Bitcoin Hits $25K for First Time Ever
https://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-hits-25k-for-first-time-ever

The price of bitcoin (BTC) topped $25,000 for the first time ever, a mere week after breaking $24,000 for the first time. Read more: Over $20K? Why Is Bitcoin Worth Anything at All?

Vale, de acuerdo, el precio de BTC sube porque todo el mundo quiere tener su trocito de tan preciado "pastel", y que pasa si todo el mundo tiene un trocito de BTC?, y el precio se pone en un millón de dólares, pero no se pueden mover con facilidad para el común de los mortales:

- Se habrá cumplido la profesía de que Bitcoin hace un mundo mejor?

- Habremos arreglado algo?

- Qué le habrá aportado Bitcoin a la sociedad?

- En qué se va a utilizar Bitcoin de lo que podamos estar orgullosos?

- Qué problema habrá resuelto?

- Realmente habremos mejorado el asunto de la corrupción?

- Tendremos un mundo mas honesto?

- Se ha impuesto una tecnología que mejora la vida de las personas?

Bitcoin Tops $27K for First Time, Has Risen More Than $2K in a Little Over a Day
https://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-tops-27k-for-first-time-has-risen-2k-in-a-little-over-24-hours

After hitting $25,000 on Dec. 25 and $26,000 on Dec. 26, quite naturally the price of bitcoin (BTC) soared past $27,000 early on Dec. 27 as the leading cryptocurrency’s recent meteoric rise continues.

Me resulta interesante ver como ésta subida de precio de BTC, en muchos grupos se toma como si estuviéramos AÚN en 2017, es como si se hubiera congelado el tiempo de aprendizaje para algunos, por suerte en este lapso de tiempo hasta 2020, algo mas hemos estado aprendido otros.
Continuará en breve...!!!!

U°Today
🔥 Ethereum Breaks Above $700 First Time Since May 2018 https://u.today/ethereum-breaks-above-700-first-time-since-may-2018
@

2021 será el fin del principio de Bitcoin https://www.elespanol.com/invertia/opinion/20201226/fin-principio-bitcoin/545565444_12.html?utm_campaign=socialbutton&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

Craig Wright Telegram´s Channels
@Craig_Wright
@CSW_Academic
@CSW_Articles
@CSW_Books
@CSW_Business
@CSW_Cybersecurity
@CSW_Economics
@CSW_Ideology
@CSW_interviews
@CSW_interviewsVideos
@CSW_Legal
@CSW_Patent
@CSW_Religion
@CSW_Satoshi
@CSW_Slack
@CSW_VideoTalks
@CSW_Videos
@CSW_Asperger
@CSW_Gallery
@theArtofBitcoin
@TheSatoshiAffaire

Min. 53
"the best thing you can do is take on your own responsability for getting financially educated".

Gold & Dollar: How Money Became Worthless | Currencies Explained | Documentary | Fiat Currency
8 dic 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgPDW0ZpgJU

Sigo leyendo los textos de la época de Satoshi (2008-2010) y me ha hecho especial ilusión ver esta frase, Ésta me la encontré anoche cerca de las 5 de la madrugada y dice mucho de las intenciones de Satoshi y de como se tiene que implementar la tecnología, para que Bitcoin reaccione, tal y como dice en ésta frase:

"Imagine if gold turned to lead when stolen. If the thief gives it back, it turns to gold again."

"Imagíne si el oro se convierte en plomo cuando es robado. Y Si el ladrón lo devuelve, se convierte en oro nuevamente".

satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member

Re: Escrow
on: August 11, 2010

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=200

Hay algún matiz, De momento si te roban el movil con la wallet de Handcash 2.5 y sin tener copia de la seed, el dueño puede recuperar los fondos, aunque el ladrón no te devuelva el movil y suponiendo que el ladrón no puede desbloquear el movil, NI pueda acceder a la wallet.

Pero creo que la frase va un poco más allá, porque en realidad los ladrones no quieren devolver nada de lo robado, salvo que la Ley se lo imponga, y eso me hace pensar en otra cosa que no tiene precisamente que ver con Handcash, sino mas bien con lo que Craig ha dicho sobre congelar fondos cuando hay un litigio legal (Ejemplo denuncio la pérdida o que me han robado mis fondos y lo puedo demostrar), en ese caso si la justicia hace las comprobaciones necesarias para ver la legitimidad de los fondos, entonces se le pueden devolver a su legítimo dueño, trazando el movimiento de los fondos desde que se robaron, congelandolos y finalmente devolviendolos (el plomo vuelve a set oro)

"Forgot to add the good part about micropayments. While I don't think Bitcoin is practical for smaller micropayments right now, it will eventually be as storage and bandwidth costs continue to fall. If Bitcoin catches on on a big scale, it may already be the case by that time. Another way they can become more practical is if I implement client-only mode and the number of network nodes consolidates into a smaller number of professional server farms. Whatever size micropayments you need will eventually be practical. I think in 5 or 10 years, the bandwidth and storage will seem trivial".

satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member

226 Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion /
Re: Flood attack 0.00000001 BC
on: August 05, 2010

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=2

226 Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion /
Re: Flood attack 0.00000001 BC
on: August 05, 2010

Forgot to add the good part about micropayments. While I don't think Bitcoin is practical for smaller micropayments right now, it will eventually be as storage and bandwidth costs continue to fall. If Bitcoin catches on on a big scale, it may already be the case by that time. Another way they can become more practical is if I implement client-only mode and the number of network nodes consolidates into a smaller number of professional server farms. Whatever size micropayments you need will eventually be practical. I think in 5 or 10 years, the bandwidth and storage will seem trivial.

I am not claiming that the network is impervious to DoS attack. I think most P2P networks can be DoS attacked in numerous ways. (On a side note, I read that the record companies would like to DoS all the file sharing networks, but they don't want to break the anti-hacking/anti-abuse laws.)

If we started getting DoS attacked with loads of wasted transactions back and forth, you would need to start paying a 0.01 minimum transaction fee. 0.1.5 actually had an option to set that, but I took it out to reduce confusion. Free transactions are nice and we can keep it that way if people don't abuse them.

That brings up the question: if there was a minimum 0.01 fee for each transaction, should we automatically add the fee if it's just the minimum 0.01? It would be awfully annoying to ask each time. If you have 50.00 and send 10.00, the recipient would get 10.00 and you'd have 39.99 left. I think it should just add it automatically. It's trivial compared to the fees many other types of services add automatically.

satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=220

257 Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion /
Re: Scalability and transaction rate
on: July 29, 2010, 02:00:38 AM

The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server. The design supports letting users just be users. The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be. Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate.

Quote from: bytemaster on July 28, 2010, 08:59:42 PM
Besides, 10 minutes is too long to verify that payment is good. It needs to be as fast as swiping a credit card is today.

See the snack machine thread, I outline how a payment processor could verify payments well enough, actually really well (much lower fraud rate than credit cards), in something like 10 seconds or less. If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=423.msg3819#msg3819

satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=240