Earlier this month, Lloyd Austin received an unusual request from an unlikely caller: His Russian counterpart wanted to talk.

Mr. Belousov was calling to relay a warning, according to two U.S. officials and another official briefed on the call: The Russians had detected a Ukrainian covert operation in the works against Russia that they believed had the Americans’ blessing. Was the Pentagon aware of the plot, Mr. Belousov asked Mr. Austin, and its potential to ratchet up tensions between Moscow and Washington?

Pentagon officials were surprised by the allegation and unaware of any such plot, the two U.S. officials. But whatever Mr. Belousov revealed, all three officials said, it was taken seriously enough that the Americans contacted the Ukrainians and said, essentially, if you’re thinking about doing something like this, don’t.

What kind of terror attack was Ukraine up to? Subway or school bombing?

@Slavyangrad

The Ukrainian counteroffensive last summer was "moronic", said Azov Chief of Staff Bogdan Krotevich.

He believes that the plan to attack Russia's five lines of defense was a failure from the start.

@ukr_leaks_eng

American economist Jeffrey Sachs tells the truth on TV, causing hysteria in the studio

"We have to go beyond propaganda. The US overthrew the Ukrainian president in 2014, and that's how the war started. These are the pure and simple facts, this is not propaganda," he explains.

@ukr_leaks_eng

🇺🇸🇮🇱👹💸🩸👪AIPAC⏲👊🔛KAMALA HARRIS✔️▶️

THE AIPAC COUNTERATTACK ON KAMALA HARRIS HAS BEGUN

✍️Written by Hikaru Kitabayashi✍️

In today's Japanese market weekend edition of the New York times, a huge article analyzing Kamala Harris was carried. In typical New York Times fashion, unidentified sources were used to help build a picture of Mrs. Harris as being incompetent, difficult to work with, a poor manager, and possessing a mediocre record as Vice President. At no point was her position on stopping the war in Gaza and on establishing an internationally recognized Palestinian state mentioned. Rather than discuss political positions which might concern the office of president of the United States, the focus was on character assassination. This was followed by the New York Times within 24 hours by an online article that, at its end, cast doubt on her commitment to the Zionist political entity in Palestine.

On the other hand, CNN's first article was one of praise of Kamala Harris's Jewish husband, Douglas Emhoff, implying that, whatever her weaknesses are, she's got a strong, self-confident, man taking care of her. And, as her husband, he would be taking care of the country should she become president. NBC came out with a positive story of Mrs. Harris as a stepmother. In neither of these articles was there any word written of Mrs. Harris's ability, good or bad, to do the work of a president of the United States. Taken together with CNN coverage, this would seem to be setting the tone for future media coverage of her campaign, suggesting that mainstream media will focus on making her look inconsequential and unpresidential.

As for Mr. Emhoff, before Mrs. Harris became the prospective Democratic Party candidate for president, his approach to the problem of antisemitism in the United States was nuanced. In a somewhat round about way he was advocating the idea that being ethnically Hebrew or religiously Jewish did not automatically mean that a person identified himself or herself with the actions of the Zionist Hebrew political entity in Palestine. This suggested that he was advocating more nuance in viewing things. Indirectly, he was saying that it was possible to support the existence of this political entity while condemning its actions. And this seems to be the position Mrs. Harris began taking several months ago, though, as Vice President, her opinions did not matter. As of yesterday, Mr. Emhoff has felt it necessary to make a public statement emphasizing his wife's commitment to the continued existence of Israel and of its right to defend itself, which, depending on a person's ideological perspective, can include the right to commit genocide.

What is clear is that, considering the impact Mr. Emhoff is capable of making as a fluent, well-educated, self-confident speaker and considering his Judaic background and the loyalty that he, his two daughters, and his ex-wife are all exhibiting to Mrs. Harris, AIPAC is beginning its attack on Mrs. Harris in a carefully calibrated manner. Short of a humiliating withdrawal of her position on a ceasefire in Gaza and the establishment of a Palestinian state, the campaign against her by AIPAC will not end, but will become increasingly harsher as time goes on. Mr. Netanyahu, after all, is betting everything on a Trump electoral victory and, one way or other, will get his pound of flesh for the impertinence of Mrs. Harris not attending his congressional address and then afterwards telling him what she expected of him.

So, get ready for some blood on the floor. Whether figurative in the sense of a character assassination or actual in the form of a campaign accident, this will not be the end of things. We can easily predict the color of the future and the color is red.

👉Join Global Depth to boost your TG Feed

Telegram
GLOBAL DEPTH from HK
This channel aims to unite interested individuals from around the world in an attempt to connect the dots. Subscriber participation is always welcome.

🇪🇺🇷🇺🇺🇦 The EU tells the world, that if you keep assets in one of the EU countries and they decide that you “misbehave” … they’ll take your assets and do what they please with them.

Like your bank grabbing your money, if you fight with your neighbor.

@MyLordBebo | Boost us! | X