🤼‍♀️ چالش لیسنینگ!
💎 @ielts2SpeakingWriting
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖
اینجا بفرمایید چی شنیدید (ساعت فعالیت 10 تا 10) 👇👇👇
👥 @ielts2group

🔷 نمونه رایتینگ نمره 9 از جدیدترین تاپیک های فوریه 2025
✍️ @ielts2WritingCorrection
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖

🔻 Some argue that schools should prioritize life skills such as working in teams and solving problems instead of traditional academics.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In contemporary education, there is an ongoing debate regarding whether schools should prioritize life skills such as teamwork and problem-solving over traditional academic subjects. While both aspects are crucial for students' holistic development, I believe that a balanced approach is essential, as placing an exclusive emphasis on either one would be detrimental to students' future prospects.

On the one hand, the increasing complexity of modern work environments necessitates strong interpersonal and analytical abilities. Many professions require individuals to collaborate effectively, think critically, and navigate unforeseen challenges. For instance, companies often seek employees who excel in collaborative problem-solving rather than those with only theoretical knowledge. If schools integrate more practical life skills training into their curriculum, students will be better prepared for real-world scenarios, reducing the gap between academic learning and professional demands.

On the other hand, traditional academic subjects remain indispensable for intellectual growth and foundational knowledge. Mathematics, science, and literature cultivate essential cognitive abilities, such as logical reasoning, analytical thinking, and effective communication. Moreover, these subjects form the backbone of specialized careers, such as medicine, engineering, and law, where proficiency in theoretical concepts is non-negotiable. A curriculum that excessively de-emphasizes traditional academics may leave students ill-equipped for higher education and specialized fields, ultimately limiting their career opportunities.

A balanced educational model would be the most effective solution. Schools should integrate life skills training into the curriculum without compromising core academic subjects. For example, incorporating project-based learning and group discussions into traditional lessons can help students apply theoretical knowledge in pragmatic contexts. Such an approach ensures that students acquire both the technical expertise necessary for their chosen professions and the adaptability required to thrive in dynamic environments.

In conclusion, while life skills such as teamwork and problem-solving are increasingly vital, they should not replace traditional academics. Instead, an integrated approach that combines both elements will best prepare students for the complexities of the modern world.

🔻پاسخ نمره 9 مجموعا 500 تاپیک جدید در کانال پریمیوم رایتینگ

✍️ پست اولمون (30 فروردین 1395)
https://t.me/ielts2com/2

✍️ سوال امروز خیلی ها درباره تغییر قیمت آیلتس

"سلام وقتتون بخیر. عذرخواهی میکنم قیمت آیلتس اگر تغییر کنه .کسایی ک از قبل رزرو کردن هم باید ما به تفاوت رو بپردازن؟"

پاسخ سنتر رسمی آیلتس: سلام بله ازمون بصورت كلي علي الحساب هستش
➖➖➖➖
💎 @ielts2Com
👥 @ielts2group

🔷 نمونه رایتینگ نمره 9 از جدیدترین تاپیک های فوریه 2025
✍️ @ielts2WritingCorrection
👥 @ielts2group
➖➖➖➖

🔻 Some people believe it is a good idea to socialize with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Others think it is important to keep work life completely separate from social life.
Discuss both views and give you opinion.

In today’s fast-paced work environment, the debate over whether employees should socialize with colleagues beyond office hours remains contentious. Some argue that building personal relationships with coworkers fosters a more harmonious and collaborative workplace, while others maintain that maintaining a strict boundary between professional and personal life is essential for mental well-being. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

On the one hand, spending time with work colleagues outside office hours can lead to a cohesive and supportive work culture. When employees engage in social activities such as team dinners or weekend outings, they build trust and rapport, which may enhance synergy during work hours. This is particularly beneficial in industries that rely on teamwork and interpersonal communication, as a strong social bond can reduce workplace conflicts and misunderstandings. Furthermore, informal gatherings provide employees with opportunities to discuss professional challenges in a relaxed setting, often leading to innovative problem-solving.

On the other hand, some individuals prefer to keep their professional and personal lives distinct, arguing that excessive interaction with colleagues outside work can blur boundaries and lead to emotional exhaustion. Maintaining a separate social life allows individuals to rejuvenate, spend quality time with family and friends, and pursue personal interests, which are crucial for long-term career satisfaction. Additionally, some employees may feel uncomfortable or even pressured to participate in social events, fearing that declining invitations could negatively impact their professional relationships. Thus, ensuring that socializing remains optional and inclusive is vital.

In my view, while socializing with colleagues outside work has its advantages, it should be approached in a balanced manner. Employees should have the freedom to engage in workplace friendships without feeling obligated to sacrifice their personal time. Companies should foster a culture where social events are encouraged but not enforced, ensuring that all employees feel respected regardless of their level of participation.

In conclusion, while socializing with colleagues can strengthen workplace relationships and improve collaboration, maintaining a distinct personal life is equally important for overall well-being. Striking a balance between these two aspects is the key to a fulfilling and sustainable work experience.