🔷 تفاوت بین "go on doing" و "go on to do"
💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖
✍️ تفاوت این دو در معنای آنها و نوع فعالیت‌هایی که به آنها اشاره می‌شود نهفته است. 🌟

1. Go on doing

✨ "Go on doing" به معنای ادامه دادن به یک عمل یا فعالیت مشخص است.
این عبارت نشان می‌دهد که فرد در حال حاضر مشغول انجام کاری است و به آن ادامه می‌دهد. 🔄

مثال‌ها:
1️⃣ She went on studying despite the distractions. 📚
• او با وجود حواس‌پرتی‌ها به مطالعه ادامه داد.

2️⃣ He went on working after the meeting was over. 💼
• او بعد از پایان جلسه به کار ادامه داد.

3️⃣ They went on playing soccer until it got dark. ⚽️
• آنها تا تاریکی هوا به بازی فوتبال ادامه دادند.

4️⃣ I will go on reading this book because I find it interesting. 📖
• من به خواندن این کتاب ادامه می‌دهم زیرا آن را جالب می‌دانم.

5️⃣ The team went on practicing even when they were tired. 🏋️‍♂️
• تیم حتی وقتی خسته بودند به تمرین ادامه دادند.
2. Go on to do

🚀 "Go on to do" به معنای حرکت به سمت یک فعالیت جدید پس از اتمام کاری قبلی است.
این عبارت معمولاً پیشرفت یا تغییر مرحله را نشان می‌دهد.

مثال‌ها:
1️⃣ After finishing her degree, she went on to work in a prestigious company. 🎓
• پس از اتمام مدرکش، او به کار در یک شرکت معتبر رفت.

2️⃣ He completed his training and then went on to become a manager. 👔
• او دوره آموزشی خود را تمام کرد و سپس به یک مدیر تبدیل شد.

3️⃣ After the presentation, they went on to discuss future projects. 💬
• پس از ارائه، آنها به بحث درباره پروژه‌های آینده پرداختند.

4️⃣ She studied biology and then went on to specialize in genetics. 🔬
• او زیست‌شناسی خواند و سپس به تخصص در ژنتیک پرداخت.

5️⃣ They won the preliminary rounds and went on to compete in the finals. 🏆
• آنها دورهای مقدماتی را برنده شدند و سپس به رقابت در فینال پرداختند.

جمع‌بندی :

✨ "Go on doing": ادامه دادن به فعالیت جاری. 🔄
🚀 "Go on to do": حرکت به سمت مرحله یا فعالیت جدید.

🟧 سوال رایتینگ آیلتس درباره نقش آموزشی #تلویزیون درباره #مسائل_اجتماعی (جدیدترین تاپیک های 2024)

Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social issues. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

While it is certainly beneficial for popular TV programmes to raise awareness about significant social issues, I do not believe that every programme should be required to serve this purpose. Television serves a range of functions, including entertainment and relaxation, which are equally valuable in a well-rounded society. This essay will argue that although educational content on social issues has merit, it should not be a mandatory feature in all popular shows.

🔻پاسخ کامل در کانال پریمیوم رایتینگ

🔷 Some people think that printed books are no longer needed in the digital era, because all writing can be stored electronically. Others think printed books will still play an important role.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖

Sample Band 9 Response:

The proliferation of digital technologies has prompted discussions about the relevance of printed books in the modern era. While some contend that electronic formats render physical books obsolete, others assert that printed books retain significant value. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my opinion.

On the one hand, the argument against printed books is underpinned by their perceived redundancy in a digital world. Electronic books (e-books) offer unparalleled accessibility, allowing users to download and store extensive collections without the need for physical space. Additionally, digital formats are often more economical, reducing costs for both publishers and consumers. From an environmental standpoint, transitioning to electronic books minimizes paper consumption, thereby addressing issues of deforestation and waste. For these reasons, proponents argue that printed books are increasingly unnecessary.

On the other hand, there are compelling arguments supporting the enduring role of printed books. First, many readers prefer the tactile nature of physical books, which fosters an emotional connection that digital devices cannot replicate. Second, printed materials are often more reliable in contexts where technology may be inaccessible or impractical, such as rural areas or during power outages. Furthermore, printed books are essential in certain fields, including academia, where annotated hard copies are indispensable for detailed study. This illustrates that physical books serve purposes that extend beyond mere convenience.

In my opinion, while digital formats offer undeniable advantages, printed books will continue to play an important role. The coexistence of both mediums caters to diverse preferences and situations. For instance, while students may use e-books for quick research, they may still rely on physical textbooks for in-depth analysis. Similarly, avid readers might enjoy e-books for their portability but still cherish printed editions of their favorite works for sentimental value.

In conclusion, the debate about printed books versus electronic formats reflects broader societal shifts. While digital media dominate in terms of practicality, printed books offer irreplaceable benefits that ensure their continued relevance. A balanced approach, embracing both formats, is the most pragmatic way forward in preserving the cultural and functional significance of books.

👈 دوره های آنلاین آیلتس مهندس ابوالقاسمی (آغاز از 1 میلیون تومان)

🔷 سمپل رایتینگ نمره 9 (از جدیدترین تاپیک های سنترهای ایرانی آیلتس)
💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖

In some countries a high proportion of criminal acts are performed by teenagers.
Why is the case?
What can be done about it?

In certain countries, the high proportion of criminal acts committed by teenagers is an alarming trend that demands immediate attention. This essay will explore the underlying reasons for this phenomenon and suggest feasible solutions to mitigate it.

One primary cause of teenage crime is socioeconomic inequality. Adolescents from economically disadvantaged backgrounds often lack access to quality education and recreational facilities, which leaves them vulnerable to negative influences. For instance, marginalized teenagers may resort to theft or vandalism as a means of expressing frustration or fulfilling unmet needs. Furthermore, broken family structures and inadequate parental supervision contribute significantly to juvenile delinquency. Without proper guidance, teenagers may seek acceptance from peer groups that encourage criminal behavior.

Another contributing factor is the normalization of violence through media and social platforms. Movies, video games, and online content sometimes glorify criminal acts, desensitizing teenagers to their consequences. Coupled with the lack of emotional regulation skills, these influences can exacerbate impulsive decision-making. Moreover, inadequate law enforcement and lenient punishments may fail to deter teenagers from engaging in unlawful activities.

To address this issue, governments and communities must adopt a multifaceted approach. Proactive intervention through educational programs that emphasize moral values, critical thinking, and conflict resolution is essential. Schools should incorporate extracurricular activities to engage teenagers in constructive pursuits. Additionally, mentorship initiatives can provide role models who inspire positive behavior. Governments should also focus on reducing socioeconomic disparities by investing in low-income neighborhoods and creating employment opportunities for youth.

Another effective solution is the implementation of community-based rehabilitation programs. These initiatives can help teenagers reintegrate into society by addressing the root causes of their behavior. For example, counseling sessions and skill-building workshops can empower adolescents to make informed decisions. Simultaneously, stricter enforcement of laws targeting juvenile offenses may act as a deterrent while ensuring accountability.

In conclusion, teenage involvement in crime stems from a combination of socioeconomic, familial, and media-related factors. Addressing these root causes through education, mentorship, and rehabilitation is vital. By fostering an environment that promotes positive growth and addressing inequalities, society can significantly reduce the prevalence of teenage crime.

👈 دوره های آنلاین آیلتس مهندس ابوالقاسمی (آغاز از 1 میلیون تومان)

🎼 #I_Started_A_Joke by #Bee_Gees

💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖

✍️ I started a joke, which started the whole world crying,
But I didn't see that the joke was on me, oh no.

I started to cry, which started the whole world laughing,
Oh, if I'd only seen that the joke was on me.

I looked at the skies, running my hands over my eyes,
And I fell out of bed, hurting my head from things that I'd said.

Til I finally died, which started the whole world living,
Oh, if I'd only seen that the joke was on me.

I looked at the skies, running my hands over my eyes,
And I fell out of bed, hurting my head from things that I'd said.

Til I finally died, which started the whole world living,
Oh, if I'd only seen that the joke was one me.

Songwriters: BARRY GIBB, MAURICE ERNEST GIBB, ROBIN HUGH GIBB

😍 Whole Collection:
https://ielts2.com/best-songs-for-learning-english/

✍️ سمپل نمره 9 رایتینگ آیلتس (از سوالات گزارش شده در ژانویه 2025 سنترهای ایران)
💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖

🔻 Some people believe that professional workers such as doctors, nurses, and teachers should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The disparity in earnings between professional workers such as doctors, nurses, and teachers, and individuals in sports and entertainment has been a topic of intense debate. While it is undeniable that entertainers and athletes often bring joy and inspiration to society, I strongly believe that professionals in essential fields deserve higher remuneration, given their indispensable contributions to societal well-being.

Firstly, professionals like doctors and nurses play a pivotal role in ensuring public health. They are tasked with saving lives and handling crises, such as pandemics, often under immense stress. Their work has a direct and tangible impact on the quality of life, making their contributions irreplaceable. Teachers, similarly, are the backbone of any society, shaping the next generation by imparting knowledge and critical thinking skills. Without them, the development of future leaders, scientists, and innovators would stagnate. Hence, their compensation should reflect the gravity of their responsibilities.

In contrast, the inflated earnings of sports and entertainment figures are largely a result of market dynamics and public demand. While their performances provide leisure and escapism, these contributions are, arguably, not as fundamental to societal progress. For instance, the multimillion-dollar contracts awarded to athletes or actors often dwarf the salaries of professionals who dedicate their lives to serving the community. This imbalance highlights a misalignment of societal values and priorities.

That said, it is important to acknowledge that the entertainment and sports industries generate substantial economic benefits, including employment opportunities and revenue from global events. This economic influence partially justifies the high earnings of individuals in these sectors. Nevertheless, this does not diminish the need to elevate the financial rewards of those in professions critical to society’s stability and growth.

In conclusion, while sports and entertainment personalities undeniably contribute to the economy and cultural landscape, the work of doctors, nurses, and teachers is far more integral to societal welfare. A more equitable distribution of income would not only honor their contributions but also ensure long-term societal progress.

🔷 بانک کامل نمونه رایتینگ های 2025