users. The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be.

Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate."
Satoshi Nakamoto

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306

En Julio del 2010 Satoshi le dijo algo estridente a los que no entendían la escalabilidad de BitCoin, no me extraña que desapareciera unos meses mas tarde. " If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry." https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306

Published on eff.org on January 20th, 2011

Bitcoin - a Step Toward Censorship-Resistant Digital Currency https://web.archive.org/web/20110205163734/https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/01/bitcoin-step-toward-censorship-resistant

Bitcoin no es una criptomoneda
https://foro.bsvespanol.org/t/bitcoin-no-es-una-criptomoneda/201

Bitfeed
Like RSS, but for Bitcoin.
Unwriter. https://powping.com/posts/ce2579a32b3e3a7487f36caa71649f1d1848a7201fcce98aaa5e52cd34f8af74

0.1 sats/byte!!!!
Esto se puede mejorar?

"This new format creates about a 60% efficiency gain, so even after incorporating the MetaStreme service fee (0.1 sats/byte) the value of all WeatherSV contributions will still increase about 30%"

https://medium.com/@sv_weather/metastreme-integration-c50425896865

"For what it's worth: 

I'm the guy who went over the blockchain stuff in Satoshi's first cut of the bitcoin code.  Satoshi didn't have a 1MB limit in it. The limit was originally Hal Finney's idea.  Both Satoshi and I objected that it wouldn't scale at 1MB.  Hal was concerned about a potential DoS attack though, and after discussion, Satoshi agreed.  The 1MB limit was there by the time Bitcoin launched.  But all 3 of us agreed that 1MB had to be temporary because it would never scale.

Several attempted "abuses" of the blockchain under the 1MB limit have proved Hal right about needing the limit at least for launching purposes.  A lot of people wanted to piggyback extraneous information onto the blockchain, and before miners (and the community generally) realized that blockchain space was a valuable resource they would have allowed it.  The blockchain would probably be several times as big a download now if that limit hadn't been in place, because it would have a lot of random 1-satoshi transactions that exist only to encode information for altcoins etc.

At this point I don't think random schmoes who would allow just any transaction are getting a  lot of blocks. The people who have made a major investment in hashing power are doing the math to figure out which tx are worthwhile to include because block propagation time (and therefore the risk of orphan blocks) is proportional to block size. So at this point I think blockchain bloat as such is no longer likely to a problem, and the 1MB limit is no longer necessary.  It has been more-or-less replaced by a profitability limit that motivates people to not waste blockchain bandwidth, and miners are now reliably dropping transactions that don't pay fees."

Re: Permanently keeping the 1MB (anti-spam) restriction is a great idea ...
February 07, 2015

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946236.msg10388435#msg10388435