⛔️19 STATES REJECT CDC'S NEW VACCINE SCHEDULE – Aligning with AAP Over International Consensus!
Big news: At least 19 states are refusing to follow the CDC's recently updated childhood vaccine schedule, choosing instead to stick with the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) long-standing recommendations.
The CDC's changes? After a fast-tracked review comparing the US to 20 peer nations, they've slashed routine doses from up to 72 for 18 diseases (including the COVID annual booster) down to just 22-23 doses for 11 diseases. Vaccines like Hepatitis B for newborns, RSV, rotavirus, meningococcal, and flu are now case-by-case under shared decision-making—not routine.
Why the pushback? States say the AAP's schedule is "rooted in science" and trusted for decades. Critics point out AAP's ties to Big Pharma (Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) and conflicts in their immunization committee.
Meanwhile, the new schedule aligns closely with Denmark's—where infant mortality is half the US rate (3.4 vs. 6.4 per 100,000 births) and life expectancy higher—despite far fewer vaccine doses. HHS Secretary @RobertFKennedyJr says this brings us in line with true international scientific consensus, with plans for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to rebuild trust.
AAP is even suing over the changes, claiming financial harm.
What do you think—should states follow the CDC's alignment with global peers, or stick with AAP? Reply below! Share if this raises questions about real science vs. conflicts of interest.
To read the full article & dive deeper: Tap the article card below! #VaccineSchedule #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
https://thehighwire.com/news/states-disregard-cdc-vaccine-schedule-change-despite-international-scientific-consensus/
@delbigtree
Big news: At least 19 states are refusing to follow the CDC's recently updated childhood vaccine schedule, choosing instead to stick with the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) long-standing recommendations.
The CDC's changes? After a fast-tracked review comparing the US to 20 peer nations, they've slashed routine doses from up to 72 for 18 diseases (including the COVID annual booster) down to just 22-23 doses for 11 diseases. Vaccines like Hepatitis B for newborns, RSV, rotavirus, meningococcal, and flu are now case-by-case under shared decision-making—not routine.
Why the pushback? States say the AAP's schedule is "rooted in science" and trusted for decades. Critics point out AAP's ties to Big Pharma (Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) and conflicts in their immunization committee.
Meanwhile, the new schedule aligns closely with Denmark's—where infant mortality is half the US rate (3.4 vs. 6.4 per 100,000 births) and life expectancy higher—despite far fewer vaccine doses. HHS Secretary @RobertFKennedyJr says this brings us in line with true international scientific consensus, with plans for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to rebuild trust.
AAP is even suing over the changes, claiming financial harm.
What do you think—should states follow the CDC's alignment with global peers, or stick with AAP? Reply below! Share if this raises questions about real science vs. conflicts of interest.
To read the full article & dive deeper: Tap the article card below! #VaccineSchedule #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
https://thehighwire.com/news/states-disregard-cdc-vaccine-schedule-change-despite-international-scientific-consensus/
@delbigtree
The HighWire
States Disregard CDC Vaccine Schedule Change Despite International Scientific Consensus - The HighWire
At least 19 states have moved to disregard the updated 2026 CDC childhood vaccination schedule that aligns with peer nations.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 DIRECTED BLOOD DONATIONS UNDER FIRE: Texas Mom's Heartbreaking Fight for Her Daughters' Lives! 🚨
Liz James (Founder of Blessed by His Blood) shares her raw story about her daughters who were born in China with thalassemia.
Texas hearing: Every 2 weeks, her daughters needed life-saving blood transfusions. They found perfect-match donors who turned everything around—until Carter BloodCare suddenly cut them off 2 years ago. No explanation. Just: "You're cut off. End of story."
Her girls' health plummeted. She prayed daily for a miracle. Why the ban? Blood bank officials claim directed donors are "incentivized" and more likely to lie on questionnaires—higher risk because loved ones or good Samaritans might hide "extracurricular habits."
But Liz fires back: Her donors responded to a public Facebook call—hundreds tested, a few matched perfectly. Strangers she's never met face-to-face, driven by pure goodness. "At the core of every human being, we all are created to do good." These heroes genuinely want to help kids thrive—not lie.
This is wild government overreach: Punishing compassion? Criminalizing choice in medical donations? In America, founded on freedom, we should protect directed donations, not ban them based on assumptions.
🎯 Key Concerns:
Incentivized donors = liars? Ignores the human drive to save lives.
No transparency from blood banks—families left in the dark.
Broader threat to medical freedom: Who decides what's "safe" for YOUR family?
What an eye-opener. This points to deeper issues in our health system.
Watch the full clip below 👇
What do you think—is this fair, or total overreach? Reply below! Share if you're standing for medical choice and real compassion.
#MedicalFreedom #BloodDonation #Thalassemia #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
@delbigtree
Liz James (Founder of Blessed by His Blood) shares her raw story about her daughters who were born in China with thalassemia.
Texas hearing: Every 2 weeks, her daughters needed life-saving blood transfusions. They found perfect-match donors who turned everything around—until Carter BloodCare suddenly cut them off 2 years ago. No explanation. Just: "You're cut off. End of story."
Her girls' health plummeted. She prayed daily for a miracle. Why the ban? Blood bank officials claim directed donors are "incentivized" and more likely to lie on questionnaires—higher risk because loved ones or good Samaritans might hide "extracurricular habits."
But Liz fires back: Her donors responded to a public Facebook call—hundreds tested, a few matched perfectly. Strangers she's never met face-to-face, driven by pure goodness. "At the core of every human being, we all are created to do good." These heroes genuinely want to help kids thrive—not lie.
This is wild government overreach: Punishing compassion? Criminalizing choice in medical donations? In America, founded on freedom, we should protect directed donations, not ban them based on assumptions.
🎯 Key Concerns:
Incentivized donors = liars? Ignores the human drive to save lives.
No transparency from blood banks—families left in the dark.
Broader threat to medical freedom: Who decides what's "safe" for YOUR family?
What an eye-opener. This points to deeper issues in our health system.
Watch the full clip below 👇
What do you think—is this fair, or total overreach? Reply below! Share if you're standing for medical choice and real compassion.
#MedicalFreedom #BloodDonation #Thalassemia #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
@delbigtree